UK Researchers: “Paradoxically, despite the success of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, vaccine confidence has significantly declined since the onset of the pandemic”
UK Researchers: “Paradoxically, despite the success of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, vaccine confidence has significantly declined since the onset of the pandemic”
To the surprise of nobody, it turns out that the campaign to increase vaccine uptake via social exclusion, threats, lies and firings has reduced public confidence in vaccination across the board
UK Researchers: “Paradoxically, despite the success of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, vaccine confidence has significantly declined since the onset of the pandemic”
Wondering what the results of the poll would be if they included the 20,000 people who were killed by the vaccines? The stupidity of these people is truly astonishing to witness.
My confidence in conventional vaccines has certainly taken a big hit in the last couple of years. I was happy to get the tetanus booster four years ago. Now, after seeing the immense amount of Big Pharma fraud around the mRNA jabs, and becoming aware of the huge fines they've paid before that, I have started to doubt the efficacy and safety of earlier vaccines that I had previously trusted. I'm not sure where to go with this doubt. I fear I may have to dive into a huge rabbit hole that is opening in front of me now.
"Despite abundant epidemiological evidence of the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines." That sentence in and of itself demonstrates why the vaccinators have taken such a hit to their credibility. Waves of myocarditis and COVID infections in the vaccinated does not look like epidemiological evidence of safety and effectiveness to me. But according to the vaccinators, that's only because I don't have a Ph.D. in epidemiology.
Having said that, the propaganda campaign did have the desired effect on a large portion of the population. We have an elderly parishioner at our church who is well known and regarded. They've been absent for a while due to a COVID infection. We learned this past Sunday that they would soon be returning to Mass, masked of course. The delay in their return was due to the fact that they can't get their COVID booster shot until they are fully recovered from their most recent bout of COVID. Get that? They can't come back to church until they get their COVID booster. But they can't get their COVID booster until they've recovered from the COVID that the previous COVID vaccines didn't protect them from. True belief is hard to overcome.
This whole COVID debacle has scared the crap out of me. I refuse to ever get a flu shot. I got a shingles shot years ago, and my doc said it was “ok” to get the new 2-dose one. Nope, not gonna do that either. My daugher got this new covid booster, WTF?!!!!?
All I can say about the survey's findings is 'what goes around, comes around'. In other words, 2 years' worth of nudging, coercion, propaganda, false promises ,suppression and repudiation of reporting of serious/ lethal side effects and scapegoating have led to, surprise, surprise, declining vaccine uptake.
The chief problem this study and others never confront is this: These papers are loaded with citations and support for collateral matters, but there is no citation or support for statements like these:
"Despite COVID-19 vaccination campaigns having led to a sharp decline in infections, hospitalisations and deaths . . . ."
"Despite overwhelming evidence supporting its importance as a key primary prevention measure, immunisation has been the object of controversy and vocal opposition ever since its inception."
Where's the citation to "overwhelming evidence?" Shouldn't be hard if there's so much of it. Where's the evidence showing "vaccination campaigns having led to a sharp decline in infections?" That might alleviate some vaccine hesitancy if it existed.
And, if these campaigns supposedly reduced infections, what's up with that Pfizer lady who just testified that they never studied if vaccines reduce transmissibility?
First, get your story straight, then come back at us with some evidence.
Seriously! Last summer it was clear to me that they severely overplayed their hand and that it would be a fatal error on their side. They would have been better off pretending to respect people’s calls for a longer “wait and see” period. But they couldn’t help themselves. And I don’t fully understand the nature of the error. Did they really think it would only be a tiny fringe who were concerned about safety?? How did they not anticipate that they would force together a smart concerned army of educated people willing to work together?? are they just clumsy and unselfaware and made a terrible error? or did they gamble and lose? Knowing this could happen and do it anyway? I still wonder if it went worse or better than they expected it would?
I'm in Oxford, England. I know quite a few people who have had 3 vaccines shots already, but being health middle aged folk they now see a 4th shot as being a step too far . . . reasoning that 3 jabs should have done the job.
Of course there are still some true believers who got the combined flu/Covid shot - and spent a week in bed recovering . . . ah well
Perfect combination of continued scientism and shoveling of the propaganda because they just can't admit wrongdoing, along with mass cognitive dissonance that they are accomplices to mass murder.
UK Researchers: “Paradoxically, despite the success of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, vaccine confidence has significantly declined since the onset of the pandemic”
If you want to take the vaccine confidence survey and poast your own results, feel free to do it in replies to this pinned comment.
React to each of the following statements on a scale of 1 (“disagree strongly”) to 5 (“agree strongly”):
1. Vaccines are safe.
2. I think vaccines should be a compulsory practice.
3. My healthcare provider (for example my GP) has mine and/or my child’s best interests at heart.
4. I believe if I get vaccinated it would benefit the wellbeing of others.
5. Vaccines are a necessity for our health and wellbeing.
Wondering what the results of the poll would be if they included the 20,000 people who were killed by the vaccines? The stupidity of these people is truly astonishing to witness.
"Despite abundant epidemiological evidence of the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines,..."
LOL, LOL!
My confidence in conventional vaccines has certainly taken a big hit in the last couple of years. I was happy to get the tetanus booster four years ago. Now, after seeing the immense amount of Big Pharma fraud around the mRNA jabs, and becoming aware of the huge fines they've paid before that, I have started to doubt the efficacy and safety of earlier vaccines that I had previously trusted. I'm not sure where to go with this doubt. I fear I may have to dive into a huge rabbit hole that is opening in front of me now.
"Despite abundant epidemiological evidence of the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines." That sentence in and of itself demonstrates why the vaccinators have taken such a hit to their credibility. Waves of myocarditis and COVID infections in the vaccinated does not look like epidemiological evidence of safety and effectiveness to me. But according to the vaccinators, that's only because I don't have a Ph.D. in epidemiology.
Having said that, the propaganda campaign did have the desired effect on a large portion of the population. We have an elderly parishioner at our church who is well known and regarded. They've been absent for a while due to a COVID infection. We learned this past Sunday that they would soon be returning to Mass, masked of course. The delay in their return was due to the fact that they can't get their COVID booster shot until they are fully recovered from their most recent bout of COVID. Get that? They can't come back to church until they get their COVID booster. But they can't get their COVID booster until they've recovered from the COVID that the previous COVID vaccines didn't protect them from. True belief is hard to overcome.
“Paradoxically, stalkers have a lower chance of getting laid.”
Who’d a thunk it?!!!!
This whole COVID debacle has scared the crap out of me. I refuse to ever get a flu shot. I got a shingles shot years ago, and my doc said it was “ok” to get the new 2-dose one. Nope, not gonna do that either. My daugher got this new covid booster, WTF?!!!!?
My healthcare provider (for example my GP) has mine and/or my child’s best interests at heart.
hahahah PMFSL. best interests at HEART...
"Good job retards."
Classic. LMFAO.
All I can say about the survey's findings is 'what goes around, comes around'. In other words, 2 years' worth of nudging, coercion, propaganda, false promises ,suppression and repudiation of reporting of serious/ lethal side effects and scapegoating have led to, surprise, surprise, declining vaccine uptake.
Who'd have guessed?
Canada, yea like we only recently got the "right" to board airplanes and trains.
Still can't legally visit the USA. But I heard the land border agents don't care...?
And in today's news there is a shortage of pediatric amoxicillin.
Paradoxically unpopular. Truly a riddle wrapped in a mystery wrapped in an enigma.
The chief problem this study and others never confront is this: These papers are loaded with citations and support for collateral matters, but there is no citation or support for statements like these:
"Despite COVID-19 vaccination campaigns having led to a sharp decline in infections, hospitalisations and deaths . . . ."
"Despite overwhelming evidence supporting its importance as a key primary prevention measure, immunisation has been the object of controversy and vocal opposition ever since its inception."
Where's the citation to "overwhelming evidence?" Shouldn't be hard if there's so much of it. Where's the evidence showing "vaccination campaigns having led to a sharp decline in infections?" That might alleviate some vaccine hesitancy if it existed.
And, if these campaigns supposedly reduced infections, what's up with that Pfizer lady who just testified that they never studied if vaccines reduce transmissibility?
First, get your story straight, then come back at us with some evidence.
Seriously! Last summer it was clear to me that they severely overplayed their hand and that it would be a fatal error on their side. They would have been better off pretending to respect people’s calls for a longer “wait and see” period. But they couldn’t help themselves. And I don’t fully understand the nature of the error. Did they really think it would only be a tiny fringe who were concerned about safety?? How did they not anticipate that they would force together a smart concerned army of educated people willing to work together?? are they just clumsy and unselfaware and made a terrible error? or did they gamble and lose? Knowing this could happen and do it anyway? I still wonder if it went worse or better than they expected it would?
I'm in Oxford, England. I know quite a few people who have had 3 vaccines shots already, but being health middle aged folk they now see a 4th shot as being a step too far . . . reasoning that 3 jabs should have done the job.
Of course there are still some true believers who got the combined flu/Covid shot - and spent a week in bed recovering . . . ah well
Perfect combination of continued scientism and shoveling of the propaganda because they just can't admit wrongdoing, along with mass cognitive dissonance that they are accomplices to mass murder.