Not sure if it might be safer for you here in the US but I have a spare room ! I really am concerned about your safety. If for a week or more we do not hear from you, who is to report what happened! Do not become a second Reiner Fuelmilch please.
We're getting the same stupid laws up here. The intention is to help save public servants from harassment; the reality is that law is being used to stop people critising them. Police, especially.
Worse, our knife-law is now so rubbery a construction worker on his day off, but who has left his tool-box in his car, may be brought up on charges for violating the law. As can a fisher, a scout, or pretty much anyone the police and the prosecutor wants to harass.
Meaning any Swede they want to harass, needless to say.
In other news, last year a Swedish senior made a joke on FB. He asked is "muslim" was a glue for glueing mice to things. "mus" = mouse, "lim" = glue. He got convicted for hate speech.
Juxtapose this with the case of the Arab man who encountering a Swedish Jew, a journalist, greeted him with screaming "Hail Victory!" in attempted German, including the gesture, spat at the journalist, and finally yelled "Fucking Jew" while pointing. Outside a railroad station in a town centre at midday among lots of people.
The prosecutor - despite photo evidence - dropped the case completely. Reason: "the message hadn't been spread to enough people.
Our hate speech law stipulates that a phrase or a word must have been spread to "enough people" for it to count, but the law makes no mention of how many that is, or what the time scale involved is.
In reality, this is of course nothing but a female feminist prosecutor afraid of causing career-critical controversy for trying a non-Swedish person harassing a Swedish Jew (one of the increasingly few remaining in Sweden, thanks to moslems and "CO2mmies).
At first I thought you were talking about England where their public & private discourse has gone totally 'Outer Limits' on the citizenry as well as crimes - see: 'The Rape Gang Inquiry' -- https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/the-rape-gang-inquiry-1
And your declaration that the prosecutor dropped the 'train station' crime "... Reason: "the message hadn't been spread to enough people." is equalling as galling. Those in power who are regulating this ludicrous application of the law have appeared in every Western country. The next step is gonna be - 'if you look at anyone with a mean face' - punishment will be meted out.
Hate speech has come to mean ANYTHING that the powers that be DECIDE is hate speech and just who was the perpetrator and who was the victim. In America, we call that 'a nation of men, NOT of laws'.
"Too many people" means effectiveness, and of course this is the many levels of Law .. we in West have had that different Law for different groups; Elites, Women, Children, and us little-people, now the 'little-people' is protected since white Christian-raised men have been separated.
We know that had it been some white man the law would have come down on him like a ton of bricks - even if no one else saw it but was reported by the journalist. These stories never contain full context like what was the Journalist doing or asking, and other information might put his actions in a better light. I always assume that information is missing and give people the benefit of the doubt.
Our Feminized Sick West does not allow a simple punch in the face for being disrespected like I remember was possible when young - even a young man - people kept rudeness low or at zero and not disrespected a man or a woman protected by a man. Of course, most of us were raised to respect everyone but those that weren't had a reason to not disrespect because that line to correct with simple violence was not too high.
Few would call the police, mostly out of a sense that it was private and maybe the 'victim' thinks that it was right he struck. The rare few times anything like that turned into a fight, I'm sure the police would have laughed at the caller. Unlike today - it is sure that arrests and maybe a number of court visits and ..
.. perhaps State would punish excessively on top of that. Any State that so casually removes a father-children relationship in Divorce-Rape or often false domestic abuse accusations is to insane and unJust to not be feared as we should fear a rabid vicious dog that you cannot escape.
When I was an older boy in early 1970s men and women treated each other with general respect even when maybe they were being very respectful. As a young man working summers on a farm crew we each made sure not to disrespect each-other except in a joking way, and every once in while you need to look another in the eye and suggest that maybe they need to stop doing or saying something - or you will beat the crap out of them. Sometime late 1980s I started to find men and women that did not realize that you could break an arm or leg of theirs without breaking a sweat and in some kind la-la-land in their mind they could act in ways that provoked a response and I sometimes had to 'throw-emergency-breaker' to stop myself from Lovingly Correct that would slap them back to reality but I knew if would cost me my job I loved and arrested and ..
The normalization of disRespect is hard to deal with. Men and women both think little of it.
It's gotten worse over my adult life and it is hard to understand what reality they live in, because if I was provoked into what would have been a person physical communication that needn't go further when a young man and Sanity existed, Now would have to be a payment for the prison-time and broken life they provoked from me so at least broken legs at knees and maybe both arms and be careful not to kill by accident but all the years in prison and the rest of broken life I would have him remember though his crippled painfilled body .. all because this Feminized Hell and unJustice and hyper-powered and psychotic enforcers and courts, some man-hating twisted women judge that has not perspective of masculine responses because men and boys are broken women and girls - or something as insane.
(BTW: My Bucket list is and has been for decades to die without killing anyone. May it soon - if God's Will.)
In this fatherless insane-accepting delusional psychotic VagFeellie-thinking Candy-Land teaching hug-your-abuser solving generations of castrated mind-raped infantile breast-feeding [adult] children at 30 Devouring Mothers and mostly similar Sick womanhood that always votes and rallies for bigger more oppressive Gov the protect her and tuck her in at night because irrationally fear-filled whenever she sees her neighbor that deer-hunts and will surely someday shoot her for no reason, or afraid Putin will break into her house at night, or ..
But don't get me started or I might rant and say what I think about it, and few VagFeelie can hear that without big hurties.
"These stories never contain full context like what was the Journalist doing or asking, and other information might put his actions in a better light. I always assume that information is missing and give people the benefit of the doubt."
In this case the context is quite clear. The assailant is an Arab moslem living in Sweden (possibly born here) becoming angry at a Swedish Jew (the journalist), whom the Arab identified as such thanks to the journalist wearing the Star of David on his jacket.
The journalist filmed the encounter, and security cameras at the station backs up his claims.
Most people never saw or even knew about the body-cam of the police officer charged with killing George Floyd where the officer spent a very long time trying to respectfully interact with Floyd, that video was locked away for days by the Soros foundation owned Black Democratic Public Prossocuter .. that wanted the riots, fires, killings, lootings ..
.. after days someone finally leaked the video, but by then the media did not want to show it and few people saw it.
We must all be careful of those that would twist our understanding to use us as programmed Golems that will harm those already victimized, harm them and ourselves .. they Hate us and would drive us to suffering endlessly till death if they get a dollar or for the fun of it.
Sorry that many lack the understanding that the video taken surely did not include the interaction before, for example the Journalist might have been 'asking' why "your dirty .. {fill in} .. Arabs shouldn't all die like the children sniper killed by israel .." for example.
Yea, thanks for helping other understand how easy it is to control a population retarded-and-mind-raped from crib as ours is.
So you didn't absorb East Germany, it absorbed you. Just like with ushering in China with a favored trading badge didn't turn them into us - except for the health problems by eating junk food - we turned into them with their glittering totalitarianism. I am with Hayek that those who seek power love regulation because it provides the keys to the operating system.
I saw a video of Putin at a Russian Orthodox service for Easter. While he didn't look exactly pious, he was there among very healthy good looking young people who did appear pious. That a former KGB head would be at a Church service must be leaving Stalin/Lenin shaking their fists from the gates of hell. And seeing photos of sparkly cities in the Middle-East also makes me wonder where the future lies. Unfortunately, it may not be in the dustbin that is now Europe and many cities of the US.
"I am with Hayek that those who seek power love regulation because it provides the keys to the operating system."
It's a matter of definition that psychopaths and sociopaths desire power over others as a primary goal -- yet, few go on to make the obvious connection that such people gravitate to government "service" precisely the same way that kiddy-diddlers gravitate to jobs at Disneyland.
"So you didn't absorb East Germany, it absorbed you"
I really like this point. More generally, I've had that thought since living in the (former) "Eastern Bloc".
Corruption, sclerotic, near one-party states, "market" reforms chucking people out of work, obscenely rich oligarchs post-1989... what terrible problems those post-Communist people have! Well, it seems a lot of people over here in the West saw all this, and while bleating about "rebuilding a democratic market state" over _there_ actually thought "Hey... I like the look of this! No Cold War anymore, let's have some of that!".
The Cold War-era Eastern Bloc always _served_ us in the West. It acted as a restraint on what our governments could do, because we couldn't possibly be as bad as those bad guys. So, when there was no more Cold War, no more Communism... all bets were off! And the worst people, in both East and West, could fill their boots and have the time of their lives.
In the UK, there used to be a lot of concern (not that it made any difference!) about the corruption and collusion involved in the takeover of the high-end London property market by oligarchs. It meant - and still means - that the real-estate and financial services industries are invested in this cohort of people. That concern seems to have been obscured now, covered over by the "hey let's all hate on Russians cos Ukraine" prolefeed. (But non-Russian oligarchs are fine!).
How deep this "East takes over West" goes is the subject of a very good spy thriller: "A Spy Alone", Charles Beaumont. Though it's a bit tinged with specifically anti-Russian "Long Telegram" fear, the way it portrays a near-real political state of the UK and the people who run it is up to LeCarré standards.
Maybe it's just that simplest thing--money laundering paying for make-work, like an extended Mafia family that has to feed all its idiot louts unfit for any useful employment other than the basic shakedown of the unfortunate local shopkeepers.
Perhaps the original sin was in setting up the means of teaching everyone to read and write. Then they think they're too good for manual labor but they're really, despite those memorized ABCs, not good enough for anything else.
The fall of USAID has certainly exposed a lot of that in the US.
The conservatives here shouldn''t be too smug though. It was Reagan and Bush the first who greased the wheels for public programs to be administered by private non profits because they felt the government shouldn't deal with it . Much of the problem with those 'non profits' that they farmed the work out to are even less responsive or accountable than the government was and gave the ability for private foundations (like Soros) to step in and call the tune policy-wise
Reagan opened the gates of hell and there were plenty of them. He fucked around all over the world and we've been finding out ever since.
And maybe electing a (known) spook as President was exactly as idiotic as it sounds.
But government is never accountable. Whatever gets uncovered--and usually decades later--is barely the introductory paragraphs.
It's the essential devil's bargain of civilization. You don't get grand inventions and cultural beauty without it but we're not wired to live successfully in large groups.
Our federal gov. is and has been GreatSatan - to use a term I have come to agree with - and it is widely known to do little good.
So, can we stop celebrating that the North won that white Christian-raised men genocidal war driven by Synagogue-of-Satan minions that enslaved all the States and all the peoples?
Sorry, I don't understand. Are you false-witnessing my statement, implying that I would point to an entire ethnic group or racial group to accuse them all?
.. If so, then perhaps YOU alone in your family might be, but likely your are yet another programmed Golem that some minions have confused.
There are subtle differences between NGO and NPO, however that is not the problem in my opinion. The real problem begins when either is funded by the government. It now becomes a corrupt government organization. There should never be government funding of NGO's since there is no control over them by any authority.
When I think about NGOs I think of Haiti and how every decade or so our Corp. Media shows the horrible state of it's people and every nation world-wide sends our taxes and public resources to UN and to NGO that pretend to do something, and media goes away until time to Rape-us all again.
NGOs like Clinton Foundations that took 10 Billion? and did nothing.
Nor does UN and NGOs want anything positive done. Likely causes problems to keep it bad.
NGOs been used by this GreatSatan to launch Color Revolutions .. sure some good must be done by few but they seem to be the small exception.
Your commentary reminds me of the times I visited Germany. I traveled around the country in 1975 and had a great time, but learned very quickly from American students who were there how to navigate. I was told that the average German person would have no problem turning me in to any local authority if I unknowingly broke a law. The person who gave me that specific understanding told me I wouldn't get a warning. I'd learn I'd broken a law or taboo only when faced by someone wearing a uniform with a badge. I saw that in action, too. Years later, in 1985 I was on a train from Belgium to Bremen. The train was about to cross the border with Germany. I told my wife that she needed to understand the rules in Germany and that the people there are extremely vigilant in following rule. I told her what I'd learned on my first visit. She was born in Wurzburg, but left when she was 2, so she had only stories from her parents to go by. She was clueless about a culture that had such little tolerance for deviation from rules. She learned, though. We had a great demonstration after we arrived in Bremen. We had to take a trolley across town to reach the US Army hostel. We boarded at the back and I told my wife to keep pushing our bags forward so I could get to the fare box. I explained that if we didn't pay the fare before we departed someone would turn us in. The trolley was totally full. Not long before we arrived at our destination I was able to reach over a couple of shoulders and drop our fare into the box. As soon as I did and elderly and well-dressed gentleman said, "I was wondering if you were going to pay." The fact that he addressed me in English said he was well educated and had spotted me as an American. What he said told me he'd been monitoring me for a while. My wife was a bit astonished. I just said, "See?" Yes, she saw. I've been reading your posts for a while now. Germany will continue to die if people don't learn to act, speak, and think according to principles instead of just rules of law. Whenever a law violates a principle of freedom that law is unjust and should be vociferously challenged. It's not in the nature of most Germans to do that. It goes against their cultural conditioning to insist on order and obedience. Your leaders are counting on that as they lead you straight down the road to a certain Hell. Good luck. I wish I could help, but can't. All I can do is watch and feel pity. The Germany I saw was far better than the Germany of today. It was a Germany that may never be again. That's up to you and your fellow countrymen. If there is to be a German culture in 50 years, you have to begin to walk back the previous 50 years of mistaken policies. As I said ... Good Luck. I won't be placing my bets on you, though. You have a culture that has had a fatal flaw in it for hundreds of years. Undoing that flaw is the first and most important objective to deal with. Germans must demand more of your leaders. You must demand that your culture be preserved. You must demand that those who live among you, yet refuse to assimilate into your culture be removed. They will be the source of your nation's demise, and allowed to be by your sorry political class.
If the US in all of its chaos can sort itself out and manage to rocket forward, Germany will take note and start to ask more questions about what they might be able to do to emulate.
The German people have been unJustly abused since before WWI and without the Synagogue-of-Satan resentment and drive to punish pre-WWI German gov removing those Private City of London Bankers and Investment and other international powerful groups and methods that had been used to control British Empire and behind our CivilWar and such throughout the West, USA would never have fought in WWI and Germany likely would have Justly won.
.. the rest against Germany was clearly unJust abuse.
Our military mass-murdered a huge number of surrendered German soldiers, and the lies that were created around deaths in their re-education camps have been forced on generations of Germans where anyone that tried to correct them were crushed and still are.
(Image if your father died something when you were young, died protecting you and his family, and those that he was protecting us from forced you and everyone - including your uncles - forced them all to stay silent or to say the lies .. that is how I understand the broken sad peoples now.)
It's clear that they and us all have been haunted by the false 5.7 millions of never-lived never-died European Jews and the lies of a demonic-nature in the people .. who but Zionists would mass murder and genocide others? Holodomor, CivilWar, WWI, WWII, Ukraine-Russian, ..? Normal white Christian-raised men and people wouldn't, and so why would we think WWII Germany would?
A sad people that were and are so tortured while helpless .. only look at Gaza today to see the putrid-lying-inHuman souls that have been a Curse on us all.
Know what those surrender honorable German soldiers died learning - it you let them win they will murder you and torture your children and never stop until they can bomb them to death like Gazans.
Mr. Golus, to try to relate today's Germany to anytime before WWII is a mistake. Your text indicates your biases, which I don't share. Germany has to deal with its own history in its own way. To lose it's culture and heritage to the Muslim hijra seems totally wrongheaded, but that's not the fault of anyone other than themselves. The truth that they're in a situation along with most of Europe is a hollow excuse. Each nation is in a similar situation, but due to somewhat unique reasons. The current unifying theme is the perfidy of the UN and it's countless sub-parts, and the truly dumb belief in multiculturalism and globalism as solutions to anything at all. No one has sold any of Europe's nations out except their leaders. It's no giant Zionist conspiracy at work. It's more fair to point at the Fabians, who have worked tirelessly for a global order for the past 130 years. Your commentary has the scent of a screed. I know many who share your views, but I am just not one of them. I take it you're a German Golus. The very few Golus' I ever met were Polish. My thought is, if that's true, your Polish kinsmen would agree with me far quicker than they would you. My wife was born in Wurzburg, but I didn't mention that her parents and older sister were in a DP camp at the time. Her sister was born in a German farm worker camp near Dresden, where her parents were taken after being captured and removed from Poland. Please don't try to lecture me. I will reject any such attempt. I know who you are.
It seems you have assumed much that is wrong from what I have written. And then used those false implications to further false-witness.
I suffered from and learned from the fraud history being written at the time and we can see being created today around something like Gaza, were Zionist lies about mass rapes, beheaded babies, .. have been shown to be lies - yet still being reported as true, still being mentioned at UN, and elsewhere. Who killed so many israeli non-military on Oct7th? It was israeli military under the 'Hannibal Doctrine', for example, yet few seem to know that because MSM refuses to report it.
Clearly the Fed. Gov has been israel-first for most of my life, and some simple research will show Zionist purchased Congress and President(s), dual citizens and professed Zionists control runs all through Fed Gov, and not hard to extrapolate from policies and such things as passive support of open mass murder in Gaza or illegal warring and murders in region that Zionist control top powerful families and Govs throughout Europe, as many nations in Mid-east.
It's clear you do not know me, and stating such suggest psychotic delusions - but not unusual. I would not be surprised to find I have been unJustly convicted by many because I suggest something we all (me also) were brain-washed to believe and punished if we questioned, and this reply of your is part of those punishments, reputational attack like some vicious 14-yo mean girl. It's everywhere, sadly.
Hope you and us all can find sanity and better Judgement, soon.
Your post reminds me of something I came up with over 10 years ago.
Back when who first came to America to work in tech this was right when feminism and tech bullshit was popular, Even before I understood the politics behind everything, I noticed that something was off. I saw lots and lots of people screaming about how the status quo was bad and demanding change, but I didn't see anybody clearly identifying the end goal of that change. It didn't take very long for me to realize that nobody had ever actually thought that out that far and for an obvious self-interest reason. If you're a professional activist, once you achieve your goal, you lose your job.
So I came up with a hypothetical question. I would love the chance to ask somebody someday. "What is your victory condition? What needs to be true of the world such that you can wake up one morning and say, my work is done here, and then stop doing what you're doing?"
I imagine that the overwhelming majority of activists have literally never even thought about this and do not know the answer. I imagine they will paper over the answer and say "our work will never be done", But that's not an answer to the question. I didn't ask when their work will be done. I asked what they're looking at to know that their work will be done.
If somebody says they're trying to achieve a goal but then you ask them for specifics on that goal and they cannot describe it, you know that they're full of shit and should be disregarded entirely.
One, because I was fourteen and angry at the world once and spent some time on the extreme fringe, and well remember the mindset: the answer from that corner will always be some kind of abstract concept, such as "equity" or "an end to -ism/-phobia" or something similarly Good-sounding yet vague.
(Which ties into that they never reach a victory-condition: you can't do that when you're chasing a Platonic ideal.)
Two, because as a teacher of social science and pol-sci among other things it was part of the job to oppose whatever notion some student or other brought up, when it was debate time (or occurred spontaneously). Radical-insert-ism-of-choice student boldly claims that XYZ is the panacea, curmudgeonly yours truly answers back: "How does that translate to # of nurses trained per year?" or some other tangible metric.
(It's fine to have an opinion and isms and values, but - as I don't need to tell you but the narrative is such that such a phrase needs be placed in the sentence - those values and isms must translate to tangibles, else no matter what one believes in, it all ends up as an Underpants' Gnome-scheme.)
> One, because I was fourteen and angry at the world once and spent some time on the extreme fringe, and well remember the mindset: the answer from that corner will always be some kind of abstract concept, such as "equity" or "an end to -ism/-phobia" or something similarly Good-sounding yet vague.
This is not a valid answer, because how can you make progress towards a goal when you can't even concretely _define_ the goal.
If they were to say something like "We are working towards XYZ, but the world being the way it is, we'll never actually get there, and we have to constantly work towards it", that would be a valid answer, and it would be consistent with what you say.
That is not the answer I have received the handful of times I've asked this question. The answer I have received is usually something that can be distilled down to a blank stare and the comment "what do you mean, end goal?".
By way of example, consider the Christian idea of everyone is always sinful. I always had problems with this, because I've never found 'sin' to be well-defined by the people who say that. But at least in theory, their answer would be "well, when everyone lives like Jesus did, our work is done here. But we have to be realistic, we know that will never happen, we just have to constantly strive towards it". That would be a valid answer. If instead they said "what do you mean? Just keep going to church, bro", that would be an example of what I'm talking about
Possibly, it is because my experience is severly out-of-date (when it concerns my youth), and/or because it is limited to mainly academics and people of means/breeding/station when it concerns career-years, and thus it doesn't fit your context and experience?
I will maintain though that there's been a quite severe shift during the past thirty years, from concrete towards greater and greater abstraction (much longer than thirty years, really, but I'm sticking to the time-period I've been conscious about that change).
I have tried since my teens to understand the concept of sin, beyond an intellectual lexical understanding. and I'm still drawing a blank on that one. Too Nordic to "get it" I think. Crime/law, yes. Wrong/right, yes. But "sin"? To me, all the concept does is turn people into slaves, mentally speaking. Like how we teach dogs to feel shame on command.
Which come to think of it is exactly how the globo-homo-liberal-progressive-climate-and the rest of the list argues: we are "sinful" and must atone for our wickedness by humiliation and subjugation. "You used a gendered pronoun?! For shame! That's ten Hail Lia Thomas and to bed with you!"
When I was 16 I made a girl cry because I Xeno's Paradoxed her faith from her.
Her: "No human can live a sin free life, that's why we have to ask forgiveness from Jesus"
Me: "So, you're saying no person can go even one day without sinning?"
Her: "Yes"
Me: "How about one hour?"
Her: "Yes"
Me: "How about one minute?"
Her (Visibly nervous): "Yes"
Me: "How about 5 seconds?"
Her (Even more visibly nervous): "Yes"
Me: *counts off five seconds from my watch*
Me: "So what sin did I commit?"
This is probably my single biggest problem with Christians. "No human can live without sinning" well, I can and do, unless "sin" has such a meaningless definition that none of us should care.
Some 16 year old girl could not answer your questions well so all Christianity is false? Wow, that seems silly.
Jesus Commands us to Love neighbor as we should Love ourselves and God, for God's Sake. Each choice we make that forgets to reflect on this - for example, is at least a failure to follow Divine Law, is widely done.
There are many ways we all fail like that. Traditional Catholics should often reflect and when we notice our failings to repent and work to change our habits and practices and over time become the better changed people.
'the answer from that corner will always be some kind of abstract concept, such as "equity" or "an end to -ism/-phobia" or something similarly Good-sounding yet vague.'
There is that Soviet Spy that defected and lectures on the method of attack used against West and we now see worked so well against our once good society and Christian-virtue values raised peoples.
McCarthy was right we learned later, Infiltration into Education, Families, Sciences, Catholic (and other) Churches, Government, .. with 'useful idiots' that were programmed with false notions of our intensions and successful True, Justice, Better-Ordering goals and undermined and destroyed with only Power taken from the destroyed remains.
They often believe that nothing is worth keeping and so everything must be destroyed and so only then can a better society be created, but every time mass murder results. A better world is only a few more murders away.
University and now before with mind-raping Sick delusional psychotic women 'educators' directed by Witches have twisted so many generations of young, and we are living in this level of insanities filled Hell and Falling more each generation.
"If you're a professional activist, once you achieve your goal, you lose your job."
When a do-gooder organization actually achieves its stated goal, it quickly finds a new and less achievable goal to perpetuate itself.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving achieved all their goals, then started to agitate against other issues such as speeding and underage purchase.
Why is March of Dimes still around? Youthful polio still a huge problem?
Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) demanded smoke-free aircraft, restaurants, and other public spaces. They got all of that. They’re still around, now agitating for “a world where cigarettes are no longer sold for profit.” a goal that their early supporters never bought into.
I once read an article (can’t find it now, more’s the pity) where the author surveyed lots of examples of do-gooder orgs, and reported that he could only find two examples of orgs who honestly dissolved once they reached their stated goals. I don’t remember one of them, but the other was the Committee to End Pay Toilets in America (CEPTIA). I am told by a colleague that Britain's Anti-Corn-Law League (the predecessor to their Liberal Party) also disbanded after 14 years having reached their goal.
Sometimes it much worse than going on with something else.
After 40+ years of collecting money and volunteer hours to waste, it seems clear to me that many or most of the pro-life groups were Controlled-Opposition run. Likely most workers were honest but top leadership must have been collecting all donated resources and throwing them away to prevent all that potential power going to groups that were actually dedicated and trying to overturn SCOTUS ruling.
When a few people in TX can finally focus on the problem and drive the change, it is simple to ask - why did it take longer than a decade of such insanity to continue.
I have written about this some, here is an example;
I propose a World's Abrahamic Court system that will review secular laws for Holy Legality. The full version of the court(s) will consist of 9 Justices; 3 orthodox Ordained Christians (for example - Traditional Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Messianic Jew), 3 orthodox Rabbis, and 3 orthodox Muslim Imams
Minimum requirements for all; God's 10 Commandments, Basics of Natural Law, and restrictions on Religious defined punishments for conversions and speech (speech without actions other than arguments, information, apologetic, wide range of communication methods)
The Proposal will be to control governments' and powerful forces' unHoly graspings with all the Abrahamic followers in Support. The system of courts would rule on laws that governments create, and require them to be withing limits that do not disrespect us people and our images of God in us all.
Court will not call for assassinations of rulers and significant adult family members but may suggest widespread non-violent protests (violence allowed in defense of person and dignity of God in some situations.) Powerful Forces might mean those families that are minions of Satan and identified by excessive wealth and [hidden] powerful influences, where if all the older adults in their bloodline and those within 3 degrees of separation power-network were removed for influence the region or world would be Truer, more Just, better right Ordered, and so Closer to God and further from those levels of Hell they have caused in the World and our Souls.
Full article that this came from, and ask yourself if you hope for a future we can raise big loving families in? Well then, .. I offer my service to us all;
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2211:, 16th May 2025, Proposal and Apologetic; I should be Accepted as world Pope-King, How and Why..."
There is a phenomenon known as totalitarianism. I am sure we have all heard of it. Though usually we have heard of just the political variant, when actually, you find totalitarianism throughout the course of human dynamics.
I believe totalitarianism is the severe form of what Carl Jung called Shadow Possession. Same concept.
It is a survival tactic, essentially, used by persons who seek the crowd/mob/herd for safety and opinion, rather than their own personal agency. Totalitarians are low on the evolutionary ladder.
"It is a survival tactic, essentially, used by persons who seek the crowd/mob/herd for safety and opinion"
The division into whig and tory is founded in the nature of men; the weakly and nerveless, the rich and the corrupt, seeing more safety and accessibility in a strong executive; the healthy, firm, and virtuous, feeling confidence in their physical and moral resources, and willing to part with only so much power as is necessary for their good government; and, therefore, to retain the rest in the hands of the many, the division will substantially be into Whig and Tory.
He actually said it more than once. I had a hard time choosing between the two passages, as they each lack a stress made by the other:
Wherever there are men, there will be parties... Those of firm health and spirits are unwilling to cede more of their liberty than is necessary to preserve order; those of feeble constitutions will wish to see one strong arm able to protect them from the many. These are the Whigs and Tories of nature... The Tories are for strengthening the Executive and General Government; the Whigs cherish the representative branch and the rights reserved by the States as the bulwark against consolidation.
Oddly, the two groups have done a flip in modern Western society, in that it is the "progressives" who are in favour of political authoritarianism, and the conservatives who are closer to centre.
Please do not buy the "Halftime in America" fantasy peddled by today's progressives, under which the teams inexplicably switched sides on the playing field. Today's authoritarian progressives are, and always have been, the same party that championed slave labor, Jim Crow, and a huge national (instead of a federal) government.
Some others pick the two Zionists we can vote on and then like 2020 will rig the vote to force which of those most of us would never have chosen to be Canidates to begin with.
I bet most of us could rightly point to a local person that would represent us, not israel-first or middle-Class destroying NAFTA-pushing corporation-Firsters. Remember when Gov. use to defend us from Corp Abuse .. I have once 'choice' for internet provider and pay $110 per month that should cost less than $25, and I pay for their 'right-of-way' and all the public resources they use to Monopoly-rape me and us all.
When have you seen any real infrastructure support projects in a long time - besides after a bridge falls down and money is borrowed to fix a little bit, money we already paid for in gas-taxes that instead went to israel or other places that hurt us or others?
Continuing the theme.....totalitarians use a narrative. A belief system. To which no one (inside or outside the group) may question/dissent.
If they do question/dissent, the group will respond with SHUN/SMEAR/PUNISH.
This is because they equate the group narrative with their protector, their source of safety. Therefore everyone must adhere to that narrative.
Naysayers who point out the lies or discrepancies must be dealt with. We saw this with the East European Stasi, and we saw this with the legions of once-normal snitches during COVID-mania. This behaviour signifies herd-people, or the hive-mind. They fear individuality and wish to wipe it out.
They do not wish to evolve, or to self-differentiate.
Yet it’s largely learned. Other groups can learn independent thinking if it is intentional. There will always be outliers too. The weak, and also the strong.
Actually, totalitarianism hits those who have certain vulnerabilities. The hive-mind and an authoritarian leader with an enforceable narrative appeals to them. They are not keen on self-differentiation.
We encountered many of this type during COVID-mania. It is not a learned attribute, but more an issue of being unwilling to awaken.
I see the tendencies in the German population towards hive mind authoritarianism as being learned. The “question authority” attitude in America as also being learned. That said…. Sociologists say 10-15% pop out of their moms being natural skeptics. Probably a survival of the species gene variation.
It has to do more with the need for such survival tactics through the family line (or even the close-knit culture/tribe/herd), due to unresolved trauma of various types. Of course there will always have been a first one in the family line.
This dovetails with subsequent infant Attachment issues in that family line, as in John Bowlby's Attachment Theory. One feeds into the other.
It would take an 8th Degree Jungian Blackbelt analyst to decipher all the self-loathing and nihilist-insanity in post-Merkel Germany. Bad judgement, non-leadership, and a total absence of SHAME…free yourself people of Germany, free yourself.
Brilliantly stated until your disappointing final words, passive and acquiescent: "For the foreseeable future we have to live with it. It sucks". That's what they want: just live with it. That's exactly what the citizens are doing who "quietly eat the fine and try to get on with their lives." Living with it for the foreseeable future ("it will only get worse") takes us to the unforeseeable future, which will vastly more than "suck" without more active resistance now. In fact, we've already arrived at the unforeseeable future for most people. There is no waiting. Don't underestimate your potential to galvanize resistance and reform. You've been mostly an unflinching beacon of truth in this calamity. You are right up there with Thomas Paine.
I do what I can to highlight what is happening and I also refuse to be intimidated or modify what I write, but I also don’t want to be naive about this. I don’t think there is a clear way to resist this thing, at least not right now.
The absurdity would be entertaining to watch from a safe distance, except there is no safe distance anymore.
Here in the US, we might have a slight reprieve, but there are no guarantees. What started with Trump, and then under Covid was like gasoline on a fire, was the ordinary citizen's wholehearted support of speech control. With, of course, no thought of unintended or long-term consequences.
But only a honeymoon effect. Most people who weren’t radical haters needed time to remember context of history and reason. Some needed time to transcend from their bad position as they had been brainwashed. Like the clearing of thick fog.
Me too. I learned that metaphor from eugyppius here in a previous substack article. Had never heard of ant mills before, but they are an apt (and depressing) comparison.
IMO It's going to get much worse. The stakes are so much higher for those who committed crimes against humanity. They have to block or suppress any and all serious dissent that might, possibly, "go viral." And if one thermo-nuclear truth bomb detonates, that's going to lead to other Truth Bombs detonating. So they can't let the first Truth Bomb ignite and, perchance, go viral.
I've been researching the "fact checker" NewsGuard. That organization has approximately 90 employees - They are well-funded and on the attack. Multiply that Censorship Industrial Complex Organization by 200 others ... and that doesn't count the army of "content moderators" that companies like Facebook (still) employ.
As I have said previously, these Hall Monitor types seem to confer god-hood upon themselves, behaving as it they are the moral arbiters of a society. Why? How?
Simply because they received funding from somewhere. With the money they have the power, and so they do.
Zionists have directed Congress through AIPAC and others for who knows how long, and since JFK was killed for not allowing israel to have nukes Zionists rule Federal GreatSatan Gov and all those Billions every year they send goes where? Bribes back to Congress and President (or threat of funding other Canidates), Key families throughout Europe and Middle-East and elsewhere .. our taxes and public resources as well as sons blood and military is directed by Zionists for israel and corporations owned by Zionists such as media and Web-Social-Media and have been most my life.
Not sure if it might be safer for you here in the US but I have a spare room ! I really am concerned about your safety. If for a week or more we do not hear from you, who is to report what happened! Do not become a second Reiner Fuelmilch please.
Is Reiner Fuelmich still being held in German prison?
he got sentenced 3 years and 9 months, and has been transferred to another prison.
See if I can find the detail
https://substack.com/home/post/p-166010938
Elsa has been reporting on his trial for some time now
Thank you for this.
he recently had a Substack started in his own name, but I cannot find it right now. It only had one or 2 items on it
A travesty and a tragedy. Throughout Western history, too often a fate of heroic Messengers
I think I saw a post from him 2 months ago which would imply he’s out but I’d like to know for sure also.
We're getting the same stupid laws up here. The intention is to help save public servants from harassment; the reality is that law is being used to stop people critising them. Police, especially.
Worse, our knife-law is now so rubbery a construction worker on his day off, but who has left his tool-box in his car, may be brought up on charges for violating the law. As can a fisher, a scout, or pretty much anyone the police and the prosecutor wants to harass.
Meaning any Swede they want to harass, needless to say.
In other news, last year a Swedish senior made a joke on FB. He asked is "muslim" was a glue for glueing mice to things. "mus" = mouse, "lim" = glue. He got convicted for hate speech.
Juxtapose this with the case of the Arab man who encountering a Swedish Jew, a journalist, greeted him with screaming "Hail Victory!" in attempted German, including the gesture, spat at the journalist, and finally yelled "Fucking Jew" while pointing. Outside a railroad station in a town centre at midday among lots of people.
The prosecutor - despite photo evidence - dropped the case completely. Reason: "the message hadn't been spread to enough people.
Our hate speech law stipulates that a phrase or a word must have been spread to "enough people" for it to count, but the law makes no mention of how many that is, or what the time scale involved is.
In reality, this is of course nothing but a female feminist prosecutor afraid of causing career-critical controversy for trying a non-Swedish person harassing a Swedish Jew (one of the increasingly few remaining in Sweden, thanks to moslems and "CO2mmies).
At first I thought you were talking about England where their public & private discourse has gone totally 'Outer Limits' on the citizenry as well as crimes - see: 'The Rape Gang Inquiry' -- https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/the-rape-gang-inquiry-1
And your declaration that the prosecutor dropped the 'train station' crime "... Reason: "the message hadn't been spread to enough people." is equalling as galling. Those in power who are regulating this ludicrous application of the law have appeared in every Western country. The next step is gonna be - 'if you look at anyone with a mean face' - punishment will be meted out.
Hate speech has come to mean ANYTHING that the powers that be DECIDE is hate speech and just who was the perpetrator and who was the victim. In America, we call that 'a nation of men, NOT of laws'.
"hate speech" will always evolve into anything the powers decide it is, usually anything that their political opponents say. it's a worthless concept.
Along with that old wheeze “not in the public interest”…
"Too many people" means effectiveness, and of course this is the many levels of Law .. we in West have had that different Law for different groups; Elites, Women, Children, and us little-people, now the 'little-people' is protected since white Christian-raised men have been separated.
We know that had it been some white man the law would have come down on him like a ton of bricks - even if no one else saw it but was reported by the journalist. These stories never contain full context like what was the Journalist doing or asking, and other information might put his actions in a better light. I always assume that information is missing and give people the benefit of the doubt.
Our Feminized Sick West does not allow a simple punch in the face for being disrespected like I remember was possible when young - even a young man - people kept rudeness low or at zero and not disrespected a man or a woman protected by a man. Of course, most of us were raised to respect everyone but those that weren't had a reason to not disrespect because that line to correct with simple violence was not too high.
Few would call the police, mostly out of a sense that it was private and maybe the 'victim' thinks that it was right he struck. The rare few times anything like that turned into a fight, I'm sure the police would have laughed at the caller. Unlike today - it is sure that arrests and maybe a number of court visits and ..
.. perhaps State would punish excessively on top of that. Any State that so casually removes a father-children relationship in Divorce-Rape or often false domestic abuse accusations is to insane and unJust to not be feared as we should fear a rabid vicious dog that you cannot escape.
When I was an older boy in early 1970s men and women treated each other with general respect even when maybe they were being very respectful. As a young man working summers on a farm crew we each made sure not to disrespect each-other except in a joking way, and every once in while you need to look another in the eye and suggest that maybe they need to stop doing or saying something - or you will beat the crap out of them. Sometime late 1980s I started to find men and women that did not realize that you could break an arm or leg of theirs without breaking a sweat and in some kind la-la-land in their mind they could act in ways that provoked a response and I sometimes had to 'throw-emergency-breaker' to stop myself from Lovingly Correct that would slap them back to reality but I knew if would cost me my job I loved and arrested and ..
The normalization of disRespect is hard to deal with. Men and women both think little of it.
It's gotten worse over my adult life and it is hard to understand what reality they live in, because if I was provoked into what would have been a person physical communication that needn't go further when a young man and Sanity existed, Now would have to be a payment for the prison-time and broken life they provoked from me so at least broken legs at knees and maybe both arms and be careful not to kill by accident but all the years in prison and the rest of broken life I would have him remember though his crippled painfilled body .. all because this Feminized Hell and unJustice and hyper-powered and psychotic enforcers and courts, some man-hating twisted women judge that has not perspective of masculine responses because men and boys are broken women and girls - or something as insane.
(BTW: My Bucket list is and has been for decades to die without killing anyone. May it soon - if God's Will.)
In this fatherless insane-accepting delusional psychotic VagFeellie-thinking Candy-Land teaching hug-your-abuser solving generations of castrated mind-raped infantile breast-feeding [adult] children at 30 Devouring Mothers and mostly similar Sick womanhood that always votes and rallies for bigger more oppressive Gov the protect her and tuck her in at night because irrationally fear-filled whenever she sees her neighbor that deer-hunts and will surely someday shoot her for no reason, or afraid Putin will break into her house at night, or ..
But don't get me started or I might rant and say what I think about it, and few VagFeelie can hear that without big hurties.
"These stories never contain full context like what was the Journalist doing or asking, and other information might put his actions in a better light. I always assume that information is missing and give people the benefit of the doubt."
In this case the context is quite clear. The assailant is an Arab moslem living in Sweden (possibly born here) becoming angry at a Swedish Jew (the journalist), whom the Arab identified as such thanks to the journalist wearing the Star of David on his jacket.
The journalist filmed the encounter, and security cameras at the station backs up his claims.
Most people never saw or even knew about the body-cam of the police officer charged with killing George Floyd where the officer spent a very long time trying to respectfully interact with Floyd, that video was locked away for days by the Soros foundation owned Black Democratic Public Prossocuter .. that wanted the riots, fires, killings, lootings ..
.. after days someone finally leaked the video, but by then the media did not want to show it and few people saw it.
We must all be careful of those that would twist our understanding to use us as programmed Golems that will harm those already victimized, harm them and ourselves .. they Hate us and would drive us to suffering endlessly till death if they get a dollar or for the fun of it.
Sorry that many lack the understanding that the video taken surely did not include the interaction before, for example the Journalist might have been 'asking' why "your dirty .. {fill in} .. Arabs shouldn't all die like the children sniper killed by israel .." for example.
Yea, thanks for helping other understand how easy it is to control a population retarded-and-mind-raped from crib as ours is.
So you didn't absorb East Germany, it absorbed you. Just like with ushering in China with a favored trading badge didn't turn them into us - except for the health problems by eating junk food - we turned into them with their glittering totalitarianism. I am with Hayek that those who seek power love regulation because it provides the keys to the operating system.
Ironically, the East Germans are the good guys now.
I saw a video of Putin at a Russian Orthodox service for Easter. While he didn't look exactly pious, he was there among very healthy good looking young people who did appear pious. That a former KGB head would be at a Church service must be leaving Stalin/Lenin shaking their fists from the gates of hell. And seeing photos of sparkly cities in the Middle-East also makes me wonder where the future lies. Unfortunately, it may not be in the dustbin that is now Europe and many cities of the US.
That's Dr Putin. A PhD in Economics. And a degree in International Relations. And a member of the Russian Federation Bar. De Juris.
"I am with Hayek that those who seek power love regulation because it provides the keys to the operating system."
It's a matter of definition that psychopaths and sociopaths desire power over others as a primary goal -- yet, few go on to make the obvious connection that such people gravitate to government "service" precisely the same way that kiddy-diddlers gravitate to jobs at Disneyland.
"So you didn't absorb East Germany, it absorbed you"
I really like this point. More generally, I've had that thought since living in the (former) "Eastern Bloc".
Corruption, sclerotic, near one-party states, "market" reforms chucking people out of work, obscenely rich oligarchs post-1989... what terrible problems those post-Communist people have! Well, it seems a lot of people over here in the West saw all this, and while bleating about "rebuilding a democratic market state" over _there_ actually thought "Hey... I like the look of this! No Cold War anymore, let's have some of that!".
The Cold War-era Eastern Bloc always _served_ us in the West. It acted as a restraint on what our governments could do, because we couldn't possibly be as bad as those bad guys. So, when there was no more Cold War, no more Communism... all bets were off! And the worst people, in both East and West, could fill their boots and have the time of their lives.
In the UK, there used to be a lot of concern (not that it made any difference!) about the corruption and collusion involved in the takeover of the high-end London property market by oligarchs. It meant - and still means - that the real-estate and financial services industries are invested in this cohort of people. That concern seems to have been obscured now, covered over by the "hey let's all hate on Russians cos Ukraine" prolefeed. (But non-Russian oligarchs are fine!).
How deep this "East takes over West" goes is the subject of a very good spy thriller: "A Spy Alone", Charles Beaumont. Though it's a bit tinged with specifically anti-Russian "Long Telegram" fear, the way it portrays a near-real political state of the UK and the people who run it is up to LeCarré standards.
Maybe it's just that simplest thing--money laundering paying for make-work, like an extended Mafia family that has to feed all its idiot louts unfit for any useful employment other than the basic shakedown of the unfortunate local shopkeepers.
Perhaps the original sin was in setting up the means of teaching everyone to read and write. Then they think they're too good for manual labor but they're really, despite those memorized ABCs, not good enough for anything else.
The fall of USAID has certainly exposed a lot of that in the US.
The conservatives here shouldn''t be too smug though. It was Reagan and Bush the first who greased the wheels for public programs to be administered by private non profits because they felt the government shouldn't deal with it . Much of the problem with those 'non profits' that they farmed the work out to are even less responsive or accountable than the government was and gave the ability for private foundations (like Soros) to step in and call the tune policy-wise
Reagan opened the gates of hell and there were plenty of them. He fucked around all over the world and we've been finding out ever since.
And maybe electing a (known) spook as President was exactly as idiotic as it sounds.
But government is never accountable. Whatever gets uncovered--and usually decades later--is barely the introductory paragraphs.
It's the essential devil's bargain of civilization. You don't get grand inventions and cultural beauty without it but we're not wired to live successfully in large groups.
'we're not wired to live successfully in large groups.'
You know that's my main theme. If only people could look at things anthropologically/evolutionarily.
Well, it goes against the whole "God breathed his spirit" theme etc. etc.
'Not wired to live successfully in large groups'. I concur.
It's the indelible impediment.
Our federal gov. is and has been GreatSatan - to use a term I have come to agree with - and it is widely known to do little good.
So, can we stop celebrating that the North won that white Christian-raised men genocidal war driven by Synagogue-of-Satan minions that enslaved all the States and all the peoples?
Hi Stevie. Synagogue of Satan bloodline here. Feelin' fine about it.
Sorry, I don't understand. Are you false-witnessing my statement, implying that I would point to an entire ethnic group or racial group to accuse them all?
.. If so, then perhaps YOU alone in your family might be, but likely your are yet another programmed Golem that some minions have confused.
God Bless., Steve
Well, your statement had me going "Huh?"
You nailed it, Stevie.
There are subtle differences between NGO and NPO, however that is not the problem in my opinion. The real problem begins when either is funded by the government. It now becomes a corrupt government organization. There should never be government funding of NGO's since there is no control over them by any authority.
When I think about NGOs I think of Haiti and how every decade or so our Corp. Media shows the horrible state of it's people and every nation world-wide sends our taxes and public resources to UN and to NGO that pretend to do something, and media goes away until time to Rape-us all again.
NGOs like Clinton Foundations that took 10 Billion? and did nothing.
Nor does UN and NGOs want anything positive done. Likely causes problems to keep it bad.
NGOs been used by this GreatSatan to launch Color Revolutions .. sure some good must be done by few but they seem to be the small exception.
Or maybe power corrupts and they sense a need to double down for fear they’ll lose their position.
I hear that happened with the ancient Egyptian priesthood too.
😂😂😂 Pretty much!
Though, not sure if being eunuchs helps or hurts those instincts.
No, those guys were married with families.
Oh! K! 😂😂😂
Your commentary reminds me of the times I visited Germany. I traveled around the country in 1975 and had a great time, but learned very quickly from American students who were there how to navigate. I was told that the average German person would have no problem turning me in to any local authority if I unknowingly broke a law. The person who gave me that specific understanding told me I wouldn't get a warning. I'd learn I'd broken a law or taboo only when faced by someone wearing a uniform with a badge. I saw that in action, too. Years later, in 1985 I was on a train from Belgium to Bremen. The train was about to cross the border with Germany. I told my wife that she needed to understand the rules in Germany and that the people there are extremely vigilant in following rule. I told her what I'd learned on my first visit. She was born in Wurzburg, but left when she was 2, so she had only stories from her parents to go by. She was clueless about a culture that had such little tolerance for deviation from rules. She learned, though. We had a great demonstration after we arrived in Bremen. We had to take a trolley across town to reach the US Army hostel. We boarded at the back and I told my wife to keep pushing our bags forward so I could get to the fare box. I explained that if we didn't pay the fare before we departed someone would turn us in. The trolley was totally full. Not long before we arrived at our destination I was able to reach over a couple of shoulders and drop our fare into the box. As soon as I did and elderly and well-dressed gentleman said, "I was wondering if you were going to pay." The fact that he addressed me in English said he was well educated and had spotted me as an American. What he said told me he'd been monitoring me for a while. My wife was a bit astonished. I just said, "See?" Yes, she saw. I've been reading your posts for a while now. Germany will continue to die if people don't learn to act, speak, and think according to principles instead of just rules of law. Whenever a law violates a principle of freedom that law is unjust and should be vociferously challenged. It's not in the nature of most Germans to do that. It goes against their cultural conditioning to insist on order and obedience. Your leaders are counting on that as they lead you straight down the road to a certain Hell. Good luck. I wish I could help, but can't. All I can do is watch and feel pity. The Germany I saw was far better than the Germany of today. It was a Germany that may never be again. That's up to you and your fellow countrymen. If there is to be a German culture in 50 years, you have to begin to walk back the previous 50 years of mistaken policies. As I said ... Good Luck. I won't be placing my bets on you, though. You have a culture that has had a fatal flaw in it for hundreds of years. Undoing that flaw is the first and most important objective to deal with. Germans must demand more of your leaders. You must demand that your culture be preserved. You must demand that those who live among you, yet refuse to assimilate into your culture be removed. They will be the source of your nation's demise, and allowed to be by your sorry political class.
If the US in all of its chaos can sort itself out and manage to rocket forward, Germany will take note and start to ask more questions about what they might be able to do to emulate.
This is not an accurate assessment of german culture. If you're a Nigger nobody will dare to call you out for any offense.
Your comment says all anyone needs to understand about you.
The German people have been unJustly abused since before WWI and without the Synagogue-of-Satan resentment and drive to punish pre-WWI German gov removing those Private City of London Bankers and Investment and other international powerful groups and methods that had been used to control British Empire and behind our CivilWar and such throughout the West, USA would never have fought in WWI and Germany likely would have Justly won.
.. the rest against Germany was clearly unJust abuse.
Our military mass-murdered a huge number of surrendered German soldiers, and the lies that were created around deaths in their re-education camps have been forced on generations of Germans where anyone that tried to correct them were crushed and still are.
(Image if your father died something when you were young, died protecting you and his family, and those that he was protecting us from forced you and everyone - including your uncles - forced them all to stay silent or to say the lies .. that is how I understand the broken sad peoples now.)
It's clear that they and us all have been haunted by the false 5.7 millions of never-lived never-died European Jews and the lies of a demonic-nature in the people .. who but Zionists would mass murder and genocide others? Holodomor, CivilWar, WWI, WWII, Ukraine-Russian, ..? Normal white Christian-raised men and people wouldn't, and so why would we think WWII Germany would?
A sad people that were and are so tortured while helpless .. only look at Gaza today to see the putrid-lying-inHuman souls that have been a Curse on us all.
Know what those surrender honorable German soldiers died learning - it you let them win they will murder you and torture your children and never stop until they can bomb them to death like Gazans.
Mr. Golus, to try to relate today's Germany to anytime before WWII is a mistake. Your text indicates your biases, which I don't share. Germany has to deal with its own history in its own way. To lose it's culture and heritage to the Muslim hijra seems totally wrongheaded, but that's not the fault of anyone other than themselves. The truth that they're in a situation along with most of Europe is a hollow excuse. Each nation is in a similar situation, but due to somewhat unique reasons. The current unifying theme is the perfidy of the UN and it's countless sub-parts, and the truly dumb belief in multiculturalism and globalism as solutions to anything at all. No one has sold any of Europe's nations out except their leaders. It's no giant Zionist conspiracy at work. It's more fair to point at the Fabians, who have worked tirelessly for a global order for the past 130 years. Your commentary has the scent of a screed. I know many who share your views, but I am just not one of them. I take it you're a German Golus. The very few Golus' I ever met were Polish. My thought is, if that's true, your Polish kinsmen would agree with me far quicker than they would you. My wife was born in Wurzburg, but I didn't mention that her parents and older sister were in a DP camp at the time. Her sister was born in a German farm worker camp near Dresden, where her parents were taken after being captured and removed from Poland. Please don't try to lecture me. I will reject any such attempt. I know who you are.
It seems you have assumed much that is wrong from what I have written. And then used those false implications to further false-witness.
I suffered from and learned from the fraud history being written at the time and we can see being created today around something like Gaza, were Zionist lies about mass rapes, beheaded babies, .. have been shown to be lies - yet still being reported as true, still being mentioned at UN, and elsewhere. Who killed so many israeli non-military on Oct7th? It was israeli military under the 'Hannibal Doctrine', for example, yet few seem to know that because MSM refuses to report it.
Clearly the Fed. Gov has been israel-first for most of my life, and some simple research will show Zionist purchased Congress and President(s), dual citizens and professed Zionists control runs all through Fed Gov, and not hard to extrapolate from policies and such things as passive support of open mass murder in Gaza or illegal warring and murders in region that Zionist control top powerful families and Govs throughout Europe, as many nations in Mid-east.
It's clear you do not know me, and stating such suggest psychotic delusions - but not unusual. I would not be surprised to find I have been unJustly convicted by many because I suggest something we all (me also) were brain-washed to believe and punished if we questioned, and this reply of your is part of those punishments, reputational attack like some vicious 14-yo mean girl. It's everywhere, sadly.
Hope you and us all can find sanity and better Judgement, soon.
God Bless., Steve
Shalom, Steve.
Your post reminds me of something I came up with over 10 years ago.
Back when who first came to America to work in tech this was right when feminism and tech bullshit was popular, Even before I understood the politics behind everything, I noticed that something was off. I saw lots and lots of people screaming about how the status quo was bad and demanding change, but I didn't see anybody clearly identifying the end goal of that change. It didn't take very long for me to realize that nobody had ever actually thought that out that far and for an obvious self-interest reason. If you're a professional activist, once you achieve your goal, you lose your job.
So I came up with a hypothetical question. I would love the chance to ask somebody someday. "What is your victory condition? What needs to be true of the world such that you can wake up one morning and say, my work is done here, and then stop doing what you're doing?"
I imagine that the overwhelming majority of activists have literally never even thought about this and do not know the answer. I imagine they will paper over the answer and say "our work will never be done", But that's not an answer to the question. I didn't ask when their work will be done. I asked what they're looking at to know that their work will be done.
If somebody says they're trying to achieve a goal but then you ask them for specifics on that goal and they cannot describe it, you know that they're full of shit and should be disregarded entirely.
I can answer that for you, for two reasons:
One, because I was fourteen and angry at the world once and spent some time on the extreme fringe, and well remember the mindset: the answer from that corner will always be some kind of abstract concept, such as "equity" or "an end to -ism/-phobia" or something similarly Good-sounding yet vague.
(Which ties into that they never reach a victory-condition: you can't do that when you're chasing a Platonic ideal.)
Two, because as a teacher of social science and pol-sci among other things it was part of the job to oppose whatever notion some student or other brought up, when it was debate time (or occurred spontaneously). Radical-insert-ism-of-choice student boldly claims that XYZ is the panacea, curmudgeonly yours truly answers back: "How does that translate to # of nurses trained per year?" or some other tangible metric.
(It's fine to have an opinion and isms and values, but - as I don't need to tell you but the narrative is such that such a phrase needs be placed in the sentence - those values and isms must translate to tangibles, else no matter what one believes in, it all ends up as an Underpants' Gnome-scheme.)
> One, because I was fourteen and angry at the world once and spent some time on the extreme fringe, and well remember the mindset: the answer from that corner will always be some kind of abstract concept, such as "equity" or "an end to -ism/-phobia" or something similarly Good-sounding yet vague.
This is not a valid answer, because how can you make progress towards a goal when you can't even concretely _define_ the goal.
If they were to say something like "We are working towards XYZ, but the world being the way it is, we'll never actually get there, and we have to constantly work towards it", that would be a valid answer, and it would be consistent with what you say.
That is not the answer I have received the handful of times I've asked this question. The answer I have received is usually something that can be distilled down to a blank stare and the comment "what do you mean, end goal?".
By way of example, consider the Christian idea of everyone is always sinful. I always had problems with this, because I've never found 'sin' to be well-defined by the people who say that. But at least in theory, their answer would be "well, when everyone lives like Jesus did, our work is done here. But we have to be realistic, we know that will never happen, we just have to constantly strive towards it". That would be a valid answer. If instead they said "what do you mean? Just keep going to church, bro", that would be an example of what I'm talking about
Interesting distinction.
Possibly, it is because my experience is severly out-of-date (when it concerns my youth), and/or because it is limited to mainly academics and people of means/breeding/station when it concerns career-years, and thus it doesn't fit your context and experience?
I will maintain though that there's been a quite severe shift during the past thirty years, from concrete towards greater and greater abstraction (much longer than thirty years, really, but I'm sticking to the time-period I've been conscious about that change).
I have tried since my teens to understand the concept of sin, beyond an intellectual lexical understanding. and I'm still drawing a blank on that one. Too Nordic to "get it" I think. Crime/law, yes. Wrong/right, yes. But "sin"? To me, all the concept does is turn people into slaves, mentally speaking. Like how we teach dogs to feel shame on command.
Which come to think of it is exactly how the globo-homo-liberal-progressive-climate-and the rest of the list argues: we are "sinful" and must atone for our wickedness by humiliation and subjugation. "You used a gendered pronoun?! For shame! That's ten Hail Lia Thomas and to bed with you!"
When I was 16 I made a girl cry because I Xeno's Paradoxed her faith from her.
Her: "No human can live a sin free life, that's why we have to ask forgiveness from Jesus"
Me: "So, you're saying no person can go even one day without sinning?"
Her: "Yes"
Me: "How about one hour?"
Her: "Yes"
Me: "How about one minute?"
Her (Visibly nervous): "Yes"
Me: "How about 5 seconds?"
Her (Even more visibly nervous): "Yes"
Me: *counts off five seconds from my watch*
Me: "So what sin did I commit?"
This is probably my single biggest problem with Christians. "No human can live without sinning" well, I can and do, unless "sin" has such a meaningless definition that none of us should care.
Some 16 year old girl could not answer your questions well so all Christianity is false? Wow, that seems silly.
Jesus Commands us to Love neighbor as we should Love ourselves and God, for God's Sake. Each choice we make that forgets to reflect on this - for example, is at least a failure to follow Divine Law, is widely done.
There are many ways we all fail like that. Traditional Catholics should often reflect and when we notice our failings to repent and work to change our habits and practices and over time become the better changed people.
God Bless., Steve
No, chiristianity is false because magic doesn't exist, you dumb fuck
Maybe learn some basic reading comprehension if you want your evangelism to be effective.
'the answer from that corner will always be some kind of abstract concept, such as "equity" or "an end to -ism/-phobia" or something similarly Good-sounding yet vague.'
Oh, of course you mean World Peace.
;)
There is that Soviet Spy that defected and lectures on the method of attack used against West and we now see worked so well against our once good society and Christian-virtue values raised peoples.
McCarthy was right we learned later, Infiltration into Education, Families, Sciences, Catholic (and other) Churches, Government, .. with 'useful idiots' that were programmed with false notions of our intensions and successful True, Justice, Better-Ordering goals and undermined and destroyed with only Power taken from the destroyed remains.
They often believe that nothing is worth keeping and so everything must be destroyed and so only then can a better society be created, but every time mass murder results. A better world is only a few more murders away.
University and now before with mind-raping Sick delusional psychotic women 'educators' directed by Witches have twisted so many generations of young, and we are living in this level of insanities filled Hell and Falling more each generation.
I have come to fully and sincerely believe that women must be stripped of the right to vote if we don't want society to collapse.
I'm also starting to believe they must be stripped of literacy, but that's a bit of a harder sell.
"If you're a professional activist, once you achieve your goal, you lose your job."
When a do-gooder organization actually achieves its stated goal, it quickly finds a new and less achievable goal to perpetuate itself.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving achieved all their goals, then started to agitate against other issues such as speeding and underage purchase.
Why is March of Dimes still around? Youthful polio still a huge problem?
Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) demanded smoke-free aircraft, restaurants, and other public spaces. They got all of that. They’re still around, now agitating for “a world where cigarettes are no longer sold for profit.” a goal that their early supporters never bought into.
I once read an article (can’t find it now, more’s the pity) where the author surveyed lots of examples of do-gooder orgs, and reported that he could only find two examples of orgs who honestly dissolved once they reached their stated goals. I don’t remember one of them, but the other was the Committee to End Pay Toilets in America (CEPTIA). I am told by a colleague that Britain's Anti-Corn-Law League (the predecessor to their Liberal Party) also disbanded after 14 years having reached their goal.
Sometimes it much worse than going on with something else.
After 40+ years of collecting money and volunteer hours to waste, it seems clear to me that many or most of the pro-life groups were Controlled-Opposition run. Likely most workers were honest but top leadership must have been collecting all donated resources and throwing them away to prevent all that potential power going to groups that were actually dedicated and trying to overturn SCOTUS ruling.
When a few people in TX can finally focus on the problem and drive the change, it is simple to ask - why did it take longer than a decade of such insanity to continue.
I have written about this some, here is an example;
I propose a World's Abrahamic Court system that will review secular laws for Holy Legality. The full version of the court(s) will consist of 9 Justices; 3 orthodox Ordained Christians (for example - Traditional Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Messianic Jew), 3 orthodox Rabbis, and 3 orthodox Muslim Imams
Minimum requirements for all; God's 10 Commandments, Basics of Natural Law, and restrictions on Religious defined punishments for conversions and speech (speech without actions other than arguments, information, apologetic, wide range of communication methods)
The Proposal will be to control governments' and powerful forces' unHoly graspings with all the Abrahamic followers in Support. The system of courts would rule on laws that governments create, and require them to be withing limits that do not disrespect us people and our images of God in us all.
Court will not call for assassinations of rulers and significant adult family members but may suggest widespread non-violent protests (violence allowed in defense of person and dignity of God in some situations.) Powerful Forces might mean those families that are minions of Satan and identified by excessive wealth and [hidden] powerful influences, where if all the older adults in their bloodline and those within 3 degrees of separation power-network were removed for influence the region or world would be Truer, more Just, better right Ordered, and so Closer to God and further from those levels of Hell they have caused in the World and our Souls.
Full article that this came from, and ask yourself if you hope for a future we can raise big loving families in? Well then, .. I offer my service to us all;
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2211:, 16th May 2025, Proposal and Apologetic; I should be Accepted as world Pope-King, How and Why..."
https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2211
There is a phenomenon known as totalitarianism. I am sure we have all heard of it. Though usually we have heard of just the political variant, when actually, you find totalitarianism throughout the course of human dynamics.
I believe totalitarianism is the severe form of what Carl Jung called Shadow Possession. Same concept.
It is a survival tactic, essentially, used by persons who seek the crowd/mob/herd for safety and opinion, rather than their own personal agency. Totalitarians are low on the evolutionary ladder.
"It is a survival tactic, essentially, used by persons who seek the crowd/mob/herd for safety and opinion"
The division into whig and tory is founded in the nature of men; the weakly and nerveless, the rich and the corrupt, seeing more safety and accessibility in a strong executive; the healthy, firm, and virtuous, feeling confidence in their physical and moral resources, and willing to part with only so much power as is necessary for their good government; and, therefore, to retain the rest in the hands of the many, the division will substantially be into Whig and Tory.
--THOMAS JEFFERSON TO JOEL BARLOW, 1802.
It is a principle manifesting within humanity that has been described in many different ways. All essentially the same concept.
I was unaware that Thomas Jefferson had had something to say about it. Thank you for drawing my attention to this.
He actually said it more than once. I had a hard time choosing between the two passages, as they each lack a stress made by the other:
Wherever there are men, there will be parties... Those of firm health and spirits are unwilling to cede more of their liberty than is necessary to preserve order; those of feeble constitutions will wish to see one strong arm able to protect them from the many. These are the Whigs and Tories of nature... The Tories are for strengthening the Executive and General Government; the Whigs cherish the representative branch and the rights reserved by the States as the bulwark against consolidation.
--THOMAS JEFFERSON, MISC NOTES, 1801
Oddly, the two groups have done a flip in modern Western society, in that it is the "progressives" who are in favour of political authoritarianism, and the conservatives who are closer to centre.
Please do not buy the "Halftime in America" fantasy peddled by today's progressives, under which the teams inexplicably switched sides on the playing field. Today's authoritarian progressives are, and always have been, the same party that championed slave labor, Jim Crow, and a huge national (instead of a federal) government.
Some others pick the two Zionists we can vote on and then like 2020 will rig the vote to force which of those most of us would never have chosen to be Canidates to begin with.
I bet most of us could rightly point to a local person that would represent us, not israel-first or middle-Class destroying NAFTA-pushing corporation-Firsters. Remember when Gov. use to defend us from Corp Abuse .. I have once 'choice' for internet provider and pay $110 per month that should cost less than $25, and I pay for their 'right-of-way' and all the public resources they use to Monopoly-rape me and us all.
When have you seen any real infrastructure support projects in a long time - besides after a bridge falls down and money is borrowed to fix a little bit, money we already paid for in gas-taxes that instead went to israel or other places that hurt us or others?
Continuing the theme.....totalitarians use a narrative. A belief system. To which no one (inside or outside the group) may question/dissent.
If they do question/dissent, the group will respond with SHUN/SMEAR/PUNISH.
This is because they equate the group narrative with their protector, their source of safety. Therefore everyone must adhere to that narrative.
Naysayers who point out the lies or discrepancies must be dealt with. We saw this with the East European Stasi, and we saw this with the legions of once-normal snitches during COVID-mania. This behaviour signifies herd-people, or the hive-mind. They fear individuality and wish to wipe it out.
They do not wish to evolve, or to self-differentiate.
Progressive and Movement. Two words describing never contented. Never settling. Always in motion- in a leftward direction.
A diehard longtime lefty named Randi Weingarten just quit the Democrat hierarchy due to intolerance to yesterday’s ordained mantas.
Yet it’s largely learned. Other groups can learn independent thinking if it is intentional. There will always be outliers too. The weak, and also the strong.
Actually, totalitarianism hits those who have certain vulnerabilities. The hive-mind and an authoritarian leader with an enforceable narrative appeals to them. They are not keen on self-differentiation.
We encountered many of this type during COVID-mania. It is not a learned attribute, but more an issue of being unwilling to awaken.
I see the tendencies in the German population towards hive mind authoritarianism as being learned. The “question authority” attitude in America as also being learned. That said…. Sociologists say 10-15% pop out of their moms being natural skeptics. Probably a survival of the species gene variation.
It has to do more with the need for such survival tactics through the family line (or even the close-knit culture/tribe/herd), due to unresolved trauma of various types. Of course there will always have been a first one in the family line.
This dovetails with subsequent infant Attachment issues in that family line, as in John Bowlby's Attachment Theory. One feeds into the other.
It would take an 8th Degree Jungian Blackbelt analyst to decipher all the self-loathing and nihilist-insanity in post-Merkel Germany. Bad judgement, non-leadership, and a total absence of SHAME…free yourself people of Germany, free yourself.
There are lifeforms other than biological ones.
Brilliantly stated until your disappointing final words, passive and acquiescent: "For the foreseeable future we have to live with it. It sucks". That's what they want: just live with it. That's exactly what the citizens are doing who "quietly eat the fine and try to get on with their lives." Living with it for the foreseeable future ("it will only get worse") takes us to the unforeseeable future, which will vastly more than "suck" without more active resistance now. In fact, we've already arrived at the unforeseeable future for most people. There is no waiting. Don't underestimate your potential to galvanize resistance and reform. You've been mostly an unflinching beacon of truth in this calamity. You are right up there with Thomas Paine.
I do what I can to highlight what is happening and I also refuse to be intimidated or modify what I write, but I also don’t want to be naive about this. I don’t think there is a clear way to resist this thing, at least not right now.
The absurdity would be entertaining to watch from a safe distance, except there is no safe distance anymore.
Here in the US, we might have a slight reprieve, but there are no guarantees. What started with Trump, and then under Covid was like gasoline on a fire, was the ordinary citizen's wholehearted support of speech control. With, of course, no thought of unintended or long-term consequences.
But only a honeymoon effect. Most people who weren’t radical haters needed time to remember context of history and reason. Some needed time to transcend from their bad position as they had been brainwashed. Like the clearing of thick fog.
Sounds like another example of the usual "ant wheel" of aggressively pointless government.
Love the ant wheel, a.k.a. ant mill https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant_mill
Me too. I learned that metaphor from eugyppius here in a previous substack article. Had never heard of ant mills before, but they are an apt (and depressing) comparison.
Phantastic and terrifying metaphor.
It's no wonder that so many people want to live in America. As bad as it has gotten here, I can still insult a politician with impunity.
Plus, we provide our citizens such a target-rich environment.
Incidentally, this came over the transom this morning, focusing on our good buddy Christian Drosten: https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/with-walls-closing-in-german-virologist
I like the transom imagery like the flood of a following wave.
IMO It's going to get much worse. The stakes are so much higher for those who committed crimes against humanity. They have to block or suppress any and all serious dissent that might, possibly, "go viral." And if one thermo-nuclear truth bomb detonates, that's going to lead to other Truth Bombs detonating. So they can't let the first Truth Bomb ignite and, perchance, go viral.
I've been researching the "fact checker" NewsGuard. That organization has approximately 90 employees - They are well-funded and on the attack. Multiply that Censorship Industrial Complex Organization by 200 others ... and that doesn't count the army of "content moderators" that companies like Facebook (still) employ.
Not to mention the increasing use of AI.
As I have said previously, these Hall Monitor types seem to confer god-hood upon themselves, behaving as it they are the moral arbiters of a society. Why? How?
Simply because they received funding from somewhere. With the money they have the power, and so they do.
Or fear of ostracism from “the group.”
Yes, but some of the group will beat you over the head with their dictates, while others do snitching at the most.
Zionists have directed Congress through AIPAC and others for who knows how long, and since JFK was killed for not allowing israel to have nukes Zionists rule Federal GreatSatan Gov and all those Billions every year they send goes where? Bribes back to Congress and President (or threat of funding other Canidates), Key families throughout Europe and Middle-East and elsewhere .. our taxes and public resources as well as sons blood and military is directed by Zionists for israel and corporations owned by Zionists such as media and Web-Social-Media and have been most my life.