261 Comments
User's avatar
Jim Foye's avatar

This post is the most uplifting thing I've read this year.

Expand full comment
Sherry 1's avatar

Ditto that. So glad the Netherlanders woke up, I hope they will lead European Nations back from the Abyss. If ONLY North American MSM would report on Europe. There is not a peep about all the no-go neighborhoods, migrant crime, praying in the streets to declare their power, women afraid to leave their homes alone and so much more. It would be our canary in the coal mine if only they would report. So, thanks to the people here on Substack who DO inform us.

Expand full comment
Gail Finke's avatar

I live in Ohio and have gotten to hear all the people freak out about urban legends about Haitian immigrants eating pet cats and geese from public parks in Springfield for the last week. How dare anyone say such a thing, why do you hate immigrants, what sort of awful racist are you, etc. etc.--NOTHING from the media about what is going on in a town of 28,000 people overwhelmed by 15,000-20,000 Haitian refugees, most of whom don't speak English and don't have jobs, and all of whom receive extensive government benefits the residents don't, that would make people think an urban legend like that might be true. So we can imagine what would WOULD hear about Europe if the MSM bothered to "report" on it.

Expand full comment
Sherry 1's avatar

I know, have seen the people who live there telling their town council what they are experiencing and they are accused of being racist … the Left won’t have that to use much longer, it has become a meaningless slur that no-one cares about. Call me a racist any day, just leave my cat alone. 😁 We SHOULD have been reading about it a LOT over the last number of years, but reality does not match up with what MSM/Gov’t is selling. I was thinking, we all should start referring to ‘government benefits’ as what they are. TAXPAYERS hard earned money, it infuriates me.

Expand full comment
Rosemary B's avatar

100% infuriating!

Expand full comment
MamaBear's avatar

The Haitians are not refugees, but were admitted into the US on the basis of humanitarian parole. They are not immigrants either, but temporary migrants who get a 2 year permit to live and work in the US. I'm not trying to nitpick but want to make sure people are using the correct terms. The NYT called the Haitians legal immigrants! They are temporary migrants without long-term legal status and cannot attain permanent residence or becomes citizens.

Expand full comment
Gail Finke's avatar

Sorry, I was not specific. I was using "refugee" in a general sense of their fleeing something dire and being permitted entrance. But you're correct, that is not the right term, and in theory they all have to go back at the end of their parole--but previous experience with other Haitian groups leads me to believe they probably will be granted long-term status.

Expand full comment
MamaBear's avatar

I'm just tired of how certain people conflate refuges, asylum seekers, illegal aliens, immigrations, temporary guest workers and migrants into one big morass of immigrants to obfuscate and mislead. Like when people say gender instead of sex. :)

Thank you for not taking my comment personally. Just wanted to clarify.

Expand full comment
Gail Finke's avatar

I'm glad you did! No offense taken.

Expand full comment
Rosemary B's avatar

I believe Holland was one of the first to readily and openly accept this mass immigration. Yes it brought on a lot of problems but they felt righteous doing this.

My parents are Hollanders and I have some family there.

I have so much of mom and dad's "stuff" at my house and I did find a printed out speech of Geert Wilders (at the time, Dutch member of Parliament and chairman of the party for Freedom in the Netherlands) It is printed out in what looks like size 3 font size, super tiny, probably my dad wanted to save paper.... Wilders addressed the Alliance of Patriots announcing the Facing Jihad conference in Jerusalem. This speech was given at the Four Seasons Hotel in New York. At this time (2000) Wilders is already marked by the Muslims. They would like to kill him

Anyway, if you can find that speech, yes, my family were aware of it, but thought "poor Holland" now they have people in governing positions that are not native, they are muslim. Also, they have mosques all over the creation!

The mass migration from other countries is just a cover to hide the real purpose of Muslim migration., Good muslims or bad muslims, there will come a day when they will over power us.

Anyway, I have read it many times, I have to put on magnifying glasses.

It is coming to you. This is their plan. Take over the world. It sounds crazy but it is true/

Expand full comment
Sherry 1's avatar

Not crazy, replacement of our culture. Read Klaus Schwab’s The Great Reset. Thank you for your comment, wonder where I can find a copy of Wilders’ speech…he was ahead of this mess from the beginning.

Expand full comment
Rosemary B's avatar

Sherry, I found it. I checked with my "very tiny" copy and it is the same speech

https://www.science.co.il/Arab-Israeli-conflict/articles/Wilders-2008-08-25.php

I now realize it was from 2008 and no one wanted to hear this bc Obama was "president" and this kind of stuff was very racist

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

Holland is 85% ethnic Dutch. IE 42.5% ethnically Dutch women. These women are having .8 babies per woman. Holland is about 15% other. Mainly Africans. Most of whom are Muslim. This group is having 4 or 5 babies per their 7.5% female population. Take 42.5% x .8 = about 35%. Take 7.5% x 4.5 = about 35%. Overall their live birth (varies from year to year) per female rate is about 1.4. At 1.4 Live births per female the population drops to 70% within 2 generations. One generation actually, but it isn’t apparent right away as the older original generation is still alive through two generations. So, this 70% of current generation will be made up of 35% Dutch, 35% other. Half and half. What that means is Rotterdam becomes Sharia run, Amsterdam might be Dutch still. However….one generation later and another generation of nearly childless Dutch moderns and the 85%-15% will have been flipped. Holland is gone in two generations. Same as France.

Expand full comment
Rosemary B's avatar

I agree with you entirely, William.

These are shocking statistics you share here. I am not surprised, but fairly sad.

Stupid globalists are destroying everything

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

check out "haystack news" (tv streaming) they report on the whole world, biased though, but interesting if you are aware of that bias

Expand full comment
Warmek's avatar

I guess I just wonder if it's "too little, too late". They've already let a huge number of people in. Some portion of them will be hostile to Western sensibilities. My guess is that Solingen will not be anywhere *near* the last such event.

Expand full comment
Deuce Ad In's avatar

I wonder this too. They’re already here and will be impossible to find and remove. Closing the border now doesn’t help with that but it does perhaps prevent the future waves.

Expand full comment
Warmek's avatar

I suppose the best tactic would be to simply deny them services. Here illegally? No food stamps for you.

Expand full comment
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

"They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats" is the "Auslander raus" of America. The drivel and shrieking will get worse as they keep losing. Scholz appears to have taken one step forward, two steps back - why is he agreeing to import 250,000 "workers" from Kenya?

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

well, his government is now denying that there was any such agreement.

Expand full comment
Sanjay Chondra's avatar

But just today he said they were taking Uzbeks, no?

Expand full comment
Demeisen's avatar

Yeah, well when we borrow German slogans here, especially in German, it tends to result in bad P.R. ;)

Expand full comment
Vxi7's avatar

If you are below replacement level you must take in immigrants. We can call them whatever they are still immigrants. Look at hungary. Same BS. on surface the government is anti-immigration. In reality try to import people from everywhere.

Expand full comment
SnowInTheWind's avatar

If you are below replacement level, then there is something wrong that your own people do not have the means to reproduce. Taking in populations of ethnic aliens dissolves your community structures and makes it even harder for them to court, marry, and raise children.

Expand full comment
Vxi7's avatar

Why population is below replacement level needs another discourse.

Expand full comment
SnowInTheWind's avatar

Yes. It probably can't be blamed entirely on alien immigration, since it seems to affect "developed" parts of the world that do not suffer from it. I would suggest that the problem is economic parasitism, in which means of making a living that take from producing people and offer nothing in return, takes over and squeezes the native population into negative growth. That can happen either with aliens or native people, but unassimilable aliens aggravate it.

Expand full comment
Latz51's avatar

Basically out sourced population replacement with no regard for the loss of culture. The transgender drumbeat is also a flanking maneuver attacking native population replacement.

Expand full comment
Laughing Goat's avatar

That only makes sense if the immigrants are a net benefit for the social system, yet many are not. In my limited experience it's obvious which ones are a drain as well. If this were only about supporting the boomers there would be systems in place to monitor the long term prospects of prospective new citizens and a some sort of selection process.

I used to think propping up the demographic shape was the hidden reason for this as well but I'm no longer so sure. 'They' could not keep aligned on this secret reason for that long. I now favour a hybrid explanation: Left-leaning elites more or less believe that it's just a good thing to do, economic liberals (european sense) see cheap labour, together that makes a majority of power.

Expand full comment
Alex Gamma's avatar

Seriously, you cannot shrink gov‘t & economy etc. to adapt to a smaller population? I doubt that.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

These are the same loonbirds that will lead you off a cliff and step aside and let you drop into the abyss. There is no excuse for surrendering your country to outside forces.

Expand full comment
Richard Axley's avatar

There's a great excuse for surrendering your country- you get PAID for it. EU and individual states need to use espionage laws to lower the influence of globalists.

Mark my words- a lot of "so called" leaders are taking money or SOMETHING of value, nobody decides a country needs a lot more uneducated people out of thin air.

Plus the WEF claims to do exactly what I think they are doing- sabotaging countries with the hope that enough chaos will enable globalists to take over. The Uktaine war is being used to push Russia into a corner where they'll be forced to nukes, if they want to survive as a country. War, especially nuclear war would enable globalists to march right in.

That nobody is talking about harm encouraged by globalists is more evidence that the above is happening.

I take the globalists at their word- they want power and are making inroads by espionage

Expand full comment
Thucydides's avatar

The way it works in the US is that enormous amounts of money are spent on various social service providers, who in return support the politicians. The same thing is true of the "homeless" problem; these open air drug markets are incentivized and facilitated under cover of humanitarianism, money flows to the providers, and a portion goes on to the politicians in the form of campaign contributions and activism.

Expand full comment
Danielle's avatar

It’s a benefit to globalists to have the population poor, drugged and struggling to survive. Takes away the resolution to do anything other than survive.

Expand full comment
Danielle's avatar

It’s not even really “surrendering”. It is literally inviting and PAYING them with taxpayer money to take over your country.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

Of course we can stop them, if we have the Will to do so.

Sink the boats and let them drown. Any survivors to be dumped back into Tunisia or Turkey.

Round up all illegals and put them in forced labour camps, sorting garbage. If they want out, they sign a release-waiver where they agree to be deported to a nation of the EUs/EU-members choice.

Round up migrant criminal guilty of rape, murder, arson and execute them. Offer their parent nation to buy them back at €1 000 000/head, before sentence is carried out.

Reset all permanent residency permits and all citizenships to 1970, then check each one towards the records for criminal activity, persistent welfare use, persistent use of interpreters, and a few other markers; any failing the mark have their permits revoked and are given 90 days to leave.

Something along those lines, and the problem is solved inside three years.

Expand full comment
John Davison's avatar

Sorry, but I ccould never agree to sink the boats and let them drown.

I don't want them here but would never cheer to your sentiments.

Give your head a wobble and think.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

I have.

Over 8 000 rapes per year. For over 15 years.

Is that enough for you?

This is how negroes, arabs, afghans and other such scum thank a people who has taken them in, letting them live for free for unlimited time, awarded them and their spawn franchise and equal rights, with no demands put on them.

You tell me, how many raped Swedish women, how many robbed and assaulted and defrauded seniors, how many beat up and tortured children is one too many for you?

Expand full comment
Burnley Beresford's avatar

This is just racial bigotry. Lazy racial slurs undermine people who make serious arguments against mass migration.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

No, it is reality.

Expand full comment
Burnley Beresford's avatar

"Negroes, arabs, afghans and other such scum" - this implies you think people are inferior based on their race.

It is not 'reality' to label groups of people 'scum' based on very shallow ethnic or racial characteristics. It's bigotry.

Expand full comment
John Davison's avatar

Wow.

You've got a problem.

You're ok with innocents drowning ?

God help you.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

No. You are a problem. You are okay with millions of people invading, occupying, colonising and replacing indigenous peoples of Europe.

You are, in fact, okay and onboard with genocide against my people. We are fewer than 10 000 000 /on this planet/. We have one land, that is ours. One. No other. If we lose that, we cease to exist.

By letting ourselves be invaded, we are being subjected to genocide.

And you claim the moral high ground anyway, saying that us wanting to protect our homeland is wrong.

Go do you-know-what.

Expand full comment
John Davison's avatar

I'm more than happy with my moral compass sunshine.

Good luck with yours when you meet your maker.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

You might feel different if you had a loved one killed by an ILLEGAL

Expand full comment
John Davison's avatar

So might you if you had an innocent on a boat.

Expand full comment
Riri's avatar

Well there's an easy solution then. Don't get on a boat

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

How about we bury one bullet in the next person who enters our country ILLEGALLY?

That's all it takes to end this lawlessness.

Sorry. Its just the way it is.

Expand full comment
Flo's avatar

I agree. Sinking the boats to let them drown is crazy shit. It is murder, FFS!!

Just take them into orderly and humane custody and deport them eventually.

Expand full comment
john kingsbury's avatar

You only have to sink one boat. Demonstrate your resolve. The boats will stop.

"War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it." - Sherman

Expand full comment
Andrew Marsh's avatar

Quite harsh measures. However, fear not. There is no chance at all any of the donating nations will spend €1 let alone €1 million to get their citizens back. Guess why they like the 'overseas development fund'? Guess why every citizen off their books means more cash to keep / steal / spend?

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

Oh I know that full well.

After all, any and all concepts of human rights and associated freedoms are a 100% western notion; once one understands that, non-westerners are trivially easy to understand.

But it has to be done to make it clear to them that we hold them accountable for the invasion, the tens of thousands of murders and hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of rapes their peoples have committed against us.

Expand full comment
Andrew Marsh's avatar

You are correct. We - EU27, UK, USA and more - need to show determination in not allowing others to trash us as they see fit.

Expand full comment
Vxi7's avatar

Open the borders legally so you know who is coming from where. Then you can deport them if they are unable to make a living. Now "open" border is a fake openness...

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

Meanwhile, I read today that Sweden is paying migrants to go home. Interested to hear your take on that. Might be more cost effective in the long run.

https://www.petersweden.org/p/it-begins-sweden-paying-people-to

Expand full comment
Flo's avatar

I shouldn't be too much money, otherwise it might create a new type of migration, similar to a merry go round.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

See reply down-thread.

Expand full comment
Abner Knight's avatar

Fair enough. But why is this suddenly happening throughout the West in the same week? Smells a lot like "masks are going to save us" and then "masks... who said anything about masks?"

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

I think at least part of it is, as eugy says, shifting the Overton window of allowable discourse. This can spread organically, and if there's a lot of pent-up feeling about it can happen very quickly. Picture a balloon popping.

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

Because politicians hate to lose elections.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Bullseye

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

The motives are rarely complicated. It's just the messes made afterwards to justify them or cover them up or drag more people into them to spread the culpability more widely.

Everything in human history is about power and resources--and it's the same in the rest of the natural world of which we have always been a part.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Some things never change.

We really are an ignorant and arrogant species...in many ways

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar
Sep 16Edited

We just have the same primal drives every other living creature does, but we have this specialized breed called "intellectuals" that uses lots and lots of elegant words to either excuse or deny normal human behavior. "Normal" of course is not a word necessarily implying "good."

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Meanwhile, across the pond its raining cat and dog Hait crimes!

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

It's a meme-rich environment for sure.

Expand full comment
Indrek Sarapuu's avatar

Hait crimes... I like that.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Well they do like their pussy cats.

I'm pretty sure they're just being discriminated against for being Vagitarians...

Expand full comment
Danielle's avatar

On fire this morning Ryan!

Expand full comment
Sherry 1's avatar

😂🤣

Expand full comment
Danielle's avatar

🤣

Expand full comment
Suzie's avatar

Political opportunism like this is always suspect, particularly in election years.

It is an effort - or ploy - to steal back votes from wobbly people who might otherwise vote for AfD primarily because of this issue.

These people don’t really care about the immigrant issue. They care solely and purely about maintaining power, and are willing to sell their grandmothers to hang onto it.

They have been forced into this move by increasing public sentiment and hostility to their schemes, but should they succeed in duping the necessary few and their hold on power as a result of staging it, expect the “beatings to resume until morale improves.”

In other words, don’t be fooled by their shiny objects, and vote them out and into the dustbin of history.

Expand full comment
Nicolas Léonard's avatar

OK, established parties are not "true believers" in problems due to immigration. But does it really matter?

Immigration policies have been insane for long, and are the result of ideology; and are SO outlandish that people who noticed the insanity and have for so long tried to get established parties to come out of their complacent torpor have given up on them and instead catapulted new or marginal parties to the door of power.

I don't necessarily want new, tougher immigration laws ENACTED BY, say, THE AFD. I want tougher immigration laws. If established parties at long last come to their senses and do it, what do I care? As long as the cat catches mice...

Expand full comment
Suzie's avatar

Well, that’s sort of what I’m getting at. If they can convince you, or anyone - all of a sudden by some miraculous insight- now they are the ones you can trust to reverse the madness, that’s game, set and match for them. It’s part of their entire strategy to woo disgruntled voters back into their fold. They literally made the mess they’re now promising they are going to fix.

When have they ever fixed anything?

And so, nothing changes or ever gets better because the same old people and parties are back to doing their same old crap.

Throw ALL the bums out and give some new, fresh, SANE people a try at the wheel of state.

What on earth do you have to lose…except your country.

Expand full comment
NAB's avatar

Sort of like Kamala Harris painting herself as a gun-toting, border wall-loving, fracking moderate to get the independent vote in America?

Expand full comment
Suzie's avatar

PRECISELY.

Expand full comment
Kerry Davie's avatar

To borrow from, and somewhat mangle, Samuel Johnson:

"Public office is the last refuge of the scoundrel."

Expand full comment
Jim Brown's avatar

The "snake eating its tail" analogy is apt. The System can devour itself until it starts eating its productive resources. Once net production is breached, the nation's ruin accelerates rapidly. More than anything, this will force a meeting of the minds on issues like immigration that drain wealth from the people. For the sake of Germany, I hope the people will address their destructive energy policies next.

Expand full comment
Belte's avatar

“Inviting, housing, and inciting millions of military aged single foreigner men in our country from crime ridden war zones is le Bad for us? Nobody could have predicted this?!”

Expand full comment
Belte's avatar

“Woman Moment.”

Expand full comment
Paul Ashley's avatar

“we need further immigration to develop culturally, intellectually and spiritually,” Islam, which I don't doubt is the largest influence coming out of mass migration, does not culturally, intellectually, or spiritually develop a society into anything worthwhile. Well, at least by Western standards. But then, perhaps Western standards are what the Left despises most.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

The people pushing Muslim migration have apparently never read a single word about Muslim history. Or Muslim philosophy (such as it is) and goals for world domination by the sword. Consider the childish and moronic American Hamas supporters/protesters proudly wrapped up in their kaffiyahs, vomiting lines such as "gays for Hamas". They apparently have less than zero idea what happens to gays in Islamic countries. Or women, for that matter.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Exactly

Expand full comment
cm27874's avatar

...and taz also announced that it will no longer appear in print.

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

i know it is so great, almost like Christmas

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

To the detriment of German birdcages.

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar
Sep 16Edited

Yes, it's so strange, isn't it? You enjoy your vacation, you don't want it to end--but then you have that primordial physiological reaction when you see the skyline or pull into the railway station of home.

Anyway--it's like a fieldmouse intrusion. Such a sweet little thing and all it wants is safety from the approaching winter and the dangerous whimsies of cats. Before you know it your pantry reeks of that appallingly sweet-stinking urine and the wiring is chewed through, and you tell your kids the next time they want to make a little terrarium habitat for teeny Timmy that field mice belong outside.

We here, unlike Europe, have no ethnic measure of what makes a real American. We had only the melting pot which worked brilliantly to create a people of one overarching culture no matter what language you communicate in with grandma. It used to be that your success depended on wanting to become that real American.

Europe is different, but one can still demand that immigrants wanting to hold residencies in any European country habituate themselves to that country's norms, or get out.

Expand full comment
Andrew Marsh's avatar

EU Commissioner Thierry Breton. Who could forget the man who woke up in the autumn of 2023 to demand where all the EU27 automotive jobs were going, when he and his neck-less, brain-less fellow EU Commissioners had written emission protocols years before to hand over the market to the CCP!

EU Commissioner Thierry Breton - former chief of basket weaving and other EU27 economic activities.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Chuck Harder RIP!

Expand full comment
Andrew Marsh's avatar

I had no idea. Chuck Harder was a real commentator. I assume he was direct and interested in the truth?

Expand full comment
wmj's avatar

I googled “tabu” and was pleasantly surprised to learn it is the nom de scène of an attractive Bollywood actress. Despite that, I believe the word you intended was “taboo”. :)

Glad to have you back. You’ll have to treat us to a bit of villapoasting when you’ve buckled down to it.

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

i was under the impression that 'tabu' was also a permissible spelling in English. 'taboo' looks very weird to me for some reason.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

It's taboo. Tabu looks weird to us.

Doesn't matter to me tho

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

Tabu was the name of a perfume I'm old enough to remember the commercials for. It's a much more attractive spelling.

Expand full comment
Barbara costas's avatar

I remember that perfume bottle sitting on my mothers dressing table, I was forbidden to open it but I did-tabu!

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

I remember too, used to wear it all the time. long ago!!

Expand full comment
MAGRIETHA DU PLESSIS's avatar

I think it was the idea of playing with words

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar
Sep 16Edited

Tabu just means "forbidden," loaded with an emotional sense of more danger.

The music master has yielded to irresistible passion.

Expand full comment
Sherry 1's avatar

Vudu…voodo.

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

It is indeed permissible and I agree with your feelings on spelling.

Expand full comment
Clever Pseudonym's avatar

i think 'tabu' looks weird to us...unless you're a student of malinowski!

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

Or a woman.

Expand full comment
Nathan's avatar

I didn't recognize "tabu" and assumed you meant "taboo". American semantics.

Expand full comment
Rosemary B's avatar

taboo is a weird word.

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

You are my age and must remember those perfume ads too. It was spelled as Eugyppius does.

Expand full comment
Rosemary B's avatar

I think you are right. My sister loved it and when she left for high school I would sneak in her room and put some on. haha

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

Well, the name itself demands that, right?

Expand full comment
Rosemary B's avatar

yeahhhh. I remember so much from my child hood. My sister remembers nothing, I mean NOTHING. I might ask her if she remembers this perfume. I think she has covid brain. She has been jabbed so many times now, she is sick every month with some sort of another chest head cold. Anyhoo, yeah I am gonna ask her 😂 if anything, just for shits and giggles

Expand full comment
6jgu1ioxph's avatar

It’s a Tongan loan word: https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/taboo . But either way, “taboo” is by far the most common spelling in English - I’m not sure I’ve ever seen “tabu” used in print by a native speaker.

Expand full comment
Jeff's avatar

“Tabu” looks like the name of the next trendy tech startup

Expand full comment
Guttermouth's avatar

It's also a silly perfume I wore for most of my 20s.

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

Both spellings are fine by me.

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

"Tabu" is an acceptable alternate spelling, according to my dictionary. I often see it in European writing.

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

Americans, remember our way isn't the only way. The world is full of flavours.

Expand full comment
Kerry Davie's avatar

If you're American shouldn't that be 'flavors'?

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

So you got my point ;)

Expand full comment
AndyinBC's avatar

And spelling variants!

Expand full comment
Stuffysays's avatar

claiming asylum in the first safe country to be reached has been working really well for the UK hasn't it? There we are - rescuing all those poor souls escaping France.

The idiots wailing about diversity being our strength should be given a few migrant lads to lodge with them for a while because, if you don't walk the streets, use the schools, shop in the towns then you don't really see a problem - your only contact with an immigrant is the nice lady who cleans your house or the guy who delivers your takeaway or, well, if you're rich, you probably don't even get the takeaway do you?

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

Don't forget the 50 illegals who were set loose in Martha's Vineyard. The kind, compassionate elites of this highly elite, rich area got those illegals out of there within 24 hours. So migrants are fine for other people and other towns, but not in Martha's Vineyard!

Expand full comment
Sanjay Chondra's avatar

They should be sent there time and time again just to prove the point that this will not be memoryholed and the noticing WILL go on.

Expand full comment
Entirely Coincidental's avatar

For many weeks already, German officials have been policing Swiss trains bound for Germany. While still in Switzerland, they pull off migrants and hand them over to Swiss authorities (who immediately release them, presumably to try again).

For now, the Swiss say they need to make no adjustments to border policy. I suspect this will change soon. And so the cascade begins.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Odd. The situation was the reverse when I was there 1976-1978. My only encounter with German police was when I visited a Jom Kippur service at a Kultushaus. Plenty with Swiss police (and once Austrian), mostly immigration, starting on the train into Zürich.

Expand full comment
Laughing Goat's avatar

Sometimes Swiss police do the rounds trough the trains coming up from Italy

Expand full comment