Yesterday evening, Joe Biden’s office announced that the former president had been diagnosed “with an aggressive form of prostate cancer that has spread to his bones.” Biden must have had this cancer for a long time for it to have spread that far, and thus it seems very strange that someone receiving presidential levels of medical care should have been diagnosed only just last week.
This has been the most despicable scandal in the last 150 years. The deep irony here is that they are revealing that they likely covered up Biden's cancer diagnosis in order to distract from news that they covered up Biden's cognitive decline. Truly unbelievable that the party of "country over party" and "nobody is above the law" could do such a thing....oh wait.
I'm not even sure if Lady Macbeth could've brought herself to sign off on something like this
Speaking of Meghan and cover-ups, its circulating now that Ms. Markle was a yacht girl on Epstien's yacht and was possibly involved with Andrew before Harry...
How interesting. I think that Andrew is the common denominator in many nasty secrets.
But then again the entire royal family and monarchy are lead globalists. They just play at being on the side of the people. It has been that way for centuries.
QUOTE: I do believe [Jill] was the one that pushed and didn’t relent on 2nd run.
---
If one assumes that "Biden" could have been seen by DNC insiders as LESS likely to prevail in the 2024 election than another Democrat (Kamala, Gavin Gruesome, etc.) given enough time to campaign, one could posit a tacit understanding between Jill and the Trump campaign: Jill ensures that Joe does NOT drop out early, so no other candidate can start campaigning in a timely fashion.
In return, Trump would promise to go easy on Jill, Jill's daughter Ashley (!), Hunter, etc. on their various corruption cases (Ukraine, China, ...). We are probably talking about amounts in the hundreds of millions.
The Democrats didn't have anyone in their stable capable of beating Trump. Their habit of destroying any candidate who becomes even marginally popular insures that only the worst, most despicable and unpopular ass-kissers and backstabbers rise to prominence.
Disagree - at least two or three candidates (Gruesome, Kameltoe, maybe even Bernie) could have been dragged across the finish line if one factors in a 10% margin for Dem vote fraud in swing states.
I'd speculate that someone even more evil was pulling her strings. I hope someday we find out what was really happening behind the scenes in the Biden White House. I can only imagine the shitshow.
I doubt Dr. Jill's influence lasted more than a week after inauguration. I'd say she and Joe were bullied out of the inner circle by a cabal of Obama holdovers, and they, in turn, fought amongst themselves for the entire term, each trying to triangulate the Bidens for ultimate authority. What a shitshow that must have been.
Perhaps. But it would seem difficult for political staffers to freeze out the woman Joe lived with - she had unique access, and should have had some strong cards to play.
It would be interesting to know what really happened. I doubt we ever will.
I'm telling you, it's frighteningly wild how similar the DNC and the Liberal Party of Canada are. They have the exact same MO. It's like they read the same colouring book.
It is what I have said for many years -- both of these organizations represent a behavioural type, and they act in lockstep patterns. Just like the lockstep behaviour across Western nations we saw during COVID mania.
These are deeply rooted human behavioural patterns. They appear under particular circumstances.
I didn't follow Biden like a hawk, but the first time I heard he had a 'stutter' was when I pointed out his cognitive decline on my Facebook page. My lefty friends excused him thus. What a joke; a stutter, even if real, wouldn't account for his senile behavior.
Easily disproved by videos of him as a Senator in years past, berating Clarence Thomas at his confirmation hearing for example: no sign of a stutter there, just a constant stream of venom.
Ryan not news at all. It was Bob Woodward who famously wrote: You know one percent of what goes on in Washington.
People do what they do because they can. Bernie Madoff did what he did because he could. How people were not out in the streets in 2018 demanding Biden be removed because of his mental decline, solidifies just how truly ignorant the American are.
The real question people should be asking is why HRC didn't come forward? Getting passed over not once but twice, first by Obama and then by Biden as well. If they could fix the books for Biden why not just have inserted HRC instead?
People don't realize there are so many factions within both these parties all vying for power.
The same can be said about Trump and hiding his profound ignorance. How are people not out in the streets demanding his removal when the man can't even pronounce the word industry? There are dozens of insiders who've all stated and confirmed the man is learning disabled. How could anyone in their right mind not see just how stupid he is but instead, believe the press - just like they did about Biden and everyone else.
The media did not want to see it, deliberately. It did not fit with their biases. "Hear, O foolish people, and without understanding: who have eyes, and see not: and ears, and hear not." Jeremiah 5:20
Well said! I don't think I can be friends with Obiden voters anymore, the scandals and horrors of that administration are so egregious. Anyone excusing any of it needs mental help.
I think because Killary would be harder to control. She truly is evil and sentient. She maybe one of the most narcissistic people in the world. And she has far too many enemies. They can play old Joey off as the kindly old man.
The Democrat establishment had plenty of evidence to blackmail HRC at the drop of a hat. They dared not allow her access to the levers of power, given her apparently bloodthirsty history. I think they were so afraid of her that they preferred dealing with Trump in 2016.
"If they could fix the books for Biden why not just have inserted HRC instead?"
They had their butts in a legal crack. All of the party's campaign funds had been collected under the name of candidate Joe Biden. Campaign finance laws didn't allow them to be applied to any replacement candidate. They waved their hands hard and argued that Kamala had a claim to those funds as Joe's running mate, and managed to persuade the right people that it was at least fair if not technically legal. But Kamala was the only possible beneficiary who could tap that war chest. Otherwise, it was gone with the wind.
A friend of mine had something very similar, discovery of stage 4 prostate cancer with little warning. He was well jabbed too. Quite a few oncologists said how many aggressive cancers they were seeing post covid jabs. So it might not be a big cover-up.
Since our father died from prostrate cancer, my then 61 yr old brother, was vigilant about his health. He took a test to identify markers for prostrate cancer and was told by his urologist that based on the test his prostrate cancer risk was very low. A routine prostrate exam one year later showed a significant increase in his PSA. Biopsy revealed very aggressive cancer requiring a prostatectomy, 26 rounds of radiation and Lupron injections to ensure his body was testosterone free. What changed in a year? Covid shots. He and I both believe the shots caused his prostrate cancer. He’s doing well and is cancer free right now but we keep our fingers crossed every three months while we wait for his blood test results.
I’m sure you’re not alone. When will the news finally break? Are most physicians still too scared to acknowledge what they can see with their own eyes? Will it take a generation for the problems with the shot to be acknowledged?
Perhaps the cancers have to do directly with the jabs, but the fact that the oncos are only now seeing them in such numbers might more likely have to do with the fact that they couldn't diagnose them during the pandemic - patients were being turned away, if you'll recall.
Do you happen to know if your friend was getting his PSA numbers checked regularly? It's done with a blood test, and for me, ordered with my annual physical.
The number alone does not indicate cancer. It can be high, and it may only indicate an enlarged prostate. It's the rapid acceleration of PSA over sequential tests that means cancer. (With metastasis, the number may go into the thousands.)
Prostate cancer is usually not dangerous; most men die with (not from) it, never knowing they had it, but with the introduction of the mRNA eugenics shot, it is now becoming a common cause of death. Many of the common life-threatening diseases have risen by over one thousand percent.
No doubt his gaslighting about a long winter of death for us Pure Bloods is now richly both karmic and ironic: that piece of shit got cancer from the jabs.
There's no way he got the real death shots at first; they couldn't take the risk to their eugenics program that he would sicken or die. Once he became an embarrassing liability and insisted on running again, they must have given him shots from the deadliest batches.
It’s practically impossible nowadays to find a western nation whose political leadership, executive branch, educational institutions and mass media haven’t been thoroughly penetrated by the globalist oligarchy.
You are an extremely self-aware, well informed, and discerning individual.
I think it’s important to keep in perspective how this administration came to power.
The fundamental landscape was completely altered by layered psychological warfare, constituting, social engineering , engineered riots all over the country by paid activists, unprecedented and illegal changes to electoral policy under the guise of public health, Censorship of not only crucial information, but also political dissent, created a landscape in which no informed consent was possible in the run up to the 2020 election.
When teams of representatives and senators stated their intention to challenge slates of electors on January 6, 2021 , and engineered riot ensued, which not only coerced political opponents by labeling them terrorists, but also effectively ended those challenges as well. The potential had existed for the decision to be sent back to the House of Representatives.
What we ended up with was an international crime syndicate posing as a legitimate administration for four long years. While committing myriad crimes and unprecedented theft against people of the United States. This was acknowledged in the pardoning of 10 key staff members and legislative allies on their way out of office.
This we know. The case will be made that a coup was perpetrated against the American people in plain sight.
You’re not wrong because it’s the nature of the job running an empire. However, the normal process in which their legitimacy is derived from the people was deliberately and systematically bypassed, which is the issue of concern I raised.
What was done during Covid was unprecedented, as was the passive reaction from most of the public. But it was a Pyrrhic victory for those in control and they won’t get another shot.
The corrupted system that facilitated that outcome is still largely in place as we have barely scratched the surface.
The actors are now cloaking themselves behind moderate language, while there is clearly intent to perpetuate the exact same system under a new illusion.
It’s Premature to declare victory just because we’ve prevailed in a handful of skirmishes.
There is a long-term war being waged at scale, and it will take time and effort..
You are correct. But they can’t get the same level of compliance as before covid. They used our trust against us, and that trust is now broken. Not everyone saw the hand moving the puppet, but a lot did. Not that the ancien regime doesn’t have other avenues of attack. They just can’t rely again on trust based compliance. But that was only the first step before mandatory jabs came down. But they manifestly failed to get the digital passes they wanted. Yes, stay viligant, but the enemy is not invincible.
That operation succeeded at inverting the minds of many people. These minds operate in a perpetual state of distortion, similar to, and including TDS.
These are the equivalent of useful idiots in communism. They are disposable weaponized humans and subject to being influenced by their perceived saviors.
The recent shift in the Overton window has driven many underground into echo chambers and what we see represents a small portion of the true number of psychotic robots that are walking among us.
This is the nature of inverted totalitarianism. Those who are stuck in the illusion will invariably experience psychotic breaks when their ontological framework collapses under the weight of its own contradictions.
We may not immediately recognize it, but we can already see this happening everywhere.
Then there are the leaders of this monumental betrayal, who’ve thus far remained completely untouchable, as they are protected by an enormous political force and they also have access to an immense reservoir of material resources.
"To summarize this new FDA policy = it is the same as the old one but in red instead of blue:
• The chemical substances amply demonstrated to be harmful and known to promote the illness which they are claimed to prevent are going to be pushed onto duped consumers without any meaningful testing.
• The randomized placebo controlled studies will be only “recommended” in 50-64 yo, and “sponsor-initiated” in other populations. This means they will not be done, period. Nobody in pharma spends money on studying safety, especially in vaccines, without gun to the head. Makary and Prasad will not enforce any of this gold standard science and their paper is very clear about this.
• Covid “vaccines” are still EUA Countermeasures, still under the current PREP Act declaration, making them regulation-free and liability-free poison. The “new” MAHA-FDA policy aims to mask these facts."
Quoting a source like that doesn't help your case. Throwing around words like "genocidal maniacs" to refer to the current administration is usually a bit of a red flag. It indicates the author is obviously a little bit... er...brainwashed by the Far Left Hivemind.
It seems rather ridiculous from a perspective grounded in critical reasoning.
The left is a groupthink collectivist cult that appeals to a delusional utopian fantasy, and this distortion is one mechanism through which they submit to programming, and wait to be told what to do by their specific authority figures. Classic cult behavior.
The right consist of an alliance capable of more independent thinking.
Of course you could cherry pick and find examples to support your case, but it’s not all encompassing like it is on the left.
I define totalitarianism outside the narrow definition often used, as a type of political authoritarianism. Totalitarianism can indeed be political authoritarianism, but it also refers to any highly dysfunctional human group dynamic under a leader with a Cluster-B personality and a subsequent damaging/restrictive narrative binding the group together in destruction of both self and other.
Totalitarianism is found in cults, gangs, extremist religions, secret societies, organized crime groups, terrorist groups, as well as in overt political totalitarianism.
QUOTE: What we ended up with was an international crime syndicate posing as a legitimate administration for four long years.
---
It is precisely this kind of cabal that regards ITSELF as illegitimate who will resort to brutal short-termist measures. They know the clock is ticking down on their usurpation from day one, so everyone is out go-getting while the getting is good, and après nous le déluge. So what if everything is drowned in a flood after we have our fun?
Correct - but the cabal themselves don't know WHAT is going to hit them (neither do we), but they do sense/know that their days are numbered and inexorably ticking down toward an unknown endpoint.
Hence the panicked rush to do and grab everything they can (just about) get away with NOW. Biologists would call this an r-selection, "fast life" strategy: one's existence could end at any moment, so live and procreate frantically "as if there is no tomorrow."
QUOTE: There is also an element that seeks to control supernatural forces that it does not understand.
---
Very astute. Yes, "savages" in Papua New Guinea have nothing on our enlightened "elites" in their attempts to propitiate the supernatural world through occult rituals. An anthropologist would even find a great deal of overlap in the substantive acts performed as part of ritual observances.
He was also subject to continuous injections of adrenaline and other concoctions before every public engagement. I wonder if the sustained doses he received had any impact on his cancer development?
What's truly amazing is 70 million Americans would've voted for him, without questioning, if they knew he was non compos mentis AND had terminal cancer.
The whole problem with these people is they are more willing to blindly trust each other in the tribe than to judge themselves.
If you can not judge your SELF, you can not judge FOR yourself because the tribe itself is the "judge" of "self"; it IS self.
I think of authentic religion as being within the centre of the spectrum.
Far leftwing religion becomes WOKE and radical atheism. Far rightwing religion becomes 17th century Puritanism or radical Islam or extremist religious cults.
These hugely dysfunctional tribes operate under a Cluster-B leader, and a group narrative from the leader. They have been conditioned to believe that their survival depends upon following both, to the letter. And punishing anyone else who does not.
They don't really have active independent thought any longer. Too scary.
Remember those crazed Vaxxed types of COVID-mania, and how they would have sold their own mothers to the Stasi for being un-vaxxed?
You're right -- the tribe/herd becomes Self. And the authentic Self regresses.
I cannot help but feel we dodged that proverbial bullet multiple times now. If he had ran he might have won. If he had died in office we would be stuck with Kamala for at least a few years.
lots of Trumpians have that problem too, sadly. Betrayal blindness is a thing. We need to stop believing Bilderberg Groupies "red" or "blue" are ever going to be on the side of humans.
Over the long run, humans have survived by banding together in groups. An inclination to associate with a group around a leader is probably deeply embedded in the human psyche. Independent thinkers, not too many of them, have also been valuable for survival, so every generation includes those too. Some societies value this second characteristic more than others.
Orrr...... I shared this comment with another substack... What if this is just a way for the public to feel sympathy for him and forget his legacy of murder and lies? Might be like the Trump ear/assassination. They might want you to forget that they knew he was senile and they all pretended that he wasn't.... same people, folks! 🤡
They also want to amplify cancer. “Everyone is getting it! Even the former president! Gasp!” Because, well everyone IS getting it. And hey didn’t you know there’s a vaccine in the works for that??? That everyone should get! Did anyone see the AstraZeneca sponsored cancer screening commercial starred in by a hockey player and his mom recently btw? 🤡
It seems to me there are two steps in the justice process that are often confused.
First, the police detectives gather evidence of harm. This often happens before the perpetrator is known. For example, before the Yorkshire Ripper was identified there were bodies of dead women killed in a similar way.
Second, the police prosecutor identifies and accuses perpetrators and then presents evidence in court.
You can see that during step one it is not necessary to know who the perpetrator is in order to deduce that there is one. It would be absurd to claim during step one that because a perpetrator has not yet been named, in some way the evidence that women have been killed is undermined.
I'm still hung up on a question without an answer.
If he was in fact not fit for at least a period of his presidency, does that not void all decisions made by him during that period?
The tidal wave of pardons comes to mind.
Another question is what caused the cancer. Was it - as would be the most probable reason for any normal octogenarian man - simply age, or was it something else?
The KGB/FSB once put a chunk of a highly radioactive isotope/mineral inside the back of an office chair, the high-backed executive kind. Inside six months, the man occupying that chair for hours on end died from cancer in pretty much his entire abdomen. The material wasn't found until much later, when the chair was taken apart at a dump.
If any of these edicts were actually real and not theater for the masses while the globalists do whatever they want to do, they would've been subject to exactly these lawsuits / challenges by now. "non compos mentis" should have serious policy ramifications.
There are a few interviews with a former dem supporter/insider named Lindy Li who offers up a few names of people involved. I'm sorry I have no links, but a search at You Tube will find a few.
I have seen assertions that the intel boys have played at this for a long time. Jack Ruby perhaps the most famous. It’s impossible to confirm but would you really put it past them?
Swedish journalist-activist with an Antifa-background and ties to PKK is arrested in Turkey.
New Swedish National security advisor is appointed and resigns within 12 hours after someone leaked his Grindr-profile and private pictures (hard-core homosexual DSM-stuff) to media and state dep.
Day after that two senior Foreign Office employees, both homsexuals (one a kurd), are arrested by State Security Police, charges of espionage for foreign powers.
Day after arrests, both are released. One of them is found dead from suicide within hours of his release.
Day after that, Turkey abbounces they'll be releasing the Swedish journalist.
Our minister of state commented on it by saying it's all coincidental.
If I had a definite source, I would have included it.
Best I can do is tell you the information was broadcast in the mid-1990s by Swedish state radio in an interview with a senior intelligence officer from the Swedish military, on how the KGB operated/operates.
Alex Berenson's money quote on this: "As with Covid, the propaganda is not so much Orwellian in its ferocity and effort to intimidae as late-Soviet in its contempt for the intelligence of its audience. We have gone from kids will be fine without in-person schooling and mRNA is a miracle cure to a man with unlimited access to the world’s best medical care wound up with cancer in his bones before anyone noticed."
I very much doubt medical neglect had anything to do with this--he was obviously highly monitored in order to maintain the facade of being "with it." Even if, as many have said, he didn't receive the care for Parkinson's that he should have in order to avoid some of the side effects that would make him look bad in public, there's a difference between not diagnosing and monitoring something and ignoring what you're told to do when you are diagnosed and monitored. He had frequent checkups. His family's prioritizing "looking like the president" over health has nothing to do with that.
That said, his saying he had cancer in 2022 means nothing. This is a pathological liar who has claimed all sorts of things over the years, and one with dementia on top of that. He might have meant it. But his saying it means nothing.
we don’t know very much about the specifics of biden’s medical care at all. the annual physicals are the best-covered, and even those are discussed in summary.
Alex Berenson did report that a neurologist made multiple—maybe around 10–visits to the White House. The public was never told what was going on.
Also, just think about how many men and trans Admirals were unable to get their prostates checked for the years medical “care” was reserved for Covid. Biden didn’t have that excuse.
That's true, as far as what is said publicly. But the president and congress have the best healthcare in the country, I very much doubt he could have functioned this long without availing himself of it. Is it possible that he got no care? I suppose. But I really doubt it.
by hersh’s account, biden‘s family and advisers kept him isolated even from friends and acquaintances. they were a small group of 7-10 people, who were managing biden and basically ruling on his behalf. they needed to prevent any kind of dementia diagnosis becoming known, which in itself would require careful management and likely limitation of Biden’s medical care. and now imagine there’s blood work suggesting Biden has cancer - they’re done for if they don’t make it go away. Biden himself is totally in their control and confused half the time, remember.
I don't agree. But unless someone talks, we won't know.
Here's what "Lu in Alaska," a nurse, wrote about it on Twitter:
"Yes the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES with a code to nuke the entire planet following him around 24/7 typically does get PRETTY THOROUGH MEDICAL CARE. I’ve only seen 8 million PSA screenings in the last 16 years of trench work in healthcare. Usually advanced cancer doesn’t spring up and surprise the most powerful man on the damn planet? Why? Omg let me spell this out. His health is a global security concern. His health determines his ability to NOT ACCIDENTALLY GET US ALL KILLED. These sheep want us to believe the sitting president who was considering running again (with a dire family history of cancer) was sitting in his underpants on the crinkly paper at his Dr’s office and they said you know what let’s just do minimal testing and see what happens. GTFO."
Sadly, after Covid and how they acted en masse, what anyone in the medical professions say is routine, science, a matter of integrity and so on, cannot be trusted in the slightest.
> a small group of 7-10 people, who were managing biden
> and basically ruling on his behalf
Ample cause for a widespread campaign of lawsuits etc. against every autopen-signed executive order. Make them *prove* to the satisfaction of a jury that Biden had any knowledge and assent to the things being signed on his behalf.
That includes bills pass by Congress, too, if there were any signed by autopen.
The showstopper is that the burden of proof is not on Biden to show he was sane, but on the complainants to show he was not. And worse, you have to show it for each individual day he did one of things you object to.
This announcement that BIden has cancer did not actually state when it was discovered. It is hard to believe that, no matter how controlled, physicians would have skipped a regular test for prostate cancer, which is standard for men Biden's age.
Co-regents are frequently adversaries too. Jill and Hunter despise one another and she was only able to provide her husband with a daughter (who she may have allowed to be molested) and not a son to dethrone another woman's preferred offspring. Others within the inner circle were likely partisans of Jill or of Hunter but not so much of both. No one could trust anyone else with the secret. The doctor was of course compromised by his business deals with the Biden family so keeping his mouth shut was not a problem.
I myself in such situations (and all others too) always just hope for justice and it's not up to me how that may eventually manifest. I'd rather get to see it of course. Not as much fun when the Cosmos handles it privately.
I personally think he had it before he ran for 2020. It progresses slowly, so when he “won”, he rejected PSA tests from Walter Reed. That alone was a huge red flag. You can reject to test for PSA after you turn 70 (the former assumption was it would progress so slowly you would outlive this type of cancer, surprise, that has changed now). Of course, I can only presume that every former President has gotten a PSA test every year since the development of the test- it beggars belief to think anyone said no to that test. Then he went to Delaware for treatment, it explains his heavy presence there, he might have even undergone chemo and other taxing treatments which would have, of course, had even greater effects on his declining cognitive state. It sure explains a lot. Little did he know that every further jab he got of mRNA was a further p53 suppressor, making it advance further and more quickly.
News segment yesterday Dr. Siegal confirmed that medical reports from WH doctors showed Obama and GWB both took PSA tests. Highlighting your point about Biden being an outlier.
Scenario a - Joe doesn't drop out and somehow (very very doubtfully but anything is posssible) wins last november..., she would be president now (or very very soon.)
Scenario b - Joe announces he has cancer last late spring (it seems he definitely had it then) and announces hee cannot do a second term because of cancer...and not because he has dementia. That plays very very different - he can go out head held high ('tragically prevented from serving a second term', etc. as opposed ot getting ditched by his own party because he was mental) and then a mini primary thingy can happen, a procccess Kamala would be definitely the front runner (i don't think Joe would have annointed her.) she proves her campiagn-ish metal, there are no quesitons about how sordid the process was and - while still would still probably lose - it would have been much much more competitve (sympathy vote, she how she iss stepping up, etc.) and could even have kept the 2028 door open a crack.
Scenario c - even well before the debate, joe announces the cancer and the party puts together an internal primary vote system (tehncially they could) and/or combined with declaring free any biden delegates already elected - again, kamala has the advantage and again is doesn't look like the skeeviest political move since, well, either yesterday or forever.
for the democrats, joe biden is the gift that keeps on taking.
I actually think that Harris's late candidacy was a huge benefit to her. She's so terrible, the more exposure people have, the worse they think of her. Had she been in the race for longer, she would have done much worse.
One quasi conspiracy theory that I'll never stop believing is that Kamala was a sacrificial lamb, a back bencher who lucked into enough name recognition that she was plausible as a real life candidate but that the DNC gave her the nomination because they knew there was no chance that any Dem could win in 24 and they didn't want to saddle one of their A listers with a humiliating defeat. To put it bluntly, no sane person could have thought that Kamala and waltz ever had a chance
Also a serious possibility, though exactly whom the "A Listers" were then and/or are now seems nebulous. There's gavin and then there's, um, pete with a beard, and, um, aox (typo intended,) wretching gritmer, staff clobberchar, and, um...
Well then there were plenty of insane people around. Although probably not the top level. There had to be a group (the ones really running the regency) who knew exactly what was up.
This doesn‘t have to be and probably wasn’t a conspiracy. Sharks like Newsome or Shapiro got to where they are by having a keen sense of political opportunity. They likely made the decision not to burn their powder where it could not achieve anything and wait at least until 2028 for their bid for the White House.
Tangential comment: I remember being totally shocked at how thoroughly and suddenly my progressive friends at our weekly croquet match were singing the praises of Kamala, who previously had been pretty much ignored by all. It was a breathtaking example of propaganda effectiveness.
One must understand that she had many Democratic critics the day before she was anointed, but as soon as she was anointed, it became an article of faith amongst Democrats that she was an outstanding candidate. It was bizarre to see from within the US. I can only imagine how it appeared abroad.
With the exception of Obama, who withheld his endorsement for long enough to cause the DNC much embarrassment.
It's generally assumed that he was the head what we might call Biden's regency committee, but his dissent here seems to indicate that he was out of the loop when Biden's candidacy was replaced by Harris's.
We had no brave reporters willing to dig into the factions of the Democratic Party. Hints emerged that the Clintons and the Obamas have been at odds at various points. Was there a power struggle inside the regency? It’s like the Kremlinology of the Soviet era. The Biden regime was that opaque.
'She's so terrible, the more exposure people have, the worse they think of her.'
And, just like them keeping Joe under wraps (for which Covid was a huge gift, allowing him to hide in his basement), Kamala's public appearances and interviews were severely limited because she usually came across as a total idiot.
What I wouldn't have given to have seen her for two hours with Joe Rogan.
there is definitely more than an element of truth to that so maybe she doesn't end up with it...but it still must gall her to no end, the what might have beens
i think we will see exactly what people think of her if she runs for cal gov - shee got fewer votes than either biden or hilary in her home state and she came within a smiddgen/foot in mouth gaffe by her opponent in her AG's race of losng that bid
in other words, those who know her work are less likely to vote for her which does not bode terribly well
i don't see the point of her running for anything beyond ego - take the board of director seaats, the speaking gigs (well, maybe not those) and live off your awful husbands cash - from now on. as a former elected (local) i completely understand the siren song pull of running, but i don't think she has a "glide path" to cal gov and that loss would be even worse than nixon's
true, the state votes 53.7% for the worst dem candidates, 57% for the less egregious, but with more recent trends showing a statwide backing away from the progressive stuff harris stands for so it could be close
and if she does run and pulls it off with 51%, the sharks will be out...
I lived in CA ~20 years ago and remember even then she was considered to be pretty crap as a politician. Even though I wasn't voting for awhile, I remember groaning when they put her as VP next to Biden. Unless there is shennanigans (possible, it is the D's) I don't think she will make it past a primary process. The the CA dems have too many fresh faces that haven't been observed performing drunken rants on national TV to put 'wine box auntie' out in front of the public again.
Apparently the thought was that Biden would run and win and then step aside so that the Vice President could assume the office, generating great excitement on the basis of racial and sexual characteristics. She is extremely dumb and while at one time she was well spoken, she no longer is. She slightly slurs her speech and uptalks frequently.
Nonetheless, the Harris candidacy offered an opportunity to burn through billions and it appears that Biden kept it up after she lost.
An “Opaque Politburo” was governing the Joe Biden™️ White House according to James Howard Kunstler. It has an ominous sound to it that I thought was quite appropriate
I don't know if he has cancer or not. That's how much I don't believe anything they say or anything in the media, especially anything connected to Biden.
I don't know if they are saying he has cancer because he has cancer, or to keep him from being prosecuted for something, or because the tapes are out, or because they think he will die soon from something else.
If he does have cancer, I don't know if he had it all along or if it's jab turbo cancer.
Interesting speculation, and the timing is definitely suspicious—my first thought was that they're distracting from the increasing attention on the cover-up of his mental state.
That said, some prostate cancers progress very rapidly. This happened with my father. First they gave him two years, then one year, then four months… and this was in 2000 or so, before the purported rise of turbo cancer* as a result of mRNA vaccinations. Pretty sure Joe had been vaccinated and boosted more than once.
Also, I've read elsewhere that the PSA test doesn't work for some varieties of prostate cancer.
So until we get more information, if we ever do, speculation can be all over the map. Let's just not let it distract from the more important issues like the coverup of his mental state.
* Members of my family, and I, believe my brother's sudden death from liver cancer was a result of the so-called vaccines – and he never even got a booster. Yes, I'm bitter and vengeful.
True my beloved uncle and godfather was diagnosed with it. I took him to lunch to try to talk him into an aggressive treatment regimen. He said “they told me that I’ll die from something old age”….
It was just a stutter...............
This has been the most despicable scandal in the last 150 years. The deep irony here is that they are revealing that they likely covered up Biden's cancer diagnosis in order to distract from news that they covered up Biden's cognitive decline. Truly unbelievable that the party of "country over party" and "nobody is above the law" could do such a thing....oh wait.
I'm not even sure if Lady Macbeth could've brought herself to sign off on something like this
Jill Biden is truly an evil person. I think she would and tried to do anything to keep herself in the powerful and regal trappings of the presidency.
She is the worst wife ever. I do believe she was the one that pushed and didn’t relent on 2nd run.
Probably the same reason she dumped a previous husband to be with Joe. She wanted the power.
Reminds me of what's-her-name -- that M. Markle woman.
Speaking of Meghan and cover-ups, its circulating now that Ms. Markle was a yacht girl on Epstien's yacht and was possibly involved with Andrew before Harry...
How interesting. I think that Andrew is the common denominator in many nasty secrets.
But then again the entire royal family and monarchy are lead globalists. They just play at being on the side of the people. It has been that way for centuries.
Wow! Not that I care about the British royal family, but THAT is interesting, if true.
She's kinda cute, but she seems like an f'ing b-i-t-c-h.
Bingo!
QUOTE: I do believe [Jill] was the one that pushed and didn’t relent on 2nd run.
---
If one assumes that "Biden" could have been seen by DNC insiders as LESS likely to prevail in the 2024 election than another Democrat (Kamala, Gavin Gruesome, etc.) given enough time to campaign, one could posit a tacit understanding between Jill and the Trump campaign: Jill ensures that Joe does NOT drop out early, so no other candidate can start campaigning in a timely fashion.
In return, Trump would promise to go easy on Jill, Jill's daughter Ashley (!), Hunter, etc. on their various corruption cases (Ukraine, China, ...). We are probably talking about amounts in the hundreds of millions.
The Democrats didn't have anyone in their stable capable of beating Trump. Their habit of destroying any candidate who becomes even marginally popular insures that only the worst, most despicable and unpopular ass-kissers and backstabbers rise to prominence.
Disagree - at least two or three candidates (Gruesome, Kameltoe, maybe even Bernie) could have been dragged across the finish line if one factors in a 10% margin for Dem vote fraud in swing states.
I suspect that Jill had as much lust for the power and trappings of the Presidency as Obama and the missus had.
You're almost certainly right
Lady MacBiden right out of Lady McBeth.
She makes Lady Macbeth seem merely confused, and possibly only temporarily suffering from menopause.
O to be considered more evil than Lady MacBeth! How divine! (Or so I think she might think.)
I'd speculate that someone even more evil was pulling her strings. I hope someday we find out what was really happening behind the scenes in the Biden White House. I can only imagine the shitshow.
Evil from the lowest depths of hell
I assume Dr. Jill was the ringleader, but Hunter must also have been in it up to his eyeballs.
What a loving family!
I doubt Dr. Jill's influence lasted more than a week after inauguration. I'd say she and Joe were bullied out of the inner circle by a cabal of Obama holdovers, and they, in turn, fought amongst themselves for the entire term, each trying to triangulate the Bidens for ultimate authority. What a shitshow that must have been.
Perhaps. But it would seem difficult for political staffers to freeze out the woman Joe lived with - she had unique access, and should have had some strong cards to play.
It would be interesting to know what really happened. I doubt we ever will.
But they undoubtedly had all the goods on the Biden family corruption, and could easily blackmail them with that.
Well, not easily. Jill/Joe likely could have taken the Obamas/blackmailers down with them, if it came to that.
It looks like it.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/jill-biden-the-brains-behind-the?utm_source=publication-search
This.
I'm telling you, it's frighteningly wild how similar the DNC and the Liberal Party of Canada are. They have the exact same MO. It's like they read the same colouring book.
It is what I have said for many years -- both of these organizations represent a behavioural type, and they act in lockstep patterns. Just like the lockstep behaviour across Western nations we saw during COVID mania.
These are deeply rooted human behavioural patterns. They appear under particular circumstances.
It's crazy how the Liberals copy the DNC. I know we can argue all four are the same but it's less pronounced with the GOP/CPC.
These are degrees of leftwing totalitarianism. Under the same types of leaders.
You mean that coloring book designed and illustrated by Fidel Castro?
"Fun with Karl and Vlad."
Lolol. "Coloring book ". Bravo!
I think you are understating the enormity of scandal.
The Ukrainian situation being the most important.
The Biden regency kept this butchery running to destroy Russia.
Very good point.
It is a good money laundering scam certainly. When the Ukriane is destroyed they can rebuild it with yet more taxpayers' money.
The Biden regency kept it running to create a crisis to expand their authority, while distracting the military, and the country.
I didn't follow Biden like a hawk, but the first time I heard he had a 'stutter' was when I pointed out his cognitive decline on my Facebook page. My lefty friends excused him thus. What a joke; a stutter, even if real, wouldn't account for his senile behavior.
Last I heard stuttering didn't make people go wandering off into the jungle, or say they had "finally beat Medicare."
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/brainspotting-some-memes?utm_source=publication-search
Easily disproved by videos of him as a Senator in years past, berating Clarence Thomas at his confirmation hearing for example: no sign of a stutter there, just a constant stream of venom.
He was always one of the nastiest, most arrogant pieces of work in the Senate.
I've observed Biden since he first entered Congress. No stutter.
Ryan not news at all. It was Bob Woodward who famously wrote: You know one percent of what goes on in Washington.
People do what they do because they can. Bernie Madoff did what he did because he could. How people were not out in the streets in 2018 demanding Biden be removed because of his mental decline, solidifies just how truly ignorant the American are.
The real question people should be asking is why HRC didn't come forward? Getting passed over not once but twice, first by Obama and then by Biden as well. If they could fix the books for Biden why not just have inserted HRC instead?
People don't realize there are so many factions within both these parties all vying for power.
The same can be said about Trump and hiding his profound ignorance. How are people not out in the streets demanding his removal when the man can't even pronounce the word industry? There are dozens of insiders who've all stated and confirmed the man is learning disabled. How could anyone in their right mind not see just how stupid he is but instead, believe the press - just like they did about Biden and everyone else.
People do what they did because they can!!
Definitely not news. Anyone with eyes, ears and non-cultist could easily see he was brain dead
I agree. I thought this was exceedingly obvious, myself. Even as a casual observer. To have missed this would have been to deny reality.
How could anyone not have seen it?
The media did not want to see it, deliberately. It did not fit with their biases. "Hear, O foolish people, and without understanding: who have eyes, and see not: and ears, and hear not." Jeremiah 5:20
Willful ignorance. 😢
And could see it during the election campaign.
100%. So easy to see.
Well said! I don't think I can be friends with Obiden voters anymore, the scandals and horrors of that administration are so egregious. Anyone excusing any of it needs mental help.
I think because Killary would be harder to control. She truly is evil and sentient. She maybe one of the most narcissistic people in the world. And she has far too many enemies. They can play old Joey off as the kindly old man.
The Democrat establishment had plenty of evidence to blackmail HRC at the drop of a hat. They dared not allow her access to the levers of power, given her apparently bloodthirsty history. I think they were so afraid of her that they preferred dealing with Trump in 2016.
"If they could fix the books for Biden why not just have inserted HRC instead?"
They had their butts in a legal crack. All of the party's campaign funds had been collected under the name of candidate Joe Biden. Campaign finance laws didn't allow them to be applied to any replacement candidate. They waved their hands hard and argued that Kamala had a claim to those funds as Joe's running mate, and managed to persuade the right people that it was at least fair if not technically legal. But Kamala was the only possible beneficiary who could tap that war chest. Otherwise, it was gone with the wind.
When you see Jill Biden in action, Lady MacBeth seems pretty reasonable
> This has been the most despicable scandal in the last 150 years.
Nah, the Wilson Regency was only what, 110 years ago?
True.
"Is this a stagger which I see before me..."
No, it's Joe Biden.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/breaking-news-joe-biden-steps-down?utm_source=publication-search
How many mRNA jabs did he take? Perhaps the jabs caused his turbo cancer?
A friend of mine had something very similar, discovery of stage 4 prostate cancer with little warning. He was well jabbed too. Quite a few oncologists said how many aggressive cancers they were seeing post covid jabs. So it might not be a big cover-up.
Since our father died from prostrate cancer, my then 61 yr old brother, was vigilant about his health. He took a test to identify markers for prostrate cancer and was told by his urologist that based on the test his prostrate cancer risk was very low. A routine prostrate exam one year later showed a significant increase in his PSA. Biopsy revealed very aggressive cancer requiring a prostatectomy, 26 rounds of radiation and Lupron injections to ensure his body was testosterone free. What changed in a year? Covid shots. He and I both believe the shots caused his prostrate cancer. He’s doing well and is cancer free right now but we keep our fingers crossed every three months while we wait for his blood test results.
As a MD, I ve found more aggressive tumors (prostate & al) in the last 2 years than in my 30-year career🫣
I’m sure you’re not alone. When will the news finally break? Are most physicians still too scared to acknowledge what they can see with their own eyes? Will it take a generation for the problems with the shot to be acknowledged?
I send my very best wishes to your brother that he remains well.
Thank you Amanda.
there was a study, I believe out of Japan, that showed aggressive prostate cancers up like 30% in the two years following the Covid jab.
Perhaps the cancers have to do directly with the jabs, but the fact that the oncos are only now seeing them in such numbers might more likely have to do with the fact that they couldn't diagnose them during the pandemic - patients were being turned away, if you'll recall.
Do you happen to know if your friend was getting his PSA numbers checked regularly? It's done with a blood test, and for me, ordered with my annual physical.
I warn you PSA is a rabbit hole. They will overdiagnose you and remove your prostate with complications and pump you with chemicals.
The number alone does not indicate cancer. It can be high, and it may only indicate an enlarged prostate. It's the rapid acceleration of PSA over sequential tests that means cancer. (With metastasis, the number may go into the thousands.)
Prostate cancer is usually not dangerous; most men die with (not from) it, never knowing they had it, but with the introduction of the mRNA eugenics shot, it is now becoming a common cause of death. Many of the common life-threatening diseases have risen by over one thousand percent.
No doubt his gaslighting about a long winter of death for us Pure Bloods is now richly both karmic and ironic: that piece of shit got cancer from the jabs.
There's no way he got the real death shots at first; they couldn't take the risk to their eugenics program that he would sicken or die. Once he became an embarrassing liability and insisted on running again, they must have given him shots from the deadliest batches.
Maybe he pardoned Fauci because he wanted to forgive him.
He didn’t know what he was doing
Huh?
Thank you! That was my first thought. He only had about 18 boosters. 🤦🏻♀️
The insiders were probably jabbed with a saline solution only.
Obviously, Sleepy Joe wasn’t an insider of his own regime.
Well, it seems that Joe was a predator of the people, but a puppet of the higher globalists.
It’s practically impossible nowadays to find a western nation whose political leadership, executive branch, educational institutions and mass media haven’t been thoroughly penetrated by the globalist oligarchy.
I think they have all been infiltrated to date. As have most or all Western institutions.
yep, pretty much …
Did you know Pfizer did not force the jab on their employees? It was optional!
I doubt he took any, unless his handlers wanted his death to come early.
That said, it’s quite possible that the original Biden is long dead, and he’s had a stand-in for some time.
TBH that doesn’t even look like the original Joe Biden
He has had a lot of plastic surgery, pulling up and back the skin on his face to eliminate wrinkles. That makes a person look different.
I doubt it, but I like it.
Ouch: I erred. C&C by Jeff Childers reports 4 jabs for Biden. I either misread, or he revised it. Apologies.
yes, but if he hadn't had the first two shots and the next six boosters think of how bad his three cases of Covid would have been!!
Ouch: I erred. C&C by Jeff Childers reports 4 jabs for Biden. I either misread, or he revised it. Apologies.
You are an extremely self-aware, well informed, and discerning individual.
I think it’s important to keep in perspective how this administration came to power.
The fundamental landscape was completely altered by layered psychological warfare, constituting, social engineering , engineered riots all over the country by paid activists, unprecedented and illegal changes to electoral policy under the guise of public health, Censorship of not only crucial information, but also political dissent, created a landscape in which no informed consent was possible in the run up to the 2020 election.
When teams of representatives and senators stated their intention to challenge slates of electors on January 6, 2021 , and engineered riot ensued, which not only coerced political opponents by labeling them terrorists, but also effectively ended those challenges as well. The potential had existed for the decision to be sent back to the House of Representatives.
What we ended up with was an international crime syndicate posing as a legitimate administration for four long years. While committing myriad crimes and unprecedented theft against people of the United States. This was acknowledged in the pardoning of 10 key staff members and legislative allies on their way out of office.
This we know. The case will be made that a coup was perpetrated against the American people in plain sight.
I am of the opinion that *every* administration is an international crime syndicate. Some are worse than others.
You’re not wrong because it’s the nature of the job running an empire. However, the normal process in which their legitimacy is derived from the people was deliberately and systematically bypassed, which is the issue of concern I raised.
What was done during Covid was unprecedented, as was the passive reaction from most of the public. But it was a Pyrrhic victory for those in control and they won’t get another shot.
The corrupted system that facilitated that outcome is still largely in place as we have barely scratched the surface.
The actors are now cloaking themselves behind moderate language, while there is clearly intent to perpetuate the exact same system under a new illusion.
It’s Premature to declare victory just because we’ve prevailed in a handful of skirmishes.
There is a long-term war being waged at scale, and it will take time and effort..
Complacency has no place in this war.
You are correct. But they can’t get the same level of compliance as before covid. They used our trust against us, and that trust is now broken. Not everyone saw the hand moving the puppet, but a lot did. Not that the ancien regime doesn’t have other avenues of attack. They just can’t rely again on trust based compliance. But that was only the first step before mandatory jabs came down. But they manifestly failed to get the digital passes they wanted. Yes, stay viligant, but the enemy is not invincible.
That operation succeeded at inverting the minds of many people. These minds operate in a perpetual state of distortion, similar to, and including TDS.
These are the equivalent of useful idiots in communism. They are disposable weaponized humans and subject to being influenced by their perceived saviors.
The recent shift in the Overton window has driven many underground into echo chambers and what we see represents a small portion of the true number of psychotic robots that are walking among us.
This is the nature of inverted totalitarianism. Those who are stuck in the illusion will invariably experience psychotic breaks when their ontological framework collapses under the weight of its own contradictions.
We may not immediately recognize it, but we can already see this happening everywhere.
Then there are the leaders of this monumental betrayal, who’ve thus far remained completely untouchable, as they are protected by an enormous political force and they also have access to an immense reservoir of material resources.
They operate freely.
If you're wrong about that, it's only slightly wrong.
Agenda 2030 just gets rebranded. We're on the MAGA brand colors now.
Yes, a relay race, handing off the baton
MAGA. There's always one reference to MAGA in these comment sections.
MAGA is the first grassroots populist movement to successfully achieve power without being ideologically captured.
That’s significant, and worthy of recognition.
😂 sadly they've been brainwashed to believe that.
"To summarize this new FDA policy = it is the same as the old one but in red instead of blue:
• The chemical substances amply demonstrated to be harmful and known to promote the illness which they are claimed to prevent are going to be pushed onto duped consumers without any meaningful testing.
• The randomized placebo controlled studies will be only “recommended” in 50-64 yo, and “sponsor-initiated” in other populations. This means they will not be done, period. Nobody in pharma spends money on studying safety, especially in vaccines, without gun to the head. Makary and Prasad will not enforce any of this gold standard science and their paper is very clear about this.
• Covid “vaccines” are still EUA Countermeasures, still under the current PREP Act declaration, making them regulation-free and liability-free poison. The “new” MAHA-FDA policy aims to mask these facts."
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/makary-and-prasad-new-covid-vax-fda
Quoting a source like that doesn't help your case. Throwing around words like "genocidal maniacs" to refer to the current administration is usually a bit of a red flag. It indicates the author is obviously a little bit... er...brainwashed by the Far Left Hivemind.
Classic projection.
It seems rather ridiculous from a perspective grounded in critical reasoning.
The left is a groupthink collectivist cult that appeals to a delusional utopian fantasy, and this distortion is one mechanism through which they submit to programming, and wait to be told what to do by their specific authority figures. Classic cult behavior.
The right consist of an alliance capable of more independent thinking.
Of course you could cherry pick and find examples to support your case, but it’s not all encompassing like it is on the left.
Severe crime syndicates are a form of totalitarianism. As was this.
It largely relied on “inverted totalitarianism” in which one’s own mind becomes the prison.
I define totalitarianism outside the narrow definition often used, as a type of political authoritarianism. Totalitarianism can indeed be political authoritarianism, but it also refers to any highly dysfunctional human group dynamic under a leader with a Cluster-B personality and a subsequent damaging/restrictive narrative binding the group together in destruction of both self and other.
Totalitarianism is found in cults, gangs, extremist religions, secret societies, organized crime groups, terrorist groups, as well as in overt political totalitarianism.
Bravo! That is a very comprehensive definition that encompasses the modern variant.
QUOTE: What we ended up with was an international crime syndicate posing as a legitimate administration for four long years.
---
It is precisely this kind of cabal that regards ITSELF as illegitimate who will resort to brutal short-termist measures. They know the clock is ticking down on their usurpation from day one, so everyone is out go-getting while the getting is good, and après nous le déluge. So what if everything is drowned in a flood after we have our fun?
The inversion cycle will not always manifest as a flood, but comes in many forms. It’s parabolic and unpredictable.
Correct - but the cabal themselves don't know WHAT is going to hit them (neither do we), but they do sense/know that their days are numbered and inexorably ticking down toward an unknown endpoint.
Hence the panicked rush to do and grab everything they can (just about) get away with NOW. Biologists would call this an r-selection, "fast life" strategy: one's existence could end at any moment, so live and procreate frantically "as if there is no tomorrow."
We are in complete agreement.
There is also an element that seeks to control supernatural forces that it does not understand.
For the purposes of extending their rule, just a little bit longer.
QUOTE: There is also an element that seeks to control supernatural forces that it does not understand.
---
Very astute. Yes, "savages" in Papua New Guinea have nothing on our enlightened "elites" in their attempts to propitiate the supernatural world through occult rituals. An anthropologist would even find a great deal of overlap in the substantive acts performed as part of ritual observances.
He was also subject to continuous injections of adrenaline and other concoctions before every public engagement. I wonder if the sustained doses he received had any impact on his cancer development?
What's truly amazing is 70 million Americans would've voted for him, without questioning, if they knew he was non compos mentis AND had terminal cancer.
The whole problem with these people is they are more willing to blindly trust each other in the tribe than to judge themselves.
If you can not judge your SELF, you can not judge FOR yourself because the tribe itself is the "judge" of "self"; it IS self.
It's religion. Faith based.
With a heaping dose of narcissism. Most religions at least call for a certain degree of humility.
I think of authentic religion as being within the centre of the spectrum.
Far leftwing religion becomes WOKE and radical atheism. Far rightwing religion becomes 17th century Puritanism or radical Islam or extremist religious cults.
And HATE
These hugely dysfunctional tribes operate under a Cluster-B leader, and a group narrative from the leader. They have been conditioned to believe that their survival depends upon following both, to the letter. And punishing anyone else who does not.
They don't really have active independent thought any longer. Too scary.
Remember those crazed Vaxxed types of COVID-mania, and how they would have sold their own mothers to the Stasi for being un-vaxxed?
You're right -- the tribe/herd becomes Self. And the authentic Self regresses.
I cannot help but feel we dodged that proverbial bullet multiple times now. If he had ran he might have won. If he had died in office we would be stuck with Kamala for at least a few years.
So glad they tripped over their own coverup.
Agree. I don't know if it would've been possible for America to ever regain itself.
Pretty amazing that 250 years of Independence could be destroyed in a mere 6-8 years.
Just add it to the other 1,789 other things the founders, in all their wisdom got right, and incessantly warned us about.
The American experiment is indeed that fragile.
of course, that 70 million includes a lot of dead people who would have a natural sympathy for the situation. Cemetaries are full of Dem voters.
Right! DOGE is already revealing that.
"Our Duhmocracy!"
lots of Trumpians have that problem too, sadly. Betrayal blindness is a thing. We need to stop believing Bilderberg Groupies "red" or "blue" are ever going to be on the side of humans.
Identity fusion: One's individual Identity becomes fused with group Identity.
Over the long run, humans have survived by banding together in groups. An inclination to associate with a group around a leader is probably deeply embedded in the human psyche. Independent thinkers, not too many of them, have also been valuable for survival, so every generation includes those too. Some societies value this second characteristic more than others.
Stealing "indentiy fusion"
Perfect term.
Science has come a long way, but nevertheless there’s only so much that adrenochrome harvested from innocent children in a Satanic ritual can do. 😃
Just adrenaline?
Or a more potent upper?
How do you know this ? Evidence or mere assertion ?
Orrr...... I shared this comment with another substack... What if this is just a way for the public to feel sympathy for him and forget his legacy of murder and lies? Might be like the Trump ear/assassination. They might want you to forget that they knew he was senile and they all pretended that he wasn't.... same people, folks! 🤡
StellaMaris I think you are dead right!!!
“NO TEARS FOR THE ARCHITECT”
No prayers for him, no solemn grace,
No mourning etched upon my face.
This isn’t grief—it’s clarity,
A reckoning for tyranny.
He lived five decades at the helm,
A liar crowned within the realm.
With smiling teeth and weathered skin,
He signed the laws that caged us in.
He sold us out with velvet charm,
Then shook our hands and did us harm.
He built his throne on shattered bones,
Then played the saint in solemn tones.
He penned the crime bills, waved the flag,
Watched mothers weep, then let them lag.
He posed as friend, but bled the streets—
A Judas cloaked in Wall Street’s sheets.
He blessed the wars he never fought,
Let bodies rot for what he bought.
Then washed his hands in public praise,
While drones turned cities into graves.
He left our weapons in the dust,
Betrayed our allies, breached their trust.
He called defeat a bold success—
A fraud wrapped up in righteousness.
He let the banks devour the land,
While feigning care with trembling hand.
He fed the beast, ignored the cries,
Then wept on cue with practiced lies.
His son, a symbol of decay,
Should rot in jail another day!
But bloodlines buy immunity—
The price of state impunity.
He ruled with pens and quiet dread,
His touch unseen, but widely spread.
He let the people starve and fall,
Then auto-signed the final call.
He smiled as virtue turned to dust,
Made moral rot a sacred trust.
And every time we sought the light,
He snuffed it out and called it right.
So no—I will not bow my head,
Or grieve a man whose touch has bled.
His body now begins to pay
What courts and cowards kept at bay.
Not by the law, but by decay,
Not ballots, but his DNA.
The judgment that he always ducked
Now blooms within—corrupted, plucked.
This isn’t hate—it’s honest weight.
A man must own the world he shaped.
And cancer, cold and void of spin,
May be the first to hold him in.
No monsters stalked with blade or mask,
He wore the crown, performed the task.
He ruled in daylight, clean and proud,
And strangled justice in a crowd.
So mourn him if you must pretend.
I’ll mark this moment as the end.
Not cruel, but true—and there I stand:
No tears for him. Just reprimand.
©️Susiejoy Barry
They also want to amplify cancer. “Everyone is getting it! Even the former president! Gasp!” Because, well everyone IS getting it. And hey didn’t you know there’s a vaccine in the works for that??? That everyone should get! Did anyone see the AstraZeneca sponsored cancer screening commercial starred in by a hockey player and his mom recently btw? 🤡
And the sheeple will line up. False positives and a referral to a “really good oncologist” from their list…
Bruh
Cancer isn't exactly new or unknown
A cancer vaccine would be fantastic but it's also completely impossible so, ya know
I think that hits the nail on the head. It is the same with the reported cancer of King Charles.
Presuming you mean the one with Jacob Trouba, it's not all that recent, they just still play it constantly.
True or not, I'm sure they will use it as a distraction and play the sympathy card to the hilt.
Quite so. I have seen people who are aware of his crimes during COVID yet now have sympathy for him. Makes me think rather of Stockholm syndrome.
Morons
Who's they
The people in charge....
It seems to me there are two steps in the justice process that are often confused.
First, the police detectives gather evidence of harm. This often happens before the perpetrator is known. For example, before the Yorkshire Ripper was identified there were bodies of dead women killed in a similar way.
Second, the police prosecutor identifies and accuses perpetrators and then presents evidence in court.
You can see that during step one it is not necessary to know who the perpetrator is in order to deduce that there is one. It would be absurd to claim during step one that because a perpetrator has not yet been named, in some way the evidence that women have been killed is undermined.
I'm still hung up on a question without an answer.
If he was in fact not fit for at least a period of his presidency, does that not void all decisions made by him during that period?
The tidal wave of pardons comes to mind.
Another question is what caused the cancer. Was it - as would be the most probable reason for any normal octogenarian man - simply age, or was it something else?
The KGB/FSB once put a chunk of a highly radioactive isotope/mineral inside the back of an office chair, the high-backed executive kind. Inside six months, the man occupying that chair for hours on end died from cancer in pretty much his entire abdomen. The material wasn't found until much later, when the chair was taken apart at a dump.
Just speculating, of course.
If any of these edicts were actually real and not theater for the masses while the globalists do whatever they want to do, they would've been subject to exactly these lawsuits / challenges by now. "non compos mentis" should have serious policy ramifications.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/who-was-true-executive-of-biden-admin
There are a few interviews with a former dem supporter/insider named Lindy Li who offers up a few names of people involved. I'm sorry I have no links, but a search at You Tube will find a few.
I knew in 2019 Biden was demented! If I knew, almost everyone knew or at least suspected!
I have seen assertions that the intel boys have played at this for a long time. Jack Ruby perhaps the most famous. It’s impossible to confirm but would you really put it past them?
Given the current ongoing drama here, I'd say no.
Swedish journalist-activist with an Antifa-background and ties to PKK is arrested in Turkey.
New Swedish National security advisor is appointed and resigns within 12 hours after someone leaked his Grindr-profile and private pictures (hard-core homosexual DSM-stuff) to media and state dep.
Day after that two senior Foreign Office employees, both homsexuals (one a kurd), are arrested by State Security Police, charges of espionage for foreign powers.
Day after arrests, both are released. One of them is found dead from suicide within hours of his release.
Day after that, Turkey abbounces they'll be releasing the Swedish journalist.
Our minister of state commented on it by saying it's all coincidental.
Riiight...
Your story about the chair would be more credible if a source was cited.
If I had a definite source, I would have included it.
Best I can do is tell you the information was broadcast in the mid-1990s by Swedish state radio in an interview with a senior intelligence officer from the Swedish military, on how the KGB operated/operates.
Take the jab they said.
It's perfectly safe they said.
You won't get covid they said.
It does not change your DNA they said.
It doesn't affect your immune system they said.
We're all in this together they said.
It stays at the injection site, does its 'magic,' and somehow disappears, they said.
Yes, and the spike protein is harmless.
If Biden's cancer is turbo cancer from the jabs, we, including he, are all in this together.
Not deplorable me.
I'm part of the control group.
Me too! No vax. No covid. Spike virgin. Beautiful Pristine Patriot!
Glad to hear it. Only became conscious in April 2021 after my second and last jab.
Alex Berenson's money quote on this: "As with Covid, the propaganda is not so much Orwellian in its ferocity and effort to intimidae as late-Soviet in its contempt for the intelligence of its audience. We have gone from kids will be fine without in-person schooling and mRNA is a miracle cure to a man with unlimited access to the world’s best medical care wound up with cancer in his bones before anyone noticed."
I very much doubt medical neglect had anything to do with this--he was obviously highly monitored in order to maintain the facade of being "with it." Even if, as many have said, he didn't receive the care for Parkinson's that he should have in order to avoid some of the side effects that would make him look bad in public, there's a difference between not diagnosing and monitoring something and ignoring what you're told to do when you are diagnosed and monitored. He had frequent checkups. His family's prioritizing "looking like the president" over health has nothing to do with that.
That said, his saying he had cancer in 2022 means nothing. This is a pathological liar who has claimed all sorts of things over the years, and one with dementia on top of that. He might have meant it. But his saying it means nothing.
we don’t know very much about the specifics of biden’s medical care at all. the annual physicals are the best-covered, and even those are discussed in summary.
Alex Berenson did report that a neurologist made multiple—maybe around 10–visits to the White House. The public was never told what was going on.
Also, just think about how many men and trans Admirals were unable to get their prostates checked for the years medical “care” was reserved for Covid. Biden didn’t have that excuse.
QUOTE: neurologist made ... 10–visits to the White House
---
Xenozoic brain cell transplant/exchange. Hamster cells to Joe, Joe's cells to hamster. Sadly, hamster died of neurological complications.
That's true, as far as what is said publicly. But the president and congress have the best healthcare in the country, I very much doubt he could have functioned this long without availing himself of it. Is it possible that he got no care? I suppose. But I really doubt it.
by hersh’s account, biden‘s family and advisers kept him isolated even from friends and acquaintances. they were a small group of 7-10 people, who were managing biden and basically ruling on his behalf. they needed to prevent any kind of dementia diagnosis becoming known, which in itself would require careful management and likely limitation of Biden’s medical care. and now imagine there’s blood work suggesting Biden has cancer - they’re done for if they don’t make it go away. Biden himself is totally in their control and confused half the time, remember.
I don't agree. But unless someone talks, we won't know.
Here's what "Lu in Alaska," a nurse, wrote about it on Twitter:
"Yes the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES with a code to nuke the entire planet following him around 24/7 typically does get PRETTY THOROUGH MEDICAL CARE. I’ve only seen 8 million PSA screenings in the last 16 years of trench work in healthcare. Usually advanced cancer doesn’t spring up and surprise the most powerful man on the damn planet? Why? Omg let me spell this out. His health is a global security concern. His health determines his ability to NOT ACCIDENTALLY GET US ALL KILLED. These sheep want us to believe the sitting president who was considering running again (with a dire family history of cancer) was sitting in his underpants on the crinkly paper at his Dr’s office and they said you know what let’s just do minimal testing and see what happens. GTFO."
Sadly, after Covid and how they acted en masse, what anyone in the medical professions say is routine, science, a matter of integrity and so on, cannot be trusted in the slightest.
> a small group of 7-10 people, who were managing biden
> and basically ruling on his behalf
Ample cause for a widespread campaign of lawsuits etc. against every autopen-signed executive order. Make them *prove* to the satisfaction of a jury that Biden had any knowledge and assent to the things being signed on his behalf.
That includes bills pass by Congress, too, if there were any signed by autopen.
QUOTE: ... a widespread campaign of lawsuits etc. against every autopen-signed executive order ...
---
Do you know where babies come from?
Do you know where judges come from?
The showstopper is that the burden of proof is not on Biden to show he was sane, but on the complainants to show he was not. And worse, you have to show it for each individual day he did one of things you object to.
'the best healthcare'
Considering that some credible estimates of iatrogenic deaths stand at 30%, 'best healthcare' could be as meaningless a phrase as 'healthy diet'.
As I understand it he also did not have a visitor list at his Delaware home. Any number of doctors could’ve visited him there.
This announcement that BIden has cancer did not actually state when it was discovered. It is hard to believe that, no matter how controlled, physicians would have skipped a regular test for prostate cancer, which is standard for men Biden's age.
Co-regents are frequently adversaries too. Jill and Hunter despise one another and she was only able to provide her husband with a daughter (who she may have allowed to be molested) and not a son to dethrone another woman's preferred offspring. Others within the inner circle were likely partisans of Jill or of Hunter but not so much of both. No one could trust anyone else with the secret. The doctor was of course compromised by his business deals with the Biden family so keeping his mouth shut was not a problem.
I myself in such situations (and all others too) always just hope for justice and it's not up to me how that may eventually manifest. I'd rather get to see it of course. Not as much fun when the Cosmos handles it privately.
The evil machinations of those ‘regents’ - it almost beggars belief.
I personally think he had it before he ran for 2020. It progresses slowly, so when he “won”, he rejected PSA tests from Walter Reed. That alone was a huge red flag. You can reject to test for PSA after you turn 70 (the former assumption was it would progress so slowly you would outlive this type of cancer, surprise, that has changed now). Of course, I can only presume that every former President has gotten a PSA test every year since the development of the test- it beggars belief to think anyone said no to that test. Then he went to Delaware for treatment, it explains his heavy presence there, he might have even undergone chemo and other taxing treatments which would have, of course, had even greater effects on his declining cognitive state. It sure explains a lot. Little did he know that every further jab he got of mRNA was a further p53 suppressor, making it advance further and more quickly.
News segment yesterday Dr. Siegal confirmed that medical reports from WH doctors showed Obama and GWB both took PSA tests. Highlighting your point about Biden being an outlier.
Yep, chemo brain is a thing and it makes sense.
I wonder how Kamala feels about this?
Actually, I don't think we need to wonder...
Scenario a - Joe doesn't drop out and somehow (very very doubtfully but anything is posssible) wins last november..., she would be president now (or very very soon.)
Scenario b - Joe announces he has cancer last late spring (it seems he definitely had it then) and announces hee cannot do a second term because of cancer...and not because he has dementia. That plays very very different - he can go out head held high ('tragically prevented from serving a second term', etc. as opposed ot getting ditched by his own party because he was mental) and then a mini primary thingy can happen, a procccess Kamala would be definitely the front runner (i don't think Joe would have annointed her.) she proves her campiagn-ish metal, there are no quesitons about how sordid the process was and - while still would still probably lose - it would have been much much more competitve (sympathy vote, she how she iss stepping up, etc.) and could even have kept the 2028 door open a crack.
Scenario c - even well before the debate, joe announces the cancer and the party puts together an internal primary vote system (tehncially they could) and/or combined with declaring free any biden delegates already elected - again, kamala has the advantage and again is doesn't look like the skeeviest political move since, well, either yesterday or forever.
for the democrats, joe biden is the gift that keeps on taking.
I actually think that Harris's late candidacy was a huge benefit to her. She's so terrible, the more exposure people have, the worse they think of her. Had she been in the race for longer, she would have done much worse.
One quasi conspiracy theory that I'll never stop believing is that Kamala was a sacrificial lamb, a back bencher who lucked into enough name recognition that she was plausible as a real life candidate but that the DNC gave her the nomination because they knew there was no chance that any Dem could win in 24 and they didn't want to saddle one of their A listers with a humiliating defeat. To put it bluntly, no sane person could have thought that Kamala and waltz ever had a chance
That's very plausible.
Also plausible is that the Democrats were so into their own Kool-Aid that they actually thought that pair had a chance.
Also a serious possibility, though exactly whom the "A Listers" were then and/or are now seems nebulous. There's gavin and then there's, um, pete with a beard, and, um, aox (typo intended,) wretching gritmer, staff clobberchar, and, um...
of course there is always oprah and michelle...
Do the Dems HAVE any bona fide A-listers?
no
Eh they have some governors that can string together a sentence
Well then there were plenty of insane people around. Although probably not the top level. There had to be a group (the ones really running the regency) who knew exactly what was up.
This doesn‘t have to be and probably wasn’t a conspiracy. Sharks like Newsome or Shapiro got to where they are by having a keen sense of political opportunity. They likely made the decision not to burn their powder where it could not achieve anything and wait at least until 2028 for their bid for the White House.
Tangential comment: I remember being totally shocked at how thoroughly and suddenly my progressive friends at our weekly croquet match were singing the praises of Kamala, who previously had been pretty much ignored by all. It was a breathtaking example of propaganda effectiveness.
in the media your friends consume, she went from ticketdragging wine mom dolt to goddess in about 3.7 seconds
Yep.
Intellectual blindness! But millions like this! Unfortunately
It was a startling and sad commentary on human nature. We are apparently herd animals.
One must understand that she had many Democratic critics the day before she was anointed, but as soon as she was anointed, it became an article of faith amongst Democrats that she was an outstanding candidate. It was bizarre to see from within the US. I can only imagine how it appeared abroad.
With the exception of Obama, who withheld his endorsement for long enough to cause the DNC much embarrassment.
It's generally assumed that he was the head what we might call Biden's regency committee, but his dissent here seems to indicate that he was out of the loop when Biden's candidacy was replaced by Harris's.
We had no brave reporters willing to dig into the factions of the Democratic Party. Hints emerged that the Clintons and the Obamas have been at odds at various points. Was there a power struggle inside the regency? It’s like the Kremlinology of the Soviet era. The Biden regime was that opaque.
'She's so terrible, the more exposure people have, the worse they think of her.'
And, just like them keeping Joe under wraps (for which Covid was a huge gift, allowing him to hide in his basement), Kamala's public appearances and interviews were severely limited because she usually came across as a total idiot.
What I wouldn't have given to have seen her for two hours with Joe Rogan.
there is definitely more than an element of truth to that so maybe she doesn't end up with it...but it still must gall her to no end, the what might have beens
i think we will see exactly what people think of her if she runs for cal gov - shee got fewer votes than either biden or hilary in her home state and she came within a smiddgen/foot in mouth gaffe by her opponent in her AG's race of losng that bid
in other words, those who know her work are less likely to vote for her which does not bode terribly well
i don't see the point of her running for anything beyond ego - take the board of director seaats, the speaking gigs (well, maybe not those) and live off your awful husbands cash - from now on. as a former elected (local) i completely understand the siren song pull of running, but i don't think she has a "glide path" to cal gov and that loss would be even worse than nixon's
true, the state votes 53.7% for the worst dem candidates, 57% for the less egregious, but with more recent trends showing a statwide backing away from the progressive stuff harris stands for so it could be close
and if she does run and pulls it off with 51%, the sharks will be out...
ps - sorry about the typospsypooss
I lived in CA ~20 years ago and remember even then she was considered to be pretty crap as a politician. Even though I wasn't voting for awhile, I remember groaning when they put her as VP next to Biden. Unless there is shennanigans (possible, it is the D's) I don't think she will make it past a primary process. The the CA dems have too many fresh faces that haven't been observed performing drunken rants on national TV to put 'wine box auntie' out in front of the public again.
Apparently the thought was that Biden would run and win and then step aside so that the Vice President could assume the office, generating great excitement on the basis of racial and sexual characteristics. She is extremely dumb and while at one time she was well spoken, she no longer is. She slightly slurs her speech and uptalks frequently.
Nonetheless, the Harris candidacy offered an opportunity to burn through billions and it appears that Biden kept it up after she lost.
Always thinking of the people that they serve.
An “Opaque Politburo” was governing the Joe Biden™️ White House according to James Howard Kunstler. It has an ominous sound to it that I thought was quite appropriate
I don't know if he has cancer or not. That's how much I don't believe anything they say or anything in the media, especially anything connected to Biden.
I don't know if they are saying he has cancer because he has cancer, or to keep him from being prosecuted for something, or because the tapes are out, or because they think he will die soon from something else.
If he does have cancer, I don't know if he had it all along or if it's jab turbo cancer.
I think that's an excellent summation.
Interesting speculation, and the timing is definitely suspicious—my first thought was that they're distracting from the increasing attention on the cover-up of his mental state.
That said, some prostate cancers progress very rapidly. This happened with my father. First they gave him two years, then one year, then four months… and this was in 2000 or so, before the purported rise of turbo cancer* as a result of mRNA vaccinations. Pretty sure Joe had been vaccinated and boosted more than once.
Also, I've read elsewhere that the PSA test doesn't work for some varieties of prostate cancer.
So until we get more information, if we ever do, speculation can be all over the map. Let's just not let it distract from the more important issues like the coverup of his mental state.
* Members of my family, and I, believe my brother's sudden death from liver cancer was a result of the so-called vaccines – and he never even got a booster. Yes, I'm bitter and vengeful.
True my beloved uncle and godfather was diagnosed with it. I took him to lunch to try to talk him into an aggressive treatment regimen. He said “they told me that I’ll die from something old age”….
He was gone in 18 months and it was painful.
so sorry