Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bash's avatar

Remember: zoonotic origin is the strongest argument for hundreds of BSL4 labs, billions in funding, and status and prestige in virology for the next 30 years

Lab-leak origin = admonishment, shame, regulation, opprobrium, blame for the death of millions l.

They are highly, highly motivated to shift public perception back to zoonosis. Regard them with due suspicion and ffs treat gain of function research like the WMD that it is

Expand full comment
Tareq I. Albaho, PhD's avatar

The recent congressional evidence of Robert Redfield, former CDC head, is very damning and I wonder (because I am a "conspiracy theorist") if this latest resurgence of the market theory is in response to Redfield's evidence?

Not only did Redfield clearly affirm his view and presented the evidence that the virus was engineered (including insertion of the components for the cleavage site) but he noted 3 things that happened at the Wuhan lab in September 2019:

1. They deleted their records

2. They called in military management

3. They changed the air-purification system

As he said, any of these 3 would raise suspicions, having all 3 happen at the same time ...?

The head of the Chinese version of the CDC, Gao Fu, was a participant at the October 2019 "event 201" simulation that was so eerily similar to what started happening a few months later. He would have already known about what happened a month earlier at Wuhan.

And that nice photo of the raccoon is so cute and nothing like Peter Daszak.

Expand full comment
193 more comments...

No posts