Also too, the bivalent jab turned out to be no more than 30% effective at preventing Covid — and this at the height of BA.5 variant, against which it was targeted.
This pandemic has caused a lot of people serious psychological harm and, for a large amount of people, this won't ever heal.
Anecdotally, I'm seeing this play out in the real world. Coworkers, friends and family that are vaxxed seem to be the ones getting ill more frequently and more severely (some for weeks on end). Those of us who abstained from the miracle jabs are not getting sick and if we do, it's very mild - almost undetectable.
"16 heroic vaccinators at the bottom of the chart"
Let's not disregard the real heroes - the 6,419 unvaccinated at the top of the chart. We can be sure their employer did not make it easy for them. They resisted, and they were right.
I'm happy to see so many people who got zero doses. The people who only got one or two doses are mostly likely deeply regretting it/coerced. I'm also wondering if the "30% fewer infections" isn't because of prior infections? How do you tease out which was the key "intervention?"
Those 16 are the most logical, really - IF you begin with other premise that the jab is 100% safe and effective. 🤡🌍
Think of the lack of logic it takes to take a leaky vaccine with over a 1,000 side effects that's only 30% effective for a disease that has a survivability percentage of 99.8%!
I don't know what people expect. You have the genetic fingerprint of generations of natural selection by corona viruses in your genome, you force a sarbecovirus through humanized mice before (accidentally?) releasing it into the population, you remove the viral interference from better-adapted respiratory viruses from your population...
and then you homogenize and fixate your whole population's immune response on an extinct version of the virus, taking more shots of the same vaccine that failed to work after two shots. And you don't just inject people with the whole virus, no, you program their own cells, to produce a small part of the virus that happens to mutate most rapidly and you fixate this protein in place with two mutations so that your immune system is only ever exposed to a handful of epitopes of this protein, rather than seeing all the different possible conformations.
So now you have countries around the Western world reporting an unprecedented burden of respiratory disease, including Sweden, which now has another massive RSV wave after last year's massive wave. Why aren't people connecting the dots? Negative efficacy vaccines against a Sarbecovirus deployed to billions of people around the whole world are an existential threat.
The 1918 flu only ever hit 25% of the population. If you had the whole population getting three influenza infections on average in a year you would also hear me telling you you're dealing with an existential threat, your immune system needs time to recover.
Hilarious. They claim this was 'unexpected' - after more than a year of data coming in from all over the world which shows that vaccine effectiveness wains quickly after each dose and then goes negative, and the more doses you get, the more this process accelerates. They then compound their clowinsh ignorance by claiming that there is 'still a lot to learn' about protection from Covid vaccines, which is 'assumed' rather than demonstrated. These are the morons we have at the vanguard of clinical science.
Note that they don't start counting people as vaccinated until 7 days after the shot, so that 30% VE during September to December figure is STILL an overestimate
At this point in time, I think most of us see this in real life without having to read the study. At least the study is harder to pooh pooh than my words are.
Now we can see why the WHO says that the unvaccinated are equivalent to terrorists: their very existence is disruptive to the world order as it dramatically demonstrates that governments and health authorities are harming you through malice or incompetence or both.
So you can 1) get a shot and get more covid or 2) not get a shot and get less covid. But if you pick #2, you miss out on all those fashionable side effects and even more covid.
I want to find the people that took 6 doses of the vaccine, maybe they will buy my NFT that I put up online.
The people with 6 doses, I am glad they are alive, and still uninjured? But how is higher likelihood of infection squared with 30% effectiveness?
The studies and the finger wagging about the vaccine and injuries are fast becoming irrelevant because this was always about stripping of freedoms and rights and plundering the wealth of Western nations whilst enslaving the population with debt & endless medical interventions through chronic health issues.
If it were truly about depopulation like the most adamant of the black-pilled community believe - they'd be pushing even harder for more boosters (threatening jobs again, locking down, requiring it for children to attend schools) knowing damn well they're lethal after a certain vaccination point -- but they're not.
Because covid & vaccines have already accomplished what they were designed to do. (See above.) They still need their plebes (don't want to kill too many of us - Who'd fly them around, fix/manufacture their Teslas, staff their yachts, clean their mansions, buy their stupid defective products after all?). They do however, want us as debt and health slaves -- fearful and easily controlled. More so than we already are, if you can imagine it.
Best believe they're planning the next psy-op to lock us up and throw away the keys for good.
Merry Christmas everyone!! :)
It seems last year the Cleveland Clinic also published (and no one would peer review it) that previously infected individuals need not get vaccination. They have rebelled the whole time.