The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Germany’s vaccine regulator, has responded to Andreas Schöfbeck’s letter (translated here), suggesting on the basis of BKK billing data that officially acknowledged rates of adverse vaccine reactions substantially understate the risk of vaccination.
It's really important that we remain focused on calling out this bullshit ass-covering. Because we can be sure that what PEI is doing will be echoed in many, many institutions, faculities and media outlets who have made the wrong call and are looking for some kind of escape route - stall for time, obfuscate the data and if all else fails, appeal to the old chestnut, "we operated with the information we had at the time, hindsight is 20/20."
absolutely! they should pay dearly for what they've done so that they do not get to pull this shit ever again. Not to forget how many lost their lives, their businesses
What a completely corrupt pile of garbage, these people are disgusting human beings. The previous safety standards we had have all been abandoned seemingly everywhere in the world, shoved into place while everyone's fear was turned to 11... there needs to be justice, this man should be jailed for ignoring the many deaths and permanently disabled injuries from these scamvines
what drives me crazy about this, is that we're not talking about some rando vaxx product on the market. this is a pharmaceutical that has been relentlessly imposed upon the german population *for a whole year* now, and the public regulators act like it's not their business how dangerous it is, maybe they'll do a study some day. it's a basic point but it's still just so insane to me.
It honestly feels like the world has gone mad or that these officials are all part of some conspiracy, as not much else seems to make sense.. I guess covering up bad medicine reactions is nothing new, but this is really really different... the regulator whose job it is to keep companies in check showing active cover up for the companies. Whether he is super corrupt, or mass formation psychosis has brainwashed him to believe in the lies we see everywhere.. who knows.
Yes. And the "system" has been selecting for these people for a very long time now, and so, here we are.
People can't believe "everybody" could be so bad, corrupt, etc. And surely they aren't ALL that way. But those who aren't are timid, weak, etc. And the system has selected for them as well.
This is a strong point, people have certainly been selected to be weak/wont speak up intentionally and PC culture / woke accusations seem to be part of this. By making everyone scared of bein cancelled they keep the masses quiet and obedient
Why do all medical bureaucrats persist in the belief that covid shots are the answer to the problem and must be universally administered? Is it because of their zealous confidence in their own power, or is it because their pockets are being lined? I don't know how much longer they can ignore the Everest and K2 like mountains of evidence that are accumulating. This doesn't speak well for human nature or the future of the West.
Your reasons are potential ones. However, seems to me it is more likely that Groupthink is operating. It is simply human nature to want to conform, to fit in with one's perceived tribe. Standing out is normally discouraged, a defiance of actual or perceived leadership. At times doing so has rewards (when you win) but those must be the rare case. More likely, the challenger is mauled or killed by the dominant male (primitive), in more civilized times, the trouble-maker is censured, marginalized, ostracized, demoted, fired, or cancelled. In less civilized times, he is imprisoned, tortured, sent to the labor camp, or simply shot.
Contracts are very binding, and why I try to avoid them. They make people do things they shouldn't, when they have 'promised' money to flow they will kill to maintain the flow. Oops.
I mean at the end they are right taking the vaccine was not mandatory you could choose also to loose your livelyhood, education or anything else. It was your free choice...
You're not crazy or the only one. What's the sense in having a 'regulator' collecting adverse event data if not to monitor safety? Some agency should be doing it. Sure seems like REI is that agency in Germany. What have they been doing for two years if they have not had a focus on the safety of products used to fight covid?
I can only hope they die right along with all the typical victims, I hope they took the poison as well. Then the problem will solve itself in a year or 2.
At one time it was reported that only 25% percent of CDC employees were vaccinated, as there is no vaccine mandate at the CDC. These peopIe would be among the best informed in the world as to the side effects of the vaccines. I would interpret this to mean that 75% are aware of the dangers and are not willing to risk their lives, while the remaining 25% are true believers.
Yes, provided that the injection is repeated massive doses of their own "vaccine". Death by hydrogen cyanide would be too quick. Besides, I believe that suffering sickness and immune system collapse would hopefully give them some empathy with their victims, as well as time to search their souls and confront their wickedness. "Just but Merciful" as the saying goes.
Agreed. Here in the USA we have the recent (month ago) disclosure during Sen. Johnson's "Covid-19 A Second Opinion" panel (Jan. 24 (?)) where whistleblowers reported the jumps in presumed vaccine reactions in the military using public database (DMED). Within a day or two, that database was taken off line and "fact checkers" reported that that all the misunderstanding was due to a "glitch," you see, for five years millions of patient records were not entered properly into the database. If one assumes that whistleblower testimony is true, this means that there is deliberate corruption and cover-ups in the highest levels of government. More recently, the CDC admits it's refusing to release detailed Covid-19 and/or vaccination data. Even the New York Times is reporting on the issue. The New York Times!!!
Since they removed it and also moved Dr. Long who warned the government about sick pilots I take it is true. There is now plenty of other evidence like a Romanian football coach refusing injected players and databases in Germany reporting less than 10 percent of deaths due to the jabs
I was thinking yesterday of how closely vac formula resembles the concoctions of medieval witches. Blood of bats and of unborn babies. Intestines of animals. Surprised that the churches have not seen that yet. But they probably get gates handouts too
What obvious corruption. He's saying the drugs are innocent until proven guilty, when it's the other way around. That approach puts the burden of proof on the patient to prove the drug unsafe, when it's really on the manufacturer and provider to prove it safe.
It looks like the PEI is just as corrupt as the FDA.
But with a decent hair cut and a less ridiculous dye job he could at least look slightly professional. Instead he looks like he cuts his own hair with gardening tools. And I don't think that synthetic color actually exists in nature.
Aside from the general unhealthy appearance of our public health experts, why do so many of them look utterly ridiculous? It's not that hard to make oneself look presentable in public. If you won't do it for yourself, consider the rest of us. We have to look at you!
Agreed. Unless Germany is a far more bureaucratic country where, say, an office worker who is sick for more than a couple days must present a doctor's note?
This wouldn't lessen the enormity of the data, but could add some context around it. Basically 2% of people have a side-effect that they made a claim for. It would be useful to know what the general attitude or behaviour towards visiting the doctor is in Germany.
For example, that figure would astound me much more if it was based on the UK, because people here don't really go to the doctor unless they desperately need prescription medicine, or have developed a serious chronic ailment. It's quite normal for people not to have seen a doctor for several years at a time.
As I understand it, in other European countries it's far more common for people to see a doctor, sometimes even for flu or a minor ailment (mainly because the health systems are not as stretched as our NHS!).
It has been estimated that perhaps as many as 1% of US soldiers receiving The Vax have experienced side effects severe enough to have them removed from active duty, so your 2% estimate is probably spot on.
I'm sure some of the recorded AEs were from hypochondriacs who went in because they had a minor headache, and others were minor but recorded anyway while someone was at the doctor for another reason. But I'd need some solid proof before I started believing that was the case for anything but a small minority of these diagnoses.
I also notice he implies that physician judgement is legitimate with regard reportable side effects in the official system, but not when they bill for them...
This is an example of trying to cover up the obvious. Deaths have gone up over the normal deaths year of 2020 (despite a pandemic and medical murder)...
So what's causing the deaths? The vax, most likely.
How obvious is that? And the 2020 average age of con-vid death is around life expectancy, so what virus?
Shapes of things to come from this experiment! If you know cellular replication, these NRNA kill shots turn you into ward of the "medical psychos" . Considering all test animals in early studies died in a 3 years study, the depopulation 70% needs to be addressed. Emergemcy Use Authorization is the only way the WEF can get these kill shots into the world population. The Nueremburg 2.0 by Dr Fuelmich must suceed! as all the evidence is there and growing day by day.
Do you think they will keep those "clinical" study public domain . I believe Dr Yeadon has discussed the safety factor of these kill shots. Moderna thought MRNA was a one size fit all to cure cancer. Memorial Sloan Kettering did a study and found opposite results an article by Mathew Tontowaz AUG 27. 2018 tells the tale of MRNA Understand the spike 19 protein thats in the kill shots is a chimera of sars/HIV/bovine tb! Trillions of these packets are in the shot. Pfizer has to release all trial data this year which they thought could bury for 55 years. The spike that you see in imagery of so covid-19 is gp120 protein. which is a part of Faucis HIV bioweapon in 1980's.
"All the animals died" is one of those common themes among us vaccine skeptics. I believe this is an example of a story that began with a grain of truth. I believe (but can't easily cite) that yes, there were earlier vaccine studies where a large percentage of animals died (from ADE or something related, I think.) Probably not a mRNA "vaccine." Even in normal times vaccine disasters were not unknown, as anyone who has read Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s latest book would know. In other words, it is a stereotype, having a seed of truth but may not reflect the overall reality.
We can equally, and validly I think, apply the same criticism to the official "vaccine" catechism, however: From the outset, the public was assured of various claims, even by officials who one would have expected to be well-informed (scientists, not just politicians) that (for example) the vaccines were safe and effective, they would prevent one from getting ill or dying, and so forth. To my knowledge, rarely if ever have studies been cited to show those, or indeed, any claims about these novel therapies. For example, there was some early research in mRNA treatments. Papers must exist. Based on summaries I've read, early results were disappointing, ineffectual, harmful. I can understand why those were not shared, but where are the positive papers?
All the above notwithstanding, I do sadly concur that with the present "experiment," even if all the animals aren't dying, it is already evident that many of them are sickened and more die than "should" be. We are (at most) 15 months into a massive Phase 3 experiment, billions of subjects. The future doesn't look very bright.
[Edit added 02-27] I read in RFK Jr's "The Real Anthony Fauci," today precisely about the topic of dying lab animals. Discussing problems with vaccines against Dengue and later experimental ones including against SARS and MERS, he does indeed mentioned (pp. 368-370, several footnoted sources.) Several vaccine types are mentioned, but "mRNA" does not. Clearly I'm no expert, but with the mRNA jabs, I am sure that the developers were aware of the risk. Perhaps pathogenic priming (similar? Identical? to antibody dependent enhancement) remains a risk with them, but with billions served, we probably would have heard of it by now, even despite thoroughly corrupted medical, government and media we are burdened with. On the other hand, to all appearances (if not official admissions) the vaxxes are racking up injuries and fatalities, but these problems may not be highly related to "challenge" infection (by the real SARS-CoV-2 virus.)
Never mind dancing on the head of a pin over mild/serious - the patient is getting sick (enough to warrant seeking medical intervention) caused by something which is supposed to stop them getting sick. Also there is a monetary cost, and use of resources. On two levels that is undesirable. And particularly so when patients are being coerced or compelled to take the medication.
Interesting answer from Mr. Cichutek. But what could he say? He pointed out as recently as February 2021 that "vaccines are tested by all the rules of the art" and reports of vaccine deaths are nonsense.
He's in too deep to go back on that now. And as eugypius said, the best means of choice is simply to initiate a study where it is clear from the beginning what will come out. This shows actionism. Typical German.
The psychological profile seems insightful. I can find traces of it in myself and my family, even after several generations in America. Or, perhaps, the reading is like a horoscope: so many generalities that they could apply to anyone? I don't think that the German(-ic) stereotype of loving conformity, a sense of belonging, adhering to rigid standards and rules, is very far from the truth, however.
This anemic amoebe is representative of all the little good-for-NOTHINGS that believe themselves capable of bringing you, me, all of us, scientific truthtelling.
This unlawful game with other people and their very lives and livelihoods ends NOW.
I, for one, can and will not tolerate the slightest influence over my godgiven life from types such as that little pale boy.
I CHALLENGE YOU TO A DUEL, MR. SQUAREHEAD AIRHEAD. Come along and meet THE PEOPLE.
The real deadly pandemic is a lack of integrity among public health officials and doctors. With such corruption and lies, how is it that anybody still has trust in them? Without trust, society is doomed, exactly the reason why Dante placed traitors in the very pit of hell.
Lack of integrity for the liars and lack of critical thinking for the other ones. I know several MDs and some of them honestly believe the shots are safe and effective. They don’t read any studies. They just blindly believe what the fda and cdc says and everything else is misinformation they refuse to even look at. Sadly most medical professionals are air heads these days.
Far too many doctors have been revealed as dull,, paint-by-numbers hacks, unthinkingly following the advice of thoroughly corrupt institutions. Dr Byram Bridle of Canada was quoted as saying that doctors receive a grand total of 5-10 lectures on virology and immunology duringtheir training, combined. No wonder they have failed so miserably during this pandemic.
Many if not most will still believe even as people around them keel over. It's like the old saying about communism - people only stop believing when they watch their family hauled off to the gulag, if even then.
It's really important that we remain focused on calling out this bullshit ass-covering. Because we can be sure that what PEI is doing will be echoed in many, many institutions, faculities and media outlets who have made the wrong call and are looking for some kind of escape route - stall for time, obfuscate the data and if all else fails, appeal to the old chestnut, "we operated with the information we had at the time, hindsight is 20/20."
We can't allow them to escape so easily.
great point, they need to be hounded from the public square and ejected from any positions of power or influence.
Ideally, something else would be done to them in the public square. 😏
absolutely! they should pay dearly for what they've done so that they do not get to pull this shit ever again. Not to forget how many lost their lives, their businesses
We can not allow them to escape prosecution for Crimes Against Humanity...period.
And we mustn't let the Ukraine situation distract from this. Which, btw, is exactly what the globalist psychopaths want.
What a completely corrupt pile of garbage, these people are disgusting human beings. The previous safety standards we had have all been abandoned seemingly everywhere in the world, shoved into place while everyone's fear was turned to 11... there needs to be justice, this man should be jailed for ignoring the many deaths and permanently disabled injuries from these scamvines
what drives me crazy about this, is that we're not talking about some rando vaxx product on the market. this is a pharmaceutical that has been relentlessly imposed upon the german population *for a whole year* now, and the public regulators act like it's not their business how dangerous it is, maybe they'll do a study some day. it's a basic point but it's still just so insane to me.
It honestly feels like the world has gone mad or that these officials are all part of some conspiracy, as not much else seems to make sense.. I guess covering up bad medicine reactions is nothing new, but this is really really different... the regulator whose job it is to keep companies in check showing active cover up for the companies. Whether he is super corrupt, or mass formation psychosis has brainwashed him to believe in the lies we see everywhere.. who knows.
They are all in it together. And since decent people will not participate in their conspiracy, only minions apply for their dirty jobs.
Yes. And the "system" has been selecting for these people for a very long time now, and so, here we are.
People can't believe "everybody" could be so bad, corrupt, etc. And surely they aren't ALL that way. But those who aren't are timid, weak, etc. And the system has selected for them as well.
This is a strong point, people have certainly been selected to be weak/wont speak up intentionally and PC culture / woke accusations seem to be part of this. By making everyone scared of bein cancelled they keep the masses quiet and obedient
Why do all medical bureaucrats persist in the belief that covid shots are the answer to the problem and must be universally administered? Is it because of their zealous confidence in their own power, or is it because their pockets are being lined? I don't know how much longer they can ignore the Everest and K2 like mountains of evidence that are accumulating. This doesn't speak well for human nature or the future of the West.
Your reasons are potential ones. However, seems to me it is more likely that Groupthink is operating. It is simply human nature to want to conform, to fit in with one's perceived tribe. Standing out is normally discouraged, a defiance of actual or perceived leadership. At times doing so has rewards (when you win) but those must be the rare case. More likely, the challenger is mauled or killed by the dominant male (primitive), in more civilized times, the trouble-maker is censured, marginalized, ostracized, demoted, fired, or cancelled. In less civilized times, he is imprisoned, tortured, sent to the labor camp, or simply shot.
You're on to something. I.E. Galileo
Contracts are very binding, and why I try to avoid them. They make people do things they shouldn't, when they have 'promised' money to flow they will kill to maintain the flow. Oops.
At least it went public. Austria and Belgium still inside the nightmare
I mean at the end they are right taking the vaccine was not mandatory you could choose also to loose your livelyhood, education or anything else. It was your free choice...
That is exactly what I have been telling my family. If you have to choose to die from a shot or from starvation that is no chpice
Engels called it "social murder." Killing by taking everything away until the person dies.
You're not crazy or the only one. What's the sense in having a 'regulator' collecting adverse event data if not to monitor safety? Some agency should be doing it. Sure seems like REI is that agency in Germany. What have they been doing for two years if they have not had a focus on the safety of products used to fight covid?
I can only hope they die right along with all the typical victims, I hope they took the poison as well. Then the problem will solve itself in a year or 2.
At one time it was reported that only 25% percent of CDC employees were vaccinated, as there is no vaccine mandate at the CDC. These peopIe would be among the best informed in the world as to the side effects of the vaccines. I would interpret this to mean that 75% are aware of the dangers and are not willing to risk their lives, while the remaining 25% are true believers.
And why I support death by injection for the whackscene pushers...because of the irony.
Yes, provided that the injection is repeated massive doses of their own "vaccine". Death by hydrogen cyanide would be too quick. Besides, I believe that suffering sickness and immune system collapse would hopefully give them some empathy with their victims, as well as time to search their souls and confront their wickedness. "Just but Merciful" as the saying goes.
Agreed. Here in the USA we have the recent (month ago) disclosure during Sen. Johnson's "Covid-19 A Second Opinion" panel (Jan. 24 (?)) where whistleblowers reported the jumps in presumed vaccine reactions in the military using public database (DMED). Within a day or two, that database was taken off line and "fact checkers" reported that that all the misunderstanding was due to a "glitch," you see, for five years millions of patient records were not entered properly into the database. If one assumes that whistleblower testimony is true, this means that there is deliberate corruption and cover-ups in the highest levels of government. More recently, the CDC admits it's refusing to release detailed Covid-19 and/or vaccination data. Even the New York Times is reporting on the issue. The New York Times!!!
Since they removed it and also moved Dr. Long who warned the government about sick pilots I take it is true. There is now plenty of other evidence like a Romanian football coach refusing injected players and databases in Germany reporting less than 10 percent of deaths due to the jabs
They are starting to look like what they are. Look at old paintings of devils
The devils do their dirty deeds in darkness - and in official redacted report.
I was thinking yesterday of how closely vac formula resembles the concoctions of medieval witches. Blood of bats and of unborn babies. Intestines of animals. Surprised that the churches have not seen that yet. But they probably get gates handouts too
I think you've found a replacement motto for Billionaire Jeff Bezos's vanity newspaper (The Washington Post): "Democracy dies in darkness." 😈
What obvious corruption. He's saying the drugs are innocent until proven guilty, when it's the other way around. That approach puts the burden of proof on the patient to prove the drug unsafe, when it's really on the manufacturer and provider to prove it safe.
It looks like the PEI is just as corrupt as the FDA.
PEI and the FDA are brothers from the same mother...WEF
I don't know if WEF caused that corruption but they certainly exploit it.
Isn’t PEI a “population control” advocacy?
No. You are confusing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Ehrlich with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_R._Ehrlich
That's a face made for radio, or hiding deep inside the bureaucracy.
But with a decent hair cut and a less ridiculous dye job he could at least look slightly professional. Instead he looks like he cuts his own hair with gardening tools. And I don't think that synthetic color actually exists in nature.
Aside from the general unhealthy appearance of our public health experts, why do so many of them look utterly ridiculous? It's not that hard to make oneself look presentable in public. If you won't do it for yourself, consider the rest of us. We have to look at you!
Are you referring to Murthy and Walensky? The latter has some very un-natural black hair dye going on. Looks like she is made up for Halloween.
No I think the German regulator guy pictured in the Substack post.
Not that I would know about this, but I imagine that most people do not make a decision to go to a doctor unless it's a serious issue.
For me, I'd have to be unconscious.
Agreed. Unless Germany is a far more bureaucratic country where, say, an office worker who is sick for more than a couple days must present a doctor's note?
This wouldn't lessen the enormity of the data, but could add some context around it. Basically 2% of people have a side-effect that they made a claim for. It would be useful to know what the general attitude or behaviour towards visiting the doctor is in Germany.
For example, that figure would astound me much more if it was based on the UK, because people here don't really go to the doctor unless they desperately need prescription medicine, or have developed a serious chronic ailment. It's quite normal for people not to have seen a doctor for several years at a time.
As I understand it, in other European countries it's far more common for people to see a doctor, sometimes even for flu or a minor ailment (mainly because the health systems are not as stretched as our NHS!).
At one point I avoided going to a doctor for 15 years and I have asthma. Then I just had to get an inhaler, but that was about 3 years ago.
"Unless Germany is a far more bureaucratic country where, say, an office worker who is sick for more than a couple days must present a doctor's note?"
The number is three.
It has been estimated that perhaps as many as 1% of US soldiers receiving The Vax have experienced side effects severe enough to have them removed from active duty, so your 2% estimate is probably spot on.
I'm sure some of the recorded AEs were from hypochondriacs who went in because they had a minor headache, and others were minor but recorded anyway while someone was at the doctor for another reason. But I'd need some solid proof before I started believing that was the case for anything but a small minority of these diagnoses.
"..physicians and non-medical practitioners are obliged to report suspected adverse health effects.."
They are required, by law, to report, but they are required, by self-interest, to bill patients for services.
Hmmm... I wonder which requirement is more compelling?
I also notice he implies that physician judgement is legitimate with regard reportable side effects in the official system, but not when they bill for them...
More compelling and more revealing.
Good information and useful to many I'm sure. But for me, it has become redundant. I'm not taking their shots. Period. RESIST.
This is an example of trying to cover up the obvious. Deaths have gone up over the normal deaths year of 2020 (despite a pandemic and medical murder)...
So what's causing the deaths? The vax, most likely.
How obvious is that? And the 2020 average age of con-vid death is around life expectancy, so what virus?
Shapes of things to come from this experiment! If you know cellular replication, these NRNA kill shots turn you into ward of the "medical psychos" . Considering all test animals in early studies died in a 3 years study, the depopulation 70% needs to be addressed. Emergemcy Use Authorization is the only way the WEF can get these kill shots into the world population. The Nueremburg 2.0 by Dr Fuelmich must suceed! as all the evidence is there and growing day by day.
Michael do you have links on the animals dying in testing. I have been looking for them.
It was vaccine studies done for the original SARS. For these current vaccines they skipped animal trials altogether.
Do you think they will keep those "clinical" study public domain . I believe Dr Yeadon has discussed the safety factor of these kill shots. Moderna thought MRNA was a one size fit all to cure cancer. Memorial Sloan Kettering did a study and found opposite results an article by Mathew Tontowaz AUG 27. 2018 tells the tale of MRNA Understand the spike 19 protein thats in the kill shots is a chimera of sars/HIV/bovine tb! Trillions of these packets are in the shot. Pfizer has to release all trial data this year which they thought could bury for 55 years. The spike that you see in imagery of so covid-19 is gp120 protein. which is a part of Faucis HIV bioweapon in 1980's.
"All the animals died" is one of those common themes among us vaccine skeptics. I believe this is an example of a story that began with a grain of truth. I believe (but can't easily cite) that yes, there were earlier vaccine studies where a large percentage of animals died (from ADE or something related, I think.) Probably not a mRNA "vaccine." Even in normal times vaccine disasters were not unknown, as anyone who has read Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s latest book would know. In other words, it is a stereotype, having a seed of truth but may not reflect the overall reality.
We can equally, and validly I think, apply the same criticism to the official "vaccine" catechism, however: From the outset, the public was assured of various claims, even by officials who one would have expected to be well-informed (scientists, not just politicians) that (for example) the vaccines were safe and effective, they would prevent one from getting ill or dying, and so forth. To my knowledge, rarely if ever have studies been cited to show those, or indeed, any claims about these novel therapies. For example, there was some early research in mRNA treatments. Papers must exist. Based on summaries I've read, early results were disappointing, ineffectual, harmful. I can understand why those were not shared, but where are the positive papers?
All the above notwithstanding, I do sadly concur that with the present "experiment," even if all the animals aren't dying, it is already evident that many of them are sickened and more die than "should" be. We are (at most) 15 months into a massive Phase 3 experiment, billions of subjects. The future doesn't look very bright.
[Edit added 02-27] I read in RFK Jr's "The Real Anthony Fauci," today precisely about the topic of dying lab animals. Discussing problems with vaccines against Dengue and later experimental ones including against SARS and MERS, he does indeed mentioned (pp. 368-370, several footnoted sources.) Several vaccine types are mentioned, but "mRNA" does not. Clearly I'm no expert, but with the mRNA jabs, I am sure that the developers were aware of the risk. Perhaps pathogenic priming (similar? Identical? to antibody dependent enhancement) remains a risk with them, but with billions served, we probably would have heard of it by now, even despite thoroughly corrupted medical, government and media we are burdened with. On the other hand, to all appearances (if not official admissions) the vaxxes are racking up injuries and fatalities, but these problems may not be highly related to "challenge" infection (by the real SARS-CoV-2 virus.)
Never mind dancing on the head of a pin over mild/serious - the patient is getting sick (enough to warrant seeking medical intervention) caused by something which is supposed to stop them getting sick. Also there is a monetary cost, and use of resources. On two levels that is undesirable. And particularly so when patients are being coerced or compelled to take the medication.
I didn’t know that Rumpelstiltskin ran the PEI.
The devil has told you that! The devil has told you that!!!!
If only it were that simple :).
Interesting answer from Mr. Cichutek. But what could he say? He pointed out as recently as February 2021 that "vaccines are tested by all the rules of the art" and reports of vaccine deaths are nonsense.
He's in too deep to go back on that now. And as eugypius said, the best means of choice is simply to initiate a study where it is clear from the beginning what will come out. This shows actionism. Typical German.
"A German is capable of great things, but he is unlikely to accomplish them, for he obeys whenever he can, as suits a naturally lazy intellect."
- Nietzsche, "The Dawn of Day" aphorism 207, "The Attitude of the Germans to Morality." [search for "207." to find section]
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/39955/39955-h/39955-h.html
The psychological profile seems insightful. I can find traces of it in myself and my family, even after several generations in America. Or, perhaps, the reading is like a horoscope: so many generalities that they could apply to anyone? I don't think that the German(-ic) stereotype of loving conformity, a sense of belonging, adhering to rigid standards and rules, is very far from the truth, however.
This anemic amoebe is representative of all the little good-for-NOTHINGS that believe themselves capable of bringing you, me, all of us, scientific truthtelling.
This unlawful game with other people and their very lives and livelihoods ends NOW.
I, for one, can and will not tolerate the slightest influence over my godgiven life from types such as that little pale boy.
I CHALLENGE YOU TO A DUEL, MR. SQUAREHEAD AIRHEAD. Come along and meet THE PEOPLE.
Planning to do a study. When? Don’t call us, we’ll call you.
Nailed it!
The real deadly pandemic is a lack of integrity among public health officials and doctors. With such corruption and lies, how is it that anybody still has trust in them? Without trust, society is doomed, exactly the reason why Dante placed traitors in the very pit of hell.
Lack of integrity for the liars and lack of critical thinking for the other ones. I know several MDs and some of them honestly believe the shots are safe and effective. They don’t read any studies. They just blindly believe what the fda and cdc says and everything else is misinformation they refuse to even look at. Sadly most medical professionals are air heads these days.
Far too many doctors have been revealed as dull,, paint-by-numbers hacks, unthinkingly following the advice of thoroughly corrupt institutions. Dr Byram Bridle of Canada was quoted as saying that doctors receive a grand total of 5-10 lectures on virology and immunology duringtheir training, combined. No wonder they have failed so miserably during this pandemic.
Many if not most will still believe even as people around them keel over. It's like the old saying about communism - people only stop believing when they watch their family hauled off to the gulag, if even then.