239 Comments
User's avatar
Thorsteinn Siglaugsson's avatar

One more example of the utter dishonesty of so many scientists. Only yesterday I wrote about the new Icelandic study that found a 42% higher infection rate among vaccinated than unvaccinated, describe by the authors in their introduction as "slightly higher".

Expand full comment
PamelaDrew's avatar

Enron accounting elevated to peer reviewed science!

Expand full comment
Fear's avatar

Nah, Enron actually tried pretty hard to obfuscate their methods and lies. These guys just don't care since they know Covidians aren't looking.

Expand full comment
Duchess's avatar

Good point.

Expand full comment
PamelaDrew's avatar

Excellent point that prompts me to note the SEC and Wall St analysts were also willfully blind to Enron evidence. One SEC whistleblower joked it was the Selective Enforcement Cabal with a corp hotline to SEC Chairman if any corps felt unfairly targeted by investigation.

Expand full comment
Duchess's avatar

Good one Ms Drew!!

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

The science and data are usually sound, it's the conclusions that are edited to fit the narrative prior to publication, often over the objections of the authors. That way the media can 'summarize' the study for the public, hoping no one actually reads it.

Expand full comment
DashRiprock's avatar

I believe the unsupported and often contrary conclusions are made for the benefit of Internet search engines, which in turn form the entirety of the “research” done by the slavering idiots who call themselves journalists.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Nicely said!

Expand full comment
Yal NA's avatar

The awakened ones know to read the whole text and not just header or summary but unfortunately asleep ones still read only header and maybe summary if they don't have to scroll too much. Always also click on fact check links and read since they often disprove the factcheck.

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar

The text of some of the articles is dense and heavy going for the average reader. Sometimes you can tell what's really going on just from the abstract.

Expand full comment
CuiBono?'s avatar

Exactly

Expand full comment
Moritz's avatar

Quite frankly, I don‘t think it‘s dishonesty. They know that we read the whole thing and that the message comes trough, but journals would probably not publish their data without this disclaimer because they are captured by Big Pharma.

Expand full comment
Brian Dougan's avatar

Though dissimilar; that reminds me of WHO Director Tedro's assinine comment: He wanted Monkepox declared a "public health emergency." The vote went 9 to 6 against. Case closed. Not for the terrorist buffoon Tedros. "WHO Director Declares Expert Panel’s 9-6 Vote a ‘Tie’ Just So He Could Declare a Monkeypox Public Health Emergency." https://ussanews.com/2022/07/25/who-director-declares-expert-panels-9-6-vote-a-tie-just-so-he-could-declare-a-monkeypox-public-health-emergency-video/

The entire world has become Clown World. Returning to the injected vs uninjected article; A forty-two percent higher infection rate among the vaxed is now considered "slightly higher." Are these people simply morons; or inveterate liars?

Expand full comment
Fast Eddy's avatar

'The study concludes that all recipients of the Pfizer Covid Vaccine died from Covid. In light of this outstanding efficacy we recommend that everyone including infants stay up to date on their Covid injections and that they urgently book their appointment to receive the Extra Strength New and Improved Booster Shot that will be available in September'

Expand full comment
Thorsteinn Siglaugsson's avatar

The zombie apocalypse everyone is talking about?

Expand full comment
Fast Eddy's avatar

COVID and the ULTIMATE EXTINCTION PLAN (UEP)

https://www.headsupster.com/forumthread?shortId=220

Expand full comment
ChesterView's avatar

Everyone is in liege to Big Pharma. They have no credibility.

Expand full comment
Fast Eddy's avatar

It cannot be about $$$.... if it was .. then why make the dodgiest most dangerous 'vaccine' in the history of the world that is ultimately going to kill off your customer base.

It makes no sense. You would instead inject a benign substance into them.

Unless the end game is: https://www.headsupster.com/forumthread?shortId=220

Expand full comment
Jens Happel's avatar

Please tell me the title if the study. Did they really compare 2x vaxed verus unvax?

I think the compared one jab wirh 2 and mor jab.

Not that this is much better for the vaxeneers.

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Heartless 💔

Expand full comment
Agent 1-4-9's avatar

Heart breaking, literally.

Expand full comment
Rob Landeros's avatar

Criminal

Expand full comment
Alvin's avatar

I covered this one a few days ago and the numbers are indeed horrifying. To add to the numbers in your article, all 7 of the "heart damage" participants (clinical or subclinical myo or pericarditis) were males. There were 202 male participants so that means this study shows that males 13-18 had a 3.5 percent risk of myopericarditis following 2 doses of Pfizer.

Putting these numbers into more context, it’s estimated that the typical myopericarditis rate in adolescents is around 1 in 100,000 = 0.001% and irregular ECG finding occur in approximately 0.5% of adolescents.

Therefore, in adolescents aged 13-18, the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine may increase the chance of irregular ECG by 36 times and the change of clinical/subclinical myopericarditis by 3500 times for boys. Yikes!

https://seekinghealthtruth.substack.com/p/18-of-adolescents-have-abnormal-ecgs

Also, a large study, from April 2022, out of Israel showed that COVID-19 doesn't increase the risk of myopericarditis in the unvaccintaed.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35456309/

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

thanks, edited to clarify the 2.33% overall and 3.5% male distinction.

Expand full comment
Yal NA's avatar

I read male extinction...I guess this is true too....

Expand full comment
Andreas Stullkowski's avatar

These articles are mostly read by working academic scientists, and they know full well that every article has to state that vaccines are good; so everyone in the field knows to disregard that passus.

Even more so as it is not mentioned in the abstract (this is what most readers only read anyway).

So the authors did very well to publish this damning study. It shows that even in such censoring times we have one can publish the truth and one can read it, albeit between the lines.

Expand full comment
Joshu's Dog's avatar

Yes, it's basically the pro forma schtick at the Party Congress. Blah blah blah Big Pharma products show immense overall benefit blah blah blah the Worker's and Peasants Democratic Republic continues to make great leaps and bounds blah blah

Expand full comment
Andreas Stullkowski's avatar

Yes.

But resistance can only come from within the party itself. So resistance looks like conformity.

I am fairly sure the mrna vaccines will be history in three years, thanks to the researchers who do objective research, and are able to publish it, even if they have to pretend they toe the party line.

And maybe even if they believe the party line themselves, but are willing to go where good research leads them.

We have to fight the liers and backbiters, like the often mentioned Lauterbach. But the honest researchers are on our side, even if they do not know it.

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

Same as with "climate change". None of the predictions have come true and the real life data (i.e not the GIGO models) show nothing terrible is happening. But we still have to end the lab report with a "something needs to be done" shout out.

Expand full comment
ChesterView's avatar

Well good for them that they ran the Big Pharma traps in getting this published but I personally find the existence of those traps incompatible with a free society.

Expand full comment
Andreas Stullkowski's avatar

This research is done on the universities, which are not free. They depend very much on pharma money, and money from the states. The restrictions are instituted by the bureaucratic classes, not the researchers.

It is hard to define what a free society is. But IMO Corona showed that we are not living in one.

Expand full comment
Joachim2's avatar

Let's see . . . damaged heart muscle biomarkers in study were present in 1 out of 50 young males (*actually in excess of 1 in 50 of all males), yet the boilerplate statement is that "COVID-19-associated cardiac injury or myocarditis is … estimated to be 100 times higher than mRNA COVID-19-related myocarditis"?

How can you get 100 times higher than 1 in 50?

Expand full comment
Jestre's avatar

Especially considering some studies have found no association between COVID-19 and heart issues.

https://jestre.substack.com/p/no-increase-in-myocarditis-and-pericarditis

Expand full comment
CuiBono?'s avatar

Exactly what I was thinking but couldn’t remember where I saw it (so much Substack gold...so little time). Thanks for the link!!

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Right?! And there's no such thing as "mild" myocarditis!

Expand full comment
Thorsteinn Siglaugsson's avatar

Easy: 100 in 50

Expand full comment
Yal NA's avatar

And this are scientists? They can't do basic math. What are we dealing here with? Are they all suddenly unable, what happened? Did alien spaceworms already invade their brains? Every day my joke of this are really podpeople becomes more possible to me and less of a joke.

Expand full comment
Grant's avatar

With the jabbed getting repeatedly reinfected I suppose they could be getting myo multiple times as well...

Expand full comment
CaliforniaLost's avatar

So the vaxx gives you myocarditis, but thebvaxx is so safe and effective, it takes it then takes it away, see, 2 for 1. Really easy when you use clown world Pharma math.

Expand full comment
PamelaDrew's avatar

Nice computation thanks.. can't get there with me math but it just stank fraud.. we never saw alarming jumps in myocarditis before the jabs in any global health data.. over half the world had been infected and no signal appeared until mRNA transfections.. grrrr

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 17, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Yal NA's avatar

I think its the subclinical (mild lol) myocardities at play. Causes at some point a deadly arrhythmia. So the "mildly" damaged heart eventually has an issue with it especially if stressed...if they die in sleep due to a bad dream or sleep apnea which puts stress on heart too.

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

Should be VADS: Vaccinated Adult Death Syndrome.

Expand full comment
SnowInTheWind's avatar

100 out of 50? 2 in 1? Good point. The math works, but it makes no sense.

Expand full comment
J/W/G's avatar

How angry will parents become when they realize they’ve been deceived & co-opted into damaging their children? When PH will say well it was YOUR choice parent, no one forced you….. or will the pain of admission be just too much and the parents look the other way. I will never forget the pediatrician pushing them HARD on my family, even knowing my child was recovered. thankful to God above my spouse and I had the maturity of an older parent and knowledge of communities like this, to say hell no

Expand full comment
Mark Bisone's avatar

"….. or will the pain of admission be just too much and the parents look the other way."

I suspect this will be the ego-saving strategy for many parents, unfortunately. People find a way to rationalize having been duped out of fifty bucks, let alone the health of their children. Just as with those parents who allowed authorities to "sexually transition" their kids, it is a strange, sad fate for them, forever apologizing for their tormentors.

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

I don't see any parent admitting to it. Don't forget, these are not normal, well-balanced human beings. They are pathetic sheep. They will deny, deny and deny it again to themselves forever.

Expand full comment
z28.310's avatar

Almost two years of the shots, and no similar prospective studies from big pharma, any public health institutions, or any of the supposed leading medical schools. Yes, it is all so tiresome.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Sickening!

Expand full comment
pandelis's avatar

well i suppose it is an experiment ... got to wait to see what happens.

Expand full comment
ChesterView's avatar

As one of the FDA panel doctors said when approving the vaccines for children said, “The only way we are to know whether they are safe is to get them out there.”

Expand full comment
Gail Finke's avatar

Does this study, or any of the comments on it, say whether the myocarditis rate the authors mention from C-19 is from all people that age known to have had Covid, or only from kids known to have been seriously ill with it (which would be only a small fraction of those who had it)?

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

The authors borrow the myocarditis rate from a few prior studies. I’ve looked into this before and come away feeling fairly unconvinced that the accepted numbers were accurate, but I can’t any longer remember specifics.

Expand full comment
MM604's avatar

The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients—A Large Population-Based Study

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/8/2219

Expand full comment
KC & the Sunshine's avatar

Most of whom had comorbidities anyway, and would likely have had excess issues/adverse outcomes to pretty much ANY illness such as pneumonia? Yeah…

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

What's interesting is that almost everyone admits that the current vaccines are useless, assuming they were ever even the least bit effective. All of this excessive promotion is for the next one.

Expand full comment
KC & the Sunshine's avatar

And now they are piling on with the Paxlovid BS, too. Suddenly, many VIPs here in the US “have covid” and they are all saying the same basic thing, as though scripted: “I have been diagnosed with covid. I am experiencing mild symptoms and and am taking Paxlovid. I am so grateful to have been vaccinated (because THAT is working so well???) and you should get vaxxed, too.” End of script. Cue cards can be put away. Give me a break.

Expand full comment
SimulationCommander's avatar

They don't seem to realize that Paxlovid is for high-risk patients......which means that they're subtly admitting the 'vaccine' didn't help.

Expand full comment
RepublicJim's avatar

Exactly! That's what I've been pointing out to anyone who will listen. When the four times-jabbed Bidens, Fauci, Bourla, etc. announce that they are immediately undergoing a course of Paxlovid, that clearly implies that they don't actually believe their experimental injections will protect them. If the jabs are so awesome at "preventing severe outcomes" they should stake their lives on that and forgo the Paxlovid.

Expand full comment
I am not your Other's avatar

If you want a shock, look up paxlovid side effects and drug interactions. It’s one of the worst if not THE worst out there.

Expand full comment
Yal NA's avatar

Guess what the unvaxxed i know have NO symptoms cause they don't get covid multiple times. I believe natural immunity is much much longer than the 3 months otherwise my situation can not be explained.

Expand full comment
Gail Finke's avatar

No vax here, and I had Covid twice. But it was very mild both times -- if I didn't know what it was I wouldn't have thought anything of it, especially the second time (the first was more like a very mild flu).

Expand full comment
Yal NA's avatar

Why can't unvaxxed say good that im unvaxxed please stay unvaxxed if their covid infection is mild?

Expand full comment
Quakeress's avatar

Funnily enough, paxlovid shouldnt be taken by the vaccinated at all.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 17, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
pandelis's avatar

cant go against science.

Expand full comment
Deborah Gregson's avatar

"...THE science."

Expand full comment
alberghetti's avatar

re phrase:can't go against scientism

Expand full comment
hoppah's avatar

It’s meant to be tiresome. You’re supposed to eventually get tired and give up and just go along. That’s what most of the population will do over time.

Expand full comment
AllieMarie777's avatar

How can these people look themselves in the mirror and sleep at night? I’m terrified of having to go to the hospital for anything given what has happened to the medical profession over the past 2 1/2 years and what is continuing to take place

Expand full comment
Gail Finke's avatar

A few years ago I read a very sobering article about Muslims being afraid to go the hospital in the Netherlands, because they thought doctors would kill them. It was not a conspiracy fear -- the Dutch experiments with "assisted suidide" and euthanasia (doctors killing you, in other words) had led to doctors assuming that people would rather die than suffer. The article was about how doctors were surprised to find how much pain and discomfort many people thought were NOT "too much suffering to bear." Ever since reading that, I have looked at doctors and hospitals differently. What they think you want is NOT necessarily what you want, and (in Dutch hospitals, anyway) could even lead to your death.

Expand full comment
ChesterView's avatar

I now view hospitals in the US with dread. They have effectively become death camps for people with covid.

Expand full comment
Gail Finke's avatar

An ER nurse I know told me no one dies at their hospital anymore from Covid. Maybe it varies?

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

Easy, Allie. They are psychopaths. Look at Fauci: he thinks he's a man of integrity and principal.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 17, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
AllieMarie777's avatar

My D.O. tried to push me to take the “safe and effective vaccine” despite my having Covid. She said I could get Covid again. Sounded like a big pharma hack. I left her practice

Expand full comment
Jestre's avatar

They have to make that statement to get published. There was a pre-print awhile back that found significant plagiarism in COVID studies, mostly in the conclusions and literature reviews IIRC. I suspect it wasn't plagiarism they found. No. It was talking points by people that found the same conclusions regardless of results.

Expand full comment
z28.310's avatar

Positive commentary on covid shots regardless of study results or conclusions has been adopted as necessary boilerplate for legal and career purposes.

Expand full comment
Irena's avatar

Moral of the story: do your absolute best to avoid the medical-industrial complex. Yes, they have mastered a few useful tricks (e.g. fixing broken bones, most of the time), but otherwise, they're more likely to mess you up than to help you.

Expand full comment
pebbleanttoast's avatar

Pre-COVID, the medical profession constituted the third leading cause of death in the United States, behind heart disease and cancer.

I used to go for annual health screens, regular vaccines, etc. Now, I only go for professional dental cleanings and to emergency if I am injured. Other than that, I maintain a healthy lifestyle and inform myself.

Expand full comment
buddhi's avatar

US Healthcare kills 440,000 people every single year. That's a lot.

Expand full comment
buddhi's avatar

Avoid their drugs too.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 17, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
buddhi's avatar

Surgery acute care is okay but the remaining chronic care (75%) will kill you slowly. Slow so they can drain your money.

Expand full comment
Big Grey's avatar

"Public Health" has become the whore of Big Business and Bigger Government. Period. Most have abandoned any trust in these agencies and / or their paid shills. Medicine has thrown in the towel on "First, Do No Harm". The grifters are taking over the western world. I for one am sick and tired of the DNC marketing a narrative to me that fits their plan of chaos. We need big fat change and we need it now. Hard times are coming. We had all better harden up physically, mentally, socially and financially or we will not ride out the storm. Until then, pray, plan, prepare and RESIST.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 17, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Big Grey's avatar

Spot on summary.

Expand full comment
UnvaxxedCanadian's avatar

It's all so 1984

Expand full comment
Sharon Garvin's avatar

As the mother of three young men "tiresome" isn't how I would describe this. It's evil. These people are monsters.

Expand full comment
ChesterView's avatar

Yes!!

Expand full comment