Creepy new vaporware vaccine factories for Africa.
Once again, follow the money. I'll just stick with natural immunity and healthy life choices. Trust is government has gone from low to zero. RESIST.
They could be compounding ivermectin for much less I bet with local employees
I would definitely have a vaccine made in 6 cobbled together shipping containers. That would instil me with far more confidence about the manufacturing process.
It had to be in Marburg, didn't it.
Every time I see Bourla, Bancel or Tureci being interviewed, I thank god I don't have their product in my body. And I feel sorry for the people that trusted them.
No thanks. Anything coming from moderna is undoubtedly pure poison. If these containers are introduced in Africa, I have no doubt they will be used to invent new strains of Ebola or some such super scary virus. Then we will get a whole new parade of moderna injections to be weary about.
I'm buying because of the green lights.
I sell lab equipment here in the Bay Area. I can put one of those things together in a couple of months, without all the voodoo. My container would make nutritional supplements, though.
The slower the better. Africans have been constantly abused by the pharma cartels, they could use a reprieve
Has the moment of peak rna vaccine manufacturer arrived?
Creepy, indeed. They’re probably gearing up for the mRNA HIV vaxx rollout they’re presently programming us to demand:
Although frightening, it is so refreshing to read…an actual article based on investigative journalism 🙏🏼🗽❤️
So basically the RVs from JP: The Lost World that were useful for all of 5 seconds before everyone in the movie nearly died in them.
Update on Scotland's forced vaccinations. My submission to the consultation.
"I am writing to point out an ambiguity between the Bill and the accompanying Policy Memorandum and to ask that the Memorandum be amended. My focus is solely on whether or not a person is compelled to undergo medical treatment including vaccination.
"The Bill states in 86D:
86D. Exclusion of requirement to undergo medical treatment
(1) Regulations under section 86A(1) may not include provision requiring a person to undergo medical treatment.
(2) “Medical treatment” includes vaccination and other prophylactic treatment.
"The Memorandum states in 57, 58 and 59:
57. Potential scenarios could cover a situation where an individual was likely to spread a
particularly infectious disease with high human mortality to a significant number of others, or where there is an immediate risk that a particularly hazardous contaminant could be released with serious consequences for human health. Any assessment of whether the threat was serious and imminent would be done with regard to the advice of the Chief Medical Officer (“CMO”), and emerging local or global scientific advice.
58. The following special restrictions and requirements may only be contained in regulations which indirectly enable their imposition (i.e. they cannot be imposed directly by regulations, they could only be imposed by a decision taken under the regulations):
• a requirement that a person submit to medical treatment,
• a requirement that a person be removed to a hospital or other suitable establishment,
• a requirement that a person be detained in a hospital or other suitable establishment,
• a requirement that a person be kept in quarantine.
59. As a result, a decision to impose those requirements could only be taken in the most
extreme circumstances where there was a serious and imminent threat to public health, and it is considered that, because of the nature of the threat and the circumstances at the time, the decision would be proportionate to the overall aim of protecting public health. It should be emphasised that a decision to impose such requirements would only be taken where individuals did not voluntarily accept such constraints and whose actions in doing so would put the wider population at significant risk.
"A person would think that 86D was definitive in that it specifically prohibits forced vaccination. But the problem arises in a future court of law when an accused appears for refusing to have a vaccination. A clever prosecutor will reference clauses 57, 58 and 59 and argue that is what the legislation really meant when the Bill was being drafted. In this respect the Bill needs no changes but the Memorandum certainly does."
South African here. Mercifully these are 'we're virtuous' factories. Long may they fail to deliver. Keep them away from us!
Smart Africans will find these vax things and recycle them into valuable parts.