The level of hate speech in South Sudan (not to be confused with Sudan, to the north) is likely quite high. They fought a terrible civil war. But this is irrelevant to the purpose of spending the money, which was spending the money.
The obvious thing that struck me when reading about this NGO is that there seems to have been zero effort placed into defining success and how to actually measure progress against that definition. This is likely by design, since the last thing either the NGO or bureaucrats overseeing them would want is accountability.
EXCLUSIVE: TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SLASHED FEDERAL FUNDING FOR GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION
"These programs five years ago, if they did exist, had very small budgets and didn't have large, multimillion-dollar federal investments," said Michael-Sean Spence, managing director of community safety initiatives at Everytown for Gun Safety"
Nowhere does anybody running these programs compare their RESULTS -- only the amount of money they successfully wasted.
Norman Lear had a rare talent for making the truth sound stupid.
The largest component of gun deaths in the US has always been suicides. Studies have shown over and over that suicides are not deterred by lack of access to guns, other means are substituted. Guns are preferred when available because they are simple and quick, but they aren't indispensable.
Meanwhile, that waste of flesh Maisie Hirono actually had the gall to claim a couple months ago that her bill to outlaw "large capacity magazines" would somehow reduce suicides among despondent veterans. No one committed the journalism of asking her how many times the average veteran suicide shoots himself.
Your "mistake" is actually a brilliant new acronym. Grossly Unsupervised Activism-Neutering Organisation.
And _guano_ is what they splat all over any discussion of political issues by actual "civil society" i.e. people. What could some silly little individual member of "civil society" possibly know, better than the Guanos? Because the Guanos are _representative_, don't you know? They have the funding from Government to prove it.
So, in the face of _guano_, we should all bow our heads and listen respectfully.
You may laugh but in April, the Swedish government presented a promemoria about the stablishing of a new government agency tasked with increasing the efficiency of government agencies.
All 400-450 of them.
And yes, it's 400 to 450. Because we don't actually know how many government agnecies there are.
One of my favourites to bring up when talking about this is the one overseeing stamps. Fourteen employees earning a minimum of €60 000/month/gross, plus living expenses compensation for "having" to live in Stockholm, plus paid parking, free dental, special private health insurance, and so on, and also a flat for the head of the agency in case he/she needs to saty overnight in the city.
We don't need DOGE. We need to nuke the site from orbit.
'the stablishing of a new government agency tasked with increasing the efficiency of government agencies.'
For some reason, this put me in mind of the decades-old US government Paperwork Reduction Act. As a result of this Act, every government mailing to citizens included an extra piece of paper: a Paperwork Reduction Act Notice.
There is no such word in German, because such concepts are unthinkable in German. Once an institution or procedure has been established, it becomes immortal and ever growing. Think about our "Bundesagentur für Arbeit BfA": BfAs primary task ist to match employment seeking people with employers in search for workers. BfA has about 100000 staff and generates about 100000 successful matches per year (latest numbers I found). Well, to be honest, less than 20% of BfA staff are engaged in worker placement, so ist 5-6 matches per year and staff. Don't ask what the other 80% do....
This is an excellent example of a now-universal Western scam. Money is filtered from government officials to their crony friends in NGOs for dubious projects and then back to those officials. The insult is the purported use of taxpayer funds--$1 million to support lesbian ant farming in Peru or whatever. All the outrage is directed at the audacious waste of taxpayer dollars, but with zero accounting for what that money was spent on. The line item gets all the attention, but the real injury is that such a ridiculous cause wasn't actually funded--it was flat-out STOLEN.
The sociopath likes to keep people around them they depend on them for employment, the less justified the better as the only justification comes from the sociopath.
It's obvious to me that the problem isn't so much the NGO's it's who is deciding the NGO is worthy of funding (I mean most people don't turn down "free" money)...
making sure the sociopath is aligned with society and only gains when society gains is the west's biggest problem. the grifters are parasiting upon the grafters, as they have more time.
That's why DOGE was so great. They may not have saved a substantial percentage of the budget, but making public all those databases of NGOs and grants and things made a wonderful rabbithole to spend a few hours in.
This is almost as good as USAID pissing away millions on condoms for Palestine or DEI education in Nicaragua. Many pockets were lined which is surely the case here.
Or funding democrat party political campaigns. It'd be fun to peak behind the EU's curtain and see how corrupt and insane their NGO funding apparatus is.
It's all funding to keep the credentialed class "employed". What is not known is how much of the money makes its way into the campaign coffers of political parties.
Clinton-era joke: Bill and Hillary are motoring up into the Berkshires for a weekend mountain getaway. They stop to get gas, and for Bill to use the rest room. Coming out, Bill sees Hillary paying at the register, having a strangely sociable conversation with the clerk, then actually hugging him goodbye. When they return to the car, Bill asks, "What was that about?" Hillary replies, "I can't believe it! That was Lawrence! I told you about him, we dated for two years while I was at Wellesley. Imagine running into him again!" Bill chuckles. "Just think -- if you had married him, you'd have spent your life pumping gas here in the Berkshires." Hillary looks Bill in the eye and replies, "If I'd have married him, he'd be President, and you'd be pumping gas in Little Rock."
Billy is smart and ruthless. Why do you think he attracted Hillary? I for one am not giving him a pass just because his wife lacks his native charm. They are a team with one objective: the power to get away with what it took to get and hold power to begin with. Mena, OK City, TWA 800 anyone?
I always figured she found herself a man who could run for the offices she wanted but that voters back then were unlikely to elect a woman to. Pretty much just like the joke had it.
I can promise you (from grim personal experience) that programs like this are happy grift fountains for local authorities (charity registration officers, bank managers) and upper-middle class boards and administrators and this is always, always so. Plus the European or American grantmaking organizations that disburse/oversee these programs are so naive that one wonders how their own boards and staff manage not to break their ankles getting out of bed each morning.
It was very sad for me to learn this but I learned it real well. The only useful programs anywhere in the non-Western world are those directly teaching local people moneymaking skills they can exercise from their own homes. Those make a difference in individual lives and regardless of how miserable the local culture may be. Everything else is fantasy.
I don't usually like to cast suspicion upon anyone, but this smells like money laundering to me. Not just senselessly spending money on wasteful do-gooders, but actively embezzling public funds. Someone should look closely upon the money trail left by this NGO.
Eugyppius, I’d like to get exercised about this, but somehow I have to admire the cheek of these NGOs and their ability to wrest funds from the EU. If only more of us had their imagination and chutzpah, we too could be laughing all the way to the bank.
Near the end of COVID, I was besieged by phone calls from "account managers" begging me to apply for COVID relief loan funds to cover all the money I had had to pay my employees who were unable to work. Now, I ran four businesses at the time, two of which were Mom and Pop, and two of which were just Pop. I even wasted time telling the first couple of callers that, and was urged to apply anyway.
Any time any government offers free money, scammers quickly devise scams to game whatever system is in place.
“Fighting hate speech” is an industry, pure and simple. Just like “fighting climate change” and whatever other “fights” (the red-flag word) may be afoot.
“Fight” and “war on” mean “fleece the middle class”.
How about a nation where people die while awaiting surgery or other treatments (or even just a doctor investigating their ailments) offering to take on an unspecified number of children from Gaza (plus their caretakers/parents and siblings of course) and let them get treatments before anyone else, with no way or plan to check IDs or make sure they leave after receiving medical treatments?
And said nations socialised health care literally being on its knees, with fully 1/# of newly minted doctors emigrating to work in the private sector in nations where they can earn more than the eq. of $60 000/year before taxes. Where the legal limit for overtime-hours/month simply must be waived or the entire sector would collapse.
Where these problems have been known for 20 years or more.
There seems to be a misunderstanding. The purpose of government spending is to spend money. Clearly, this program is a success.
Definitely agree. Since the funding began in 2020 neither I nor any of my friends or relatives have come across any Sudanese hate speech.
Problem solved. We can stop sending them money.
The level of hate speech in South Sudan (not to be confused with Sudan, to the north) is likely quite high. They fought a terrible civil war. But this is irrelevant to the purpose of spending the money, which was spending the money.
The EU has two purposes
1. To piss away their citizens' money.
2. To regulate and regulate and regulate.
3) To import and prioritize 7th century 3rd world barbarians
You can't do that; there's nothing so permanent as a temporary government solution.
You guys are cracking me up!
"They fought a terrible civil war." (This is an example of hate speech. The people of South Sudan would recognize that.)
Fantastic result! But Homer Simpson wants his tiger-repelling rock back.
The obvious thing that struck me when reading about this NGO is that there seems to have been zero effort placed into defining success and how to actually measure progress against that definition. This is likely by design, since the last thing either the NGO or bureaucrats overseeing them would want is accountability.
It's by design. From last week's news:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-administration-slashed-federal-funding-gun-violence-prevention-2025-07-29/
EXCLUSIVE: TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SLASHED FEDERAL FUNDING FOR GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION
"These programs five years ago, if they did exist, had very small budgets and didn't have large, multimillion-dollar federal investments," said Michael-Sean Spence, managing director of community safety initiatives at Everytown for Gun Safety"
Nowhere does anybody running these programs compare their RESULTS -- only the amount of money they successfully wasted.
Gloria (Sally Struthers): "Daddy, did you know that sixty percent of the people murdered in this country in the last ten years were killed by guns?"
Archie Bunker (Carroll O' Connor): "Would it make you feel any better, little girl, if they was pushed out of windows?"
Gun violence prevention people would call that a win.
Norman Lear had a rare talent for making the truth sound stupid.
The largest component of gun deaths in the US has always been suicides. Studies have shown over and over that suicides are not deterred by lack of access to guns, other means are substituted. Guns are preferred when available because they are simple and quick, but they aren't indispensable.
Meanwhile, that waste of flesh Maisie Hirono actually had the gall to claim a couple months ago that her bill to outlaw "large capacity magazines" would somehow reduce suicides among despondent veterans. No one committed the journalism of asking her how many times the average veteran suicide shoots himself.
I'm sure some of the ctilnon linked suicides shot themselves multiple times.
Which is why the original post by Richard is so good: too many people seem to think that spending money is not a means, but an end in and of itself.
I think we can say it is indeed an outrageous success.
https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
Lmao well put
Until Substack implements a mute control, is there a way for the moderator to mute and ban persistent spammers?
https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
The true purpose is to steal money, in which case the program is still a success.
LOL
https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
What’s the German word for “DOGE”?
It is BASE - Bundesamt für Staatliche Effizienz
There is NO such thing in Germany!
Other question: What is "NGO" short for? - Near-Governmental Organisation"!
The British have a similar term—“guanos”— quasi-governmental organizations
Your "mistake" is actually a brilliant new acronym. Grossly Unsupervised Activism-Neutering Organisation.
And _guano_ is what they splat all over any discussion of political issues by actual "civil society" i.e. people. What could some silly little individual member of "civil society" possibly know, better than the Guanos? Because the Guanos are _representative_, don't you know? They have the funding from Government to prove it.
So, in the face of _guano_, we should all bow our heads and listen respectfully.
Quango is the term we use.
It's short for "quangaroo guano."
Non-Governmental Organization.
🤣🤣
Wow, Germany actually has such an entity? Or just translation?
Does the catholic church have a satanic ritual department?
Thank God it is just a joke. Imagine the level of crazy of such an institution in Germany.
You may laugh but in April, the Swedish government presented a promemoria about the stablishing of a new government agency tasked with increasing the efficiency of government agencies.
All 400-450 of them.
And yes, it's 400 to 450. Because we don't actually know how many government agnecies there are.
One of my favourites to bring up when talking about this is the one overseeing stamps. Fourteen employees earning a minimum of €60 000/month/gross, plus living expenses compensation for "having" to live in Stockholm, plus paid parking, free dental, special private health insurance, and so on, and also a flat for the head of the agency in case he/she needs to saty overnight in the city.
We don't need DOGE. We need to nuke the site from orbit.
'the stablishing of a new government agency tasked with increasing the efficiency of government agencies.'
For some reason, this put me in mind of the decades-old US government Paperwork Reduction Act. As a result of this Act, every government mailing to citizens included an extra piece of paper: a Paperwork Reduction Act Notice.
AFD Audit Fur Deutschland
AuditFurDeutschland ?
There is no such word in German, because such concepts are unthinkable in German. Once an institution or procedure has been established, it becomes immortal and ever growing. Think about our "Bundesagentur für Arbeit BfA": BfAs primary task ist to match employment seeking people with employers in search for workers. BfA has about 100000 staff and generates about 100000 successful matches per year (latest numbers I found). Well, to be honest, less than 20% of BfA staff are engaged in worker placement, so ist 5-6 matches per year and staff. Don't ask what the other 80% do....
Yes, immortal is a synonym for bureaucracy.
👍 "der Hund" LOL!!!!!!!!
https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
Judith, you're starting to get a little bit spammy here.
Starting?
Little bit??
Spammy???
We could spam her.
😜
/s
https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
Unsure what your comment has to do with the discussion, can you clarify?
https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
Don't tell me: "someone hacked my account." Sure.
This is an excellent example of a now-universal Western scam. Money is filtered from government officials to their crony friends in NGOs for dubious projects and then back to those officials. The insult is the purported use of taxpayer funds--$1 million to support lesbian ant farming in Peru or whatever. All the outrage is directed at the audacious waste of taxpayer dollars, but with zero accounting for what that money was spent on. The line item gets all the attention, but the real injury is that such a ridiculous cause wasn't actually funded--it was flat-out STOLEN.
It keeps supporters employed. It seems very like the patronage era. A job as reward.
This has always been the purpose of power-accrual. A country is just a feudal fiefdom, expanded.
The sociopath likes to keep people around them they depend on them for employment, the less justified the better as the only justification comes from the sociopath.
This means they can control them.
Some sociopathic traits are useful but these types always need to be kept in a limited sphere. It's true they don't like to be boxed in though.
It's obvious to me that the problem isn't so much the NGO's it's who is deciding the NGO is worthy of funding (I mean most people don't turn down "free" money)...
making sure the sociopath is aligned with society and only gains when society gains is the west's biggest problem. the grifters are parasiting upon the grafters, as they have more time.
All governments become incestuous.
That's why DOGE was so great. They may not have saved a substantial percentage of the budget, but making public all those databases of NGOs and grants and things made a wonderful rabbithole to spend a few hours in.
It let people know the ridiculousness of the situation. Pretty disgusting when you consider our down and out Vets.
Bloated Bureaucracy is the nation killer.
https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
This is almost as good as USAID pissing away millions on condoms for Palestine or DEI education in Nicaragua. Many pockets were lined which is surely the case here.
Or funding democrat party political campaigns. It'd be fun to peak behind the EU's curtain and see how corrupt and insane their NGO funding apparatus is.
"Fun" and sickening!
It's all funding to keep the credentialed class "employed". What is not known is how much of the money makes its way into the campaign coffers of political parties.
I think you have perfectly described the operating mechanism and existence of all NGO's ...
Just look to the Clinton Foundation to find the perfect scam NGO.
Media literacy is a dangerous form of brainwashing. See my Substack here https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
If Billy didn’t invent it, he perfected it.
Pretty sure it wasn't Bill.
Clinton-era joke: Bill and Hillary are motoring up into the Berkshires for a weekend mountain getaway. They stop to get gas, and for Bill to use the rest room. Coming out, Bill sees Hillary paying at the register, having a strangely sociable conversation with the clerk, then actually hugging him goodbye. When they return to the car, Bill asks, "What was that about?" Hillary replies, "I can't believe it! That was Lawrence! I told you about him, we dated for two years while I was at Wellesley. Imagine running into him again!" Bill chuckles. "Just think -- if you had married him, you'd have spent your life pumping gas here in the Berkshires." Hillary looks Bill in the eye and replies, "If I'd have married him, he'd be President, and you'd be pumping gas in Little Rock."
Billy is smart and ruthless. Why do you think he attracted Hillary? I for one am not giving him a pass just because his wife lacks his native charm. They are a team with one objective: the power to get away with what it took to get and hold power to begin with. Mena, OK City, TWA 800 anyone?
I always figured she found herself a man who could run for the offices she wanted but that voters back then were unlikely to elect a woman to. Pretty much just like the joke had it.
I can promise you (from grim personal experience) that programs like this are happy grift fountains for local authorities (charity registration officers, bank managers) and upper-middle class boards and administrators and this is always, always so. Plus the European or American grantmaking organizations that disburse/oversee these programs are so naive that one wonders how their own boards and staff manage not to break their ankles getting out of bed each morning.
It was very sad for me to learn this but I learned it real well. The only useful programs anywhere in the non-Western world are those directly teaching local people moneymaking skills they can exercise from their own homes. Those make a difference in individual lives and regardless of how miserable the local culture may be. Everything else is fantasy.
Media literacy is an extremely dangerous form of brainwashing. See here https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
Judith. Time to lay off.
Geez. You discovered that the sun rises every morning? This has been going on since people invented making marks on clay with scratchy thingies.
I don't usually like to cast suspicion upon anyone, but this smells like money laundering to me. Not just senselessly spending money on wasteful do-gooders, but actively embezzling public funds. Someone should look closely upon the money trail left by this NGO.
🤣 I'd say it ranks as literally the most obvious money laundering effort ever seen.
Eugyppius, I’d like to get exercised about this, but somehow I have to admire the cheek of these NGOs and their ability to wrest funds from the EU. If only more of us had their imagination and chutzpah, we too could be laughing all the way to the bank.
Same here in the UK. Some "charities" here are more or less taxpayer funded. Usually to lobby for something the government would like to push through.
Circle jerk of corruption, in reality. But the boiler nuts are corroded and rusting, and the boiler pressure increases by the day.
There's serious trouble going to happen here. The level of loathing for Starmer only equalled by his personality disordered assault on us.
Fuck them all. May they rot in hell.
Living in Britain myself, I can only agree.
As can I. And I will second the motion: fuck them all, indeed. Not a patriot among them.
Me too
I think Britain and Germany are the new China….SAD
I don’t think they have to work hard to get the money. Bureaucrats would chase them down the street with pre populated application forms.
And if they don't middlemen will.
Near the end of COVID, I was besieged by phone calls from "account managers" begging me to apply for COVID relief loan funds to cover all the money I had had to pay my employees who were unable to work. Now, I ran four businesses at the time, two of which were Mom and Pop, and two of which were just Pop. I even wasted time telling the first couple of callers that, and was urged to apply anyway.
Any time any government offers free money, scammers quickly devise scams to game whatever system is in place.
The total fraud number for this particular government freebie came in at $10 billion. (https://www.irs.gov/compliance/criminal-investigation/five-years-post-cares-act-irs-ci-has-launched-2039-covid-fraud-investigations-totaling-10b-in-attempted-fraud) Anyone could have predicted this. That the nitwits who proposed it didn't, means only that they didn't want to.
This is not the cheek of NGOs. It is an extremely dangerous and very well funded form of brainwashing. See here https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
“Fighting hate speech” is an industry, pure and simple. Just like “fighting climate change” and whatever other “fights” (the red-flag word) may be afoot.
“Fight” and “war on” mean “fleece the middle class”.
Are you trying to tell me the war on drugs was not a success?
It was a smashing success. Just like the wars on alcohol and guns were before it, and the war on terrorism is currently proving to be.
Don't forget fact-checking.
Don't Bellinghausen and Kovats look like people you would like to get to know and spend lots of time with?
lol
They sound like a law firm that would have Nosferatu as a client.
Funny how the woman looks more masculine than the guy.
Gurlboss got a great Adam’s Apple, tho
Someone is on a nice little earner. Wonder if UvDL is on a commission?
Just checking the phone... no text messages about this but - wait - no way - gosh.....Oh no! Just dropped it. Woops.
This has all the hallmarks of a proper crime. Plenty of money. Almost no output.
No evidence of effect.
We rarely get a glimpse inside such NGOs, and when it arrives, it is usually shocking.
This is no exception, and thank you to eugyppius for bringing this scam to a wider audience.
PS: You've probably heard of 'Hope Not Hate'.
I suggest it becomes simply #Hate. A more honest view of that NGO's bile.
I wish there was no effort. Media literacy is a covert industry extremely well funded by Americans and Europeans. It is a dangerous form of brainwashing. Here https://judithbrown.substack.com/p/the-control-of-information-b52
I don't know...
How about a nation where people die while awaiting surgery or other treatments (or even just a doctor investigating their ailments) offering to take on an unspecified number of children from Gaza (plus their caretakers/parents and siblings of course) and let them get treatments before anyone else, with no way or plan to check IDs or make sure they leave after receiving medical treatments?
And said nations socialised health care literally being on its knees, with fully 1/# of newly minted doctors emigrating to work in the private sector in nations where they can earn more than the eq. of $60 000/year before taxes. Where the legal limit for overtime-hours/month simply must be waived or the entire sector would collapse.
Where these problems have been known for 20 years or more.
I think that's even more stupid.
I hate the EU...so fight that with your million Euros.
It has possibilities. If the EU sends me €1M, I will almost certainly not hate them as much.
Isn't that Susanne Wossername really Jeff Epstein in a frock?