Excess mortality in Germany 2020–2022 is a preprint by Christof Kuhbandner (a psychologist at Regensburg) and Matthias Reitzner (a statistician at Osnabrück) that applies sophisticated actuarial analysis to the publicly available all-cause mortality data provided by the German government. It turns out that when you account for historical mortality trends, the virus no longer looks so dangerous, and the vaccines no longer look so great.
Excess mortality in 2021 seems pretty definitely connected to the science-juice to me. That leaves us with the question though: How the hell do we have worse excess mortality so far in 2022 than during the previous two years according to Euromomo?
I think in 2022 we're now dealing with the evolutionary ramifications of the mass vaccination program: Constant reinfections throughout the population and massive unprecedented waves of infection, even in the middle of summer, are starting to cause strokes, heart failure and other issues. Very worrisome.
This kind of analysis attributing death directly to the vaccine is being independently replicated all over the world. Meanwhile, vaccine mandates continue at country borders, in public service jobs, and at great universities. My own child (unvaccinated) is at risk of choosing the jab just to receive a prestigious scholarship in the scientific field he loves. It is a monstrous evasion of the scientific facts. I believe this madness will end at some point, but then, who will pay?
I believe governments know the truth about the jabs and that's why they are slowly backing away from the vaccines -- but the harm has been done, so they are in no rush really to "save lives" but are more concerned with preserving their credibility (and looking for a fall guy.)
We of the proletariat have no power to control the oligarchs who run Western society. All we can do is to do our best to protect ourselves and our families. For my part, I am investing in publicly traded companies that provide caskets, burial, and cremation services.
It is becoming clearly obvious to me that no politician took the “real” jab. I say we line the politicians up worldwide and have them all catch up on two doses plus two boosters all one one day. It would make for great TV over the next two months.
Aug 27, 2022·edited Aug 27, 2022Liked by eugyppius
What stops them from claiming that these are covid long term adverse events?
To clarify, I 1000% know/believe that these are lead by vaccination programs. But what is the counterargument to demolish the source/1+1/fact check mob?
My father lives in an expensive private retirement community. fancy apartments, 5+ restaurants within, everything you could possibly desire. I would imagine 80% are vaxxed.
The age range at As hby Po nds is about 70 to 100. Yes there are a few 100 year oldsters
My dad is 98. Every one has had 4 jabs, 80% if not more.
The younger set, 70+ I have seen strokes, sudden cancers (brain and lung) in those that never had it before. These people are ones that regularly visit medical docs, have blood work history from before covid. I have seen many many in the 80's range with sudden flare at I think an unusual rate, of auto immune diseases, such as diabetes!!, MS, Immune-mediated myositis, and several others.
It appears that my daddy is doing okay. His blood work is fine. He has not had covid, and his personal hygiene is "just okay/average"
Still posting relevant articles on Covid although I have cut back after over two and a half years. This will be one that I will still link tomorrow @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
One issue I can spot with this paper is that the deaths are linked to dose 1 and dose 3. We have seen evidence that adverse events are dose dependent. There are also studies that show myocarditis occurs at a much higher rate after dose 2 than dose 1. Also recent evidence suggests that the death rate is something akin to 1 in 5000 doses. From personal experience, there also seems to be a greater reaction after the second dose though this is anecdotal I just don't see the rest of the evidence out there supporting the idea that dose 1 is more deadly than dose 2.
Excess mortality in 2021 seems pretty definitely connected to the science-juice to me. That leaves us with the question though: How the hell do we have worse excess mortality so far in 2022 than during the previous two years according to Euromomo?
I think in 2022 we're now dealing with the evolutionary ramifications of the mass vaccination program: Constant reinfections throughout the population and massive unprecedented waves of infection, even in the middle of summer, are starting to cause strokes, heart failure and other issues. Very worrisome.
This is the part where midwits chime in with "correlation does not equal causation!"
This kind of analysis attributing death directly to the vaccine is being independently replicated all over the world. Meanwhile, vaccine mandates continue at country borders, in public service jobs, and at great universities. My own child (unvaccinated) is at risk of choosing the jab just to receive a prestigious scholarship in the scientific field he loves. It is a monstrous evasion of the scientific facts. I believe this madness will end at some point, but then, who will pay?
I believe governments know the truth about the jabs and that's why they are slowly backing away from the vaccines -- but the harm has been done, so they are in no rush really to "save lives" but are more concerned with preserving their credibility (and looking for a fall guy.)
We of the proletariat have no power to control the oligarchs who run Western society. All we can do is to do our best to protect ourselves and our families. For my part, I am investing in publicly traded companies that provide caskets, burial, and cremation services.
It is becoming clearly obvious to me that no politician took the “real” jab. I say we line the politicians up worldwide and have them all catch up on two doses plus two boosters all one one day. It would make for great TV over the next two months.
What stops them from claiming that these are covid long term adverse events?
To clarify, I 1000% know/believe that these are lead by vaccination programs. But what is the counterargument to demolish the source/1+1/fact check mob?
Here is Canada we are deaf, blind, and brain washed.
Germany used primarily Pfizer? I'm just wondering if we could pinpoint which Very Safe Shot was the worst....
Does this mean the end of boosters, etc.? The more seasons of jabbing, the more obvious this relationship will become.
this is astonishing.
My father lives in an expensive private retirement community. fancy apartments, 5+ restaurants within, everything you could possibly desire. I would imagine 80% are vaxxed.
The age range at As hby Po nds is about 70 to 100. Yes there are a few 100 year oldsters
My dad is 98. Every one has had 4 jabs, 80% if not more.
The younger set, 70+ I have seen strokes, sudden cancers (brain and lung) in those that never had it before. These people are ones that regularly visit medical docs, have blood work history from before covid. I have seen many many in the 80's range with sudden flare at I think an unusual rate, of auto immune diseases, such as diabetes!!, MS, Immune-mediated myositis, and several others.
It appears that my daddy is doing okay. His blood work is fine. He has not had covid, and his personal hygiene is "just okay/average"
https://babylonbee.com/news/drug-company-unveils-new-drug-to-fix-side-effect-from-other-drug-that-fixed-side-effect-from-other-drug
Babylon Bee strikes again...
Happy to see you covering this story.
For those that have not seen it, this video is great and hopefully a sign that the MSM embargo on vaccine injury reporting is breaking down: https://rumble.com/v1hcznd-tucker-carlson-blame-trump.html .
Still posting relevant articles on Covid although I have cut back after over two and a half years. This will be one that I will still link tomorrow @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
Great job, sir!!!!
This may be one of the scariest tables I've ever seen.
Thank you for highlighting this, Eugyppius.
I wonder what the peer-review will look like.
One issue I can spot with this paper is that the deaths are linked to dose 1 and dose 3. We have seen evidence that adverse events are dose dependent. There are also studies that show myocarditis occurs at a much higher rate after dose 2 than dose 1. Also recent evidence suggests that the death rate is something akin to 1 in 5000 doses. From personal experience, there also seems to be a greater reaction after the second dose though this is anecdotal I just don't see the rest of the evidence out there supporting the idea that dose 1 is more deadly than dose 2.