64 Comments
User's avatar
wolf's avatar

Let's hope he sues the crap out of the German government for going all Stasi on him.

Time to put the woke left extremists back where they came from and use common sense going forward.

Plus we most definitely need to get started on reimmgration before the western world we know is destroyed and looks like the 3rd world shithole where they come from - you don't integrate and behave you will be sent back.

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

He has substantial damages, so he will sue and he'll probably win.

Expand full comment
Riri's avatar
11hEdited

Just wish these bozos feel it in their pocket, instead of the taxpayers having to pay for this. This is what was interesting and quite a surprise in South Africa. A court made a cost order against a errant politician in his personal capacity. Wish European courts can start doing this.

Expand full comment
wolf's avatar

Wouldn't that be nice. Worst case for our politician is they step down and get a nicely paid job.

Same should be true for CEOs instead of a golden parachute.

Expand full comment
Chixbythesea's avatar

I find it interesting that Merz is scaling back on immigration. I thinks it’s a big price tag each month he’s happy to cut while he meanwhile gets to pretend he’s responding to voters.

Expand full comment
joe stuerzl 85's avatar

That's totally naive .Wolfs never integrate with sheep . Send the whole gang back where they came from .

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

Has Faeser et al not read the Koran or listened to/read what is taught and preached in mosques all over EU-rope?

Translation software make it trivial to get the gist of it.

I'd say the Koran in itself constitutes a challenge to the democratic order and constitution of Germany.

Expand full comment
Charlotte's avatar

It is pretty remarkable that the UK not only tolerates Sharia law, they openly support it as a separate legal system. Sharia law directly violates many laws, the most obvious ones by treating women like cattle, especially in terms of marital and custody law. I will never understand this.

Expand full comment
Jack McCord's avatar

I think there's another reason the Left coddles Islamists. Shariah is 'all-encompassing' and governs politics, personal behavior, civil and criminal law. It's essentially totalitarian.

Expand full comment
Yukon Dave's avatar

Religion of Peace, Truck of Peace, Knife of Peace, etc... Islam and Communism do not go together. Yemen made some attempt at if for a while but it failed. Just left a bunch of angry commies fighting with their neighbors

Expand full comment
Riri's avatar
11hEdited

Indeed. Strange that the left is so quiet about this. Even if we are hearing more and more concerning stories out of German schools where children are forcefully converted or ridiculed for being pigeaters.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

Logic of the post-Soviet Left:

1) Moslems brown people

2) Brown people victims of white racist oppressor colonialists

3) Therefore, moslems victims

4) As moslems are victims of white oppression, all bad things done by moslems originate from white colonialist racism

5) Therefore, pointing out moslems doing bad things is racism

---

It is the exact same pattern of brain-washing that has been used against white USAmericans since the late 1950s/early 1960s, by a plethora of academics of various ethnic backgrounds, including Anglo-Saxon-American.

It also chimes in harmony with the post-modernist New Left's projected self-hate/self-loathing and perpetual puerile protest against everything (which is memetic mimicry of their parent generation's adulation of the "rebels are heroes"-arche-/stereotype as spread by US entertaintment media since the end of WW2).

---

The above is my long-winded way of saying: "No, not strange at all"

Expand full comment
Yukon Dave's avatar

IF you want to pull on the communists chain, substitute the word Moslem with Mohammedan. Always play the word games back at them. I also like to use the term "Religion of Peace", you can not say it without it sounding sarcastic no matter how you try not to.

Example: Was the man who drove that truck into the parade a member of the Religion of Peace?

Expand full comment
Suzie's avatar

“ The court is clear that such content could indeed warrant a ban; in this case it doesn’t only because this material does “not yet” meet the threshold of being a “defining characteristic” of Compact as a publication.”

Clear as mud. Just what is “the threshold,” pray tell? “We’re trying to run a magazine here ya know!”

On another note, do they get all their stuff back? Ugh. Just sickeningly wicked behavior.

🤦‍♀️

Expand full comment
Charlotte's avatar

That type of decision is also just absurd. For all of the faults of the US system (and there are many), at least the Supreme Court aims to set clear thresholds, usually by setting a 3 prong test, giving clear guidance on the threshold. Here the judge says nothing definitive, leaving the door wide open for some other judge to come up with a ridiculous guidance for the threshold, one which is applied retrospectively, which of course the easiest way to have people break a law. You write the law into existence after the fact, I guess sort of like a judicial Beria system.

Expand full comment
ZuZu’s Petals's avatar

Eugyppius, Thank you for this. Earlier today I read a related report on this announcing “Victory for freedom of the press”. I was, briefly, elated, but now not so much.

Expand full comment
Stuffysays's avatar

How can any comment about Islam be considered unconstitutional in a supposedly Christian European country? Would it be unconstitutional to be rude about, say, Orthodox Christians who, presumably, are not generally going to be German? Would it be unconstitutional to comment on Hinduism or Sikhism in relation to Germany? Western Christian countries really are run by people who want us to commit national suicide!

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

anti-Islamic attitudes in a political context are considered to take issue with religious freedom and therefore to be unconstitutional.

Expand full comment
1.032547698's avatar

Question (I'm from the US): Does the German government consider Islamic GDR citizens' anti-Christian attitudes in a political context something that takes issue with religious freedom and is therefore unconstitutional? Or is Christianity the sole religion not included under issue with religious freedom being taken?

Expand full comment
carol ann's avatar

So it is okay to express anti-Catholic or anti-Hindu (for example) in a political context??

Expand full comment
Ravishing Rudey's avatar

What a deliberately disingenuous, grotesque and vile twisted reasoning. Surely the courts in a "demuhcrasee" are supposed to prevent such abusive uses of law?

Imagine genuinely believing that it's more "demuhcratik" to restrict liberties and give the state more power and control over what they may think and read and learn than requiring more direct consent and participation in a supposed "demuhcrass-y"?

And for the people who have never had the opportunity to have a conversation which asked these types of questions of a "normal", middle-class "right-thinking" German in Germany (especially a Berliner in Berlin), boy, do I have disappointing news for you: to the full degree of their capability they will defend this contradictory, unnatural pretzel-logic insanity to the death, like the well-trained programmed sheep they are. Eventually they will walk away in disgust at your questions.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

"Western Christian countries really are run by people who want to murder the past, present and future of all European peoples, and the actual people too"

is more like it.

Expand full comment
John Haupt's avatar

Exactly! Erase every vestige of western civilization…and replace it with what? Some form of Marxist utopia.

Expand full comment
Riri's avatar

These idiots will protect islam till the day it grows powerful enough to overthrow the system. Then the left will be surprised again (as always) that their pet turned on them

Expand full comment
jotolo's avatar

Germany needs Free Speech. Which Party will advocate for it?

Expand full comment
Ravishing Rudey's avatar

The only possible hope on that front is the AfD. However, it is not just absolute free speech that Germany needs, it is actually a complete constitutional overhaul as you can tell from Eugypius' many articles. Only then can nature be allowed to self-heal Germany.

Expand full comment
Ravishing Rudey's avatar

Correct, *ABSOLUTE 🥶 🍑

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

2024 bumper stickers demanding to save by 'Demoracy™ by voting for appointed politicians are nothing more than a derivative of what is happening in Europe. Is it sinister motives causing all this or are we in a zeitgeist like a hundred years ago when the world embraced Eugenics as the best new thing to build a society?

Expand full comment
Ray Noack's avatar

The word here in the USA is Germany is prepared to institute the draft to send conscripted soldiers to Ukraine . The draft will occur only if enough men and women do not voluntarily sign up . I wonder how many “ greens “ will volunteer to go fight the Russians in a bloody Verdun trench war . Is there any truth in this ? Is Germany really gearing up to defend Berlin ?

Expand full comment
eugyppius's avatar

Germany will never send soldiers to Ukraine, but we might re-institute national service.

Expand full comment
John Lester's avatar

It might change the country for the better. We had it here in the US in the 1950's and 60's. My high school graduation trip was to Army Basic Training. The big lesson I saw and learned was that you sometimes had to do things you would rather not without bitching about it. I think that would be a good lesson for many of today's snowflakes.

Expand full comment
Bizarro Man's avatar

Yeah, being shanghaied into fighting a stupid war for the neocons and Lockheed-Martin, that'll show 'em.

Expand full comment
John Lester's avatar

It worked out well for me, I volunteered while in High School, got an Honorable Discharge in December 1964 after eight years, just before the Grandaddy of Neocon/Military Industial Complex wars started.

Expand full comment
Ravishing Rudey's avatar

Well, John, that was literally 60 years ago, and the America you grew up in doesn't exist anymore, and sadly modern Germany never was akin to it, and the German military is (I believe) even more heavy-handed and ideologically repressive than the psychological and legal insanity ordinary Germans have to live under. It might make a generation of ordinary young Germans more physically capable of defending themselves and those same pressures may push those people to question everything... but that would be the most optimistic possibility.

Expand full comment
SCA's avatar

So just a mini Mazal Tov, mayn mensch!

Expand full comment
Efferous's avatar

This is a problem that every nation seems to have: there is no means to punish the one responsible here. Continually, government officials will infringe on rights even knowing something will be overturned because they get some period of time with their action in place. When it's finally overturned, nothing whatsoever happens to them as punishment.

Willful infringement of rights by elected and appointed officials should be a crime in all societies, and like other categories of crime, it should come with various tiers of punishment options. The most severe should be capital punishment while the lowest could be something like a lifetime ban from office. These tyrants need to fear the consequences of their actions.

Expand full comment
les's avatar

The problem is that these people never have to face the consequences for their crazy beliefs.

Expand full comment
UM Ross's avatar

Infringement of rights "under color of law" is a crime in the USA. Unfortunately, it is rarely prosecuted.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/242

Expand full comment
carol ann's avatar

Yes, the process is the punishment meaning that people can be charged and even bankrupted even if found not guilty.

Expand full comment
Chixbythesea's avatar

I still can’t believe that old white Karen, Nancy Faeser, is Antifa. So weird!

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

Bummer.

Expand full comment
Jack McCord's avatar

I've been banging my insurrectionist drum for awhile, but it's worth repeating: German politicians' ability to abrogate civil liberties - free speech and others - has progressed so far that underground publications - anonymous, subversive samizdat - seem the best way forward. Court cases move slowly, judges are timid and dishonest.

The plague chronicle is a fine example, but perhaps some anonymous German-language analogues, focusing on more particularly German and regional / local issues, are needed. I don't have a good grasp of the technical considerations involved in maintaining anonymity - eg protecting IP addresses and so forth, so that the Faesers of the world don't track you down.. But apparently it can be done.

Maybe if Germans 'flood the zone' with enough anonymous, illegal dissent, it will break the authorities' brains, and more importantly, their will.

Expand full comment
Colin Hunt's avatar

That was generally what happened in the early 1980s in the USSR. By the time of the death of Brezhnev, the Soviet regime had lost all legitimacy with the people. It was seen to be corrupt, incompetent and generally useless at making any kind of improvement in Soviet society. Russian culture was being submerged by a deluge of music and literature out of the West that the Soviet Union was inacapable of stopping or controlling. The USSR was failing completely to supply many of the necessities of life, and it was obviously slipping further and further behind the West.

Then came Chernobyl in 1986, and that was the end. But this end was long preceded by the undermining of Soviet government propaganda and legitimacy over the previous two to three decades.

So, your strategy of 'flood the zone' has worked before against regimes a lot stronger than that of Germany.

Expand full comment
John Davison's avatar

Is it possible to have a suitable photo of said Minister Faeser. Just so I can add her visage to my collection of the Oh ever so nice kind and gentle Liberal Elitists whose only mission in life is to rescue us degenerate unthinking maybe Fascist Right Wing leaning Plebs.

PS . I'm not some weirdo who gets a kick out of looking at middle/old age women.

Honestly. It's just that in most of your other posts you do provide a photo - which tends to add credence to the unsavoury elements of the person's character.

If you have the gift, one can often judge character by appearance and demeanour

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

Pretty sure this is the original Marshmallowian image: https://www.eugyppius.com/p/breaking-marshmallow-minister-nancy

Expand full comment
Lone Wolf's avatar

Welcome to Germany 3.0...where even when you win, you lose

Expand full comment
les's avatar

It is amazing that these people actually want to live in their own countries. They hate every thing about their national identity

Expand full comment
Bizarro Man's avatar

If they move away, they can't torment the normal people they hate.

Expand full comment