116 Comments
User's avatar
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

"EU has a big impotent retarded sad" - been that way for decades. You should start an NGO called "Two Minutes Hate". The unelected bureaucrats will funnel millions to you to censor all the reporting on Somali fraudsters stealing billions in America. Does the EU have an economy left outside welfare scams, NGOs, and tourism? Time to join the European Army to defend the commissars, comrade: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/european-union-army-recruitment

Expand full comment
ChrisC's avatar

And a reminder for all the dipshits who have been shrieking about Trump's tariffs. The EU can call it a "fine" but it is a massive tariff on a US tech company and their services.

Expand full comment
Tell's avatar

If it is a one-time payment it is a fine.

Expand full comment
Robert C Culwell's avatar

Sic'm Yuri!

Expand full comment
SamizBOT's avatar

The leftist shit bags of the world could continue with their rule basically indefinitely if they would just moderate a couple of unpopular policies. It's frankly amazing that they don't

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

It's one of the clearest demonstrations that they're actually certifiably retarded. They could just let us have the internet thing and leave us alone. First of all, their countermeasures suck and are retarded. Second of all, they're often directly counterproductive and give us a lot of momentum and even power we wouldn't have otherwise.

ETA: I owe around 10% of my subscribers to Imran Ahmed and the Guardian, who went after me in the dark days of Covid as an anti-vaxxer.

Expand full comment
SamizBOT's avatar

They could ease up on immigration, refrain from overt censorship, and not shit on whitey and the "far right" would cease to exist

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

absolutely. close the borders and AfD is a <10% party tomorrow, it's literally that simple. most AfD voters haven't even figured out what a poison pill all the climate shit is yet.

Expand full comment
Pat Robinson's avatar

Is it really just the immigration thing? Do most Germans still think the climate/insane nonsense is a good idea?

Even as BASF, VW, Siemens etc get out as fast they can?

Truly retarded If that is the case.

Expand full comment
Quakeress's avatar

It depends where they get their information from. If they trust the big tax-financed media corps (ÖRR), they are more likely to still think The Climate is out to get us. If they've already lost their jobs or if they are experiencing job insecurity as a result of stupid degrowth policies, they might already have jumped off the band wagon or be more likely to do so. The richer and more secure they are, the more they are willing to sacrifice to Save The Climate. The poorer and insecure they are, the more they are likely to oppose policies that will mean less disposable income for them.

Expand full comment
BD's avatar
1hEdited

Truly retarded is my take as well. They learned NOTHING from WWII, and why we rebuilt them. Trump has made them look like idiots for years now. Remember the German fools laughing at the UN at Trump's natural gas remarks? Only retarded morons haven't learned from that episode. Here's the deal...they've wanted to expunge the Nazis for decades and turn themselves into Marxists. And they're finally succeeding. Only now, the Brits and Frogs are trying to join them.

Expand full comment
Quakeress's avatar

They don't see it that way. Day in, day out they are told what an idiot Trump is and what a failure his admin is. I kid you not. You turn on the news, it's Orange Man Bad, We Must Save The Climate, and Ukraine Needs Our Money all day long.

Expand full comment
EppingBlogger's avatar

In the UK it is hard to find a rightie. Who is he. I’ve never come across him.

Expand full comment
Brian RL Catt's avatar

People who believe that policies should be populist in a people's democracy, the best for the most, are considered far right.

That makes the majority of the members of the UK's largest political party, REFORM, "far right populists". They really don't like people who understand what is best for the most, and who understand what they get is what is worst for the most - and best for the elite parasites they are forced to pay for in taxes.

And the governing legacy elite really hate it when people start publishing such views and calling out the blatantly unrepresentative elite corruption legalised in our names - so more of the gullible , trusting electorate can see understand the absolute corruption of European governments.

All passed into law in the name of people they are impovershing and ever more controlling of, in the name of obvious lies to those who can check their claims. Heresy that must be silenced. Truth is labelled as lies.

The reality of what they do cannot be published or broadcast to the masses. It's far too real. But the masses can smell the shit now. They are catching on that they have been lied to and robbed by their parasitic governments since about 1997.Nothing that is done is to enrich, free or enable them, they are taxed and controlled to limit any such gains, while those in power asset strip the nations assets for their own profit and destroy te people's future . All to bankroll their bloated, unwanted, and often unnecessary bureaucracies as they enrich their crony elites at our expense.

Expand full comment
Sage Alfields's avatar

That's like saying the "far right" could win by embracing communism: being anti-White and censorious is the entire point of the left.

Expand full comment
Brian RL Catt's avatar

Better far right than far wrong.

Expand full comment
Decaf's avatar

And small-minded, thinking they're so important that we shouldn't be even allowed to comment freely about them.

Expand full comment
Indrek Sarapuu's avatar

"Certifiably retarded", is appropriate.

Expand full comment
Brian RL Catt's avatar

Eurotards? Smother with new National Socialism 2.0's EUthanasium ointment and the inconvenient democratic tendencies will be disappeared after only a few applications. To paraphrase National Socialism 1.0, as described by Herman Goering at Nurenberg:

"Naturally, the common people don't want expensive energy, the destruction of their farming culture and economic competitiveness, and the vandalism of their environment.

But, after all, it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist state, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.

Voice or no voice, the people can always be bought to the bidding of the leaders.

This is easy. All you have to do is tell them the planet is in danger of climate catastrophe, caused by CO2 emissions they are responsible for, and denounce those who question this for lack of belief and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in very country."

Expand full comment
Anne Liebert's avatar

They run on ideology not intelligent planning. They think they are building a utopia and they will not compromise on anything. They want to live in a perpetual Star Trek episode.

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

So you and CCDH are symbiotic opponents? 😜

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

As eugy said in a footnote, they're shockingly ham-fisted. What's amazing is that the people don't notice more than they do.

Expand full comment
Rond's avatar
4hEdited

"Leftist shit bag" is a description of an adherent to a process, not a position. Moderation is not compatible with this idealogy.

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

'the Americans have revoked his visa because he is a fucking creep and an enemy and they want him out.'

Absolutely. But isn't he also being prosecuted for actual crimes, such as lying on his nonprofit application?

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

I have seen people raise allegations in this direction, but as far as I know, there is no word of an active proseuction or investigation. Happy to be corrected! Will edit post too ofc.

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

I should've tried looking it up before I commented. If he's not being prosecuted, he certainly should be.

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

Resorting to AI:

'As of now, no formal legal charges have been brought against Imran Ahmed regarding allegations that he lied on his application for nonprofit status for the American branch of the Center for Countering Digital Hate or any other matter. However, he is currently involved in a legal dispute with the U.S. government.

'The Trump administration recently imposed a ban on Imran Ahmed and four other European nationals, accusing them of seeking to "coerce" tech platforms into censoring viewpoints they oppose. This led to legal actions where Ahmed filed a lawsuit against U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, alleging violations of his free speech and due process rights related to his residency status.

'A federal judge has temporarily blocked the U.S. government's actions to detain or deport Ahmed, granting him a restraining order that allows him to remain in the U.S. while his case is resolved. The judge's ruling highlighted the importance of the legal process in determining the validity of the government's claims.

'Previous Legal Challenges: Ahmed's organization faced a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk's social media platform, X, regarding reports of increased hate speech, which was dismissed by the court.

'Despite the serious nature of the allegations, no criminal charges have been formally filed against Ahmed to date.'

Expand full comment
Art's avatar

'the Americans have revoked his visa because he is a fucking creep and an enemy and they want him out.'

Without regard to anything else, this sentence just sounds like beautiful music to my ears, and might be the single best sentence Dr. Eugyppius has ever written.

Expand full comment
alexei's avatar

I'm tempted to rephrase that description as "an abominably smug fucking creep". I've often thought someone needs to wipe that smug grin off his ugly mug.... pardon the French.

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

Your analyses are always full of painful truth and in some alternate reality Trump Redux would've brought us Trump the Mature with a Cabinet full of preternaturally cunning and effective staffers. He's always been uniquely talented at giving his enemies and adversaries all their best weapons.

But every little bit of thwarting of them is better than nothing at all. There's some gold in our Christmas stockings though it comes, to be sure, marked with coal dust.

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

"Human wet noodle incarnation and German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul..."

Good Lord but I hope that name means something less hilariously apt in German...

Expand full comment
Graeme Macbeth's avatar

>omid nouripour

That fine old German name. Who could forget Omid the Camel, Duke of Saxony under the Hohenstauffens, or the magnificent exploits of Manfred von Nouripour during the Thirty Years War?

Wahnsinnwelt.

Expand full comment
Larry the Leper's avatar

Sounds like a brand of infant formula.

Expand full comment
Graeme Macbeth's avatar

Sounds like a brand I wouldn't feed my kids.

(My daughters actually drank Holle, imported at some expense and inconvenience from Germany with the assistance of a very helpful Gmbh in Stuttgart. Deutscher Wein gets a shoutout in the anthem, but my family will forever be grateful to deutsche Säuglingsnahrung)

Expand full comment
Brian RL Catt's avatar

Thought he was Iranian fifth columnist embedded in the Bundeswank to promote the Islamic take over of Germany?

Expand full comment
Seb Thirlway's avatar

No coverage of whatever impotent retarded sad came from our so-called "Government" over here in the UK. CCDH - for whom no sanction is bad enough - is heavily linked to the origins of Starmer's "New New Labour Party". Morgan McSweeney is up to his eyeballs in it.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

The then-boss of Russia Today, which is by no measures an unbiased channel, was asked - and I think this was some 15 years ago - about their agit-prop campaigns against Sweden by some Swedish journo, and the answer was hilarious (no matter if it was actually true or not).

The journo asked if they found it difficult to make up new material, and the RT-boss replied:

"No, no we don't need to. We only have to look at what Swedish regime media report and then broadcast the stuff they censor or bury, we don't need to make anything up"

The actual quote made it clear they didn't need to make anything up as propaganda because the reality was bad enough.

I mention this because while it may have come to greater knowledge in 2018, the EU has been going after free speech for 30 years now.

They really really hate that you can place your servers and business in the United States of America and thus out of their reach. Swedish free speech platform/forum Flashback have been fighting this fight since it was a punk fanzine in the 1980s, as have many (West&East) German fanzine and samizdat publications too, not seldom in comic form.

The people we fight, this nebulous *Them*, /hate/ us, Eugyppius, and they hate us because we are disobedient, because we point out that they are venal corrupt incompetent liars, that we talk to each other, that we don't look at the ground in their presence, that we exist at all in any way or form than the one they have decided is the correct one.

They hate us, one and all, and they want us dead and gone, our history gone and our children and grandchildren turned into a sienna-coloured Homo EUropeaus, and they rvel in inflicting suffering just because they can.

They must be toppled, any way we can, and they must be made examples of, in public.

To the gallows with the EUrocrats! Literally!

Expand full comment
Franz Kafka's avatar

Well, at least to the Galleons. RT is the last remaining, full service news platform in the West that does not induce mouth vomit.

Extrapolating from that, it confirms once more that Russia is now Europe. There is no other and yet another there shall not be.

Expand full comment
Brian RL Catt's avatar

Really? The Radio Times is the propaganda broadcasting schedule of the BBC - what does that have to do with Euroshit??

Expand full comment
DevonshireDozer's avatar

I think he means the TV channel Russia Today. I stopped watching TV in 2020, so I could be wrong.

Expand full comment
Catie's avatar

You had me at that hilarious, coffee-spew-inducing title! Love your work, Eugypius...thank you for keeping me (mostly) sane all these years. We need a thousand more just like you.

Expand full comment
marlon1492's avatar

💯

Expand full comment
Decaf's avatar

The title alone made me laugh out loud. Now on to the article...

Expand full comment
Larry the Leper's avatar

I love it when the EU acts the verbal tough guy with the Trump administration because when Ursula v.d. L subsequently turns up at the White House with a coterie of transient Euromorons (© E) it's so that they can receive a collective beating and manage to learn no lessons.

Expand full comment
Christine Summerson's avatar

HateAid is really an unfortunate name (for them) because it suggests that they are fomenting hate, which they seem to be. So perhaps it's a good name after all.

Expand full comment
Quakeress's avatar

Denglish at its very best.

Expand full comment
Warmek's avatar

> All of this naturally depends on what it is the Americans want to achieve.

If I were to guess, "we" don't actually *know* what we're trying to achieve, and thus, will achieve essentially nothing with any of this. Which isn't to say that I don't appreciate the base emotions that come from seeing this sort of public slap, as it is indeed quite satisfying. But I don't expect it to truly have any significant impact.

More's the pity.

Expand full comment
KHP's avatar

Wasn't there some German general in world War II who supposedly said, " it's a waste of time studying American military manuals because the Americans don't know their own doctrines"?

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

'These NGOs and many others sprouted like mushrooms in the space of just a few months, capitalising on establishment insecurity by promising vague, buzzword-laden solutions to the illusory Russian social media menace. In practice, they swallowed and continue to swallow millions of Euros while doing a lot of huffing and puffing for middle-aged digitally naive German politicians about all the evil monsters that lurk in the scary internet world.'

Your descriptions are the best.

Expand full comment
Paulette's avatar
4hEdited

CCDH isn’t just trying to suppress free speech in America, but also interfere with Elections

https://aflegal.org/press-release/america-first-legal-releases-new-evidence-files-formal-complaint-with-the-doj-to-investigate-uk-based-center-for-countering-digital-hate-for-engaging-in-a-foreign-influence-campaign/

Check out the bios of the CCDH board members

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar
1hEdited

...crikey :-((

Expand full comment
Tell's avatar

>"Criminal behaviour such as incitement to hatred and insults are not protected by freedom of expression,” she warned.

Note the propaganda. The real expression is "incitement to violence," which is criminal. The socialist knows that people have learned that way that "incitement" is something criminal, violent, so she attaches it to something else, "incitement to hatred."

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

good catch. how to (legally) define such a term as 'hatred', that'll be fun...

Expand full comment
Quakeress's avatar

"Whatever I don't like" seems to be the working definition.

Expand full comment