At least in the US, it seems that the fall back position of the public health establishment is that the negative effects and failure of their pandemic response is due to people not following their prescriptions well enough. People didn’t stay home, they didn’t mask hard enough, they didn’t all get vaccinated, and if the did get vaccinated they didn’t all get the boosters as often as possible. If everybody had just followed their advice, Covid would be gone and nobody would ever die again.
Here stateside, Dr. Walensky’s testimony yesterday was just incredible- she’s even admitting that the data was never there for comparing hospitalizations between vaccinated/unvaccinated, she was lying to our faces and look at her smug face while she tells us that!
Not chosen, then they'd be megalomaniacal and suffer delusions of grandeur.
They feel they have taken up a sacred duty and a burden for the benefit of others, making them martyrs and paladins - a much more dangerous trait in anyone with power.
Of course, all these elements may be present to varying degrees - psychology isn't a "hard" science after all.
I haven't listened to the entirety of her testimony, but my first follow-up to that response would have been "Why on earth weren't you tracking vaccinated versus unvaccinated, or at the very least why is that data not available?"
"If everybody had just followed their advice...." Note the precise parallel to the socialist refrain, "They didn't do socialism right", or "That's not real socialism". Which, of course, is supposed to explain away the abject failure of state socialism. Or at least end any discussion thereof.
Defenders of the pandemic responses ALWAYS blame "the people" for failure to comply with whatever rules and conditions were imposed. The efficacy of those rules is NEVER open to discussion. It has, and probably will always be, "YOU DIDN'T DO IT RIGHT!".
This is the pattern of every technocratic intervention by the the bureaucracy, beautifully elucidated by Thomas Sowell in his masterful ‘Vision of the Anointed.’
the lockdown protocols were not adhered to so people died, and simultaneously the protocols were adhered to so successfully that the seasonable flu disappeared. go figure.
They know that the massive wave of excess deaths is either caused by the vaccines or by delayed lockdown effects or a combination of both. Both causes are not something they are keen to look into....
wait long enough until people forget. just go on as usual, continuing the same old lies forever. Governments do this over and over again everywhere, for thousands of years. Why do people let this happen? Wouldn't it be great to go back to close communities, like there still are in less 'civilized' places in the world? Better to go to the medicine man than to all these psycho docs.
Yes. And it was the lockdowns that paved the way for mass vaccination anyway.
But have you noticed many on our side have developed a monomania about the vaccines, pretty much forgetting the evil of lockdowns in the process? I find it to be a weird turn of events.
I belong to a campaign group in the UK that lobbied against lockdowns, vaccine passes, and vaccine mandates. Our primary concern is restoring the democratic process, the rule of law, transparency around policymaking, and accountability in government.
Well, we get slammed all the time not for not taking an emphatic stance against all covid vaccines... Apparently we are apologists for the establishment for not promoting claims about genocide and depopulation. These vax-is-murder people who hound us are as zealous and nasty as the most fervent pro-lockdown covidians. It's so disappointing.
The lockdowns broke the social contract as understood by a large number of people. It also crushed the hopes and dreams of a large group of people. That type of social displacement effects has long term health impacts. There is also the increase in drug use, food shortages, and decreased medical care. It is all a massive public health failure.
I am Canadian not living there now..but I see from afar the evil deeds being done to the once ‘Best country in World’ and I cry. The WEF put JT & Lib party in office and the WEF is running Canada from inside. DPM Freeland is secretary of WEF..do a lot of Cnds not see this?
I recently read a quote supposedly made by Jefferson. It's certainly plausible enough. The gist of it was that the newspapers of the day reported such lies, that a man was literally closer to the truth if he had read nothing at all and was ignorant of alleged current events.
I keep coming back to the observation that "COVID" death ascended in much of the world as vaccinations were taken up by the population in 2021-2022, and then decline precipitously when people suddenly stopped getting boosters en masse in the Fall of last year when it became clear to even the densest of minds that the vaccines weren't working.
And remember, they were all counted as unjabbed. You weren’t jabbed until 14 days after dose two. By then, everyone who was going to drop from the jab was gone already. IMHO, the whole reason for the two dose regimen was to hide the carnage. Those damn anti vaxxers!!!! A study out of Denmark 🇩🇰 believe, showed much better results in those who had one jab only. Yet another example of the “experts” doing every single thing wrong. What a coincidence.
On the one hand, a valid claim could be made to call them "unvaccinated," as the makers from the start claimed that 14-days and/or two doses were required for full effect.
On the other hand, it's my understanding that -- with legacy vaccines -- most severe reactions/deaths are fairly quick (acute reactions, minutes to days after).
I give Them credit, if they planned it that way. It's certainly plausible: they knew that most bad news happens within the first hours, few days. By not claiming anyone is vaxxed until 14+ days later, right there they've reduced their adverse effects by 90% or whatever.
The scam isn't all that different from how some countries embarrassed by high infant mortality "solved" the problem by not adding births to the rolls until the child had made it to age one.
If memory serves me, 50% of Vaers deaths were within 48 hours and 80% within two weeks. I’m guessing the majority of the final 20% happened before that 44 day mark. The charts showing the giant death spikes when the jabs were rolled out lasted about a month. How convenient. And or course all of the SADS deaths we are seeing now are long Covid. Or so the sheeple believe.
What galls me is that a significant number of vaccine deaths were not only tagged "unvaccinated", but probably attributed to COVID as well! That's a double win for the vaccinators.
Cardiologist Peter McCullough testified before the Pennsylvania state Senate and was asked if there's any research on vaccines passing from blood donors to blood recipients. He said there's no research being conducted on this BUT....
The Red Cross is changing its blood donor info to reflect on the dozens of supposed new genders of persons donating blood.
I am old enough to have given blood during the AIDS crisis,there was a very unusual period of time when the following happened.They went over a questionnaire with different questions about AIDS ,have you been exposed,had sex with someone who was exposed,diagnosed HIV+ etc.If you were safe according to your answers,you would be put through the process of giving blood.You were also given a piece of paper with 2 stickers.One sticker was to indicate you were truthful with you answers and you blood was safe ,the second sticker was to indicate you want your blood to be disposed of because it might be HIV+.You placed the sticker on the form and a reader later on would toss the blood ,I forgot how the anonymous part worked but you weren’t linked to the blood. The idea behind this was so blood drives at an office etc. wouldn’t be a shaming event for a person who believed they could possibly be infected.
This behavior is standard Red Cross ,they never want to admit any problems or slow donors or users.
That was Dr. McCullough's question. It seemed from listening to his testimony that there's little research being done on the consequences of this mass vaccine experiment.
My guess is that the medical bureaucrats DO NOT WANT TO KNOW the extent of their culpability in a ticking time bomb.
Yes. Absolutely no research is being done in the long-term medical consequences regarding the shots. Why? There is a quite sizeable control group of people not receiving the shots (30% of 300 million people) to compare against. Why are there no studies between the health of this control group and those shotted? As you say, the medical industrial complex doesn't want to know, or more likely want to be sued.
Additionally, Big Pharma is now embarking on a "humanitarian" program of giving the shots to the "under-served" population of Africa, thereby destroying a very large control group.
Africans have rejected the shots..it’s all BS..Africans endured decades of Pharma NGO’s..so many groups..using them & children as test subjects..they learned of the evil being done and have rejected it. UN/NGO’s trying to force them to take this poison..
Tardigrade - Because how would that make money for TPTB? I realize this is an extremely cynical comment, but I’m just going on my observation of what has actually happened. The only way to get a safe blood transfusion for a planned, or unplanned, surgery is to bank your own. Which only wealthy people can afford, of course. One should not have to be wealthy to receive a safe blood transfusion. Then again, a lot of things are not as they should be.
I'm in the UK. I asked the NHS Blood Transfusion Service if they logged donors' Covid 'vaccine' status. They do not - they only ask if the donor has had the disease - I got spun a lot of rubbish about how safe the blood is due to the vaccine staying at the site of vaccination and the expulsion of any residue in a few days!
I have it on my medical record that I do not wish to have a blood transfusion from a Covid vaccinated person - just to make sure!
Well, they're not going to know if the blood they're giving you came from the Jabbed. How would they?
A guy from work got pancreatic cancer shortly after his first booster. He mentioned it to the doctors so the nurse made note of it. Fat chance that's going anywhere.
Obviously - but you can refuse the blood. Jehovah's Witnesses - I'm not one - have been doing this for religious beliefs since blood donation started. There's an organisation that now registers people with (Covid) unvaccinated blood - either donors, recipients or both. Also, it's possible to use friends or family if of the correct match, donate blood to yourself in advance if you know it's needed, and there are other treatments depending on the circumstances.
What exasperates me is that because the mRNA traveled through the entire body it created a tsunami of different side effects, making it easier for the health officials to bury their heads in the sand and pretend they didn’t see the link. Dr. Rose just published moment ago this incredible compilation of side effects that Pfizer was hiding listed from 2021 to 2022. There are obvious trends to be seen here but as you noted, the agencies responsible for mandates are looking the other way. Our media is also intent on shoving down our throats instead ever pathetic dramatic story that they can dig up to further distract us.
Now that J and J was officially buried with Davy Jones’ locker, will we get a compilation of possible side effects to track?
Even though contract after contract specifically excluded any way to sue pharma companies, governments also now know the scale of the problem is big enough to be a significant debt in it's own right. So, the policy for all who imposed this mess is silence or denouncement, in the hope no one actually sues the elite.
I just keep musing..there are 7.5 billion people worldwide..what is the percent in the ‘masters in charge’? Is it 0.001? Maybe when the ants awaken the hive will shake.
They're relying on the fallacy of the counterfactual hypothetical. That process cites something that didn't happen to explain something else that didn't happen ("It would have been worse IF we hadn't vaccinated"). But neither thing happened, so their prediction is a baseless fallacy. But people find it persuasive if they don't think about it too much.
I'm just an amateur logician. However, I feel obligated to point out that, as with many tools, a counterfactual can be used in a valid or an invalid way.
A valid example would be a proposition like:
"If it had rained, then there would be puddles in the street." The statement is a counterfactual (perhaps it didn't rain) but it's logically admissible because the proposition's components could be evaluated to be true or false. Also, there's no contradiction in them.
Now consider the expression:
"If my aunt had a dick, she'd be my uncle." This is inadmissible because of the contradiciton that having a dick is incompatible with the definition of "aunt." Truth or falsehood does not even enter in, since the part of the equation is logically incoherent, as much as would be a piece of wood made of iron.
Interesting, thank you for that explanation. So how would one evaluate the statment "My father took 5 injections then died of Covid, but it would have worse if he weren't vaccinated?" It would be laughable if it weren't so tragic, but I've actually seen that said.
“But the sky did NOT crash down upon us because we followed the priestly caste and made the rituals at the pyramids. If we hadn’t, it would have been infinitely worse with the sky turning blood red and crashing upon us. Are you implying it would somehow be BETTER if we didn’t do the blood sacrifices?”
"The total lack of interest in explaining these strange numbers speaks volumes."
It's not just the authorities. Just yesterday, a vaxxed friend told me about someone she knew who died suddenly from a blood clot; guy in his 50s I think. I said in the most bland way possible that *some* people are having side effects from the vaxx.
It was like it tripped a switch in her. "People have always had blood clots and died. It's totally normal. It's always happened and will always happen. It's completely normal."
There are three things that are scary for the future which is why it’s important we keep talking about this:
1) The WHO digital health initiative. They are going by how “successful” what they did was that they want to expand it to all vaccines with restrictions on freedom of movement and association - among others
2) The excess deaths have not slowed down in 2023 and are unlikely to slow down considering the virus is still around with many people having broken immune systems
3) The possibility of a more virulent variant which they can use as a pretext to put 1) and all the authoritarian dystopian plans they have in mind for us plebs
'unlikely to slow down considering the virus is still around with many people having broken immune systems'
Do you still consider coronavirus in its current form a bigger risk than any other infectious disease? It seems to me they're pretty much of equal risk now, with all those broken immune systems.
The virus (SARS-COV-2) not the disease (COVID-19).
Among other things, the class switching of IgGs to IgG4 induces tolerance to the virus, which promotes reinfection and reduces virus clearance, causing immune exhaustion, which in turn prevents it from keeping at bay cancer, and other infectious diseases.
Also, the virus is constantly evolving. With omicron it increased infectiousness at the expense of virulence however since everyone who is vaccinated has the exact same immune response this forces the virus to potentially increase virulence.
There you go - using logic again. Did you not receive the memo? The one which clearly stated that logic is NEVER to be applied in discussions regarding covid.
We have until November 2023 to try to halt this WHO treaty(bill..agreement?) If it passes..it is doom..that ‘consortium of WHO/UN..Govt) will have absolute control and nations will have NO sovereignty at all..they will do whatever they wish..we must get involved by pressuring all govt agencies..leaders..from the top to bottom to SAY NO..it will destroy Constitution totally!
Our political-medial was quite skilled to create a panic about a flu virus, but its true power lies in the things that it ignores and not talks about, and makes the citizens totally ignore it as well.
Nordstream is another good example, or the impoverishment of society, or the daily knife attacks by "a man".
It was disheartening to see when you friends & relatives went into a panic because somebody somewhere may get Covid, but they are completely uninterested in the results of what has been done to them.
Not only are people uninterested in what has been done to them, they really REALLY believe that these injections saved their lives.
Case in point: SIL has a masters degree. Over 65. Middle son was an occasional drug user, died 5 days after Pfi$er injection. They blame the drugs. A year or so later, SIL's husband gets a booster and has shingles for almost 9 months that turn into neuropathy. The doctor says he is vaxx injured.
My SIL (who is a lovely, albeit trusting person) has said she will get more boosters if her doctor says so.
Probably they cannot admit to themselves that they did grievously wrong by trusting the government and taking the medication. They would not be able to live with the regrets they would have.
It is. There are things that can be done to mitigate the damage, but until people are open to admitting there *might* be a problem, they're not open to a possible solution. Very, very sad.
Edward Dowd & The Ethical Skeptic also have mounds of statistical data showing the toxicity of the covid vax. The lockdowns & all other government interventions were damaging also but the vax itself has caused, will continue to cause outrageous numbers of death & injury plus a decline in births. Another casualty is the modern "healthcare" system; I woked in it for 37years & I won't set foot near it ever again.
I can't prove it but I'm certain Edward Dowd can't be trusted. Better to never listen to someone like that (someone who claims to have made billions running an investment fund but betrays his ignorance about the markets everytime he talks. He doesn't know the markets at all).
Which leads to the issue of why so many people in the anti narrative crowd are imposters. Did you know that Stew Peters was trying to make it as a gangster rapper pre-Covid? Look him up on BitChute. I'm sure you know at least a little about Robert Malone, Dr. David Martin and Del Bigtree, to make just three.
When I consider the own effects the "pandemic" had on my health—the increased drinking, the weight gain, the falling out with friends and family, the unnerving condition of being attacked whenever I left my home—I think it's entirely possible that a great many old and frail people simply died of stress. I have no doubt that the vaccine kills in some instances, but I do wish we could disentangle those deaths from people who checked out because they couldn't handle living in a festering open air vagina hospital ward.
What? The pandemic was the best time of my life. I got 3 1/2 months to organize and de-stress. Then I found out almost everyone I'd ever known couldn't be trusted. Sure it sucked but it's better then never knowing at all.
Then I lost my job and got it back 6 months later. Half of my coworkers still shun me. Again, I'd rather have known they're weasels then live in ignorance. Also, on balance, the people who obeyed the company mandate are furious and none of them know why. Mad at the company or union? Mad at themselves? Who knows?
From the beginning, it was “all cause” that would tell the real story. It’s time for accountability! For now, they’re still smug, thinking their cherry picked studies will hide their deeds-but the trial data has been combed & published -they’re guilty! They knew all along it was a cull they were perpetrating on a unsuspecting public.
A similar point is made by Kendrick about (say) a drug study. For a recommended intervention (e.g. take a statin) the questions should be: Does it reduce morbidity? Does it reduce mortality? From the handful I've looked at, it's amusing after a fashion, the lengths the authors go to, to hide such basic information. Sometimes it's not even disclosed. Instead, they may tout "endpoints" that put the product in a good light, but often are of little import.
You are all underestimating the corruption of the human heart. No one will be prosecuted. Even after WWII they prosecuted as few people as possible because the trials were just for show.
I saw an interview will William Barr on Face The Nation. He says Trump is being prosecuted under the same laws that Trump was prosecuting Assange. Every left wing YouTube channel is full of people that want Trump prosecuted. The right wing channels are the opposite.
No one can force us to see clearly. What's happening now is most likely just a return to normal. We've been tricked into think people were reasonable.
Join the deluded and have it all! For example, I really do own the Moon. I just choose to keep it in its orbit about 250,000 miles away, as it's a convenient storage location.
At least in the US, it seems that the fall back position of the public health establishment is that the negative effects and failure of their pandemic response is due to people not following their prescriptions well enough. People didn’t stay home, they didn’t mask hard enough, they didn’t all get vaccinated, and if the did get vaccinated they didn’t all get the boosters as often as possible. If everybody had just followed their advice, Covid would be gone and nobody would ever die again.
You’ve well described the last refuge of cowards haven’t you. But they’re far worse than that, because I don’t think they’re finished.
No they are FAR from finished
Here stateside, Dr. Walensky’s testimony yesterday was just incredible- she’s even admitting that the data was never there for comparing hospitalizations between vaccinated/unvaccinated, she was lying to our faces and look at her smug face while she tells us that!
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1668950276546461699
I’ll never forget the look on her face when she announced the jab “approval” for under 5’s. It was like she hit twenty powerballs. What a demon.
I watched her shameless game playing and thought to myself ,she would look really good with a rope around her neck .
A sociopath. Do some people feel chosen to lie to and rule over those they think of as livestock?
Not chosen, then they'd be megalomaniacal and suffer delusions of grandeur.
They feel they have taken up a sacred duty and a burden for the benefit of others, making them martyrs and paladins - a much more dangerous trait in anyone with power.
Of course, all these elements may be present to varying degrees - psychology isn't a "hard" science after all.
I haven't listened to the entirety of her testimony, but my first follow-up to that response would have been "Why on earth weren't you tracking vaccinated versus unvaccinated, or at the very least why is that data not available?"
They are blaming the anti lockdowners for the lockdown. The Great Barrington Declaration made us lockdown is the message.
"If everybody had just followed their advice...." Note the precise parallel to the socialist refrain, "They didn't do socialism right", or "That's not real socialism". Which, of course, is supposed to explain away the abject failure of state socialism. Or at least end any discussion thereof.
Defenders of the pandemic responses ALWAYS blame "the people" for failure to comply with whatever rules and conditions were imposed. The efficacy of those rules is NEVER open to discussion. It has, and probably will always be, "YOU DIDN'T DO IT RIGHT!".
This is the pattern of every technocratic intervention by the the bureaucracy, beautifully elucidated by Thomas Sowell in his masterful ‘Vision of the Anointed.’
the lockdown protocols were not adhered to so people died, and simultaneously the protocols were adhered to so successfully that the seasonable flu disappeared. go figure.
Yes! We could go back to pre "covid" when no one ever got sick or died. People had eternal life until March 2020. (Sarc)
They know that the massive wave of excess deaths is either caused by the vaccines or by delayed lockdown effects or a combination of both. Both causes are not something they are keen to look into....
indeed.
The trouble is that the public inquiries are being run by those who think "delayed lockdown effects" means the effects of delaying lockdowns
wait long enough until people forget. just go on as usual, continuing the same old lies forever. Governments do this over and over again everywhere, for thousands of years. Why do people let this happen? Wouldn't it be great to go back to close communities, like there still are in less 'civilized' places in the world? Better to go to the medicine man than to all these psycho docs.
I’m fine blaming lockdowns. That way they can never happen again.
Yes. And it was the lockdowns that paved the way for mass vaccination anyway.
But have you noticed many on our side have developed a monomania about the vaccines, pretty much forgetting the evil of lockdowns in the process? I find it to be a weird turn of events.
I belong to a campaign group in the UK that lobbied against lockdowns, vaccine passes, and vaccine mandates. Our primary concern is restoring the democratic process, the rule of law, transparency around policymaking, and accountability in government.
Well, we get slammed all the time not for not taking an emphatic stance against all covid vaccines... Apparently we are apologists for the establishment for not promoting claims about genocide and depopulation. These vax-is-murder people who hound us are as zealous and nasty as the most fervent pro-lockdown covidians. It's so disappointing.
There was a decrease in infant mortality in 2020, apparently the result of parents skipping “well baby visits”.
Parents were reportedly afraid of exposing their infants to Covid, however that had the effect of delaying infant vaccines.
Aren't the lockdowns too long over to be related to current excess?
The lockdowns broke the social contract as understood by a large number of people. It also crushed the hopes and dreams of a large group of people. That type of social displacement effects has long term health impacts. There is also the increase in drug use, food shortages, and decreased medical care. It is all a massive public health failure.
Yes, they already know the answer. Is that “the dog that doesn’t bark?”
Just read an interesting piece by el gato:
"adventures in chart-crime: making climate data look scary"
And then I read your essay on Covid-19 excess deaths...
Nothing a government says/claims holds water.
Nothing.
Call me cynical, but closer to the truth.
If a government is screaming about something, it’s a grift steeped in idiocy
True.
I live in Canada, so witness J. Trudeau.
I am Canadian not living there now..but I see from afar the evil deeds being done to the once ‘Best country in World’ and I cry. The WEF put JT & Lib party in office and the WEF is running Canada from inside. DPM Freeland is secretary of WEF..do a lot of Cnds not see this?
Not nearly enough.
I gag every time I see or hear C. Freeland.
I recently read a quote supposedly made by Jefferson. It's certainly plausible enough. The gist of it was that the newspapers of the day reported such lies, that a man was literally closer to the truth if he had read nothing at all and was ignorant of alleged current events.
Attributed to Thomas Jefferson.
The actual quote is:
"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers. "
I keep coming back to the observation that "COVID" death ascended in much of the world as vaccinations were taken up by the population in 2021-2022, and then decline precipitously when people suddenly stopped getting boosters en masse in the Fall of last year when it became clear to even the densest of minds that the vaccines weren't working.
indeed this is what it looks like.
And remember, they were all counted as unjabbed. You weren’t jabbed until 14 days after dose two. By then, everyone who was going to drop from the jab was gone already. IMHO, the whole reason for the two dose regimen was to hide the carnage. Those damn anti vaxxers!!!! A study out of Denmark 🇩🇰 believe, showed much better results in those who had one jab only. Yet another example of the “experts” doing every single thing wrong. What a coincidence.
On the one hand, a valid claim could be made to call them "unvaccinated," as the makers from the start claimed that 14-days and/or two doses were required for full effect.
On the other hand, it's my understanding that -- with legacy vaccines -- most severe reactions/deaths are fairly quick (acute reactions, minutes to days after).
I give Them credit, if they planned it that way. It's certainly plausible: they knew that most bad news happens within the first hours, few days. By not claiming anyone is vaxxed until 14+ days later, right there they've reduced their adverse effects by 90% or whatever.
The scam isn't all that different from how some countries embarrassed by high infant mortality "solved" the problem by not adding births to the rolls until the child had made it to age one.
It would be interesting to know how many died 'between jabs' and how many died during the 14 days after the second shot.
If memory serves me, 50% of Vaers deaths were within 48 hours and 80% within two weeks. I’m guessing the majority of the final 20% happened before that 44 day mark. The charts showing the giant death spikes when the jabs were rolled out lasted about a month. How convenient. And or course all of the SADS deaths we are seeing now are long Covid. Or so the sheeple believe.
What galls me is that a significant number of vaccine deaths were not only tagged "unvaccinated", but probably attributed to COVID as well! That's a double win for the vaccinators.
Yeah right. Hospitals gotta get paid too.
In the US when the shot mandates were suspended the "covid virus" deaths declined. Not vice versa.
Cardiologist Peter McCullough testified before the Pennsylvania state Senate and was asked if there's any research on vaccines passing from blood donors to blood recipients. He said there's no research being conducted on this BUT....
The Red Cross is changing its blood donor info to reflect on the dozens of supposed new genders of persons donating blood.
Have a nice day.
Don't forget, the Red Cross is now OK with sexually active gays donating blood.
If you're having surgery, find an unvaxxed person to donate, or donate your own blood.
I am old enough to have given blood during the AIDS crisis,there was a very unusual period of time when the following happened.They went over a questionnaire with different questions about AIDS ,have you been exposed,had sex with someone who was exposed,diagnosed HIV+ etc.If you were safe according to your answers,you would be put through the process of giving blood.You were also given a piece of paper with 2 stickers.One sticker was to indicate you were truthful with you answers and you blood was safe ,the second sticker was to indicate you want your blood to be disposed of because it might be HIV+.You placed the sticker on the form and a reader later on would toss the blood ,I forgot how the anonymous part worked but you weren’t linked to the blood. The idea behind this was so blood drives at an office etc. wouldn’t be a shaming event for a person who believed they could possibly be infected.
This behavior is standard Red Cross ,they never want to admit any problems or slow donors or users.
WHY is there no research being conducted on this? I think that's a relevant question.
That was Dr. McCullough's question. It seemed from listening to his testimony that there's little research being done on the consequences of this mass vaccine experiment.
My guess is that the medical bureaucrats DO NOT WANT TO KNOW the extent of their culpability in a ticking time bomb.
Yes. Absolutely no research is being done in the long-term medical consequences regarding the shots. Why? There is a quite sizeable control group of people not receiving the shots (30% of 300 million people) to compare against. Why are there no studies between the health of this control group and those shotted? As you say, the medical industrial complex doesn't want to know, or more likely want to be sued.
Additionally, Big Pharma is now embarking on a "humanitarian" program of giving the shots to the "under-served" population of Africa, thereby destroying a very large control group.
Africans have rejected the shots..it’s all BS..Africans endured decades of Pharma NGO’s..so many groups..using them & children as test subjects..they learned of the evil being done and have rejected it. UN/NGO’s trying to force them to take this poison..
Tardigrade - Because how would that make money for TPTB? I realize this is an extremely cynical comment, but I’m just going on my observation of what has actually happened. The only way to get a safe blood transfusion for a planned, or unplanned, surgery is to bank your own. Which only wealthy people can afford, of course. One should not have to be wealthy to receive a safe blood transfusion. Then again, a lot of things are not as they should be.
I'm in the UK. I asked the NHS Blood Transfusion Service if they logged donors' Covid 'vaccine' status. They do not - they only ask if the donor has had the disease - I got spun a lot of rubbish about how safe the blood is due to the vaccine staying at the site of vaccination and the expulsion of any residue in a few days!
I have it on my medical record that I do not wish to have a blood transfusion from a Covid vaccinated person - just to make sure!
Well, they're not going to know if the blood they're giving you came from the Jabbed. How would they?
A guy from work got pancreatic cancer shortly after his first booster. He mentioned it to the doctors so the nurse made note of it. Fat chance that's going anywhere.
Obviously - but you can refuse the blood. Jehovah's Witnesses - I'm not one - have been doing this for religious beliefs since blood donation started. There's an organisation that now registers people with (Covid) unvaccinated blood - either donors, recipients or both. Also, it's possible to use friends or family if of the correct match, donate blood to yourself in advance if you know it's needed, and there are other treatments depending on the circumstances.
Morons, willfully moronic, ugh.
What exasperates me is that because the mRNA traveled through the entire body it created a tsunami of different side effects, making it easier for the health officials to bury their heads in the sand and pretend they didn’t see the link. Dr. Rose just published moment ago this incredible compilation of side effects that Pfizer was hiding listed from 2021 to 2022. There are obvious trends to be seen here but as you noted, the agencies responsible for mandates are looking the other way. Our media is also intent on shoving down our throats instead ever pathetic dramatic story that they can dig up to further distract us.
Now that J and J was officially buried with Davy Jones’ locker, will we get a compilation of possible side effects to track?
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/pfizer-appendix-22-document-compared
Even though contract after contract specifically excluded any way to sue pharma companies, governments also now know the scale of the problem is big enough to be a significant debt in it's own right. So, the policy for all who imposed this mess is silence or denouncement, in the hope no one actually sues the elite.
I just keep musing..there are 7.5 billion people worldwide..what is the percent in the ‘masters in charge’? Is it 0.001? Maybe when the ants awaken the hive will shake.
They're relying on the fallacy of the counterfactual hypothetical. That process cites something that didn't happen to explain something else that didn't happen ("It would have been worse IF we hadn't vaccinated"). But neither thing happened, so their prediction is a baseless fallacy. But people find it persuasive if they don't think about it too much.
I'm just an amateur logician. However, I feel obligated to point out that, as with many tools, a counterfactual can be used in a valid or an invalid way.
A valid example would be a proposition like:
"If it had rained, then there would be puddles in the street." The statement is a counterfactual (perhaps it didn't rain) but it's logically admissible because the proposition's components could be evaluated to be true or false. Also, there's no contradiction in them.
Now consider the expression:
"If my aunt had a dick, she'd be my uncle." This is inadmissible because of the contradiciton that having a dick is incompatible with the definition of "aunt." Truth or falsehood does not even enter in, since the part of the equation is logically incoherent, as much as would be a piece of wood made of iron.
Interesting, thank you for that explanation. So how would one evaluate the statment "My father took 5 injections then died of Covid, but it would have worse if he weren't vaccinated?" It would be laughable if it weren't so tragic, but I've actually seen that said.
This is the bread and butter of governments.
“But the sky did NOT crash down upon us because we followed the priestly caste and made the rituals at the pyramids. If we hadn’t, it would have been infinitely worse with the sky turning blood red and crashing upon us. Are you implying it would somehow be BETTER if we didn’t do the blood sacrifices?”
Precisely. "If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle." But she doesn't and she isn't.
"The total lack of interest in explaining these strange numbers speaks volumes."
It's not just the authorities. Just yesterday, a vaxxed friend told me about someone she knew who died suddenly from a blood clot; guy in his 50s I think. I said in the most bland way possible that *some* people are having side effects from the vaxx.
It was like it tripped a switch in her. "People have always had blood clots and died. It's totally normal. It's always happened and will always happen. It's completely normal."
That's brainwashing in action people.
Sure, it’s totally normal. What’s not normal is personally knowing several healthy people who died suddenly of blood clots.
There are three things that are scary for the future which is why it’s important we keep talking about this:
1) The WHO digital health initiative. They are going by how “successful” what they did was that they want to expand it to all vaccines with restrictions on freedom of movement and association - among others
2) The excess deaths have not slowed down in 2023 and are unlikely to slow down considering the virus is still around with many people having broken immune systems
3) The possibility of a more virulent variant which they can use as a pretext to put 1) and all the authoritarian dystopian plans they have in mind for us plebs
'unlikely to slow down considering the virus is still around with many people having broken immune systems'
Do you still consider coronavirus in its current form a bigger risk than any other infectious disease? It seems to me they're pretty much of equal risk now, with all those broken immune systems.
The virus (SARS-COV-2) not the disease (COVID-19).
Among other things, the class switching of IgGs to IgG4 induces tolerance to the virus, which promotes reinfection and reduces virus clearance, causing immune exhaustion, which in turn prevents it from keeping at bay cancer, and other infectious diseases.
Also, the virus is constantly evolving. With omicron it increased infectiousness at the expense of virulence however since everyone who is vaccinated has the exact same immune response this forces the virus to potentially increase virulence.
That’s what I meant in 2 & 3 respectively.
There you go - using logic again. Did you not receive the memo? The one which clearly stated that logic is NEVER to be applied in discussions regarding covid.
We have until November 2023 to try to halt this WHO treaty(bill..agreement?) If it passes..it is doom..that ‘consortium of WHO/UN..Govt) will have absolute control and nations will have NO sovereignty at all..they will do whatever they wish..we must get involved by pressuring all govt agencies..leaders..from the top to bottom to SAY NO..it will destroy Constitution totally!
Our political-medial was quite skilled to create a panic about a flu virus, but its true power lies in the things that it ignores and not talks about, and makes the citizens totally ignore it as well.
Nordstream is another good example, or the impoverishment of society, or the daily knife attacks by "a man".
It was disheartening to see when you friends & relatives went into a panic because somebody somewhere may get Covid, but they are completely uninterested in the results of what has been done to them.
Not only are people uninterested in what has been done to them, they really REALLY believe that these injections saved their lives.
Case in point: SIL has a masters degree. Over 65. Middle son was an occasional drug user, died 5 days after Pfi$er injection. They blame the drugs. A year or so later, SIL's husband gets a booster and has shingles for almost 9 months that turn into neuropathy. The doctor says he is vaxx injured.
My SIL (who is a lovely, albeit trusting person) has said she will get more boosters if her doctor says so.
Brainwashed. Sad.
Very sad.
Probably they cannot admit to themselves that they did grievously wrong by trusting the government and taking the medication. They would not be able to live with the regrets they would have.
It is. There are things that can be done to mitigate the damage, but until people are open to admitting there *might* be a problem, they're not open to a possible solution. Very, very sad.
The best one can do is to gently suggest not to take any boosters anymore.
Which is exactly what I have done.
Or we could invent clever ways to get them to take more boosters. Lol
Edward Dowd & The Ethical Skeptic also have mounds of statistical data showing the toxicity of the covid vax. The lockdowns & all other government interventions were damaging also but the vax itself has caused, will continue to cause outrageous numbers of death & injury plus a decline in births. Another casualty is the modern "healthcare" system; I woked in it for 37years & I won't set foot near it ever again.
Yes here’s his link theyliedpeopledied.com
I can't prove it but I'm certain Edward Dowd can't be trusted. Better to never listen to someone like that (someone who claims to have made billions running an investment fund but betrays his ignorance about the markets everytime he talks. He doesn't know the markets at all).
Which leads to the issue of why so many people in the anti narrative crowd are imposters. Did you know that Stew Peters was trying to make it as a gangster rapper pre-Covid? Look him up on BitChute. I'm sure you know at least a little about Robert Malone, Dr. David Martin and Del Bigtree, to make just three.
When I consider the own effects the "pandemic" had on my health—the increased drinking, the weight gain, the falling out with friends and family, the unnerving condition of being attacked whenever I left my home—I think it's entirely possible that a great many old and frail people simply died of stress. I have no doubt that the vaccine kills in some instances, but I do wish we could disentangle those deaths from people who checked out because they couldn't handle living in a festering open air vagina hospital ward.
What? The pandemic was the best time of my life. I got 3 1/2 months to organize and de-stress. Then I found out almost everyone I'd ever known couldn't be trusted. Sure it sucked but it's better then never knowing at all.
Then I lost my job and got it back 6 months later. Half of my coworkers still shun me. Again, I'd rather have known they're weasels then live in ignorance. Also, on balance, the people who obeyed the company mandate are furious and none of them know why. Mad at the company or union? Mad at themselves? Who knows?
I'm sorry but finding out that the majority of my friends and countrymen are pitiful cowards is not what I'd call the best time of my life
From the beginning, it was “all cause” that would tell the real story. It’s time for accountability! For now, they’re still smug, thinking their cherry picked studies will hide their deeds-but the trial data has been combed & published -they’re guilty! They knew all along it was a cull they were perpetrating on a unsuspecting public.
A similar point is made by Kendrick about (say) a drug study. For a recommended intervention (e.g. take a statin) the questions should be: Does it reduce morbidity? Does it reduce mortality? From the handful I've looked at, it's amusing after a fashion, the lengths the authors go to, to hide such basic information. Sometimes it's not even disclosed. Instead, they may tout "endpoints" that put the product in a good light, but often are of little import.
He lists a number of commonly used statistical and study-design tricks in Doctoring Data. That's Dr. Malcolm Kendrick for those who don't know.
You are all underestimating the corruption of the human heart. No one will be prosecuted. Even after WWII they prosecuted as few people as possible because the trials were just for show.
I saw an interview will William Barr on Face The Nation. He says Trump is being prosecuted under the same laws that Trump was prosecuting Assange. Every left wing YouTube channel is full of people that want Trump prosecuted. The right wing channels are the opposite.
No one can force us to see clearly. What's happening now is most likely just a return to normal. We've been tricked into think people were reasonable.
This may interest you too.
Simpson's Paradox in the correlations between excess mortality and COVID-19 injections: a case study of iatrogenic pandemic for elderly Australians
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371342838_Simpson's_Paradox_in_the_correlations_between_excess_mortality_and_COVID-19_injections_a_case_study_of_iatrogenic_pandemic_for_elderly_Australians
I'd love to see the excess mortality data for China.
Of course, I may as well wish for the moon, or for good behavior by national governments.
Join the deluded and have it all! For example, I really do own the Moon. I just choose to keep it in its orbit about 250,000 miles away, as it's a convenient storage location.
All cause mortality.
It's a thing.
Everywhere jabs were heavily used.
There was an article on all cause mortality in the US on ZeroHedge yesterday. Never mentions the jab, except in the comments:
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/annual-us-excess-deaths-relative-other-developed-countries-are-growing-alarming-rate
spoiler: in the US we're fat. And "gunz." And, of course, "car accidents." Plus... don't forget "racial and economic inequality."
#AnythingButVaccines.
You forgot climate change