From yesterday’s Public Health Scotland COVID-19 Statistical Report, a graph of acute hospital admissions from 1 September 2020 to 15 October 2021 (the log scale enormously magnifies Corona-related admissions as a share of the total): Remember that over 92% of all eligible adults are vaccinated in Scotland. Once again, there is just no discernible effect on the overall numbers.
Alright. How many months until the good ole' US of A catches up to the glaringly obvious data that these jabs are an absolute failure? Not sure if we'll ever acknowledge the harm they've caused...
Time is our best tool in this fight against Covid tyranny. Data will eventually break through the surface of MSM / Government suppression. As I have previously noted, it's all about economics.
Another variant could possibly be released that tears through the population with much higher mortality rates all driving an economic collapse. I still connect a de-population scheme to drive a US Dollar / World Currency re-set. The world spins on two things - sex and money. And this ain't sex. Resist.
Just finished reading the Spartacus letter from a couple of weeks back. First time I had enough time to actually read it. Some great observations in it. No doubt the higher numbers in the 0-15 age group will be used to support vaccination of children.
Again, no matter the country, how are cases being established? What exact, proven, pre-tested method is being used? Stating that people are going to the hospital and testing positive for covid means nothing unless they are being tested with something that has an accuracy of over 95%. The PCR test ain't it.
I would submit that most hospitalizations, other than regular medical cases, are for the common flu, suspected viruses, pneumonia, or severe reactions to the mRNA and other injections. Without proper testing for covid, there is no way to sort it out. My guess is that most of these admissions are for some type of seasonal flu/pneumonia and more so from severe negative reactions to the covid injections from pfizer, moderna and j & j.
By far, the mRNA spike protein injections are causing the vast majority of hospital/doctor visits and this truth is being distorted immensely. Remember, big pharma has tons and tons of lies it needs to protect from the truth. They want the money while your life is of no concern to these butchers.
The Pfizer booster trial data is even more puzzling. The double vaccinated placebo group had 109 infections out of 5000. The original "95% efficacy" vaccine trials had just 8 infections out of 21,720 fully vaccinated group. That is a 5800% increase in infection rate.
NIH provides evidence Collins and Fauxi lied to congress about Wuhan funding. If they're prosecuted, the scam ends. If they're not prosecuted, the administration falls and the scam ends. It's nearly over. It won't be pretty.
Arent we missing the point just like the other side? Who cares about "cases"? Asymptomatic cases of covid among the gene-therapy-jabbed would be touted as huge victories for the vaccine crowd, "hey look, our vaccine is reducing death and serious illness like our globalist leaders told us it would!". Cases arent telling us much. We should be looking at hospitalizations and deaths. What do these numbers look like in Scotland. And in general, would do the death rates of the jabbed vs un-jabbed look like?
Here in Romania, authorities haven't acknowledged one single case of vaccine related death ... with over 11 million doses administered; i wonder what will take to wake up people
"in the unvaccinated they remain flat or declining. " Well, as more people contract the virus, less people are available to be infected. As the injected therapy wears off, more people with the shot become infected. Then over time, as with the uninjected, the cases will decline.
The tyrants will continue to mandate injections, over and over and over. Resist.
Note that it is acknowledged now that vaccine efficacy against infections declines over time such that after about 6 months, and some reports put it as soon as 4 months, protectiveness against infection is no better than the unvaccinated.
It had been assumed that the decline would just stop there after the 6 months. But the recent data suggest the protection gets WORSE than the unvaccinated after this time. However, this has only been intimated at by the way this is being measured, looking at infection rates for vaxxed and unvaxxed since January.
But clearly what needs to be done is to instead count the NUMBER OF INFECTIONS ACCORDING TO THE TIME SINCE VACCINATED. This would show clearly that once you get past 6 months or so, you are worse off being vaxxed for protection against infection then being unvaxxed.
As I said, this is being judged by infection rates. But is there an actual immunity system measurement that suggests also this is the case? There may indeed be one, and it may have just missed seeing this signal because it did the cut off at 6 months, *assuming* again the drop would not be below the standard baseline of the unvaxxed.
See the image and link to a CDC video here:
Robert Clark
@RGregoryClark
Replying to
@noorchashm
@amobeirne
and 2 others
In this CDC video Fauci acknowledges antibody titers even for vaccine tells us the degree of protection. So why not have everyone get their antibody levels tested? And why can’t they acknowledge prior infection also results in high antibody levels?
This data is what led the CDC to say booster shots would be needed but notice it is looking at actual antibody levels, not mere numbers of infections rates.
What needs to be done then is go beyond 6 months in this data to see if antibody levels drop *below* the standard baseline of the unvaccinated.
Then we would have two separate pieces of evidence to suggest the vaccine over sufficient time is actually damaging to our immune system.
Note this very strongly suggests the much feared “antibody dependent enhancement”(ADE) is occurring now. It is extremely important to find out if this is happening since all prior attempts to come up with a corona vaccine in animals all failed with the animals all dying due to ADE.
Another Brief Look at Vaccine Performance in Scotland
Alright. How many months until the good ole' US of A catches up to the glaringly obvious data that these jabs are an absolute failure? Not sure if we'll ever acknowledge the harm they've caused...
Time is our best tool in this fight against Covid tyranny. Data will eventually break through the surface of MSM / Government suppression. As I have previously noted, it's all about economics.
Another variant could possibly be released that tears through the population with much higher mortality rates all driving an economic collapse. I still connect a de-population scheme to drive a US Dollar / World Currency re-set. The world spins on two things - sex and money. And this ain't sex. Resist.
So clearly it's the unvaxxxed children (5-12) that are responsible. Then it will be the unvaxxxed toddlers responsible...
Just finished reading the Spartacus letter from a couple of weeks back. First time I had enough time to actually read it. Some great observations in it. No doubt the higher numbers in the 0-15 age group will be used to support vaccination of children.
If you haven't read this already, here it is.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/damn-you-hell-you-will-not-destroy-america-here-spartacus-covid-letter-thats-gone-viral
Shared. It is a shame how the "follow the science" crowd refuses to acknowledge the harm of the mRNA shot.
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/no-to-covid-vaxs-for-kids/
I'm so appreciative of your analyses and recommended reading, "False Gods vs. Corona-Chan," thank you.
Again, no matter the country, how are cases being established? What exact, proven, pre-tested method is being used? Stating that people are going to the hospital and testing positive for covid means nothing unless they are being tested with something that has an accuracy of over 95%. The PCR test ain't it.
I would submit that most hospitalizations, other than regular medical cases, are for the common flu, suspected viruses, pneumonia, or severe reactions to the mRNA and other injections. Without proper testing for covid, there is no way to sort it out. My guess is that most of these admissions are for some type of seasonal flu/pneumonia and more so from severe negative reactions to the covid injections from pfizer, moderna and j & j.
By far, the mRNA spike protein injections are causing the vast majority of hospital/doctor visits and this truth is being distorted immensely. Remember, big pharma has tons and tons of lies it needs to protect from the truth. They want the money while your life is of no concern to these butchers.
please be careful with that first plot of hospitalizations. It can be super misleading on that log scale.
The Pfizer booster trial data is even more puzzling. The double vaccinated placebo group had 109 infections out of 5000. The original "95% efficacy" vaccine trials had just 8 infections out of 21,720 fully vaccinated group. That is a 5800% increase in infection rate.
https://tchebycheff.substack.com/p/pfizer-funny
NIH provides evidence Collins and Fauxi lied to congress about Wuhan funding. If they're prosecuted, the scam ends. If they're not prosecuted, the administration falls and the scam ends. It's nearly over. It won't be pretty.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/nih-confirms-it-funded-gain-function-virus-research-wuhan-calls-it
Arent we missing the point just like the other side? Who cares about "cases"? Asymptomatic cases of covid among the gene-therapy-jabbed would be touted as huge victories for the vaccine crowd, "hey look, our vaccine is reducing death and serious illness like our globalist leaders told us it would!". Cases arent telling us much. We should be looking at hospitalizations and deaths. What do these numbers look like in Scotland. And in general, would do the death rates of the jabbed vs un-jabbed look like?
Here in Romania, authorities haven't acknowledged one single case of vaccine related death ... with over 11 million doses administered; i wonder what will take to wake up people
"in the unvaccinated they remain flat or declining. " Well, as more people contract the virus, less people are available to be infected. As the injected therapy wears off, more people with the shot become infected. Then over time, as with the uninjected, the cases will decline.
The tyrants will continue to mandate injections, over and over and over. Resist.
We can still influence the CDC’s ACIP committee, please comment! https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/tell-the-cdc-no/
Note that it is acknowledged now that vaccine efficacy against infections declines over time such that after about 6 months, and some reports put it as soon as 4 months, protectiveness against infection is no better than the unvaccinated.
It had been assumed that the decline would just stop there after the 6 months. But the recent data suggest the protection gets WORSE than the unvaccinated after this time. However, this has only been intimated at by the way this is being measured, looking at infection rates for vaxxed and unvaxxed since January.
But clearly what needs to be done is to instead count the NUMBER OF INFECTIONS ACCORDING TO THE TIME SINCE VACCINATED. This would show clearly that once you get past 6 months or so, you are worse off being vaxxed for protection against infection then being unvaxxed.
As I said, this is being judged by infection rates. But is there an actual immunity system measurement that suggests also this is the case? There may indeed be one, and it may have just missed seeing this signal because it did the cut off at 6 months, *assuming* again the drop would not be below the standard baseline of the unvaxxed.
See the image and link to a CDC video here:
Robert Clark
@RGregoryClark
Replying to
@noorchashm
@amobeirne
and 2 others
In this CDC video Fauci acknowledges antibody titers even for vaccine tells us the degree of protection. So why not have everyone get their antibody levels tested? And why can’t they acknowledge prior infection also results in high antibody levels?
https://youtu.be/X2CESL6Ej1M
2:13 PM · Aug 20, 2021·Twitter for iPad
https://twitter.com/RGregoryClark/status/1428782183938920455?s=20
This data is what led the CDC to say booster shots would be needed but notice it is looking at actual antibody levels, not mere numbers of infections rates.
What needs to be done then is go beyond 6 months in this data to see if antibody levels drop *below* the standard baseline of the unvaccinated.
Then we would have two separate pieces of evidence to suggest the vaccine over sufficient time is actually damaging to our immune system.
Note this very strongly suggests the much feared “antibody dependent enhancement”(ADE) is occurring now. It is extremely important to find out if this is happening since all prior attempts to come up with a corona vaccine in animals all failed with the animals all dying due to ADE.
Robert Clark