Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Graham Stull's avatar

I carefully read the trial data that was made publically available and on that evidence advised my then 79 yo father to get the vaccine. I reasoned that although long term risks were unknown, his age meant these were less important.

On October 30 2021, he got his first Pfizer booster. I saw him on Nov 3, when he complained of feeling unwell. I travelled back to Europe that week and on 30 November got the news that he had suffered a massive stroke.

Tomorrow I’m getting on a plane to fly over and see him in the nursing home, where he will spend the rest of his life in a wheelchair.

Point being, if I had known this about the trials in Feb 2021, I would have persuaded him not to get the shot at all.

Expand full comment
RioRosie's avatar

So it begins: the magnifying glasses & microscopes come out to analyze the efficacy of the so-called "vaccines" and the adverse effects of it.

In a normal world, this scrutiny would've taken place before millions of people were assured that the potion was "safe & effective."

In a normal world, Big Pharma would not have rushed to puncture millions of arms.

In a normal world, government medical bureaucrats would've protected the public.

Too bad we don't live in a normal world.

Expand full comment
246 more comments...

No posts