Discussion about this post

User's avatar
baboon's avatar

"There is no preventing these outcomes. The only thing that could matter – again, assuming you want to reduce the burden on hospitals – is getting vaccines to the high-risk unvaccinated."

Those people probably don't even exist: everyone I know who is "vulnerable" has been vaxxed. We need to abandon this vaxx obsession and promote early treatment and, where required, "focused protection".

It's almost like we had all the things we needed from the top epidemiologists and front line doctors in the world 18 months ago. But apparently, stating this makes me a far-right, antivaxx conspiracy theorist.

Expand full comment
Caro E's avatar

Obviously, our governments don't care how many die. It's not about saving lives - or public hospitals. Otherwise, we would have seen a rational policy of targeted vaccination for the elderly and other high risk groups. Doctors would have been allowed - even encouraged - to prescribe early treatments like ivermectin and other safe and effective repurposed medicines. Vitamins D and C, zinc and quercetin would be distributed to everyone as prophylaxis for free. People would be encouraged to spend more time outdoors and exercise.... Mass vaccination is a means to and end, i.e., social credit systems and digital IDs. Austria is trailing behind other EU countries and must be compelled to reach at least 80% vaccinated before winter ends so EU vaccine passports can be more efficiently rolled out. And then the real segregation of the disobedient unvaccinated minority can begin. They're rushing to do this now since if/when the majority of Europeans have natural immunity from wild virus, the vaccination imperative thru compulsory jabs will be harder to pull off.... The vaccines don't work but they function.

Expand full comment
165 more comments...

No posts