181 Comments

Every single person who has been fired for whistleblowing need to form a few companies of their own...just whistleblowers at every level....we outnumber them.

Expand full comment

Yup. They fired this guy, but until they scrub their servers of all that inconvenient data, the truth remains, and it will continue to get out.

What's particularly odd about this is that ignoring vaccine side effects actually hurts an insurance company's bottom line. If they aren't taking this risk into account, they are underpricing their policies, with the concomitant hit to future profitability. So they just fired a guy who was trying to run the business in the most profitable fashion.

Get woke, go broke!

Expand full comment

Doubt they will scrub the data but write algorithms to keep certain diagnosis and/or procedure codes from being effectively searched. Or add alerts that certain search criteria has been entered in reporting function.

To erase codes, they run the risk of compromising patient data/care, don't think they are that stupid.

But then .... this does appear to be a race to the bottom.

Expand full comment

Oh I don't think they'll scrub it either. The world already knows it's there. I don't know about German law, but in the USA, any attempt to hide that data would likely be illegal. Of course that doesn't mean they need to publish it, but if there were any sort of subpoena, even monkeying with the search functions would be illegal. And of course, I'd imagine that there are still executives there who probably would like to look at the data too. Schöfbek's "crime" was probably going public with this info.

It's interesting that the regulators don't just ask him to the meeting anyway. Seems like he has info they should want to hear.

Expand full comment

Didn't stop the DOD covering up the huge spike in post jab injuries.

Expand full comment

so true...and this final solution of a central digital everything...while killing as many off as possible...sounds like a real nice bedtime story for the kids about their future...their own effing kids...the untouchables may find they are touchable...

Expand full comment

An all digital world can be constantly modified to fit a narrative. DOD just did when the DMED data were revealed.

Expand full comment

Yes agree....but the damage to the idea that our military is up to task has been done, they will know we are comprimised militarily from the jabs. I dunno about you Doc but I am not ready for the mass die-off we are beginning to experience...I can only guess that Biden et al has thrown the fight and given us to the Chinese, just the formalities are left to parrot.

I have only met one man from China that I have gotten to know, and I can say that he was someone who had no problem taking advantage of ANYTHING for his benefit. (Glad to tell the story but it is my life experience).

I think they are as a culture more eager to capitalize on situations. Glad to discuss I know that seems harsh- I try to keep the people and the leaders separate in my head and so would not say this lightly.

Expand full comment

In general I have come to the conclusion that the Chinese cannot be trusted in anything, at anytime.

Expand full comment

something about believing in empire building, which many do believe in far and wide....I, not so much....I am more in an empire dissolving mode personally and have been esp since covid. Countries will country I guess....best

Expand full comment

"...they just fired a guy who was trying to run the business in the most profitable fashion." Very true, but... the people who sit on the board of this insurance company most likely sit on the board of some other companies and/or have large amount shares elsewhere. And some of those other companies, and those shares, could be profiting from the continuation of the great covid vaccine deception.

So this decision COULD be profit-led, but the profits these board members are protecting are in other places.

Expand full comment

Actually, they could still raise premiums on everybody without publicly acknowledging anything, and sweep the evidence under the rug.

Expand full comment

In the US, the Fed will just print more money and do a bailout for the insurance industry.

As for get woke, go broke, how many woke companies went bankrupt? None as far as I know. The shareholders might have lost money, but the companies and woke execs are still employed.

Expand full comment

It's a saying; not a literal statement of fact. Cheers.

Expand full comment

I wish it was literal.....

Expand full comment

They don't care about the insurance company's bottom line. Old school capitalism is in the process of being killed, to be replaced with "stake holder capitalism" which is code for fascism, or more widely known by the euphemism "public/private partnership".

Expand full comment

I was thinking about this too. Time unite them all.

Expand full comment

If you fire this one guy, the problem magically goes away! -- Government

Expand full comment

We've seen this play before.

Expand full comment

"Punish one, teach 100"

Expand full comment

"There is a man; there is a problem. No man, no problem." -Iosef Stalin

Expand full comment

Throughout this entire vaccine affair, I thought I couldn't be shocked any more. And yet this one shocked me. I read this and immediately said aloud, "HOLY SMOKES!"

The corruption. The bloodlust. The raw, naked power. This is an example of what Orwell's boot to the face looks like in practice.

Expand full comment

I suspect, rather than know, that many of the people in on the genocide are True Believers and really, really believe the only way to save the earth is to k*ll the majority of humanity.

The rest are sociopaths.

Not really sure about the percentage of each group.

Expand full comment

Why aren't the people who think we need to reduce the human population the first to volunteer to go?

Expand full comment

I had the exact same reaction. I keep being shocked that I still keep getting so shocked. I guess something in me just can hardly bear to believe it's this bad.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Mar 1, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

They love having their faces stomped on almost as much as they look forward to the next booster.

Expand full comment

"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the state can shield the people from the political, economic, and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for The State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of The State."

Expand full comment

“In the kingdom of lies, truth is treason”.

Expand full comment

Truth is the enemy of a corrupt state, but truth is the friend of a transparent state. That is what we need to work towards.

Expand full comment

Also reasonable to think that just as with many regular citizens, experts in areas like finance, and health care professionals who "believed," that these data are so appalling and terrifying, the insurance industry needs some time to absorb the reality of it all. Perhaps take time to get read up on the other datasets and findings that support their own discovery. Maybe start subscribing to some Substacks. Why would these death rates be a surprise at all to a forward looking industry like insurance?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Mar 1, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

😂😂

Expand full comment

My Lord. The vaccine cult is scary. I mean, like, it's worrisome.

Expand full comment

If you tell zee truse of zee eugenicide, we have ways of making you fired. Zen dead.

Expand full comment

It would be really interesting to know the specifics of the Board meeting. If I am a Board member of this company, and I am furious with Schofbeck, what would be my line of attack? I might ask: 1) are you sure our data says what you claim it says? Prove the data and your conclusions from it. Or, 2) The data and your conclusions are correct, but what gives you the authorization to share it publicly? I’m betting that Schofbeck had the receipts on the data. And he no doubt consulted with his company’s data experts to ensure he was on solid ground. (I wonder if the company personnel that parsed the data and double checked his conclusions will also be fired.) Board members of a company this size are all part of a club (and we’re not in it). They all attend the same parties, vacation in the same places, support the same charitable causes. Their executive, by telling the truth and asking the right questions based on the data, put his Board’s membership in that “club” at risk. This cannot be tolerated. I also have no doubt that either Pfizer or the government or both, reached out to the Board and made it very clear either through payola or threats, what would happen to them personally if this was not dealt with. When Big Pharma is making $22 billion per quarter based on vaccine mandates, there is a lot of $$$ for “advertising.” With the possible exceptions of Sweden and Japan, it is sad to see there is not one Western country where moral courage is in supply.

Expand full comment

It's really not easy to get rid of somebody that fast in Germany - there has to be gross misconduct of some sort, but there can't have been in this case. Schöfbeck doesn't strike me as somebody who seeks publicity or 15 minutes of fame, and he must have been pretty sure of his facts and figures if he made them public. So what really happened? Who leant on the board? In this light, I think your posting is spot on.

Expand full comment

In the US, there is a term called the Blackmail Industrial Complex. It’s a play on the term, Military Industrial Complex - something one of our Presidents warned about in the 1950s. Since the inception of the Patriot Act after 9/11, the intelligence community has become our “4th branch of government.” The IC in fact controls the other 3 branches - mainly through blackmail. Based on your insight into German business practices, I suspect blackmail is at play here as well. People’s lives and/or fortunes have to be at risk for this firing to have happened so quickly.

Expand full comment

Can't like, so liking now

Expand full comment

Yep, great comment.

Expand full comment

No, apart from Schöfbeck nobody will be fired. Firing is almost not a thing in Germany, cf. Quarkeress's comment below. Board members are actually an exception (sometimes you need a scapegoat) but usually they even have some kind of insurance in place. Rules for companies are strict, in fact, much stricter than for the bureaucracy. There, people can be shuffled around and given bullshit tasks if they are expressing the wrong opinions.

I assume that there is some chain of command, from Schöfbeck down to the experts, that has been involved in the letter. I am curious what will happen next.

Expand full comment

I live in Germany and have first-hand experience of being in a senior position (MD/CEO/CFO) and still got fired for making decisions in Germany, which did not go down well with the foreign based management. There are so many avenues to get rid of senior personnel, as BOM members are not protected by German labour law as is the case with "normal" employees. Argument is you are experienced enough in high level decision making, and you make enough money to compensate for the risk you are carrying!

Expand full comment

It's not that easy to get rid of a chairman though. I've seen it done. Unless there is some gross malfeasance, then it takes time and procedures.

Expand full comment

On the other hand, they got rid of this guy really quickly so my immediate response: what have they got on him and/or did he get a payoff?

Expand full comment

But now that he is free, he may have more to say. Looking forward to that.

Expand full comment

Let's see. He may be restricted in what he can say. Am I getting paranoid because I'm thinking, is this guy and his family safe?? Has Hollywood been more accurate than the news media all along? I didn't see that coming.

Expand full comment

How do we know he wasn't fired for stealing his girlfriend's wig...?

Expand full comment

i think he represents more the hippie wing of the vaxx sceptic movement.

Expand full comment

Pandemic hair, my husband has kept his.

Expand full comment

He reminds me a bit of the Asst Sec of Health and Human Services in the US, which is frightening. As they said in the 60s: "Cut your hair and get a job!"

Expand full comment

Actually if you compare him to the rat face guy who wrote back to him- they really do aesthetically represent polar opposites. Here Schofbeck is smiling and has a pleasant aura about him and natural but groomed long hair. Rat guy had a pinched expression, dead eyes and short highly controlled oily hair. Kind of interesting.

Expand full comment

I like his hair. Heehee. But seriously, I do. Nothing wrong with long hair on men.

Expand full comment

Now if he cuts hair it he can go a bit incognito for awhile.

Expand full comment

Actions like these do not help their cause of hiding the truth. The opposite in fact happens, it gives validation to his concerns over the data. Otherwise they wouldn’t be fearful of including him in the conversation. Germany once dominated propaganda, not any more. We the people have also learned, adapted and overcome these cheap tricks.

Expand full comment

agreed, they’re behaving like total idiots

Expand full comment

He is a brave man for sounding the whistle despite knowing of the potential personal implications his actions may yield. May God bless him.

Expand full comment

Clearly this guy isn't the only one in the company who feels this way or thinks it's a problem. There are lots of people under him who brought this to his attention. If the deranged board is willing to fire even the chairman over this, think about how all those under him now feel. Very chilling effect on truth at that company.

Expand full comment

Perhaps it's as simple as "truth is what we say it is." Aka "it's safe, it's effective, it's tested."

Expand full comment

How many fingers, Winston?

Expand full comment

Kudos to him for being upright.

He may not have expected to be fired, but he knew that he will have big problems when he published this report.

Expand full comment

whistleblower from december 2020 proven correct ... it changes your DNA...

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/allegations-of-genetic-harm-to-newborn/comments?utm_source=url

Expand full comment

About a year ago, I had a run in with someone who works for Pfizer on a political blog. They told EVERYONE on the blog that the injections were safe and effective and tested and they should get one. When I pointed out that it could get into your DNA, I was insulted and called out for my utter lack of scientific knowledge.

That person still blogs there, and has, to this day, never apologized for his statements or corrected himself.

He's also injected/ boosted and was in the hospital with C0VID pneumonia for about ten days a few months ago.

Expand full comment

Phizer oops I mean the FDA released its first data dump today. Appendix A in one document lists 10 pages of adverse events of special interest from the trials. That is why they wanted 75 years to release the data. Everyone shotted will be dead by then. You can never change the truth and the truth is coming to light about these poison shots. Tick tock.

Expand full comment

But remember, it would've been so much worse if he hadn't been vaccinated!

Expand full comment

he can enjoy his job .... some people would never get it ... brainwashed.

Expand full comment

The vaccine cult is scared out of their minds that they will face significant consequences for their indefensible behavior.

Expand full comment

Why would they be worried? All they have to do is deny reality in front of a judge that is injected. "All of these vaxx injuries are caused by something else and are not vaxx related." The vaxxed judge does not want to believe he and/or his loved ones are at risk of deaths because of his obedience, so he agrees with the "doctor/ experts" and the whole charade continues.

Expand full comment

"In the empire of lies, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell....or Abraham Lincoln....or, who knows for sure, but the point holds.

Expand full comment

How can this not be so obvious???!!

Expand full comment