I just spent Sunday at the Bundestag. I have to say, it was an amazing event and a very very open 'open day'. I had conversations with parliamentarians from Greens, CDU, die Linke, and AfD, as well as a very long chat with the security advisor to the FDP. I also listened to a number of panel discussions on a variety of topics.
My takeaways:
1) There is no, and I mean no, appetite to discuss SARS-2 policy sins of the past. This includes the AfD, who clearly want votes from former corona hysterics and are keen to downplay this issue politically.
2) The Greens really are as crazy as you think. One prominent MdB (congresswoman) answered my question about economic harms caused by Net Zero policies by saying, basically, that Germany should be decarbonising twice as fast. That was really the sum total of her answer.
3) On the upside, there is surprisingly balanced treatment of the AfD both by the bureaucratic administration of the Parliament and by their political peers - at least publicly. If you were to observe them without knowing the background, you would not believe this is a party on the verge of getting constitutionally banned.
4) CDU backbenchers seem to be aware of the damage they have caused Germany through de-nuclearisation and de-industrialisation policies and they have regrets. They are surprisingly honest and forthcoming about it.
5) The rhetoric on Ukraine from the FDP and CDU is Nikki-Haley-level insane (though not quite Lindsey-Graham-level insane). As someone who got to know Germany in the 1990s, it's a shocking level of propaganda-fuelled warmongering. They really don't see the problem with sending German panzers to burn on the Ukrainian steppes - a second time around.
6) the SPD had the best free ice cream and the funnest games.
Thanks for this post and the references to Larissa Fußer's reporting and the book Ausbruch.
Have you previously reviewed "Ausbruch: Innenansichten einer Pandemie - Die Corona-Protokolle", by Katja Gloger, Georg Mascolo (2021) and I missed it? Is it worth getting?
i thought about reviewing it. it is very full of curious information, and also i think very telling tidbits of misinformation. a lot of it reported very naively by journalists who don’t always understand the significance of things.
my sense is interest in lockdowns etc. is very much fading but maybe i write about it anyway.
Graham, may I ask how you received such access to so many parliamentarians? Are you based in Berlin, were you there as a journalist, or as a member of the public?
As a member of the public. It was the 'Tag der Ein- und Ausblicke'. I had super low expectations - expecting nothing more than a nice view of Berlin from the Reichstag roof terrace (this I also got - it's really nice). I was really very surprised by how much real engagement there was. There were no ministers, but plenty of backbenchers there, and they took questions from the public with no moderation.
Oh, I nearly forgot - the view of the cityscape was marred by this one building, which fans of E.'s writing could not help but associate with a notorious enemy-of-the-blog:
Astonished. Such openness, I did not expect. Can it be believed, that the German government won't suppress inquiries from a skeptical public?
Ich war erstaunt. Eine solche Offenheit habe ich nicht erwartet. Kann man glauben, dass die deutsche Regierung die Anfragen einer skeptischen Öffentlichkeit nicht unterdrücken wird?
The solution to all of this (and all corruption in government) is creating Swarms and running both businesses and governments using decentralized, transparent, and trustworthy swarming systems. Have you ever heard of Human Swarm Intelligence? Stay tuned because you are about to. https://joshketry.substack.com/p/human-swarm-intelligence-the-most
I had a look but was not all that impressed. I don't really see what is novel about this idea. Getting humans to think together and come up with solutions cooperatively is the essence of all society. How is the software any different to a flip chart in a brainstorming session? How does the software you propose fundamentally address the problems of hierarchy, self-interest and corruption any more than existing institutions?
I am also not convinced that this system of decision-making will yield outcomes that are any more coherent than if we elected a leader based on his/her abilities (sort of what representative democracy already is).
If intelligence is normally distributed, don't we want decisions to be made by the right tail, instead of by the mid point of the distribution?
Also, it feels like a sales pitch.
Also, who is the 'we' in your group? From the site, it just seems to be one guy (Josh Ketry). If transparency is your pitch, you should be transparent about who you are.
Good to see such a different take, as I found the article very interesting, and think the idea has a lot of potential. As I understand it, wouldn't the difference between this idea and a flip chart be the number of people who could be involved in producing a solution? You go from the numbers that can fit in a room or a hall, to many times more than that because the technology facilitates it, and can also process all the responses.
Also, I'm not sure our elected leaders have any abilities outside of the capacity to get themselves elected and hang onto their position despite all indications that most of them should never be allowed anywhere near the levers of power. When I look at the current crop in the UK Parliament, I wonder how such self serving idiots ever managed to claw their way into that building. There are notable exceptions, but I wouldn't leave most of them running a jumble sale, never mind a country. (If they are running it, that is.)
I see what you mean. Certainly the tech allows you to scale up the solutions.
As regards the abilities of our elected reps, I can only agree with you. The system is certainly failing, I just wonder though how this tech addresses the inherent fragility of systems. After all, if special interests can capture the elected reps, surely they will have an easier time capturing the gatekeepers of the swarm?
But maybe there is something there that I missed. I'll go and read it again.
Maybe there is a way, or the intention at least, of not having gatekeepers? I do wonder about how to implement solutions that are derived by this process too.
NO ONE should have taken the God forsaken injection in the first place. You cannot fix gullible—it has to fix itself. Pain and failure are the best teachers, but no one wants to be their student. The problem with these injections, however, is that you cannot learn from your mistakes if you are dead.
So regarding that warp speed COVID vaccine…
Rushed, guaranteed to succeed, corruptly tested, experimental injection? ✓
That killed and maimed well-over a thousand people during the severely abbreviated trial phase? ✓
And also caused 23 spontaneous abortions and 75 serious clinical events from 270 expectant mothers during said trial? ✓
Using a highly dangerous mRNA tech that in the past killed every mouse with ADE? ✓
A tech previously untested on humans, the emergency usage of which upended over a century of vaccine safety and efficacy research? ✓
For a virus far less deadly than the lockdowns themselves? ✓
Also less deadly than the flu - which conveniently went AWOL when COVID hit the scene? ✓
For a (cold) virus they’ve been unable to cure after over a century of trying? ✓
But somehow all of a sudden, the criminal pharmaceutical companies - notorious for rampant felonious trial fraud - figured it out in less than a year? ✓
And then went on to manufacture billions of quality assured, safe and effective doses at record speed which were then lawfully distributed by the US military? ✓
People actually bought into this on a grand scale, and voluntarily injected this poison? ✓
The information above is what everyone in the first world had access to - either before the injection was unleashed on the public or shortly thereafter with the release of the Pfizer trial adverse event data (which they tried to hide for 55 years) - and yet many still eagerly lined up and took it in droves.
The myriad of egregious problems associated with the COVID injections were as clear as day, easily accessible, self-evident, went against any and all rational thought, could not stand up to ANY scrutiny, and yet all of that still didn't matter.
This is the power of fear. It suspends all logic based on facts. This is why the technocrats and media so carefully cultivated fear and panic during the “pandemic.”
Partly fear, yes, but also a population that doesn't regularly think critically. Thinking that only an 'expert' can make an informed decision, people don't use the information available to them. It's much easier to let someone else think for you especially with the media blasting the same message everywhere.
I'm all for people doing their own research, but evaluating the credibility of your sources is a skill that must be learned. This is too much work for a lot of people.
True but it's essential to do that work or we are doomed to herd behavior. Critical thinking is imperative because of the technocrats taking over public forums.
Yeah, I don't think it was entirely fear. I'm pretty sure many of the people I knew who jumped on the bandwagon were no more afraid of covid than I was.
It's not just lack of critical thinking ability either. Many were highly intelligent, who showed excellent critical thinking in most other areas.
It was mostly trust in public authority, and politics. Most folks just can't believe that media and government are as corrupt as they are, or that the seeming consensus of all their peers may be no better founded than their own weak decision to follow that consensus and contribute to it. As soon as they got on board, it was an easy ego boost to virtue-signal their public devotion to the cause, and take shots at their political enemies while doing so.
Once they did that, they couldn't back out, because their personal and political credibility was at stake.
The word ‘expert’ has been misused and abused to the point where it has become meaningless. As has happened with many other words (science, as one other example).
Yet again I must protest in defence of myself and many others. In my country and others Phyzer’s clinical trial data wasn’t released until it was way too late long after the initial two shots were made available. There are many people, parents especially who are kept fully occupied by keeping food on the table and a roof over their family’s heads who had and still have relatively little downtime to peruse the Internet for research. Secondly I am sure I was not the only one with a very vulnerable aged parent living in a nursing home whom I was responsible for and who I felt it was my duty to protect.
I disagree all you listed was fully made available in time to dissuade people and even if it was everyone wouldn’t know where to look to even find it and if they did, how would they know if it was real or misinformation or disinformation which the Internet provides plenty of both? It was a terrifying time and it’s so easy to look back now with the benefit of hindsight and judge people. What service does this provide? How does it help anyone now? All I hear from your opinion is judgement and criticism and a healthy sense of superiority and I want to know how do you think that this helps anyone now? The answer is it doesn’t. The only fault that I can see the people of the West were guilty of was in the trusting of their own governments apart from the covid fanatics.
It's ok to admit to not having been informed, to not having had time to research, for even being trusting of authority. Those are strategies or traits or circumstances which can only really harm yourself (if what you trusted ended up being bad for you). Being trusting is not a crime, even if it's not necessarily good for you. What galls me and many others like me, is that many who took that route chose to be rabidly vicious and turn on the likes of us. For making the time to be informed (I barely slept for months). For being healthily sceptical. For simply making our own personal choices over our own health and bodies and managing our fears, if we had them, the way we saw fit. They joined in the bloodlust and bloodletting and scapegoating. Hounding people out of jobs, public life, shops, gatherings, family events. They inflicted a different type of fear on us. We faced having to choose between making our living and feeding our families. We faced broken partnerships and marriages. They broke up families. They forced us, or tried, to do something that we knew was not just ineffectual and unnecessary - but likely dangerous. They harangued and gloated and pontificated and admonished and condescended and threatened. They loved it. Savoured it with sanctimonious righteousness. Called us conspiracy theorists, right-wingers, Trump-lovers, anti-vaxxers. It was pack mentality. They lost their heads. Not us.
So don't worry. If you did none of that, we're good. No need to explain yourself for your own choices. But if you did, perhaps take some pause.
Yeah I did none of that, I instead hated my government for using identity politics initially shortly after coming to power to separate and divide us long before covid appeared.After covid appeared our prime minister began with the targeting which worsened to the actual persecution of the unvaccinated. Deep in my gut everything you mention that the sanctimonious vaccinated did and said about the unvaccinated scared the living crap out of me! Their hatred was a very scary thing to witness from strangers then firsthand from some not immediate family members and from a person I had felt very close to for many years. The persecution of the unvaccinated was eerily familiar to my German mother’s stories about how the Jewish people were treated initially and then how they suddenly just seemed to disappear overnight. That was the sick feeling in my gut I couldn’t explain at the time.
My husband and I identified with the unvaccinated from the very beginning and we were also called conspiracy theorists. My entire lifetime has been good I’m in my 60’s so I trusted in our government, why wouldn’t I?
There has to be some sort of accountability and some form of justice served for this persecution. I pray it happens eventually even if not in my lifetime. We need for it to happen in order for all the unvaccinated who were treated so unjustly and reprehensibly and who were so persecuted to be able to move past it, I know that full well.
In hindsight I’ve been very blessed to have lived a good life so I didn’t need to be informed about all the crap but Covid changed all that in an instant and my rose coloured spectacles have been removed forever. The world is ugly and I’m really really glad I didn’t see it for most of my life.
We're good then, Sonya. My spouse is one who, when it comes to medicine, implicitly trusts the government. And the scientists who inform the government. Me, not so much. In fact, not at all. Mandates and one coerced jab later to keep my job and try save my marriage, and they all have my undying contempt forever. My tiny supply of forgiveness has been spent on my unrepentant husband. That's it. The rest will get my fury. If they coerced, in any way whatsoever, they're dead to me. Eugyppius has been one of the golden ones, throughout. His sharp, analytical analyses have been a godsend. And his unrelenting stance and contempt for the Coercers is exactly what the likes of people like myself have needed to survive this ordeal.
Well I’m so glad we’re good then Ann. I certainly can’t be the only one who was sickened and repulsed by the persecution you all endured so all I ask is please don’t lump us all together as that is also an injustice and it really hurts. It is infuriating that now the Coercers are denying it and trying to rewrite history by saying they never forced anyone to get the jab! Threatening job loss and following through with it was most definitely using force to get people to comply! I’m so glad you were able to find a tiny supply of forgiveness for your husband but I think your feelings are fully justified and reasonable even under the circumstances.
I just wanted for you to know that not everyone who got vaccinated behaved like a beast and in an atrocious manner and that I am in full support of your fury for all those that did, all the Coercers and all the people who got vaccinated and turned into crazed fanatical lunatics. I didn’t find Eugyppius til much more recently and wish I’d found him sooner but once I found Substack I too have benefited greatly and have found lots of support for my views and feelings because I identify with you yet got vaccinated. I felt very isolated and alone during the pandemic too, saw all of the wrongs and injustices being done to the unvaxxed and we were outraged by it yet we were powerless to do anything about it. We got the initial two jabs due to our nurse daughter’s insistence on it as we were in the high risk category due to our age and she didn’t want to lose us and we figured she knew better being a registered nurse. We had to agree to just disagree afterwards as we had completely opposing views on all of it so likewise caused lots of friction in our family with 3 grownup millennials and she is the eldest, the smartest and the most educated person in our family… go figure hey?
I don't know what country you are in but I am 63 now and had witnessed the degradation of society over that period of time. The corruption of government here in the UK seemed obvious to me and so I was immediately suspicious.
What I did not realise was how bad the NHS had become so accepted a diagnosis of cancer from the doctors in early 2020. I had immuno-therapy as a consequence until Sept 2020 when I understood at last what had really caused my facial palsy and other symptoms.
I now do not trust mainstream doctors at all and understand more about disease than they do which I never thought I could ever state.
Anyway, I had no vaccines, never wore the face nappy but got poisoned by another route. Nevertheless if I hadn't I would not have understood all that I do now so I am eternally grateful.
Yes I had been noticing how the political correctness was ever increasing in Canada and was choking off free speech since 2009-2010 and encouraging self censorship in our country. Also the identity politics our prime minister began using almost immediately in 2015 when he came to power.
But nothing nothing nothing prepared me for the covid pandemic with its restrictions and mandates and how brutally they would be enforced.
Well said! I suppose it helps if you start from a position of mistrust of BigPharma and knowledge that Pfizer were fined $2.3 billion - partly for fraud. Kind of sets one wondering!
I understand how you feel. I also realized that many people had lots on their plates and felt that they had no time for research. I also understand that those of us in the west grew up with the impression that our governments can be trusted.
About 15 years ago I had a cancer diagnosis. I had a manufacturing business at the time which meant I worked a 55+ hour work week in addition to family responsibilities.
With the diagnosis, I basically barircaded myself in my office for a few days so I could read everything I could about my cancer; yes I shrugged other responsibilities but if I'm dead, I can't run a business or take care of a family anyway.
I hope you've learned that you have to take care of yourself first, then your family then the rest comes after that.
Medical journals are good sources of information even though they are being corrupted. The articles can be hard to read for the lay person but you can learn.
Sometimes the abstract is enough. Some articles are free access, some are paywalled. I spent a few hundred dollars purchasing articles that I deemed very pertinent to my cancer. I can tell you that my research paid off especially since I'm cancer free 15 years later.
The experience taught me to do my own research...always.
Yes, do your own research (as one ought)...but sadly, it was in an internet environment where much of the truth was being suppressed...and still is. It was like taking a brisk walk through a minefield...
I usuallly relied on the BMJ (British Medical Journal) and British covid statistics. They were the best I could come accross, especially the BMJ. One of the editiors was critical of the shots and that helped me a lot.
I usually read zerohedge.com, a financial news site. Their reporting on covid got them censored a fair bit so that should tell you a lot. I especially make sure to read comments people make to even MSM news websites. Someone always provides a good link to further info.
Dr. Byram Bridle is a viral immunologist specializing in vaccinations. He is an absolutely GREAT source of information as well as a great writer and has been very anti narrative. His life was turned upside down because of his views; he writes on substack, no paywall. I'm a paying subscriber to help him out:
Thank you so much Vanda! Funny you should mention the BMJ as I follow Dr. John Campbell from Britain and he is a dear and also a wealth of information on covid and the vaccines and the vaccine death rates. Amazingly he is still allowed on YouTube!🤞
He provides only qualified good medical studies and accompanying graphs from various countries around the world about covid, the vaccine release dates and medical graphs charting the results from so many different countries all over the world with mostly all except Sweden showing a sharp 90 degree increase in sudden deaths and injuries upon both initial vaccine release dates. He uses the BMJ too. I’ll check out Dr. Bridle too. Appreciate your own personal sources you use thanks!
Check out Dr. Makis on Covid Intel on Substack he is behind a paywall but he is providing all the vaxx injuries and sudden deaths occurring around the world and has been at it for a few years now. It’s really grim.
This might interest you. I had a cancer diagnosis. I got to the answers but not until I had some immuno-therapy which should be avoided. It may not be as toxic and the chemo but still pointless.
Congrats on 15 years! Well if I survive the first two jabs I will never trust my government ever again that’s for sure nor take anything at face value. I am the most worried about my kids tho, I’d rather die from the jab and they be ok.🙏
I’m just as angry about what’s being done to the vaccinated now.. there’s no winners except for whoever is pulling the strings. First the unvaccinated were persecuted now the vaccinated are being murdered. The goal is to turn us against each other.
The mRNA covid vaccines are still killing the vaccinated daily, in 2022 the number of sudden deaths even increased dramatically from 2021 showing anyone vaccinated is like a ticking time bomb and tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of the vaccinated have now “died suddenly” all over the world and are still dying suddenly every single day so many young, it’s so very grim. I follow Dr. Makis on Covid Intel on Substack.
I hear you, Sonya. Nobody likes a smug braggart. Commenters who do this on Substack need to knock it off; it merely divides us (we’ve got plenty of other forces trying to do that, after all). Each of us figured out things at different points in time, for a number of reasons. I’m either ignoring those folks who insult others who didn’t recognize what was going on from the outset, or I am responding to them and calling them out for their obnoxiousness. It’s so counter-productive.
Well said, Cathleen!! Those are all of my sentiments exactly. Let’s support one another instead of finding faults and judging because it is exactly that we each figured out things at different points in time and for a number of reasons! Thank you!!!!
I understand what you are saying. I am 72 but fortunately, here in South Africa, I had children that already did not believe the government, as you can understand, and they put me on the trail. My one son was in South Africa and the other in Germany so I was at an advantage, but I hear you as I had to listen to it all
Don't protest in defense of yourself. Absolutely, you were a victim, but that doesn't mean you couldn't have applied better due diligence up front.
Consider, for just one aspect, how much apocalyptic doom - modeling has accompanied so many previous health "crisis" scenarios--mad cow, Ebola, MERS, over and over and over again vast numbers of casualties predicted, and it never actually coming to pass.
That alone was enough for me to conclude that COVID was likely no different.
Oh, and also -- videos of Chinese people collapsing in the street, from a respiratory infection? Didn't that set off you BS detector even a little bit?
Soooo you didn’t get vaccinated sooo that’s all you have to do to fight the deep state?! Really??? No more??? I don’t know why you’re so proud of it and why you seem to have such a problem with people who did, what does it matter to you anyway?
The truth is it isn’t a black and white issue as you’d so like to make it as we are all individuals living different lives so we were all red pilled at different points in time by being exposed to different things at different times.
Btw I don’t think of myself as a “victim” and if it’s my time to die then I’ve lived a good life. I don’t want to live in the globalist WEF UN WHO hellish gulag future that is planned for us anyway.
who knew that a chart of vaccine safety (x-axis: risk; y-axis: reported adverse events) would work like the laffer curve?
a jab that causes no events yields no reports and looks safe, as the vaccine gets more dangerous reports rise, until the point the huge number of reports can no longer be processed and then it looks safe again.
And this is a long-running theme in medicine. Anyone ever tried looking into the infant serum levels that result from medications used for decades during labor? Yawn. Info doesn't exist. Not that we need to bother doing the very simple tests for any of that. The common line among perinatologists is simply to claim that this medication does not transfer to the baby.
Spoiler: it does, and according to cell experiments it changes the developing brain cells. Which one might theoretically observe if a society had any issue in recent decades with abnormal brain functions.
Medical science (and other sciences as well) always had the problem to be only aware of what can be measured easily. And also: what gets money from grants and industry to be measure.
Corona was a very clear demonstration of the medical practice: "absence of evidence is evidence of absence".
First it was postulated, without any good studies: the vaccines stop infection, stop hospitalization, stop grave outcomes, stop transmission, and are safe. So everyone should be vacced.
Then the first studies rolled in, and now it was: ok, it does not stop infection, but it surely it does stop hospitalization, stops grave outcomes, stops transmission, and is safe. So everyone should be vacced.
After a few months and further studies: ok, it does not stop infection, and it does not stop transmission, but it surely does stop hospitalization, and stops grave outcomes, and is safe. So everyone should be vacced.
After a few more months and even further studies: ok, it does not stop infection, and it does not stop transmission, and it does not stop hospitalization, but it surely stops grave outcomes, and it is safe. So everyone should be vacced.
Now we are at: ok, it does not stop infection, and it does not stop transmission, and it does not stop hospitalization, and it does not stops grave outcomes, and it is not safe.
But of course, everyone should still be vacced, Because by now we said it so often and so loudly, that it does not need to be proven anymore. It has become self-evident.
And have simply ignored all the harms and deaths - we’re too busy and there’s too much. Maybe it will all go away if we just don’t look.
THEY WILL LOOK FOR OUR GRANDCHILDREN’S SAKE, AND THE REST OF THE WORLD’S. THEY WILL LOOK AT WHAT THEY HAVE DONE AND ARE STILL DOING. THEY MUST BE ACCOUNTABLE. We must not stop.
I recall having my Austrian neighbors over for dinner one night and him just casually mentioning that he mandated all his employees get the jab (he runs some dumb healthcare app). He said it with the same tone one would use to say that it's looking like it'll rain tomorrow. There is a certain slavishness to people against which the United States used to act as a bulwark—within memory, his attitude would have been regarded as distinctly and offensively anti-American. I fear that we too are succumbing to the long dark night of communalism, safetyism, and matriarchal tyranny. It may be already too late. And yet a greater part of me is hopeful that at the next opportunity the Spirit of '76 can show itself once again. We'll see.
I would have agreed with you about Americans, back in 2019. No more. Not all, but a hefty majority of the Americans I know who could natter on about how awful the Germans were back when, well, they all took 3-5 jabs and in 2021-2022 were fine as pie with mandates and with vaxx passports, too. It has been for me, well, I have to say, a revelation.
The hardest part of the last few years has been the awful realization that the majority of my countrymen are not just people with whom I might disagree, but rather my actual enemies who wish me harm.
Depends on your neighborhood. For example, if you live anywhere near a university it can get Kool-Aid-y, even in red states. That said, some states, such as FL and TX, have passed some impressive legislation to protect some degree of medical freedom. The immortal words of Davy Crockett often come to mind... “You may all go to hell and I will go to Texas.”
Thanks for this. Alas, there are plenty of Americans to put your Austrian neighbor to the test as to who wins the "Govern Me Harder Daddy" Kool-Aid glugging contest. Here's a prime example:
NY State senator John Liu doesn’t care about thousands of NYC teachers who lost their jobs
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: This was filmed by Chris in a public park.
TRANSCRIPT
CHRIS: Senator Liu, hi how you doing?
JOHN LIU: Hi.
CHRIS: My name's Chris.
JOHN LIU: Chris?
CHRIS: I have a question for you.
JOHN LIU: Yeah, what's happening?
CHRIS: Um, so you are the chairperson of the Senate Committee on New York City Education.
JOHN LIU: Yes.
CHRIS: Is that correct? OK.
JOHN LIU: Yes. And I'm also a member of the Education Committee itself.
CHRIS: Fantastic.
JOHN LIU: The education committee gets, it's like really bogged down with issues in Watertown and—
CHRIS: Hmm hmmm.
JOHN LIU: — Buffalo.
CHRIS: OK.
JOHN LIU: Rochester.
CHRIS: Here we are in New York City, we're in Queens right now. So my question is, so far 965 New York City teachers have been fired for not getting the vaccine.
JOHN LIU: Yeah.
CHRIS: And on September 6 that number's going to go up by probably a couple of thousand because—
JOHN LIU: Yeah.
CHRIS: — people signed up for the leave without pay options. So how do you feel about the fact that thousands of New York City teachers are, have have lost and will lose their jobs for not getting the vaccine?
JOHN LIU: Just get the vaccine.
CHRIS: Just get the vaccine?
JOHN LIU: Just get the vaccine. [stepping back, away from Chris]
CHRIS: You don't believe that people have the right to—
JOHN LIU [coming close, shaking fist, shouting into the camera]: Just get the vaccine! Get vaxed and boosted! [turns his back and starts to walk away]
CHRIS: So the vaccine doesn't work because Eric Adams* got covid, President Biden got covid—
JOHN LIU: Listen.
CHRIS: They've all been double vaxed and—
JOHN LIU: Listen, get the vax and do do do us all a favor, tell your colleagues to get vaccinated.
CHRIS: So—
JOHN LIU: That's important. [turns his back again and continues walking away]
CHRIS: — people don't have the right to do what they want with their own body? So I've got you on record saying that, in the land of the free people don't have the right to do that.
JOHN LIU: Sir, you can, you can spout out as much nonsense as you want.
CHRIS: That's not nonsense.
JOHN LIU: Absolutely.
CHRIS: That's not nonsense. The vaccines—
JOHN LIU: The Center for Disease Control, the Department of Health, they all say get vaxed.
CHRIS: And the FDA approved it, the FDA also approved oxycontin for kids.
JOHN LIU: [addressing white-haired man, who appears standing to the right]: Are you vaccinated, sir?
WHITE-HAIRED MAN: Yes, I am.
JOHN LIU [addressing white haired man]: Thank you very much. Thank you because everybody has the right to do—
CHRIS: The FDA approved oxycontin for children.
JOHN LIU: — what they want with their body but they do not have a right to infect everybody else. [to white-haired man]: Thank you very much. [turns back to Chris and continues walking away]
WHITE-HAIRED MAN [to John Liu]: [inaudible]
CHRIS: And people who got the vaccine are infecting other people.
WHITE-HAIRED MAN [addressing John Liu]: Um, I wanted to ask you, um—
CHRIS: I got you on the record.
JOHN LIU [waving at camera]: Thank you!
CHRIS: Got you on the record.
JOHN LIU [smiling and waving at Chris's camera] Thank you! Hello everyone!
CHRIS: People do not have, according to Senator Liu, people do not have the right—
JOHN LIU [still waving at camera, but turning away, to the white-haired man]: Thank you.
CHRIS: — to do what they want with their own bodies. OK.
WHITE-HAIRED MAN [looking at Chris' camera] Alright. [turning his back then, and beginning conversation with John Liu]
CHRIS: OK, they must get an experimental vaccine.
WHITE-HAIRED MAN [addressing John Liu]: Alright, so anyway [inaudible]
CHRIS: Run away. A typical politician running away.
WHITE-HAIRED MAN: [inaudible]
JOHN LIU [to white-haired man]: Yeah, yeah, of course I remember—
I sincerely supported John Liu when he ran for mayor. I really had no idea what people would be like once totalitarianism was no longer just black & white pictures in the history books
I criticise quakcine effectiveness: you are not an expert on this topic
Government gives the power to any employer to mandate the quakcine. So a carpenter can mandate the concoction to his employees: fineee this looks legit.
Jessica Rose with all her degrees and covid restricted travel, jumped into the VARS data and exposed the many adverse events. One example: she wrote a paper with Peter McCullough arguing against teen vaccination which was peer reviewed before the US began teen vaccination -- paper sidelined, and the US went ahead.
The denial of early treatment with off the shelf drugs had to be done in order to shield Big Pharma from liability because, they claimed, NO alternatives were available. Then the agencies got mRNA into childhood schedule of vaccines which makes them free of liability.
Recently, the CDC said that they will stop collecting adverse event data about the mRNA
Is the German data publicly available that someone like Jessica Rose could do the work that the agencies are unable to do?
"There is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number
What originally got my attention was the tinfoil hat crowd screaming about lots being intentionally distributed to certain people to kill them — in other words certain Covid-19 vaccine lots were for all intents and purposes poisoned. That was wildly unlikely so I set out to disprove it and apply some broom handles to the tinfoil hatters heads. What I found, however, was both interesting and deeply disturbing:"
I heard early on that the various lots were distributed to various parts of the country in Canada. A red flag was raised but I heard no more about this.
How about the Pfizer Australia execs getting grilled by Rennick admitting that Pfizer employees got a separate batch from the general population? Another fact that looks as good as Pfizer trying to hide their study data for 75 years.
A great follow up question for Rennick would have been to ask if anyone outside of the company got their vaccine from Pfizer's batch, like politicians or public health authorities.
Governments aren't that good at big data tech outside of intelligence agencies (where at least in the USA and UK they're very good at it).
That said, these are not by any means 'big data' problems. We're talking on the order of millions of records here. That can be processed six ways from Sunday on my laptop. They just don't want to do it and/or don't know how to automate anything.
They might not know how to automate anything because the intelligence agencies have snapped up all the brainy types. But I think it's more likely they just don't want to do it.
Even more frightening is the fact that this pattern has occurred in lockstep in developed countries around the world. As if driven by a single global "incentive" structure of some kind.
Me too. I was suspicious by March 2020 because I was aware of the Diamond Princess data analysis, and the conclusion the fatality rate was no higher than 0.3% in almost perfect conditions with the elderly etc.
But the lockstep aspect just reinforced my view this was a con.
Very early 2020 when they announced airport closures. Think back a few years to Ebola spreading via airplane passengers -- as in, 3 days of nightmare illness as a super-contagion to anyone around, then death. Any thought of limiting air traffic then? Nah.
In the USA, with its continental scale, massive and diverse population, and hodge hodge of state and local governments coming under the umbrella of what has been (by Constitutional design) a relatively loose federal government, one would have expected a huge number of reactions to and policy prescriptions (if any!) for the arrival on our shores of a new virus. Yet that is not what happened. Almost instantaneously it was like a switch was flipped and a monolithic response to the new virus was in place. The same slogans and policy prescriptions were rolled out universally, and it was demanded that everybody get on the same page immediately. It even became "conventional wisdom" to lock our precious kids out of school! It was surreal. That is not the USA I had lived in for the prior five-plus decades. It all looked and smelled like a pre-planned rollout of sinister design. Something truly execrable and evil was done to us Americans.
Not just the USA though. The thing is whilst much was very similar, not all was and this was the key to the unravelling of the 'Cunning plan' for those who could be bothered to scratch their heads and say 'Something is not right here'. This was my starting point.
"In 2020, he signed the UNAIDS Public Letter on People's Vaccine which was a campaign calling for accessibility of the COVID-19 vaccine to all. He joined other world leaders in the signing. He wrote "all people everywhere must have access to the vaccine when one becomes available." Concerns were raised that people in richer countries may have quicker access to the vaccine than poor countries which led to the writing of an open letter that any vaccine against the disease should be free and made available at no cost to all people.[3] In February 2021, Ghana became the first African country to receive COVID-19 vaccines through the World Health Organization's COVAX program. The shipment consisted of 600,000 doses of the AstraZeneca vaccines.[75]"
This is the story in all western nations. What a shame and travesty! In Canada there is not even this level of open dialogue on these issues. There is simply blind disregard and denial - and pushing the bivalent jab like none of what is happening is actually happening. I am getting angry and disgusted because it seems so many people I know don't see past the fiction presented by our bought and very costly national media. Come on and think please people!!!
Yes! This is true and I am grateful. The problem is that almost no one knows this. The other problem, in my understanding, is that it lacks any potential for actual legal action. Am I wrong in this? I would be happy to be! Our so called 'liberal' government controls the media and seems to also have frightening influence in the legal sphere. This is why I am not as positive as I would love to be about our national citizens inquiry. I would be happy to hear I am wrong!
I just spent some time on the website. The biggest problem I can see is that the complicit media won't cover it, so the inquiry is pretty much preaching to the choir. There will be almost no reach to those who might benefit from the information.
Wanna bet our computers here at Health Canada are just fine? I remember how reporting of adverse events was discouraged by public health authorities and mostly disallowed, and that doctors reporting too many adverse events were investigated by regulatory bodies. A woman in Saskatoon dropped dead in the drug store immediately post vax and the authorities ruledthat the booster she got had nothing to do with her death. (By the way, the sheep who saw her fall that day dutifully stayed in line and took their shots in turn,) Canada is fucked as long as the media reports nothing but official lies.
I think their claims of general incompetence are largely true. All the large liberal institutions hire and promote on the basis of tribal loyalty. Mediocrity is not an obstacle to promotion. It's often a plus. Feckless dependency ensures loyalty and obedience.
It's clear that hubris and blind ideology won't let them change their ways.
If they admit they were wrong (even a little bit, let alone about EVERYTHING) then masses of people will begin questioning the very existence of their institutions to begin with. It's a domino effect.
Of course we hope for that to transpire, but I don't see it as realistic given they keep doubling down.
Many will be psychopaths and narcissists. The psychopaths don't care if they were wrong because it worked. The narcissists are not capable of processing information if it endangers their self-image, so they will generally struggle to consider any of their actions as wrong.
Many people dismiss conspiracies and what not because they can't imagine people, particularly those in power, are capable of doing such things. But they miss the fact that many of those in power are legit psychopaths that lack empathy.
Yes, exactly this. Most people don't really understand psychopathy. The total lack of ability to empathize. A real deficit. Many involved in Covid will be absolutely indifferent to suffering.
"The PEI didn’t start evaluating adverse vaccination events yesterday. They’ve been doing this for many years, and yet somehow the world’s most safe and effective vaccine yielded so many adverse event reports that they literally broke their computers and made their routine safety evaluations impossible."
Hard to decide if this is more like a scene from Orwell or Alice in Wonderland Mad Hatter's tea party.
At least the German officials tried to make an excuse. In the US, the FDA, or whatever agency, was required to monitor and evaluate adverse events, yet simply did not do so.
CDC did collect data but they haven't sorted out what to share so they have shared nothing & solved the problem by ending data collection but did say thanks for playing!
"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) V-safe website quietly stopped collecting adverse event reports with no reason or explanation. The V-safe website simply states: “Thank you for your participation. Data collection for COVID-19 vaccines concluded on June 30, 2023.”
Phew! It's good to know long-term safety studies is two years. Now I can go out and get the bestest safe and effective shot in the history of humankind! /s
As part of the EUA or other approval process for the vaccines, the FDA was required to report on adverse events after a period of six months, or perhaps periodically. They have not done so.
I prefer the latter but in reality it is a mixture of both. The whole COVID 19 nonsense is, if you will accept this, a glorious hotchpot of every story you have ever read, every film you have ever seen, and every play you have ever been too and then some.
"The computer program has a severe glitch and is being reprogrammed. Thank you for your patience, normal service will be resumed as soon as possible."
Agree completely and very best articulation of this from pure science perspective is recent interview of (love him to the moon & back) Michael Yeadon w Steve Kirsch & preferred view w brilliant teacher & neuro-biologist Jay Couey commentary to flag bits we lay folks miss.
Dad, 89, now has had 5 jabs. Never been sick before, now had 2 bouts of severe cold? both six weeks, and a few weeks ago another one, thankfully only lasted a week. He thinks he won't get a sixth shot, even if he gets an 'invitation" and probably still free... ahhhh
just heard that my youngest cousin after 4 jabs, got covid for the second time, apart from the bad reaction and 3 days of bed rest from the jabs. will they ever learn?
It took 5 jabs??? In a six shot vaccine revolver that's good going! I haven't asked my dad directly and his health is not that good but I have told him and my sister about the vaccines and, in essence, avoid like the plague.
Some people like having the plague, I really can't think why.
It’s all so horrible and tedious. And it leaves your anger (my anger, our anger) with nowhere to go—“it’s in the past, we didn’t know, it’s not our fault,” they say, the perfect passive-aggressive defense mechanism.
Chat GPT says relax also! The passage you've provided appears to express strong criticism and skepticism about the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, particularly by the country's public health authorities and institutions. It highlights concerns related to the evaluation of vaccine safety and effectiveness, data processing, and transparency in the decision-making process.
While the concerns raised here may warrant attention and investigation, it's important to approach such claims critically and consider multiple sources of information to form a well-rounded perspective. Investigating the pandemic response and vaccine safety is a complex and ongoing process that involves numerous institutions, experts, and data analysis. Public health agencies and regulatory bodies often have their own procedures for assessing vaccine safety, and these processes can take time.
It's crucial for public health policies to be based on rigorous scientific evidence and transparent decision-making, and any concerns or allegations should be thoroughly examined by appropriate authorities and subject to independent scrutiny. Public trust in the healthcare system is essential for the successful management of health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
If you have specific questions or need more information about any aspect of the pandemic response or vaccine safety, feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to provide information up to my knowledge cutoff date in September 2021.
AI may be A, but it's certainly not I! There is no intelligence involved here, just a clever statistical, bland summation of all of the previously written things that it has been trained on.
"Public health agencies and regulatory bodies often have their own procedures for assessing vaccine safety, and these processes can take time."
Indeed, which is why it is vital -- vital, I say! -- to rush and vaccinate as many people as possible *before* we know the results of that safety assessment.
According to Stefan Homburg, Wieler´s handler Rottmann-Großner was reporting to Generalstabsarzt Dr. Holtherm, a military guy who was placed into the Health Ministry. This, in my opinion, is (if true) pretty clear evidence that the whole pandemic response was not a case of outward-facing Drosten and Lauterbach types (or even smaller fry) running amok on their own but that there was the whole time (and still is) tight control by deep state operatives.
I know these claims, but they're just very hard to evaluate. Simply because creeps like Rottmann-Großner may have been taking orders from military elements, doesn't mean this was the driver of the response internally. A lot of people were pushing in the same direction for different reasons.
I just spent Sunday at the Bundestag. I have to say, it was an amazing event and a very very open 'open day'. I had conversations with parliamentarians from Greens, CDU, die Linke, and AfD, as well as a very long chat with the security advisor to the FDP. I also listened to a number of panel discussions on a variety of topics.
My takeaways:
1) There is no, and I mean no, appetite to discuss SARS-2 policy sins of the past. This includes the AfD, who clearly want votes from former corona hysterics and are keen to downplay this issue politically.
2) The Greens really are as crazy as you think. One prominent MdB (congresswoman) answered my question about economic harms caused by Net Zero policies by saying, basically, that Germany should be decarbonising twice as fast. That was really the sum total of her answer.
3) On the upside, there is surprisingly balanced treatment of the AfD both by the bureaucratic administration of the Parliament and by their political peers - at least publicly. If you were to observe them without knowing the background, you would not believe this is a party on the verge of getting constitutionally banned.
4) CDU backbenchers seem to be aware of the damage they have caused Germany through de-nuclearisation and de-industrialisation policies and they have regrets. They are surprisingly honest and forthcoming about it.
5) The rhetoric on Ukraine from the FDP and CDU is Nikki-Haley-level insane (though not quite Lindsey-Graham-level insane). As someone who got to know Germany in the 1990s, it's a shocking level of propaganda-fuelled warmongering. They really don't see the problem with sending German panzers to burn on the Ukrainian steppes - a second time around.
6) the SPD had the best free ice cream and the funnest games.
thanks for reporting, pinned
Thanks for this post and the references to Larissa Fußer's reporting and the book Ausbruch.
Have you previously reviewed "Ausbruch: Innenansichten einer Pandemie - Die Corona-Protokolle", by Katja Gloger, Georg Mascolo (2021) and I missed it? Is it worth getting?
i thought about reviewing it. it is very full of curious information, and also i think very telling tidbits of misinformation. a lot of it reported very naively by journalists who don’t always understand the significance of things.
my sense is interest in lockdowns etc. is very much fading but maybe i write about it anyway.
Graham, may I ask how you received such access to so many parliamentarians? Are you based in Berlin, were you there as a journalist, or as a member of the public?
As a member of the public. It was the 'Tag der Ein- und Ausblicke'. I had super low expectations - expecting nothing more than a nice view of Berlin from the Reichstag roof terrace (this I also got - it's really nice). I was really very surprised by how much real engagement there was. There were no ministers, but plenty of backbenchers there, and they took questions from the public with no moderation.
were there journalists there?
I didn't see any, but the Bundestag admin had cameras covering the panel discussions, and the parties were filming and taking pictures themselves.
Oh, I nearly forgot - the view of the cityscape was marred by this one building, which fans of E.'s writing could not help but associate with a notorious enemy-of-the-blog:
http://grahamstull.com/2023/09/05/view-from-the-roof-of-the-reichstag-in-berlin/
Astonished. Such openness, I did not expect. Can it be believed, that the German government won't suppress inquiries from a skeptical public?
Ich war erstaunt. Eine solche Offenheit habe ich nicht erwartet. Kann man glauben, dass die deutsche Regierung die Anfragen einer skeptischen Öffentlichkeit nicht unterdrücken wird?
I'm curious as to what these different groups believe about the gas pipeline sabotage.
You know I brought that up with the CDU guy but he dodged it with reference to a wider point about needing to take 'a sober look at energy security'.
Ah, there's the evasiveness I was expecting!
The solution to all of this (and all corruption in government) is creating Swarms and running both businesses and governments using decentralized, transparent, and trustworthy swarming systems. Have you ever heard of Human Swarm Intelligence? Stay tuned because you are about to. https://joshketry.substack.com/p/human-swarm-intelligence-the-most
I had a look but was not all that impressed. I don't really see what is novel about this idea. Getting humans to think together and come up with solutions cooperatively is the essence of all society. How is the software any different to a flip chart in a brainstorming session? How does the software you propose fundamentally address the problems of hierarchy, self-interest and corruption any more than existing institutions?
I am also not convinced that this system of decision-making will yield outcomes that are any more coherent than if we elected a leader based on his/her abilities (sort of what representative democracy already is).
If intelligence is normally distributed, don't we want decisions to be made by the right tail, instead of by the mid point of the distribution?
Also, it feels like a sales pitch.
Also, who is the 'we' in your group? From the site, it just seems to be one guy (Josh Ketry). If transparency is your pitch, you should be transparent about who you are.
Good to see such a different take, as I found the article very interesting, and think the idea has a lot of potential. As I understand it, wouldn't the difference between this idea and a flip chart be the number of people who could be involved in producing a solution? You go from the numbers that can fit in a room or a hall, to many times more than that because the technology facilitates it, and can also process all the responses.
Also, I'm not sure our elected leaders have any abilities outside of the capacity to get themselves elected and hang onto their position despite all indications that most of them should never be allowed anywhere near the levers of power. When I look at the current crop in the UK Parliament, I wonder how such self serving idiots ever managed to claw their way into that building. There are notable exceptions, but I wouldn't leave most of them running a jumble sale, never mind a country. (If they are running it, that is.)
I see what you mean. Certainly the tech allows you to scale up the solutions.
As regards the abilities of our elected reps, I can only agree with you. The system is certainly failing, I just wonder though how this tech addresses the inherent fragility of systems. After all, if special interests can capture the elected reps, surely they will have an easier time capturing the gatekeepers of the swarm?
But maybe there is something there that I missed. I'll go and read it again.
Maybe there is a way, or the intention at least, of not having gatekeepers? I do wonder about how to implement solutions that are derived by this process too.
Great insight, many thanks
Scary as hell too
NO ONE should have taken the God forsaken injection in the first place. You cannot fix gullible—it has to fix itself. Pain and failure are the best teachers, but no one wants to be their student. The problem with these injections, however, is that you cannot learn from your mistakes if you are dead.
So regarding that warp speed COVID vaccine…
Rushed, guaranteed to succeed, corruptly tested, experimental injection? ✓
That killed and maimed well-over a thousand people during the severely abbreviated trial phase? ✓
And also caused 23 spontaneous abortions and 75 serious clinical events from 270 expectant mothers during said trial? ✓
Using a highly dangerous mRNA tech that in the past killed every mouse with ADE? ✓
A tech previously untested on humans, the emergency usage of which upended over a century of vaccine safety and efficacy research? ✓
For a virus far less deadly than the lockdowns themselves? ✓
Also less deadly than the flu - which conveniently went AWOL when COVID hit the scene? ✓
For a (cold) virus they’ve been unable to cure after over a century of trying? ✓
But somehow all of a sudden, the criminal pharmaceutical companies - notorious for rampant felonious trial fraud - figured it out in less than a year? ✓
And then went on to manufacture billions of quality assured, safe and effective doses at record speed which were then lawfully distributed by the US military? ✓
People actually bought into this on a grand scale, and voluntarily injected this poison? ✓
Expanded version with inline references for every claim made above here: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/the-doormats-of-the-new-world-order
The Power of Propaganda
The information above is what everyone in the first world had access to - either before the injection was unleashed on the public or shortly thereafter with the release of the Pfizer trial adverse event data (which they tried to hide for 55 years) - and yet many still eagerly lined up and took it in droves.
The myriad of egregious problems associated with the COVID injections were as clear as day, easily accessible, self-evident, went against any and all rational thought, could not stand up to ANY scrutiny, and yet all of that still didn't matter.
This is the power of fear. It suspends all logic based on facts. This is why the technocrats and media so carefully cultivated fear and panic during the “pandemic.”
Partly fear, yes, but also a population that doesn't regularly think critically. Thinking that only an 'expert' can make an informed decision, people don't use the information available to them. It's much easier to let someone else think for you especially with the media blasting the same message everywhere.
I'm all for people doing their own research, but evaluating the credibility of your sources is a skill that must be learned. This is too much work for a lot of people.
True but it's essential to do that work or we are doomed to herd behavior. Critical thinking is imperative because of the technocrats taking over public forums.
I don't disagree. The older I get the more cynical and cranky I become.
That is what I was so clumsily trying to convey. I don’t know about too much work rather it’s just not a skill set we all have.
Too much work to gain a skill set that we don't already have. Same thing.
I'm 69. When I look at back on my public school education, especially history, I'm rather appalled at how bad it was.
Yeah, I don't think it was entirely fear. I'm pretty sure many of the people I knew who jumped on the bandwagon were no more afraid of covid than I was.
It's not just lack of critical thinking ability either. Many were highly intelligent, who showed excellent critical thinking in most other areas.
It was mostly trust in public authority, and politics. Most folks just can't believe that media and government are as corrupt as they are, or that the seeming consensus of all their peers may be no better founded than their own weak decision to follow that consensus and contribute to it. As soon as they got on board, it was an easy ego boost to virtue-signal their public devotion to the cause, and take shots at their political enemies while doing so.
Once they did that, they couldn't back out, because their personal and political credibility was at stake.
That's definitely what happened for some.
And pride will be their downfall.
I wouldn’t have believed my government was this corrupt.. covid woke a lot of people up out of our peaceful slumbers.
I am South African so I had a pretty good idea already but I was still shocked at how bad it is.
The “so called experts” have been wrong about everything absolutely everything. A person with average intelligence can do better.
The word ‘expert’ has been misused and abused to the point where it has become meaningless. As has happened with many other words (science, as one other example).
I think 'expert' was always rather meaningless. Really though it does imply experienced and the wisdom to apply the lessons learned.
Which is severely lacking nowadays.
Yet again I must protest in defence of myself and many others. In my country and others Phyzer’s clinical trial data wasn’t released until it was way too late long after the initial two shots were made available. There are many people, parents especially who are kept fully occupied by keeping food on the table and a roof over their family’s heads who had and still have relatively little downtime to peruse the Internet for research. Secondly I am sure I was not the only one with a very vulnerable aged parent living in a nursing home whom I was responsible for and who I felt it was my duty to protect.
I disagree all you listed was fully made available in time to dissuade people and even if it was everyone wouldn’t know where to look to even find it and if they did, how would they know if it was real or misinformation or disinformation which the Internet provides plenty of both? It was a terrifying time and it’s so easy to look back now with the benefit of hindsight and judge people. What service does this provide? How does it help anyone now? All I hear from your opinion is judgement and criticism and a healthy sense of superiority and I want to know how do you think that this helps anyone now? The answer is it doesn’t. The only fault that I can see the people of the West were guilty of was in the trusting of their own governments apart from the covid fanatics.
It's ok to admit to not having been informed, to not having had time to research, for even being trusting of authority. Those are strategies or traits or circumstances which can only really harm yourself (if what you trusted ended up being bad for you). Being trusting is not a crime, even if it's not necessarily good for you. What galls me and many others like me, is that many who took that route chose to be rabidly vicious and turn on the likes of us. For making the time to be informed (I barely slept for months). For being healthily sceptical. For simply making our own personal choices over our own health and bodies and managing our fears, if we had them, the way we saw fit. They joined in the bloodlust and bloodletting and scapegoating. Hounding people out of jobs, public life, shops, gatherings, family events. They inflicted a different type of fear on us. We faced having to choose between making our living and feeding our families. We faced broken partnerships and marriages. They broke up families. They forced us, or tried, to do something that we knew was not just ineffectual and unnecessary - but likely dangerous. They harangued and gloated and pontificated and admonished and condescended and threatened. They loved it. Savoured it with sanctimonious righteousness. Called us conspiracy theorists, right-wingers, Trump-lovers, anti-vaxxers. It was pack mentality. They lost their heads. Not us.
So don't worry. If you did none of that, we're good. No need to explain yourself for your own choices. But if you did, perhaps take some pause.
Yeah I did none of that, I instead hated my government for using identity politics initially shortly after coming to power to separate and divide us long before covid appeared.After covid appeared our prime minister began with the targeting which worsened to the actual persecution of the unvaccinated. Deep in my gut everything you mention that the sanctimonious vaccinated did and said about the unvaccinated scared the living crap out of me! Their hatred was a very scary thing to witness from strangers then firsthand from some not immediate family members and from a person I had felt very close to for many years. The persecution of the unvaccinated was eerily familiar to my German mother’s stories about how the Jewish people were treated initially and then how they suddenly just seemed to disappear overnight. That was the sick feeling in my gut I couldn’t explain at the time.
My husband and I identified with the unvaccinated from the very beginning and we were also called conspiracy theorists. My entire lifetime has been good I’m in my 60’s so I trusted in our government, why wouldn’t I?
There has to be some sort of accountability and some form of justice served for this persecution. I pray it happens eventually even if not in my lifetime. We need for it to happen in order for all the unvaccinated who were treated so unjustly and reprehensibly and who were so persecuted to be able to move past it, I know that full well.
In hindsight I’ve been very blessed to have lived a good life so I didn’t need to be informed about all the crap but Covid changed all that in an instant and my rose coloured spectacles have been removed forever. The world is ugly and I’m really really glad I didn’t see it for most of my life.
We're good then, Sonya. My spouse is one who, when it comes to medicine, implicitly trusts the government. And the scientists who inform the government. Me, not so much. In fact, not at all. Mandates and one coerced jab later to keep my job and try save my marriage, and they all have my undying contempt forever. My tiny supply of forgiveness has been spent on my unrepentant husband. That's it. The rest will get my fury. If they coerced, in any way whatsoever, they're dead to me. Eugyppius has been one of the golden ones, throughout. His sharp, analytical analyses have been a godsend. And his unrelenting stance and contempt for the Coercers is exactly what the likes of people like myself have needed to survive this ordeal.
Well I’m so glad we’re good then Ann. I certainly can’t be the only one who was sickened and repulsed by the persecution you all endured so all I ask is please don’t lump us all together as that is also an injustice and it really hurts. It is infuriating that now the Coercers are denying it and trying to rewrite history by saying they never forced anyone to get the jab! Threatening job loss and following through with it was most definitely using force to get people to comply! I’m so glad you were able to find a tiny supply of forgiveness for your husband but I think your feelings are fully justified and reasonable even under the circumstances.
I just wanted for you to know that not everyone who got vaccinated behaved like a beast and in an atrocious manner and that I am in full support of your fury for all those that did, all the Coercers and all the people who got vaccinated and turned into crazed fanatical lunatics. I didn’t find Eugyppius til much more recently and wish I’d found him sooner but once I found Substack I too have benefited greatly and have found lots of support for my views and feelings because I identify with you yet got vaccinated. I felt very isolated and alone during the pandemic too, saw all of the wrongs and injustices being done to the unvaxxed and we were outraged by it yet we were powerless to do anything about it. We got the initial two jabs due to our nurse daughter’s insistence on it as we were in the high risk category due to our age and she didn’t want to lose us and we figured she knew better being a registered nurse. We had to agree to just disagree afterwards as we had completely opposing views on all of it so likewise caused lots of friction in our family with 3 grownup millennials and she is the eldest, the smartest and the most educated person in our family… go figure hey?
Well, an analysis is, by default, analytical. Or should be. But you know what I mean.
I don't know what country you are in but I am 63 now and had witnessed the degradation of society over that period of time. The corruption of government here in the UK seemed obvious to me and so I was immediately suspicious.
What I did not realise was how bad the NHS had become so accepted a diagnosis of cancer from the doctors in early 2020. I had immuno-therapy as a consequence until Sept 2020 when I understood at last what had really caused my facial palsy and other symptoms.
I now do not trust mainstream doctors at all and understand more about disease than they do which I never thought I could ever state.
Anyway, I had no vaccines, never wore the face nappy but got poisoned by another route. Nevertheless if I hadn't I would not have understood all that I do now so I am eternally grateful.
Yes I had been noticing how the political correctness was ever increasing in Canada and was choking off free speech since 2009-2010 and encouraging self censorship in our country. Also the identity politics our prime minister began using almost immediately in 2015 when he came to power.
But nothing nothing nothing prepared me for the covid pandemic with its restrictions and mandates and how brutally they would be enforced.
Well said! I suppose it helps if you start from a position of mistrust of BigPharma and knowledge that Pfizer were fined $2.3 billion - partly for fraud. Kind of sets one wondering!
Add to that our government paid them 12% more that the rest of the African Union!
Beautiful rant! The unvaxxed will not forget how we have been REVILED!
I understand how you feel. I also realized that many people had lots on their plates and felt that they had no time for research. I also understand that those of us in the west grew up with the impression that our governments can be trusted.
About 15 years ago I had a cancer diagnosis. I had a manufacturing business at the time which meant I worked a 55+ hour work week in addition to family responsibilities.
With the diagnosis, I basically barircaded myself in my office for a few days so I could read everything I could about my cancer; yes I shrugged other responsibilities but if I'm dead, I can't run a business or take care of a family anyway.
I hope you've learned that you have to take care of yourself first, then your family then the rest comes after that.
Medical journals are good sources of information even though they are being corrupted. The articles can be hard to read for the lay person but you can learn.
Sometimes the abstract is enough. Some articles are free access, some are paywalled. I spent a few hundred dollars purchasing articles that I deemed very pertinent to my cancer. I can tell you that my research paid off especially since I'm cancer free 15 years later.
The experience taught me to do my own research...always.
Yes, do your own research (as one ought)...but sadly, it was in an internet environment where much of the truth was being suppressed...and still is. It was like taking a brisk walk through a minefield...
I usuallly relied on the BMJ (British Medical Journal) and British covid statistics. They were the best I could come accross, especially the BMJ. One of the editiors was critical of the shots and that helped me a lot.
I usually read zerohedge.com, a financial news site. Their reporting on covid got them censored a fair bit so that should tell you a lot. I especially make sure to read comments people make to even MSM news websites. Someone always provides a good link to further info.
Dr. Byram Bridle is a viral immunologist specializing in vaccinations. He is an absolutely GREAT source of information as well as a great writer and has been very anti narrative. His life was turned upside down because of his views; he writes on substack, no paywall. I'm a paying subscriber to help him out:
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/about
I wish you every success. Life sometimes is like walking through a minefield, especially these days. I try my best to have faith and to trust in God.
Thank you so much Vanda! Funny you should mention the BMJ as I follow Dr. John Campbell from Britain and he is a dear and also a wealth of information on covid and the vaccines and the vaccine death rates. Amazingly he is still allowed on YouTube!🤞
He provides only qualified good medical studies and accompanying graphs from various countries around the world about covid, the vaccine release dates and medical graphs charting the results from so many different countries all over the world with mostly all except Sweden showing a sharp 90 degree increase in sudden deaths and injuries upon both initial vaccine release dates. He uses the BMJ too. I’ll check out Dr. Bridle too. Appreciate your own personal sources you use thanks!
The cruise ship data was all you needed to know and that data was in all the papers.
Check out Dr. Makis on Covid Intel on Substack he is behind a paywall but he is providing all the vaxx injuries and sudden deaths occurring around the world and has been at it for a few years now. It’s really grim.
This might interest you. I had a cancer diagnosis. I got to the answers but not until I had some immuno-therapy which should be avoided. It may not be as toxic and the chemo but still pointless.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/19/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in-your-food-and-how-to-remedy-it/
Congrats on 15 years! Well if I survive the first two jabs I will never trust my government ever again that’s for sure nor take anything at face value. I am the most worried about my kids tho, I’d rather die from the jab and they be ok.🙏
Ok, but where is your anger now that you know better?
I’m just as angry about what’s being done to the vaccinated now.. there’s no winners except for whoever is pulling the strings. First the unvaccinated were persecuted now the vaccinated are being murdered. The goal is to turn us against each other.
United we stand Divided we fall.
Well said, sonya!
What do you mean by the vaccinated are being murdered?
The mRNA covid vaccines are still killing the vaccinated daily, in 2022 the number of sudden deaths even increased dramatically from 2021 showing anyone vaccinated is like a ticking time bomb and tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of the vaccinated have now “died suddenly” all over the world and are still dying suddenly every single day so many young, it’s so very grim. I follow Dr. Makis on Covid Intel on Substack.
I hear you, Sonya. Nobody likes a smug braggart. Commenters who do this on Substack need to knock it off; it merely divides us (we’ve got plenty of other forces trying to do that, after all). Each of us figured out things at different points in time, for a number of reasons. I’m either ignoring those folks who insult others who didn’t recognize what was going on from the outset, or I am responding to them and calling them out for their obnoxiousness. It’s so counter-productive.
Well said, Cathleen!! Those are all of my sentiments exactly. Let’s support one another instead of finding faults and judging because it is exactly that we each figured out things at different points in time and for a number of reasons! Thank you!!!!
I understand what you are saying. I am 72 but fortunately, here in South Africa, I had children that already did not believe the government, as you can understand, and they put me on the trail. My one son was in South Africa and the other in Germany so I was at an advantage, but I hear you as I had to listen to it all
Don't protest in defense of yourself. Absolutely, you were a victim, but that doesn't mean you couldn't have applied better due diligence up front.
Consider, for just one aspect, how much apocalyptic doom - modeling has accompanied so many previous health "crisis" scenarios--mad cow, Ebola, MERS, over and over and over again vast numbers of casualties predicted, and it never actually coming to pass.
That alone was enough for me to conclude that COVID was likely no different.
Oh, and also -- videos of Chinese people collapsing in the street, from a respiratory infection? Didn't that set off you BS detector even a little bit?
Soooo you didn’t get vaccinated sooo that’s all you have to do to fight the deep state?! Really??? No more??? I don’t know why you’re so proud of it and why you seem to have such a problem with people who did, what does it matter to you anyway?
The truth is it isn’t a black and white issue as you’d so like to make it as we are all individuals living different lives so we were all red pilled at different points in time by being exposed to different things at different times.
Btw I don’t think of myself as a “victim” and if it’s my time to die then I’ve lived a good life. I don’t want to live in the globalist WEF UN WHO hellish gulag future that is planned for us anyway.
I always very much love your comments 🙏
All brought to you by trump. And if you think he was tricked why tucker carlson didn't ask him about it.
Can’t trust a politician but Trump was an outsider.. I don’t know what to think but if anyone is being persecuted now it is Donald Trump.
Politics is mind control: https://tritorch.com/folly
"The vaccine is so safe that we are overwhelmed with vaccine injury reports and cannot process them"
LMFAO
who knew that a chart of vaccine safety (x-axis: risk; y-axis: reported adverse events) would work like the laffer curve?
a jab that causes no events yields no reports and looks safe, as the vaccine gets more dangerous reports rise, until the point the huge number of reports can no longer be processed and then it looks safe again.
There is also this old joke:
"If you owe your Bank 100,000 € you are in trouble.
If you owe your Bank 1,000 million €, your bank is in trouble."
Substitute € with lives, and you have it.
That’s what they teach in economics now, and this is policy; it means the government and cronies can borrow as much as they want.
If you think I’m joking, I’m not.
That’s the magic hand wave to say no problem.
The app to report vaccine injuries was down; hence no vaccine injuries were reported; hence no vaccine injury occurred; hence the vaccine is safe.
And this is a long-running theme in medicine. Anyone ever tried looking into the infant serum levels that result from medications used for decades during labor? Yawn. Info doesn't exist. Not that we need to bother doing the very simple tests for any of that. The common line among perinatologists is simply to claim that this medication does not transfer to the baby.
Spoiler: it does, and according to cell experiments it changes the developing brain cells. Which one might theoretically observe if a society had any issue in recent decades with abnormal brain functions.
Medical science (and other sciences as well) always had the problem to be only aware of what can be measured easily. And also: what gets money from grants and industry to be measure.
Corona was a very clear demonstration of the medical practice: "absence of evidence is evidence of absence".
First it was postulated, without any good studies: the vaccines stop infection, stop hospitalization, stop grave outcomes, stop transmission, and are safe. So everyone should be vacced.
Then the first studies rolled in, and now it was: ok, it does not stop infection, but it surely it does stop hospitalization, stops grave outcomes, stops transmission, and is safe. So everyone should be vacced.
After a few months and further studies: ok, it does not stop infection, and it does not stop transmission, but it surely does stop hospitalization, and stops grave outcomes, and is safe. So everyone should be vacced.
After a few more months and even further studies: ok, it does not stop infection, and it does not stop transmission, and it does not stop hospitalization, but it surely stops grave outcomes, and it is safe. So everyone should be vacced.
Now we are at: ok, it does not stop infection, and it does not stop transmission, and it does not stop hospitalization, and it does not stops grave outcomes, and it is not safe.
But of course, everyone should still be vacced, Because by now we said it so often and so loudly, that it does not need to be proven anymore. It has become self-evident.
In a nutshell.
Someone should get a hold of those injury reports before they’re destroyed.
Like all the telemetry NASA did on the moon missions....oops.
Together with the original footages being lost?
Would be nice if we were still gracefully entertained by moon landings instead of Texas school shootings.
Can't, since Kubrick died.
And have simply ignored all the harms and deaths - we’re too busy and there’s too much. Maybe it will all go away if we just don’t look.
THEY WILL LOOK FOR OUR GRANDCHILDREN’S SAKE, AND THE REST OF THE WORLD’S. THEY WILL LOOK AT WHAT THEY HAVE DONE AND ARE STILL DOING. THEY MUST BE ACCOUNTABLE. We must not stop.
I recall having my Austrian neighbors over for dinner one night and him just casually mentioning that he mandated all his employees get the jab (he runs some dumb healthcare app). He said it with the same tone one would use to say that it's looking like it'll rain tomorrow. There is a certain slavishness to people against which the United States used to act as a bulwark—within memory, his attitude would have been regarded as distinctly and offensively anti-American. I fear that we too are succumbing to the long dark night of communalism, safetyism, and matriarchal tyranny. It may be already too late. And yet a greater part of me is hopeful that at the next opportunity the Spirit of '76 can show itself once again. We'll see.
I would have agreed with you about Americans, back in 2019. No more. Not all, but a hefty majority of the Americans I know who could natter on about how awful the Germans were back when, well, they all took 3-5 jabs and in 2021-2022 were fine as pie with mandates and with vaxx passports, too. It has been for me, well, I have to say, a revelation.
The hardest part of the last few years has been the awful realization that the majority of my countrymen are not just people with whom I might disagree, but rather my actual enemies who wish me harm.
Here from the outside (Germany) it looks like at least there are different parts of the USA, and some kept a level of sanity. Texas, or Florida?
So you have at least places in your country you could feel safe.
Depends on your neighborhood. For example, if you live anywhere near a university it can get Kool-Aid-y, even in red states. That said, some states, such as FL and TX, have passed some impressive legislation to protect some degree of medical freedom. The immortal words of Davy Crockett often come to mind... “You may all go to hell and I will go to Texas.”
I totally hear you.
Thanks for this. Alas, there are plenty of Americans to put your Austrian neighbor to the test as to who wins the "Govern Me Harder Daddy" Kool-Aid glugging contest. Here's a prime example:
NY State senator John Liu doesn’t care about thousands of NYC teachers who lost their jobs
911 Jedi, June 30, 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_UVZW-K_t4
[hat tip: https://nooneyouknow.substack.com/p/the-problem-with-censorship-by-omission ]
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: This was filmed by Chris in a public park.
TRANSCRIPT
CHRIS: Senator Liu, hi how you doing?
JOHN LIU: Hi.
CHRIS: My name's Chris.
JOHN LIU: Chris?
CHRIS: I have a question for you.
JOHN LIU: Yeah, what's happening?
CHRIS: Um, so you are the chairperson of the Senate Committee on New York City Education.
JOHN LIU: Yes.
CHRIS: Is that correct? OK.
JOHN LIU: Yes. And I'm also a member of the Education Committee itself.
CHRIS: Fantastic.
JOHN LIU: The education committee gets, it's like really bogged down with issues in Watertown and—
CHRIS: Hmm hmmm.
JOHN LIU: — Buffalo.
CHRIS: OK.
JOHN LIU: Rochester.
CHRIS: Here we are in New York City, we're in Queens right now. So my question is, so far 965 New York City teachers have been fired for not getting the vaccine.
JOHN LIU: Yeah.
CHRIS: And on September 6 that number's going to go up by probably a couple of thousand because—
JOHN LIU: Yeah.
CHRIS: — people signed up for the leave without pay options. So how do you feel about the fact that thousands of New York City teachers are, have have lost and will lose their jobs for not getting the vaccine?
JOHN LIU: Just get the vaccine.
CHRIS: Just get the vaccine?
JOHN LIU: Just get the vaccine. [stepping back, away from Chris]
CHRIS: You don't believe that people have the right to—
JOHN LIU [coming close, shaking fist, shouting into the camera]: Just get the vaccine! Get vaxed and boosted! [turns his back and starts to walk away]
CHRIS: So the vaccine doesn't work because Eric Adams* got covid, President Biden got covid—
JOHN LIU: Listen.
CHRIS: They've all been double vaxed and—
JOHN LIU: Listen, get the vax and do do do us all a favor, tell your colleagues to get vaccinated.
CHRIS: So—
JOHN LIU: That's important. [turns his back again and continues walking away]
CHRIS: — people don't have the right to do what they want with their own body? So I've got you on record saying that, in the land of the free people don't have the right to do that.
JOHN LIU: Sir, you can, you can spout out as much nonsense as you want.
CHRIS: That's not nonsense.
JOHN LIU: Absolutely.
CHRIS: That's not nonsense. The vaccines—
JOHN LIU: The Center for Disease Control, the Department of Health, they all say get vaxed.
CHRIS: And the FDA approved it, the FDA also approved oxycontin for kids.
JOHN LIU: [addressing white-haired man, who appears standing to the right]: Are you vaccinated, sir?
WHITE-HAIRED MAN: Yes, I am.
JOHN LIU [addressing white haired man]: Thank you very much. Thank you because everybody has the right to do—
CHRIS: The FDA approved oxycontin for children.
JOHN LIU: — what they want with their body but they do not have a right to infect everybody else. [to white-haired man]: Thank you very much. [turns back to Chris and continues walking away]
WHITE-HAIRED MAN [to John Liu]: [inaudible]
CHRIS: And people who got the vaccine are infecting other people.
WHITE-HAIRED MAN [addressing John Liu]: Um, I wanted to ask you, um—
CHRIS: I got you on the record.
JOHN LIU [waving at camera]: Thank you!
CHRIS: Got you on the record.
JOHN LIU [smiling and waving at Chris's camera] Thank you! Hello everyone!
CHRIS: People do not have, according to Senator Liu, people do not have the right—
JOHN LIU [still waving at camera, but turning away, to the white-haired man]: Thank you.
CHRIS: — to do what they want with their own bodies. OK.
WHITE-HAIRED MAN [looking at Chris' camera] Alright. [turning his back then, and beginning conversation with John Liu]
CHRIS: OK, they must get an experimental vaccine.
WHITE-HAIRED MAN [addressing John Liu]: Alright, so anyway [inaudible]
CHRIS: Run away. A typical politician running away.
WHITE-HAIRED MAN: [inaudible]
JOHN LIU [to white-haired man]: Yeah, yeah, of course I remember—
1:57
[END]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
New York State Senator John Liu:
https://www.nysenate.gov/senators/john-c-liu
*Eric Adams, Mayor of New York City, was already double-vaxxed and boosted when he fell sick and tested positive for covid. See: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/04/10/us/mayor-eric-adams-covid-19-positive/index.html
I sincerely supported John Liu when he ran for mayor. I really had no idea what people would be like once totalitarianism was no longer just black & white pictures in the history books
Thanks for reading. If it's any consolation, a lot of people surprised me, too.
I see
chi haj UN unholy
hi huh Jon lunacy
Are two anagrams of his full name, John Chun Yah Liu. It's probably nothing...
I too hope we can see more of the spirit of 76. Thanks for your post.
Answer from midwits:
I criticise quakcine effectiveness: you are not an expert on this topic
Government gives the power to any employer to mandate the quakcine. So a carpenter can mandate the concoction to his employees: fineee this looks legit.
I think we’re already seeing.
What happened to the promises of Big Data?
Jessica Rose with all her degrees and covid restricted travel, jumped into the VARS data and exposed the many adverse events. One example: she wrote a paper with Peter McCullough arguing against teen vaccination which was peer reviewed before the US began teen vaccination -- paper sidelined, and the US went ahead.
The denial of early treatment with off the shelf drugs had to be done in order to shield Big Pharma from liability because, they claimed, NO alternatives were available. Then the agencies got mRNA into childhood schedule of vaccines which makes them free of liability.
Recently, the CDC said that they will stop collecting adverse event data about the mRNA
Is the German data publicly available that someone like Jessica Rose could do the work that the agencies are unable to do?
"There is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number
What originally got my attention was the tinfoil hat crowd screaming about lots being intentionally distributed to certain people to kill them — in other words certain Covid-19 vaccine lots were for all intents and purposes poisoned. That was wildly unlikely so I set out to disprove it and apply some broom handles to the tinfoil hatters heads. What I found, however, was both interesting and deeply disturbing:"
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/11/02/uh-thats-not-a-conspiracy-theory/
I heard early on that the various lots were distributed to various parts of the country in Canada. A red flag was raised but I heard no more about this.
How about the Pfizer Australia execs getting grilled by Rennick admitting that Pfizer employees got a separate batch from the general population? Another fact that looks as good as Pfizer trying to hide their study data for 75 years.
A great follow up question for Rennick would have been to ask if anyone outside of the company got their vaccine from Pfizer's batch, like politicians or public health authorities.
Governments aren't that good at big data tech outside of intelligence agencies (where at least in the USA and UK they're very good at it).
That said, these are not by any means 'big data' problems. We're talking on the order of millions of records here. That can be processed six ways from Sunday on my laptop. They just don't want to do it and/or don't know how to automate anything.
Oh, they know how to do it. And they have probably done the analysis. The thing is that the result doesn't look so well, so they hide it.
If you are the authority, who will compel you to disclose something that hurts you?
And when one makes money out of it. Don't kill the golden goose springs to mind.
They might not know how to automate anything because the intelligence agencies have snapped up all the brainy types. But I think it's more likely they just don't want to do it.
Even more frightening is the fact that this pattern has occurred in lockstep in developed countries around the world. As if driven by a single global "incentive" structure of some kind.
This kind of observation got my attention very early on in 2020....the global lockstep aspect of it all.
Me too. I was suspicious by March 2020 because I was aware of the Diamond Princess data analysis, and the conclusion the fatality rate was no higher than 0.3% in almost perfect conditions with the elderly etc.
But the lockstep aspect just reinforced my view this was a con.
Very early 2020 when they announced airport closures. Think back a few years to Ebola spreading via airplane passengers -- as in, 3 days of nightmare illness as a super-contagion to anyone around, then death. Any thought of limiting air traffic then? Nah.
A useful observation, thank you. When i understood in 2020 that virology was fundamentally flawed I realised that Ebola suffers the same problem.
In the USA, with its continental scale, massive and diverse population, and hodge hodge of state and local governments coming under the umbrella of what has been (by Constitutional design) a relatively loose federal government, one would have expected a huge number of reactions to and policy prescriptions (if any!) for the arrival on our shores of a new virus. Yet that is not what happened. Almost instantaneously it was like a switch was flipped and a monolithic response to the new virus was in place. The same slogans and policy prescriptions were rolled out universally, and it was demanded that everybody get on the same page immediately. It even became "conventional wisdom" to lock our precious kids out of school! It was surreal. That is not the USA I had lived in for the prior five-plus decades. It all looked and smelled like a pre-planned rollout of sinister design. Something truly execrable and evil was done to us Americans.
Not just the USA though. The thing is whilst much was very similar, not all was and this was the key to the unravelling of the 'Cunning plan' for those who could be bothered to scratch their heads and say 'Something is not right here'. This was my starting point.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/a-is-for-anti-social-distancing
Well, I'll keep saying it was all planned, two agenda' one evil, one good. I call it the Great Retest.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/the-great-covid-retest
"In 2020, he signed the UNAIDS Public Letter on People's Vaccine which was a campaign calling for accessibility of the COVID-19 vaccine to all. He joined other world leaders in the signing. He wrote "all people everywhere must have access to the vaccine when one becomes available." Concerns were raised that people in richer countries may have quicker access to the vaccine than poor countries which led to the writing of an open letter that any vaccine against the disease should be free and made available at no cost to all people.[3] In February 2021, Ghana became the first African country to receive COVID-19 vaccines through the World Health Organization's COVAX program. The shipment consisted of 600,000 doses of the AstraZeneca vaccines.[75]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nana_Akufo-Addo#Other_ventures
This is the story in all western nations. What a shame and travesty! In Canada there is not even this level of open dialogue on these issues. There is simply blind disregard and denial - and pushing the bivalent jab like none of what is happening is actually happening. I am getting angry and disgusted because it seems so many people I know don't see past the fiction presented by our bought and very costly national media. Come on and think please people!!!
In Canada is very active and interesting National Citizen Inquery. They do hearings with real witnesses front of commissioners and public audience.
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/
Yes! This is true and I am grateful. The problem is that almost no one knows this. The other problem, in my understanding, is that it lacks any potential for actual legal action. Am I wrong in this? I would be happy to be! Our so called 'liberal' government controls the media and seems to also have frightening influence in the legal sphere. This is why I am not as positive as I would love to be about our national citizens inquiry. I would be happy to hear I am wrong!
I just spent some time on the website. The biggest problem I can see is that the complicit media won't cover it, so the inquiry is pretty much preaching to the choir. There will be almost no reach to those who might benefit from the information.
Wanna bet our computers here at Health Canada are just fine? I remember how reporting of adverse events was discouraged by public health authorities and mostly disallowed, and that doctors reporting too many adverse events were investigated by regulatory bodies. A woman in Saskatoon dropped dead in the drug store immediately post vax and the authorities ruledthat the booster she got had nothing to do with her death. (By the way, the sheep who saw her fall that day dutifully stayed in line and took their shots in turn,) Canada is fucked as long as the media reports nothing but official lies.
Isn't Canada the country that is so concerned about a possible increase in temperatures that would make the country almost livable?
Exactly!
Absolutely. I have tried to do my bit for Canada. I am not PC.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/silly-saturday-sovietk-turdo-the
I think their claims of general incompetence are largely true. All the large liberal institutions hire and promote on the basis of tribal loyalty. Mediocrity is not an obstacle to promotion. It's often a plus. Feckless dependency ensures loyalty and obedience.
Definitely a big factor.
It's clear that hubris and blind ideology won't let them change their ways.
If they admit they were wrong (even a little bit, let alone about EVERYTHING) then masses of people will begin questioning the very existence of their institutions to begin with. It's a domino effect.
Of course we hope for that to transpire, but I don't see it as realistic given they keep doubling down.
Many will be psychopaths and narcissists. The psychopaths don't care if they were wrong because it worked. The narcissists are not capable of processing information if it endangers their self-image, so they will generally struggle to consider any of their actions as wrong.
Yep.
Many people dismiss conspiracies and what not because they can't imagine people, particularly those in power, are capable of doing such things. But they miss the fact that many of those in power are legit psychopaths that lack empathy.
Yes, exactly this. Most people don't really understand psychopathy. The total lack of ability to empathize. A real deficit. Many involved in Covid will be absolutely indifferent to suffering.
"The PEI didn’t start evaluating adverse vaccination events yesterday. They’ve been doing this for many years, and yet somehow the world’s most safe and effective vaccine yielded so many adverse event reports that they literally broke their computers and made their routine safety evaluations impossible."
Hard to decide if this is more like a scene from Orwell or Alice in Wonderland Mad Hatter's tea party.
At least the German officials tried to make an excuse. In the US, the FDA, or whatever agency, was required to monitor and evaluate adverse events, yet simply did not do so.
All the U.S. perps are in hiding and hoping that everyone will forget about it all....short memories and all that.
CDC did collect data but they haven't sorted out what to share so they have shared nothing & solved the problem by ending data collection but did say thanks for playing!
"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) V-safe website quietly stopped collecting adverse event reports with no reason or explanation. The V-safe website simply states: “Thank you for your participation. Data collection for COVID-19 vaccines concluded on June 30, 2023.”
https://brownstone.org/articles/cdc-refusing-new-covid-vaccine-adverse-event-reports/
Phew! It's good to know long-term safety studies is two years. Now I can go out and get the bestest safe and effective shot in the history of humankind! /s
Yes, that was V- safe.
As part of the EUA or other approval process for the vaccines, the FDA was required to report on adverse events after a period of six months, or perhaps periodically. They have not done so.
I prefer the latter but in reality it is a mixture of both. The whole COVID 19 nonsense is, if you will accept this, a glorious hotchpot of every story you have ever read, every film you have ever seen, and every play you have ever been too and then some.
"The computer program has a severe glitch and is being reprogrammed. Thank you for your patience, normal service will be resumed as soon as possible."
Agree completely and very best articulation of this from pure science perspective is recent interview of (love him to the moon & back) Michael Yeadon w Steve Kirsch & preferred view w brilliant teacher & neuro-biologist Jay Couey commentary to flag bits we lay folks miss.
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1920699978
Many thanks Pamela. It is a very long video!
Dad, 89, now has had 5 jabs. Never been sick before, now had 2 bouts of severe cold? both six weeks, and a few weeks ago another one, thankfully only lasted a week. He thinks he won't get a sixth shot, even if he gets an 'invitation" and probably still free... ahhhh
just heard that my youngest cousin after 4 jabs, got covid for the second time, apart from the bad reaction and 3 days of bed rest from the jabs. will they ever learn?
Oh I do hope so, I really do.
"Dear Ingrid's cousin
Please connect the dots, please, pretty please!
Kind regards etc. etc."
It took 5 jabs??? In a six shot vaccine revolver that's good going! I haven't asked my dad directly and his health is not that good but I have told him and my sister about the vaccines and, in essence, avoid like the plague.
Some people like having the plague, I really can't think why.
P.S. I can, but what I wrote sounds better!
It simply keeps getting better.
The "babysitter" was present to prevent any untoward truth spoken.
Just like the CIA babysitter at the UFO hearings in Congress in the US. Completely controlling the so-called "Whistleblower."
It’s all so horrible and tedious. And it leaves your anger (my anger, our anger) with nowhere to go—“it’s in the past, we didn’t know, it’s not our fault,” they say, the perfect passive-aggressive defense mechanism.
"It's in the past."
For crying out loud, it all JUST happened and the negative impacts continue to cascade and affect us all!
"It's in the past." Baloney. The dynamics these morons and evildoers set off are still playing out in big ways.
I find expressing anger in a post helps a lot. If a post is too much then notes can be a useful start.
It is extremely fortuitous for my personal mental wellbeing that I read this while in a café with a glass of wine. I may need others.
If that is not a signal, what is? Replying to Igor.
Chat GPT says relax also! The passage you've provided appears to express strong criticism and skepticism about the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, particularly by the country's public health authorities and institutions. It highlights concerns related to the evaluation of vaccine safety and effectiveness, data processing, and transparency in the decision-making process.
While the concerns raised here may warrant attention and investigation, it's important to approach such claims critically and consider multiple sources of information to form a well-rounded perspective. Investigating the pandemic response and vaccine safety is a complex and ongoing process that involves numerous institutions, experts, and data analysis. Public health agencies and regulatory bodies often have their own procedures for assessing vaccine safety, and these processes can take time.
It's crucial for public health policies to be based on rigorous scientific evidence and transparent decision-making, and any concerns or allegations should be thoroughly examined by appropriate authorities and subject to independent scrutiny. Public trust in the healthcare system is essential for the successful management of health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
If you have specific questions or need more information about any aspect of the pandemic response or vaccine safety, feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to provide information up to my knowledge cutoff date in September 2021.
lol
I see AI has been captured also 😜
AI may be A, but it's certainly not I! There is no intelligence involved here, just a clever statistical, bland summation of all of the previously written things that it has been trained on.
As a lifelong science-fiction nerd, I completely agree.
Easy for something with no cardiopulmonary system to say
My favourite part is "up to my knowledge cut-off date in September 2021". Lmao.
Good Lord!
"Public health agencies and regulatory bodies often have their own procedures for assessing vaccine safety, and these processes can take time."
Indeed, which is why it is vital -- vital, I say! -- to rush and vaccinate as many people as possible *before* we know the results of that safety assessment.
"rigorous scientific evidence"! What might that be? The evidence that was not even looked at, let alone analyzed?
According to Stefan Homburg, Wieler´s handler Rottmann-Großner was reporting to Generalstabsarzt Dr. Holtherm, a military guy who was placed into the Health Ministry. This, in my opinion, is (if true) pretty clear evidence that the whole pandemic response was not a case of outward-facing Drosten and Lauterbach types (or even smaller fry) running amok on their own but that there was the whole time (and still is) tight control by deep state operatives.
I know these claims, but they're just very hard to evaluate. Simply because creeps like Rottmann-Großner may have been taking orders from military elements, doesn't mean this was the driver of the response internally. A lot of people were pushing in the same direction for different reasons.
That just mean that we are at war. Sorry guys.