From yesterday’s Public Health Scotland COVID-19 Statistical Report, a graph of acute hospital admissions from 1 September 2020 to 15 October 2021 (the log scale enormously magnifies Corona-related admissions as a share of the total):
Alright. How many months until the good ole' US of A catches up to the glaringly obvious data that these jabs are an absolute failure? Not sure if we'll ever acknowledge the harm they've caused...
Presumably only very few states will make the mistake of publishing these kinds of detailed breakdowns, now that they have the examples of Israel and the UK to warn them. The vaccine statistics published by the RKI here in Germany are so devoid of detail as to be nearly worthless.
Hospitals are in compliance mode to hide the stats by deliberately not asking vax status on intake, so they only know if patients' EMR contains their vax, which would only happen if the hospital system administered. No record, no data, no problem.
Hospitals comply with whatever TPTB demands, or they will lose access to Medicare/Medicaid reimbursements. This is also how facilities and providers are coerced into denying early treatment until patients are near-death.
The only way to get the data in the US is to untangle the regularly issued reports and do math and track over time. For example, Vermont puts out a biweekly report that has data, but you have to do the math and take differences to track how things are progressing. It buried and not easy. (That said, in doing so, over the last six weeks, majority of new deaths reported over the three reports were breakthrough. In fact, there was a four week period in which 80% of covid deaths added were breakthrough)
I have been doing this with Miami-Dade's daily PDF. COVID hospitalizations among the vaccinated now make up 25% of the total (up from 11% the first week they reported this data a couple of months ago). It will continue to climb, mirroring England's climb. If I could put money down on it, I'd bet the house.
This is where a whistle blower, or two, from insurance actuarial profession, would be most beneficial.
Not sure if MIB (master insurance bureau) is still in existence, or something far more intrusive took it's place. It's where all diagnoses, patient stats go to be viewed, manipulated and hidden from public view. Where data we thought was private but was ALWAYS available to those with money (if you used insurance to pay claim).
There was a medicare WB who released CMS data, and and FDA WB who released data. They both had the same lawyer. That Hospitalist PA from NY blew the whistle on the difficulty reporting with VAERS and how her hospital made her stop reporting and stop recording patient vax status. They're trying to be "pro-vax," and the data makes that difficult.
Miami-Dade County, Florida puts out a daily PDF with COVID stats. About 10 weeks ago they began including vaccination status of those hospitalized with COVID. Of course, in the beginning the numbers were pretty good. Only 11% of those hospitalized were vaccinated. In the current week to date that's up to 25%. Yesterday specifically, 10 of 26 patients hospitalized for COVID were vaccinated, by far the worst day for this stat since they began publishing it. I suspect they will stop publishing it soon.
My best guess is that we cannot reliably verify if a particular person has gotten a vaccine.
When someone shows up in a hospital, how do you know if they're vaccinated? Check first name, last name, zip code? John Felts in 30282? Against which Grand National Database Where All Vaccines Go? Be real. When hospitals report small fractions vaccinated, they are likely just failing to find vaccine status for that person due to data quality issues. Of course they won't ask if people are vaccinated because they'll just lie.
The numbers don't add up. In many states, deaths are as high (or higher) than they've ever been. If the vaccines are "95% effective" and only 20% of the vulnerable are unvaccinated, then I guess it means you think that this wave would have been 5x more deadly without vaccines? What do the numbers have to be? Deaths as high as the highest pre-vaccine peaks, but it's all driven by the 5% anti-vax grandmas?
They really need to validate their method of checking whether their hospitalized patients have vaccines. The database they're joining to should at least *usually* turn up a positive if the person has a vaccine card. You can even test from a pool of people you know are definitely vaccinated, and see which fraction can be verified by whatever method they're using. Or you could test your other hospital patients, and either conclude "yup, our COPD patients and expecting mothers are all a bunch of anti-vaxx racists too!", or more realistically conclude that your method is busted.
Sorry to write a lot - but my point is that raw counts are very simple. Figuring out specifically *who* is vaccinated is much more difficult, and I do not believe the data quality supports it in the USA. Although I cannot prove this because none of the methods or data are transparent.
“We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying.”
If you see the objective as defeating COVID, it doesn’t make much sense, does it? But if the objective is to milk billions in tax money from us to pay for the “free” shots, well, of course the drug companies and their cohorts in the Administration and media will push it for all it’s worth.
Time is our best tool in this fight against Covid tyranny. Data will eventually break through the surface of MSM / Government suppression. As I have previously noted, it's all about economics.
Another variant could possibly be released that tears through the population with much higher mortality rates all driving an economic collapse. I still connect a de-population scheme to drive a US Dollar / World Currency re-set. The world spins on two things - sex and money. And this ain't sex. Resist.
harder to test them. i suspect there's not really any efficacy against infection, rather just a period following dose 2 where your symptoms are most likely to be extremely mild. if this is right & I'm also right that asymptomatic school testing is driving 5-12 year-old case numbers, then infections not actually come down very much even if they manage to vaxx all the kids.
Just finished reading the Spartacus letter from a couple of weeks back. First time I had enough time to actually read it. Some great observations in it. No doubt the higher numbers in the 0-15 age group will be used to support vaccination of children.
I wrote an excellent response, then realized I didn't want to give my full name and address to a federal government who calls people who criticize it domestic terrorists, and deleted it.
Haha. Point taken for sure. I've heard somewhere before that if you're going to be on a list, it's best to be at the top of the list! I gave my name, but I'll bet they already have my name. At this point, I'm not sure there's much to lose. Someone else I heard recently said, "there are things worse than death."
Thanks for that link. Every one of us who cares about the future of humanity simply must take the few minutes and send the email. We have to stop this madness.
Again, no matter the country, how are cases being established? What exact, proven, pre-tested method is being used? Stating that people are going to the hospital and testing positive for covid means nothing unless they are being tested with something that has an accuracy of over 95%. The PCR test ain't it.
I would submit that most hospitalizations, other than regular medical cases, are for the common flu, suspected viruses, pneumonia, or severe reactions to the mRNA and other injections. Without proper testing for covid, there is no way to sort it out. My guess is that most of these admissions are for some type of seasonal flu/pneumonia and more so from severe negative reactions to the covid injections from pfizer, moderna and j & j.
By far, the mRNA spike protein injections are causing the vast majority of hospital/doctor visits and this truth is being distorted immensely. Remember, big pharma has tons and tons of lies it needs to protect from the truth. They want the money while your life is of no concern to these butchers.
Around 15 years ago, I was one of those who truly believed that these corporations were doing things for the "good of humanity". I'm not sure what really woke me up to the fact that these monsters do NOT care about our "safety" or our health or anything else. They care about their major shareholders and whatever new thing they can either get people to buy, get a government contract for or now, alarmingly, get literally forced into the bodies of the public at large. I'm still in awe that I'm living in these times and watching all of this. I often say to myself, "our world wasn't perfect, and we certainly had a lot of problems, but life was good."
Just watch some of the recent Project Veritas videos of interviews with Pfizer staff, and take a look at Pfizer's record. That alone says it all. I can accept that large corporations do their best to maximise profits. What I can't accept is that they lie about it; and that ethical scientists and doctors who speak out are actively censored eg Prof Byram Bridle a Canadian virologist who was one of the first to call attention back in May to the fact that the spike protein from the shots was travelling all over the body. We are being naive if by this stage we still think that "something will change" and people will wake up. I had hopes that Rand Paul might lead the charge with a group that would include the likes of Peter McCullough. But doesn't look like that is going to happen. Then I had hopes for Reiner Fuellmich but that just seems to be a talk forum. Attorney Renz? What is he doing? It seems that the courts are corrupt also so little hope there. Where does that leave us?
I have a Master's Degree in Physiology. I teach healthcare students. And yet .... my dad says that I have gone to the extreme of being skeptical of any new medical intervention or biomedical research. I say better safe than sorry - and these are godless people (for the most part) involved in this work. At best, they are amoral. At worst .... well, they are evil doers that are perpetuating this evil on a global scale and disguising it as a good. Yuck!
You touch upon one of the biggest inaccuracies of the entire pandemic. ("Fraud" might be too strong a word, but...) We are aware of the inaccuracies of the common PCR test, choose a cycle rate as high or low as you need to get a negative or a positive result! At least for the USA, providers get extra money from the government for a COVID-19 "case" or "death" -- even if the admitted patient had no typical symptoms of a COVID-19 infection. Need I explain the perverse incentive to inflate case numbers? In fairness, they must expend extra resources for positive cases but still...
The problem of subsidy unintended consequences is age-old. One of my favorites was in Vietnam (during French colonial era, I guess), in the big city, there was a rat infestation. So the government offered a bounty on dead rats. It paid so well that people started raising rats.
Absolutely, and there's more antigen testing now, so cases are more likely correctly identified, versus last year when all we had were inflated Ct PCR "tests" that were never Covid. Certainly, the supposed "re-infections" were never Covid the first time, either.
Do you have any further info on these antigen tests? Are they approved by the FDA or CDC? Have they been field tested/trialed prior to their use in the real world? Have they been proven to be able to detect covid or any variant? I keep reading about rising covid cases, but nowhere do I find what test is being used. Thanks.
The Pfizer booster trial data is even more puzzling. The double vaccinated placebo group had 109 infections out of 5000. The original "95% efficacy" vaccine trials had just 8 infections out of 21,720 fully vaccinated group. That is a 5800% increase in infection rate.
That is weird.... I am in the camp of never entirely believing that the vaccines EVER made a protective difference. I'm not saying they don't - I'm just not all in on even a short protective window. I think there could be some confounding data, chief among that the vanishingly small number of people that even end up hospitalized. It just seems tricky to actually measure the difference the vaccine may make with such a generally undeadly disease. But whether it's true or not, many months ago I realized that even if the vaccines were PERFECT, I wouldn't get one. I'd rather die of COVID than support continued use of aborted fetal cells. I had found my hill to die on.
The devil is in the details. The relative risk is what the vax-holes claim the vax reduces by 95%, not the absolute risk, which was already so small. Why aren't these same pushes made to get everyone the flu shot? Flu has higher impact on kids than covid for sure.
NIH provides evidence Collins and Fauxi lied to congress about Wuhan funding. If they're prosecuted, the scam ends. If they're not prosecuted, the administration falls and the scam ends. It's nearly over. It won't be pretty.
Arent we missing the point just like the other side? Who cares about "cases"? Asymptomatic cases of covid among the gene-therapy-jabbed would be touted as huge victories for the vaccine crowd, "hey look, our vaccine is reducing death and serious illness like our globalist leaders told us it would!". Cases arent telling us much. We should be looking at hospitalizations and deaths. What do these numbers look like in Scotland. And in general, would do the death rates of the jabbed vs un-jabbed look like?
Here in Romania, authorities haven't acknowledged one single case of vaccine related death ... with over 11 million doses administered; i wonder what will take to wake up people
"in the unvaccinated they remain flat or declining. " Well, as more people contract the virus, less people are available to be infected. As the injected therapy wears off, more people with the shot become infected. Then over time, as with the uninjected, the cases will decline.
The tyrants will continue to mandate injections, over and over and over. Resist.
Note that it is acknowledged now that vaccine efficacy against infections declines over time such that after about 6 months, and some reports put it as soon as 4 months, protectiveness against infection is no better than the unvaccinated.
It had been assumed that the decline would just stop there after the 6 months. But the recent data suggest the protection gets WORSE than the unvaccinated after this time. However, this has only been intimated at by the way this is being measured, looking at infection rates for vaxxed and unvaxxed since January.
But clearly what needs to be done is to instead count the NUMBER OF INFECTIONS ACCORDING TO THE TIME SINCE VACCINATED. This would show clearly that once you get past 6 months or so, you are worse off being vaxxed for protection against infection then being unvaxxed.
As I said, this is being judged by infection rates. But is there an actual immunity system measurement that suggests also this is the case? There may indeed be one, and it may have just missed seeing this signal because it did the cut off at 6 months, *assuming* again the drop would not be below the standard baseline of the unvaxxed.
See the image and link to a CDC video here:
Robert Clark
@RGregoryClark
Replying to
@noorchashm
@amobeirne
and 2 others
In this CDC video Fauci acknowledges antibody titers even for vaccine tells us the degree of protection. So why not have everyone get their antibody levels tested? And why can’t they acknowledge prior infection also results in high antibody levels?
This data is what led the CDC to say booster shots would be needed but notice it is looking at actual antibody levels, not mere numbers of infections rates.
What needs to be done then is go beyond 6 months in this data to see if antibody levels drop *below* the standard baseline of the unvaccinated.
Then we would have two separate pieces of evidence to suggest the vaccine over sufficient time is actually damaging to our immune system.
Note this very strongly suggests the much feared “antibody dependent enhancement”(ADE) is occurring now. It is extremely important to find out if this is happening since all prior attempts to come up with a corona vaccine in animals all failed with the animals all dying due to ADE.
Alright. How many months until the good ole' US of A catches up to the glaringly obvious data that these jabs are an absolute failure? Not sure if we'll ever acknowledge the harm they've caused...
Presumably only very few states will make the mistake of publishing these kinds of detailed breakdowns, now that they have the examples of Israel and the UK to warn them. The vaccine statistics published by the RKI here in Germany are so devoid of detail as to be nearly worthless.
Hospitals are in compliance mode to hide the stats by deliberately not asking vax status on intake, so they only know if patients' EMR contains their vax, which would only happen if the hospital system administered. No record, no data, no problem.
Hospitals comply with whatever TPTB demands, or they will lose access to Medicare/Medicaid reimbursements. This is also how facilities and providers are coerced into denying early treatment until patients are near-death.
The only way to get the data in the US is to untangle the regularly issued reports and do math and track over time. For example, Vermont puts out a biweekly report that has data, but you have to do the math and take differences to track how things are progressing. It buried and not easy. (That said, in doing so, over the last six weeks, majority of new deaths reported over the three reports were breakthrough. In fact, there was a four week period in which 80% of covid deaths added were breakthrough)
I have been doing this with Miami-Dade's daily PDF. COVID hospitalizations among the vaccinated now make up 25% of the total (up from 11% the first week they reported this data a couple of months ago). It will continue to climb, mirroring England's climb. If I could put money down on it, I'd bet the house.
I’ll add that in some states, the only way to figure out the deltas is to use the way back machine and more math. If I had the time…
This is where a whistle blower, or two, from insurance actuarial profession, would be most beneficial.
Not sure if MIB (master insurance bureau) is still in existence, or something far more intrusive took it's place. It's where all diagnoses, patient stats go to be viewed, manipulated and hidden from public view. Where data we thought was private but was ALWAYS available to those with money (if you used insurance to pay claim).
There was a medicare WB who released CMS data, and and FDA WB who released data. They both had the same lawyer. That Hospitalist PA from NY blew the whistle on the difficulty reporting with VAERS and how her hospital made her stop reporting and stop recording patient vax status. They're trying to be "pro-vax," and the data makes that difficult.
Miami-Dade County, Florida puts out a daily PDF with COVID stats. About 10 weeks ago they began including vaccination status of those hospitalized with COVID. Of course, in the beginning the numbers were pretty good. Only 11% of those hospitalized were vaccinated. In the current week to date that's up to 25%. Yesterday specifically, 10 of 26 patients hospitalized for COVID were vaccinated, by far the worst day for this stat since they began publishing it. I suspect they will stop publishing it soon.
My best guess is that we cannot reliably verify if a particular person has gotten a vaccine.
When someone shows up in a hospital, how do you know if they're vaccinated? Check first name, last name, zip code? John Felts in 30282? Against which Grand National Database Where All Vaccines Go? Be real. When hospitals report small fractions vaccinated, they are likely just failing to find vaccine status for that person due to data quality issues. Of course they won't ask if people are vaccinated because they'll just lie.
The numbers don't add up. In many states, deaths are as high (or higher) than they've ever been. If the vaccines are "95% effective" and only 20% of the vulnerable are unvaccinated, then I guess it means you think that this wave would have been 5x more deadly without vaccines? What do the numbers have to be? Deaths as high as the highest pre-vaccine peaks, but it's all driven by the 5% anti-vax grandmas?
They really need to validate their method of checking whether their hospitalized patients have vaccines. The database they're joining to should at least *usually* turn up a positive if the person has a vaccine card. You can even test from a pool of people you know are definitely vaccinated, and see which fraction can be verified by whatever method they're using. Or you could test your other hospital patients, and either conclude "yup, our COPD patients and expecting mothers are all a bunch of anti-vaxx racists too!", or more realistically conclude that your method is busted.
Sorry to write a lot - but my point is that raw counts are very simple. Figuring out specifically *who* is vaccinated is much more difficult, and I do not believe the data quality supports it in the USA. Although I cannot prove this because none of the methods or data are transparent.
“We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying.”
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
And yet they are brazen enough to keep going and evil enough to not care.
The vax problems are a feature, not a flaw.
The harm is the point.
If you see the objective as defeating COVID, it doesn’t make much sense, does it? But if the objective is to milk billions in tax money from us to pay for the “free” shots, well, of course the drug companies and their cohorts in the Administration and media will push it for all it’s worth.
Time is our best tool in this fight against Covid tyranny. Data will eventually break through the surface of MSM / Government suppression. As I have previously noted, it's all about economics.
Another variant could possibly be released that tears through the population with much higher mortality rates all driving an economic collapse. I still connect a de-population scheme to drive a US Dollar / World Currency re-set. The world spins on two things - sex and money. And this ain't sex. Resist.
So clearly it's the unvaxxxed children (5-12) that are responsible. Then it will be the unvaxxxed toddlers responsible...
harder to test them. i suspect there's not really any efficacy against infection, rather just a period following dose 2 where your symptoms are most likely to be extremely mild. if this is right & I'm also right that asymptomatic school testing is driving 5-12 year-old case numbers, then infections not actually come down very much even if they manage to vaxx all the kids.
might* not actually come down ...
Have no doubt you are correct. But you're aren't factoring the shareholders or psychopathology.
https://thediplomat.com/2021/06/why-are-indians-so-angry-at-bill-gates/
And then... "unvaxxed" in the womb.
The left doesn't think there is a person in the womb, so that will make their head expload.
They're already targeting them via the pregnant women. Or should I say pregant people? SMH
Just finished reading the Spartacus letter from a couple of weeks back. First time I had enough time to actually read it. Some great observations in it. No doubt the higher numbers in the 0-15 age group will be used to support vaccination of children.
If you haven't read this already, here it is.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/damn-you-hell-you-will-not-destroy-america-here-spartacus-covid-letter-thats-gone-viral
Comment to the FDA in advance of their October 26 meeting to approve the vax for kids! https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/no-to-covid-vaxs-for-kids/
Done...and thanks.
Thanks!
While the letter is somewhat technical, whoever wrote it seems to know what they are talking about.
Shared. It is a shame how the "follow the science" crowd refuses to acknowledge the harm of the mRNA shot.
Their religon doesn't actually allow them to follow science.
Scientism.
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/no-to-covid-vaxs-for-kids/
I wrote an excellent response, then realized I didn't want to give my full name and address to a federal government who calls people who criticize it domestic terrorists, and deleted it.
I don't think anything productive was lost.
Haha. Point taken for sure. I've heard somewhere before that if you're going to be on a list, it's best to be at the top of the list! I gave my name, but I'll bet they already have my name. At this point, I'm not sure there's much to lose. Someone else I heard recently said, "there are things worse than death."
You made a better point than me.
If this all goes down the way they want, there will be nothing to lose.
The goal is submission, remember
Thanks for that link. Every one of us who cares about the future of humanity simply must take the few minutes and send the email. We have to stop this madness.
Yes! Thank you!
I'm so appreciative of your analyses and recommended reading, "False Gods vs. Corona-Chan," thank you.
thanks, I'm glad you liked that piece - I did too.
Again, no matter the country, how are cases being established? What exact, proven, pre-tested method is being used? Stating that people are going to the hospital and testing positive for covid means nothing unless they are being tested with something that has an accuracy of over 95%. The PCR test ain't it.
I would submit that most hospitalizations, other than regular medical cases, are for the common flu, suspected viruses, pneumonia, or severe reactions to the mRNA and other injections. Without proper testing for covid, there is no way to sort it out. My guess is that most of these admissions are for some type of seasonal flu/pneumonia and more so from severe negative reactions to the covid injections from pfizer, moderna and j & j.
By far, the mRNA spike protein injections are causing the vast majority of hospital/doctor visits and this truth is being distorted immensely. Remember, big pharma has tons and tons of lies it needs to protect from the truth. They want the money while your life is of no concern to these butchers.
Around 15 years ago, I was one of those who truly believed that these corporations were doing things for the "good of humanity". I'm not sure what really woke me up to the fact that these monsters do NOT care about our "safety" or our health or anything else. They care about their major shareholders and whatever new thing they can either get people to buy, get a government contract for or now, alarmingly, get literally forced into the bodies of the public at large. I'm still in awe that I'm living in these times and watching all of this. I often say to myself, "our world wasn't perfect, and we certainly had a lot of problems, but life was good."
Just watch some of the recent Project Veritas videos of interviews with Pfizer staff, and take a look at Pfizer's record. That alone says it all. I can accept that large corporations do their best to maximise profits. What I can't accept is that they lie about it; and that ethical scientists and doctors who speak out are actively censored eg Prof Byram Bridle a Canadian virologist who was one of the first to call attention back in May to the fact that the spike protein from the shots was travelling all over the body. We are being naive if by this stage we still think that "something will change" and people will wake up. I had hopes that Rand Paul might lead the charge with a group that would include the likes of Peter McCullough. But doesn't look like that is going to happen. Then I had hopes for Reiner Fuellmich but that just seems to be a talk forum. Attorney Renz? What is he doing? It seems that the courts are corrupt also so little hope there. Where does that leave us?
I have a Master's Degree in Physiology. I teach healthcare students. And yet .... my dad says that I have gone to the extreme of being skeptical of any new medical intervention or biomedical research. I say better safe than sorry - and these are godless people (for the most part) involved in this work. At best, they are amoral. At worst .... well, they are evil doers that are perpetuating this evil on a global scale and disguising it as a good. Yuck!
Dr Michael Yeadon is a great example. He genuinely can't believe how evil his previous company, Pfizer, and his industry.
I understand. I have questioned big pharma and the medical mafia since the 1990's. I am looking more towards natural cures and improving diet.
You touch upon one of the biggest inaccuracies of the entire pandemic. ("Fraud" might be too strong a word, but...) We are aware of the inaccuracies of the common PCR test, choose a cycle rate as high or low as you need to get a negative or a positive result! At least for the USA, providers get extra money from the government for a COVID-19 "case" or "death" -- even if the admitted patient had no typical symptoms of a COVID-19 infection. Need I explain the perverse incentive to inflate case numbers? In fairness, they must expend extra resources for positive cases but still...
The problem of subsidy unintended consequences is age-old. One of my favorites was in Vietnam (during French colonial era, I guess), in the big city, there was a rat infestation. So the government offered a bounty on dead rats. It paid so well that people started raising rats.
Absolutely, and there's more antigen testing now, so cases are more likely correctly identified, versus last year when all we had were inflated Ct PCR "tests" that were never Covid. Certainly, the supposed "re-infections" were never Covid the first time, either.
Do you have any further info on these antigen tests? Are they approved by the FDA or CDC? Have they been field tested/trialed prior to their use in the real world? Have they been proven to be able to detect covid or any variant? I keep reading about rising covid cases, but nowhere do I find what test is being used. Thanks.
please be careful with that first plot of hospitalizations. It can be super misleading on that log scale.
this is a good point - people should realise the Corona share of admissions has always been a vanishing minority
added a note
The Pfizer booster trial data is even more puzzling. The double vaccinated placebo group had 109 infections out of 5000. The original "95% efficacy" vaccine trials had just 8 infections out of 21,720 fully vaccinated group. That is a 5800% increase in infection rate.
https://tchebycheff.substack.com/p/pfizer-funny
That is weird.... I am in the camp of never entirely believing that the vaccines EVER made a protective difference. I'm not saying they don't - I'm just not all in on even a short protective window. I think there could be some confounding data, chief among that the vanishingly small number of people that even end up hospitalized. It just seems tricky to actually measure the difference the vaccine may make with such a generally undeadly disease. But whether it's true or not, many months ago I realized that even if the vaccines were PERFECT, I wouldn't get one. I'd rather die of COVID than support continued use of aborted fetal cells. I had found my hill to die on.
The devil is in the details. The relative risk is what the vax-holes claim the vax reduces by 95%, not the absolute risk, which was already so small. Why aren't these same pushes made to get everyone the flu shot? Flu has higher impact on kids than covid for sure.
NIH provides evidence Collins and Fauxi lied to congress about Wuhan funding. If they're prosecuted, the scam ends. If they're not prosecuted, the administration falls and the scam ends. It's nearly over. It won't be pretty.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/nih-confirms-it-funded-gain-function-virus-research-wuhan-calls-it
I hope you are right! I'd rather have an unpretty truth outing than the continuation of this farce.
Ditto
Arent we missing the point just like the other side? Who cares about "cases"? Asymptomatic cases of covid among the gene-therapy-jabbed would be touted as huge victories for the vaccine crowd, "hey look, our vaccine is reducing death and serious illness like our globalist leaders told us it would!". Cases arent telling us much. We should be looking at hospitalizations and deaths. What do these numbers look like in Scotland. And in general, would do the death rates of the jabbed vs un-jabbed look like?
Here in Romania, authorities haven't acknowledged one single case of vaccine related death ... with over 11 million doses administered; i wonder what will take to wake up people
"in the unvaccinated they remain flat or declining. " Well, as more people contract the virus, less people are available to be infected. As the injected therapy wears off, more people with the shot become infected. Then over time, as with the uninjected, the cases will decline.
The tyrants will continue to mandate injections, over and over and over. Resist.
Unless there is a new variant, most likely produced by a vaccinated, that is sufficiently supercharged to start killing the unvaccinated as well.
Hold the line. The tide may turn!
We can still influence the CDC’s ACIP committee, please comment! https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/tell-the-cdc-no/
Note that it is acknowledged now that vaccine efficacy against infections declines over time such that after about 6 months, and some reports put it as soon as 4 months, protectiveness against infection is no better than the unvaccinated.
It had been assumed that the decline would just stop there after the 6 months. But the recent data suggest the protection gets WORSE than the unvaccinated after this time. However, this has only been intimated at by the way this is being measured, looking at infection rates for vaxxed and unvaxxed since January.
But clearly what needs to be done is to instead count the NUMBER OF INFECTIONS ACCORDING TO THE TIME SINCE VACCINATED. This would show clearly that once you get past 6 months or so, you are worse off being vaxxed for protection against infection then being unvaxxed.
As I said, this is being judged by infection rates. But is there an actual immunity system measurement that suggests also this is the case? There may indeed be one, and it may have just missed seeing this signal because it did the cut off at 6 months, *assuming* again the drop would not be below the standard baseline of the unvaxxed.
See the image and link to a CDC video here:
Robert Clark
@RGregoryClark
Replying to
@noorchashm
@amobeirne
and 2 others
In this CDC video Fauci acknowledges antibody titers even for vaccine tells us the degree of protection. So why not have everyone get their antibody levels tested? And why can’t they acknowledge prior infection also results in high antibody levels?
https://youtu.be/X2CESL6Ej1M
2:13 PM · Aug 20, 2021·Twitter for iPad
https://twitter.com/RGregoryClark/status/1428782183938920455?s=20
This data is what led the CDC to say booster shots would be needed but notice it is looking at actual antibody levels, not mere numbers of infections rates.
What needs to be done then is go beyond 6 months in this data to see if antibody levels drop *below* the standard baseline of the unvaccinated.
Then we would have two separate pieces of evidence to suggest the vaccine over sufficient time is actually damaging to our immune system.
Note this very strongly suggests the much feared “antibody dependent enhancement”(ADE) is occurring now. It is extremely important to find out if this is happening since all prior attempts to come up with a corona vaccine in animals all failed with the animals all dying due to ADE.
Robert Clark