427 Comments
User's avatar
Rose Loomis's avatar

I have started a new company, it’s the Center For Countering the Center for Countering Digital Hate.

Scott's avatar

Yeah, a shadowy NGO promoting coordinated anti-speech campaigns that almost all MSM outlets participate in on the same day while being cheered on by the US administration. Clearly nothing fascistic going on here!

Paula's avatar

Does Hunter have a new job? Looks like.

Anna T's avatar

Ha, does Hunter's brain work enough to do this?

CMCM's avatar

He has a brain full of mush as this point, BUT...the scam artist part of his brain was spared.

Jen Downey's avatar

That organization is a dark joke. An obvious tool. it's job is to create narratives that link the word "hate" with the word "anti-vaxxer" and demands for bodily autonomy as a form of terrorism a la Peter Hotez. That's it. The whole point of the exercise. At who's behest and on who's dime? No idea.

baker charlie's avatar

The same usual suspects that fund entities like Stonewall, BLM, Amnesty International, etc. It might go through shells, but it is all Gates, Soros, Koch, Pritzker, et al. The same ones deforming our society for the last two decades. Obviously our masters want us at each other's throats for insisting on reality rather than the 'metaverse'. They're doing a bang up job too, because very many see the toes, tail or trunk of the elephant, but very few can back up enough to see the whole damn thing.

The Doctress's avatar

THIS. Spot on. #transcult #peaktrans #itsafetish #thisneverhappens

https://suedonym.substack.com/p/the-elephant-in-the-room

womenarehuman d0t c0m

4w d0t pub

baker charlie's avatar

You're obviously someone I likely know from the shit going on the last 6 years or so. I've been trying to warn them the same tricks are being played. Good to see you here!

Richard Seager's avatar

Totally agree. That nonsense makes a little more sense in 2022 than it did in 2019.

hoppah's avatar

I made a comment on that article that I expect won’t be well-received, so I’ll repeat it here:

An excellent article. Indulge me as I reminisce my youth in and around a very vibrant gay community way back in the late 1970s and 1980s. The gay community (which was the label back then for *both* homosexual men and women) was becoming politically powerful, mainly due to the horror of the AIDS epidemic. First they demanded “tolerance”, which most straights were down with - it wasn’t long before tolerance and acceptance became more the norm than the exception. However, tolerance wasn’t enough. Communities which had long felt marginalized wanted more than tolerance. They wanted celebration. A straight who merely tolerated must now cheer and support and embrace. And all organizations which were viewed as straight were suddenly ripe for colonization. Resistance was lambasted as “homophobia” and in many cases, brought to court and prosecuted. Many such colonized organizations were transformed into nonexistence - destroyed. Soon, even bringing up and questioning the wisdom of this process was dangerous to the person who wanted to discuss the elephant in the room. This was all seen as “progress”.

Now that you’ve read this little history, re-read the article and try to spot the irony.

The Doctress's avatar

No problem. Also check out

savewomenssports d0t com

and

kpssinfo d0t org.

Thank you.

Gail Finke's avatar

While that is an important topic, I'm not sure what you are getting at by posting it here. Did you post it here by mistake? Or are you saying that Bill Gates, George Soros, et al have a similar desire to destroy themselves (and the rest of us) and be reborn as something else that excites them?

baker charlie's avatar

Bill Gates and friends are delusional. I would not trust them to sit in a bathtub unattended.

The Doctress's avatar

Many powerful men (for example, James "Jennifer" Pritzger) are closet autogynephiles and pedocriminals. George Soros donates millions if not billions of dollars to misogynist "trans rights" orgs. It's all part of the same agenda.

https://thefederalist.com/2018/02/20/rich-white-men-institutionalizing-transgender-ideology/

Gail Finke's avatar

Oh, I see what you mean. Yes, I think these perversions are all connected and often come along with narcissism and desire for power over others.

br14's avatar

But to what end? From where I sit half the world is intent on self-destruction. Gates, Soros etc are busy deconstructing western democracies, but they'll be the first victims. (Not least because they're busy destroying their own markets). Are they so psychologically damaged they seek to destroy themselves and everyone else with them?

Gail Finke's avatar

I think they are. I think it's a spiritual issue -- a destructive force that attracts people by promising them power and freedom, even as it creates a frenzy that destroys those things. The lure of being in charge and "liberating the world" is very strong for these people, who then become caught up in this frenzy. It's the same kind of frenzy that causes people to beat other people to death. They don't INTEND to when they start, but they find themselves intoxicated with power that makes them feel immortal, and grows as they destroy more. "MacBeth" (currently in theaters) is a brilliant examination of this idea. The more people he kills, the more people he has to kill, until he hates everyone and everything but keeps right on killing because he believes he is entitled to power over everyone.

Cynthia Jeanne Ford's avatar

That's brilliant. Makes me think of the slogan of the fascists in the Spanish Civil War--"Long live Death. Death to Intelligence" or the Iraqis and Iranians, one of them drinking the others' blood in war. Like a chimp frenzy. I am convinced this has to be fought while positioned in spirituality, like the devotional religious groups who fought the nazis. (Not, of course, like the Catholic church, which created ratlines for nazis to escape prosecution) I can't find that music though. At least not yet.

Richard Seager's avatar

Drives their child obsessions as well in my view.

denis bider's avatar

Gates, Soros, Fauci and everyone else who's names we know are visible, and therefore disposable. They are people who are granted these positions in exchange for playing a role. If things go awry, these people pay the price while the real culprits cut their losses.

The real culprits are people whose names we don't know, or we do know, but the media makes sure to ridicule us if we mention them. They're richer than the richest people in Forbes. They make sure their wealth goes unanalyzed and unmentioned. They control the supply of money for the entire world.

These people know things about the world that we don't know. They plan not just 5, but 50-100 years in advance. They started teaching things in schools 50 years ago that they need people to take for granted today. Many of those things are at best tangential to truth. Others are directly opposite.

The real reason for what they are trying to pull off today, is something we may discover if we defeat them. Otherwise, this will just become a series of unfortunate events that befell humanity for no obvious reason at all.

baker charlie's avatar

In their timing all that shit happens AFTER they die. Our job, as I see it, is to move that day of reckoning up a bit.

Paula's avatar

Laying out shrouds seems a rather useful occupation to me.

Paula's avatar

I was thinking more along the lines of the head honcho, Lucifer.

Krull The Warrior King's avatar

Everybody has a boss....and the likes of Gates, have chosen theirs.

Jack Bauer's avatar

Maybe Berenson should do an investigation of CCDH funding...

Scott's avatar

Apparently they are funded by "the Oak Foundation," a rather shadowy far left group that focuses mostly on "climate justice." In other words, neomarxist corporatists: https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-lefts-green-giant-part-1/

Silva's avatar

Climate justice? What the hell is that?

They think you can just take any word, attach "justice," and it somehow means something?

I want some ice cream! Looks like I need to focus on dessert justice.

We should start using that all the time.

Richard Seager's avatar

It is supposed to mean generational justice. But basically it comes down to me justice. As in I want everything, you die.

Having had a bit to do with climate warriors my view is that most of them couldn't give a fuck for environmental concerns. Say the wrong pronoun though and they'll come down on you like a ton of pricks.

hoppah's avatar

Most “environmentalism” is just religion. Michael Crichton nails it in this speech:

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kw/crichton.html

hoppah's avatar

It works because stupid people take the terms literally, which is why Leftists mangle language as a core competency.

Mark Anthony Hoffman's avatar

Stands to reason. Switzerland is home to plenty of wonderful folks - •World Health Organization

•World Trade Organization

•Bank For International Settlements

•World Economic Forum

Plus more

Betsy McDonel Herr, Ph.D.'s avatar

Yes please. We need top journalistic investigative skills on this one.

Richard Seager's avatar

I'm trying to figure out how to make a living from it. I've been doing it for free for too long and need to look after me and mine a little better.

George's avatar

You don’t suppose the CIA is behind this do you?

Nevermind the Molochs's avatar

Eek, help, I'm being online harmed

baker charlie's avatar

I think the CIA is just a lapdog to these creeps, I mean, look at their cool new recruitment campaigns.

Susan G's avatar

Tried to like your comment. Wouldn't let me. LIKE

Professor's avatar

That was probably also at least part of the point of Antifa. Who wants to call themselves Anti Fascist and then be associated with them. The thinking was probably that it would help the fascists to not be called fascists.

The Doctress's avatar

Yep, anything that counters the COVID or trans cult narrative is "hate". That is how they silence the truth tellers.

hoppah's avatar

It started out with shit like “chauvinist”, and then rolled forward into “hate,” “*-phobic”, “rayciss”, “misogyniss” (yes, I am misspelling these on purpose), and has now tumbled all the way down to “traitor”. We’ve finally reached a term to which that the death penalty can be applied - which was the whole point.

CMCM's avatar

Soros seems to have his grimy hands in and on almost everything these days.

Guttermouth's avatar

Hotez is a scary dude. I think that little fat fuck would pull levers on gas chambers if someone offered him a job.

Jim Foye's avatar

I just started The Center for Countering the Center For Countering the Center for Countering Digital Hate

Princess Tatiana's avatar

How about a Center for Countering? Just countering in general. It could be like a free speech movement or something.

Mark Bisone's avatar

Unfortunately for you, I just started The Center for Digitally Hating the Center for Countering the Center For Countering the Center for Countering Digital Hate.

DavidC's avatar

You've made me lose "count."

CPJ's avatar

Do you have a Gofu**me?

jo jergensin's avatar

Or you could just call it "The Truth"... same thing and easier to say. I will sign up when you put out the invite.

Mark Bisone's avatar

I've seen a lot of important, useful words get ground to dust over the last several decades (racism, sexism, xenophobia, etc.) But "hate" seems to be the worst casualty. Once "hatred" becomes unmoored from meaning, literally any human atrocity, of any scale, is on the table.

Navyo Ericsen's avatar

This is truly dangerous. Words, not just as such, but their popular meanings, the emotional value they hold, have been captured, usurped and turned into weapons that invert or distort those meanings - without most people even realising.

Mark Bisone's avatar

This inability to grasp the dangers of language demolition is, I believe, the greatest threat to human existence we have ever faced. Greater than industrialized war machines, nuclear weapons, or any breed of plague.

Words have always been weaponized to some degree or other (even Aristotle expounded on this in his "Rhetoric"). But to strip away or even invert the meanings of simple, mutually understood terms and concepts invites catastrophes beyond imagination, because we won't even be able to remotely describe what is happening, let alone to plan a remedy.

Gail Finke's avatar

That's part and parcel of postmodernism -- nominalism PLUS. Things mean what you want them to mean, and the way you can tell who is the most "authentic" is that they FEEL most strongly. Outrage and ecstacy are REAL, biology and logic are not.

Navyo Ericsen's avatar

Maybe it just comes down to a dopamine rush.

Mark Bisone's avatar

I think this is somewhat true, though I also think you are putting the cart before the horse. Or, to put it another way, perhaps the arrow of causality is pointing the wrong direction.

Navyo Ericsen's avatar

Exactly. The very name The Center for Countering Digital Hate is an inversion - what they really mean is Truth. The outcome of which is people subconsciously associating truth with hate.

Silva's avatar

The Ministry of Truth in 1984 has a purpose that is the inverse of its nominal one too, and that's about what all of this is. The only difference is that the Ministry of Truth was an arm of the government/ruling party, while the modern Ministry of Truth in America is private companies acting as an arm of the government/ruling party (aka fascism).

Navyo Ericsen's avatar

While companies may be based in the US their reach (and their subsidiaries) are global. 'America' has become a strategic term, a brand in the battlefield.

cat's avatar

I've learned that all of these leftist organizations are always the opposite of their name. Same with their proposed/passed laws too.

hoppah's avatar

If the Left accuses you of something, it’s something they’re already doing. This is a maxim that is never violated.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 27, 2022
Comment deleted
hoppah's avatar

We have elected sociopaths and cowards. Giving sociopaths and cowards power over themselves is a mistake that societies seem to repeat no matter how many skulls litter the ground and cities are left in rubble.

Guttermouth's avatar

Sorry, but as Chairbeing of the Center For Countering Rose Loomis, I've already begun circulating a petition to freeze all your bank accounts and burn your house down to promote tolerance.

I wish it hadn't come to this.

Rose Loomis's avatar

LOL. Burning things down is absolutely part of tolerance these days!

br14's avatar

I imagine the Center for Countering Digital Hate spends most of it's time investigating its own members.

John Raymond's avatar

Yup. Like SPLC... IT’S the hate group

TK plus's avatar

if you could write like that joke, I'd sign up for your substack (not kidding). More seriously, unpacking the sources of funding of these NGOs, would be a valuable undertaking. If it's the state , or Gates esque, I'd wanna know who's leading the charge.

Rose Loomis's avatar

My Substack isn’t so funny but maybe I should change it up a little. I have an idea for that. My old Facebook account was hilarious and full of the skewering of congress critters etc. Too bad it got Zucked.

Susanna's avatar

Eugyppius - we are all leaving Substack if they start censoring writers here. Nearly all of us migrated over from the Little Bird when it got too evil. And migrate away from Substack we will if they do this.

Graham Stull's avatar

Well said. The day Substack messes with E is the day I close my subscription and shut off Substack forever.

dawn's avatar

Maybe we will all end up writing PO Box letters again pen pal style. Surely they can't open up every envelope (second thoughts maybe they might) (the covid vaccinators come to mind just pay someone £13.10 an hour in London and they think they have won the lottery!

baker charlie's avatar

Just wait until we have to pass xerox samizdat and bootleg cassette tapes. Then we know we'll have arrived.

Rikard's avatar

I remember when we did that over here. Private broadcasting was prohibited, and punishable by several years in prison and confiscation of your property including your house and land. When some people started to buy satellite dishes in the eighties, the socialist party wanted to criminalise private ownership:

"Motverka i god tid kommersiella utländska tv-satelliters möjligheter att invadera och infektera vår mentala miljö."

"To as early as possible counter commercial foreign tv-satellites' opportunities to invade and infect our mental environment."

Thankfully, this was stopped. However, the same party is in power today, and they have given Facebook and Google virtually free electricity and other prerogatives in exchange for the party appointing their factcheckers for Sweden.

And our current prime minister and the leader of the opposition are both WEF alumni. What a coinky-dink.

Richard Seager's avatar

Just about the same here. Simon Bridges is always on the cusp of being leader of the National Party (and in fact was for a while). Was WEF branded year before Jacinda of the Labour Party.

Jack Winogrodzki's avatar

And we to complain about North Korea and the CCP! What on earth happened???

Kerry Davie's avatar

People like Justin Trudeau, Jacinda Ardern, Dan Andrews (and a few more) happened.

If there were any people who I would hope to see SARS-CoV-2 do its work on, these are prime candidates.

Dubois's avatar

I would encourage everyone who is worried about Substack 'caving' to back up their writing materials on Odysee.com.

Odysee is better known as a video-hosting site, but the underlying technology can handle sharing any file, not just video. The Odysee platform issues text & image based updates (see: https://odysee.com/@Odysee:8/2022priorities:b).

The best thing about it is that it's peer-to-peer and anyone can host a copy of the file and seed it (like a torrent). For text articles, anyone with a PC will be able to share arbitrarily large numbers of articles.

Watchful's avatar

The elite are getting scared. Too many of us not taking their narrative seriously. If what they say is true, we should all be dead by now.

Rose Loomis's avatar

I’ve been saying that for two years, If this thing was so horrible as to necessitate draconian measures we wouldn’t have the luxury of pushing back against the draconian measures. So we have already proved them wrong without a shadow of a doubt.

dawn's avatar

Good point if this thing was EBOLA! Now, that would be different!

dawn's avatar

Here is the thing, now the masses know of their shenadigans, they know they could do anything, so waking up the masses is important to stop the front line from backing them but stopping them non violently. No revolution or anything. Let us all research like we have done so since 2020 and let us discover the difference between religion verses a personal relationship with God and his plan of salvation for mankind before his imminent rapture arrives soon. Let us all not worry no more and because it is in his will he will take worry away from us and give us the mind of Christ, Amen.

Tank Hough's avatar

Nope---Ebola's death rate is ONLY 50%---so that means half of us would still be here.

Kerry Davie's avatar

Gee, don't give them (or Bill Gates) any ideas!

Tank Hough's avatar

Gates just recently talked about a new virus much more deadly coming down the road. So you know he's already brewing that one. They need it to complete their NWO reset.

Tank Hough's avatar

So you think Ebola will kill everyone? Really?

Guttermouth's avatar

No, I think the seriousness of a disease does not more or less justify the stripping of fundamental human rights from healthy people guilty of no crime under the law. Whether it's coof or ebola or The Black Death.

dawn's avatar

They are not scared, they are irritated that we are alive because they really believe we are sponging off them, the fact is, they stole the earth from their brothers and then become self imposed proprietors and bribed all and sundry to amass greater wealth. Worry not, God feeds the sparrow and clothes the lillies of the field. You will not have to pay for a gaff to live in for in my father's house are many mansions and he has prepared a place for us, so if so be it water, basic food and shelter with agape love from the brethren you will all be fine.

Crixcyon's avatar

Yes...brain dead like the elite have been for decades.

𝙂𝙊𝙊𝘿 𝘾𝙄𝙏𝙄𝙕𝙀𝙉's avatar

Congratulations! You've made it. When the greatest purveyors on misinformation in human history gripe about 'misinformation' we know they're getting desperate. Turns out they over estimated the marketplace for lies and propaganda and underestimated the market for unbiased objective truth. This is all their own doing.

Zdeněk Šípek's avatar

They are truly getting desperate... A complete collapse of the narrative might be closer than we think.

VeryVer's avatar

Yeah, why are they bothering now?

CPJ's avatar

There's no such thing as unbiased objective truth but I'll take simply questioning the narrative

Abner Knight's avatar

My cardiologist disagrees.

CPJ's avatar

Yeah sure, I guess I meant in the social sciences

Irena's avatar

Stay strong, E! You may also get some extra subscribers, now that the Guardian has decided to advertise you for free. Assuming anyone still reads the Guardian...

I also suspect that Substack will hold firm. After all, much of its business model relies on revenue that goes to high-quality content producers who've been shut out of the legacy media. If Substack chickens out, writers will go elsewhere, and their readers will follow. After all, I'm not reading Substack because it's Substack (this time last year, I didn't even know the thing existed). I'm reading it because it happens to host people whom I want to read. If that changes, then bye-bye Substack.

Dr. MaryAnne Shiozawa, D.C. 🌸's avatar

That's what I was thinking when reading the article. I'm sure Eugyppius has gained several new subscribers. Well done! Keep writing your awesome content. We're here for you!

Ema's avatar

The very same for me!

Joseph Carroll's avatar

We need to form The Center For Countering Phony Propaganda Groups Designed to Censor Truth Because Their Lies Fell Apart. I bet I could get it done in an hour for less than 100 bucks.

dawn's avatar

Oh The Centre for dealing with fake liars and coveteous property/land thieves has been formed for a while collecting data. Once the data's algorythms, sort the tares from the wheat, the supertramp elite, with their so called anti Christ will be done.

I don't believe these heinous people will accomplish their goals because they aren't the true owners of the planet but land bandits who have amassed wealth to build weapons which the fallen angels taught them to do as described in Enoch and other books, so not to worry although it does look quite hopeless, we all have to learn to understand what it means to live/walk in the spirit. Take courage folks, we will all be ok.

GT's avatar

Well, that's what we are doing by coming to Substack

CPJ's avatar

Sure does trip off the tongue, I'll grant you that

Linotype's avatar

Indeed, something is afoot ... and it doesn't smell good.

Please keep us informed.

Ming the Merciless's avatar

“Anti vaxxers made $2.5 million” 🙄

Hey let’s not talk about the countless billions the pharm companies have paid people to promote their ineffective and dangerous products. No, no, let’s focus on the chump change the anti vaxxers get so that we can insult them as “just being in it for the money.”

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

I just read recently that Pfizer spent more money on publicity than on checking their jab

GT's avatar

yeah, ads are expensive (Big Tech has to eat too)

David Watson's avatar

It's not about the vax, nor about pharma. It's about government, and their tyranny. Pfizer can't force us to take their product, only government can. And only if we the people allow it. It's pfizer's job to sell chemicals, and the job of the frightened to seek safety. Convince the frightened they have more to fear from government than routine virus and they'll leave us alone.

It's all about control. Do we control the government, or continue to allow them to control us?

Beyond Spin's avatar

Pfizer and other corporations have basically bought the governmental regulatory agencies and politicians that are supposed to oversee and regulate those agencies especially in th United States where pretty much all the agencies FDA, CDC, NIH, USDA, EPA, etc are captured and corrupt along with the politicians that rely on industry campaign contributions and spend too much of their time with corporate lobbyists. The US like many wealthy countries are really just corporatocracies transitioning to totalitarian plutocracies.

David Watson's avatar

They're only buying what is being sold. The corruptor isn't the problem, only the corrupted. Pfizer can't make us do anything. Only government can do that. And only if we allow it.

SimulationCommander's avatar

I always laugh when some congresscritter or another complains about the money that special interests are throwing around, as if Washington is simply a pack of whores that will spread their legs at anybody who offers to slide a buck between them.

David Watson's avatar

That seems to be the case for many of them. It's the only way they can get elected. The voters respond to ads, not ideas.

SimulationCommander's avatar

Yep! It's just a little accidental honesty from the political class.

Beyond Spin's avatar

I take it you have never worked in government or on many political campaigns. The system is corrupt and broken plus a lot of vested interests that like and want to keep it that way. Sure the people/public could rise up and force change. But "the people" are too divided in tribes that are fighting with one another over culture wars and other magnified and manufactured differences. Those vested interests, who want to maintain and reinforce the status quo, are the ones stoking such division since people who are divided will never coalesce to bring about the necessary changes needed to fix the broken system or replace that broken system with something else.

David Watson's avatar

The system is fine. People cause the problems. Accusing the system for individual failures is the natural recourse for the guilty, everywhere. People are naturally corrupt, selfish, and vicious, unless constrained by the tribe. Corruption in government is inevitable, and increases whenever it's allowed. Blaming nebulous "others" protects the corruption. Prosecute a few and the rest will behave for a time. Prosecutions for this disaster will commence next year.

Beyond Spin's avatar

Hard to argue with someone who is so naive. But I've worked on numerous political campaigns and my job entails working with a lot of local, state and federal agencies. So you really need to put down your crack pipe because all that crack has given you a very distorted perspective of reality.

Kerry Davie's avatar

I'm afraid the answer to that question is a bit discouraging.

CaliforniaLost's avatar

Talk about inflation, the going rate to sell someone out used to be 30 pieces of silver.

Jack Winogrodzki's avatar

The MSM has been peddling lies and taken subscribtion and government money for two years at the cost of many lives and side effects. Methinks attack is their best form of defense as they may well end up in prison.

The Doctress's avatar

So mote it be. Prison for all of them.

Big Grey's avatar

Almost everything I have seen from yourself and Berenson is actual government / agency data analyzed and interpreted in a logical, scientific manner. So much for misinformation. Some of it you had to dig for but everything seems in order as far as sourcing. Why this must be hidden, censored and blacklisted is the real story no MSM journalist seems interested in. I just don't understand the hacks calling themselves journalists these days. Progressive snowflakes maybe. They are intellectually and morally superior to us deplorables so I say - Pray, plan, prepare and RESIST. As if your life depends on it. It really does.

SimulationCommander's avatar

That's the major issue they have with us -- we use official data that anybody can go see for themselves.

Rikard's avatar

Be prepared for personal hit pieces and being stalked by journalists. The nest step in this tactic is making an example of one or two prominent figures, though not too prominent (i.e. presumably able to fight back through the courts and other media).

They will start by e-mail and establishing accounts here, if they haven't already. They may very well comment using very inflammable language and might even step it up to full scale trawling, or trolling.

If that doesn't garner the wished for response from either you or commenters, they will move on by using your credit history, they will contact and map out family members and friends trying to find dirt there for GBA, and they will look up career and professional activites, sponsorships and any crminial record no matter how trivial.

They will also offer you to be left alone, if you just come out and confess and show regret publicly: that you abase yourself. (Obviously, this will gain you nothing at all.)

If none of the above gets the intended result: getting rid of you, they will start harassing you, trying to provoke a violent response, preferably on camera but vicious langugae is also fine, espcially if you happen to use "problematic" terms or "hate speech" (and anything you say can and will be used against you).

Best you can do is think strategically. Be prepared. Accept that it will cost you, emotionally and financially and not least socially. Trust me, you /will/ learn who your real friends are in a situation like that. If you have experienced school yard bullying, well this is exactly the same and must be handled the same way. Have your strategy made in advance, and do not panic.

Teresa's avatar

I love how the Guardian article actually links to some of the stacks. Hopefully that will bring some more subscribers over!

General John H Forney's avatar

E, you are definitely over the target. The "flak" is getting louder. "They" know we are here.

Amanda's avatar

Kinda shooting themselves and their malevolent intentions in the foot aren’t they?? 😂😂

Richard Seager's avatar

Journalist activism maybe.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 27, 2022
Comment deleted
Irena's avatar

Y'know, it's possible they're right. Anyone still reading the Guardian and taking it seriously is, shall we say, probably not the sharpest tool in the box.

David Watson's avatar

The competition isn't Alex vs substack, nor substack v. Ccdh. It's substack v. the mob, and ultimately, civilization v. anarchy. Anarchy is always around the next corner, backed by tyrants who want to control us. Our choice is always the same -- fight, try to run, or submit. Running seldom works, and submission means you accept existence on the tyrant's terms, which seldom works. All tyrants can be defeated. Those who don't mind being enslaved can try to accept the tyrants, either by surrender or hiding. The rest need to learn to fight.

Eugyppius is still fighting, and Alex, and substack, and many others. We should too.

Aimee's avatar

I just wish Alex would apologize to Dr. Malone. I could move on lol

Jim Brown's avatar

The fact that you've been targeted by such an organization is a badge of honor.

The Green Hornet's avatar

Substack is a threat. Good.

Betsy McDonel Herr, Ph.D.'s avatar

Even Senator Ron Johnson referred to some data within a Substack post in his Second Opinion Hearing on Monday. I was pleased to hear that reference and acknowledgement of its influence. Someone else besides me must have noticed that too, and saw it as a threat.

ForkInSocket's avatar

The Guardian making a convenient list of who to follow? IMO it's a good start but they could expand it to include many other fine authors.