When it escapes, vaccine-induced antibodies to legacy spike will enhance infectiousness.
It’s all irrelevant because human immune systems hardly respond to spike. Instead our immune system generates antibodies and cytotoxic T-cells against stable parts of SARS-CoV-2. There seems to be a near obsession with circulating IgG antibodies, when immunological experience teaches that, for respiratory viruses, antibodies in blood play a secondary role in host defence.
Secreted IgA antibodies are a different matter but almost no one studies these.
What has been studied in depth is the repertoire of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. No question, cross-immunity from beating somewhat related viruses leaves most of us with some cross-protection. It’s possible that ADE will make infection worse, but I’m not concerned about these breathy pieces telling us the sky is falling. It’s not.
The exit is simple except the elites are interested in mass depopulation. That exit is to halt mass PCR testing & lift all restrictions. Within weeks the position would be indistinguishable from any other autumn.
Remember, there are around 200 other respiratory viruses. In almost no case can illness be unequivocally ascribed to a specific virus. It’s just lies to misuse the PCR mass testing system. Helps no one.
Years ago I worked as graduate student. Our lab introduced single amino acid mutations to evaluate for change in bacterial toxin configuration and activity. It was amazing how such a small change could result in a wide variety of outcomes, sometimes that being enhanced toxin activity. Protein folding is a sort of molecular ballet.
I seriously doubt anyone considered the caveats of protein folding before they took the jab.
Within nature there seems to be a sort of purity. Like that of fire, it burns away the refuse of virtue signaling and lays waste to the fear of dying. Nature has all the time it needs to prove its might.
This pandemic seems to affect people who don't know math, which is the real pandemic. Statistics show covid is only a minor concern, if at all, for the vast majority who still have reasonably healthy innate immune health. A competent and honest medical industry would be teaching how to restore and maintain natural immune health, not pushing patent medicines like street drug dealers. But corrupt medical industry is another pandemic, enabled by the ignorance pandemic mentioned above. The solution for this panic, like most panics, is education.
Great report! Yet, somehow the unvaxxed are villified. Those who have not been vaxxed need to remain so to provide a viable control group for when this debaucle is fairly analyzed.
With the breakthrough cases mounting and early indicators of antibody dependent enhancement already present, I fear it is inevitable that our experiment will end badly with complete escape and helping hand antibodies. Add in the fact that this virus has a human imprint from lab manipulation, of which the extent is unknown, and you can only anticipate a dark outcome. Idiots.
This is a bit of a simplification of an extremely dense and insularly-written paper, which elides the key flaws in the paper.
To flesh out your quote of the authors, for example:
"We analyzed these 16 [post-natural-infection derived monoclonal] anti-NTD neutralizing [according to our own previous, highly-virtualized trials] antibodies, and found that none of the anti-NTD neutralizing antibodies could recognize Delta spike [in our new, highly-virtualized trial] … In contrast, when we analyzed the binding of the anti-NTD infectivity-enhancing [according to our own previous, highly-virtualized trials] antibodies … eight out of ten anti-NTD enhancing antibodies bound to Delta spike at levels comparable with wild-type spike [in our new, highly-virtualized trial] …
Based on confidence in their own conclusions, the authors then proceed to *extrapolate* from their conclusion by challenging cells with custom-mutated "Delta" (actually a different virus mutated to express the mutated Delta protein), to see how well Covid-vaccinated plasma fares. (While describing the conclusion correctly, you leave out what is actually the most interesting part: that when the donor sample was *more* concentrated, the pseudo-virus did better at infecting test cells).
Naturally, by this point the authors were well beyond trying to *disprove* their conclusion, rather than just confirm it everywhere they could look.
They never thought to see what would happen if they tested the mutant Delta pseudo virus against non-vaccinated donor plasma. In other words, they did not include a control.
Pending such a control test, they failed to demonstrate anything at all about the Covid "vaccines."
Fascinating. I can only imagine how politicized it will be when a new deadly wave sweeps through those of us who did receive the vaccine.
I ask myself, what does all this almost impossible to understand biology and human intervention mean? This looks like humankind's first mass biological blunder.
Blunder, in that the "vaccine" countermeasures don't seem to work, and don't cause more harm than doing anything.
Blunder, in the release of the virus, was only accidental and not intended.
I hope a different word is not needed in the future to describe a vastly more serious outcome than what we have today.
The Graphic of the Protein looks like the outline of Africa... Hmmmm!!! Conspiracy Theory?
At this point, I could care less about the vaxxed. What does this mean for the unvaxxed?
The Law of Unintended Consequences will get you *every single time*.
this the right TLDR? :
1. Geert Vanden Bossche hypothesis was accurate
2. Since so many have natural immunity, especially the young, for the majority of the population, it'll be fine. See: packed stadiums all the fall, non bat shit crazy universities are open, partying and doing college stuff, and are fine
3. papers like this will be suppressed, as they're saying: you're fighting todays battle with yesterdays weapons.
4. we can expect boosters to be required as evidence of vaccination ...
It’s a good thing we have all those control group placebo arms out there…oh wait.
This specifically mentions Pfizer, is the same true for Moderna? What about J&J?
This seems to be the case “in life” here in the U.K. vaxxed population over 40 currently have around double the infection rate of unvaccinated people over 40. Gov.uk stats on the vaccine efficacy PHE document
Opinions on this study... https://www.ngvbcc.org/pdf/gtclin.pdf;jsessionid