Pfizer enrolled 44,000 people across 270 clinical sites in the phase 3 clinical trials for the Pfizer/BioNTech Comirnaty vaccine. The largest of these sites by far was number 1231 in Buenos Aires, under the direction of the pediatric infectious diseases specialist Fernando Polack. The Argentine operation
I carefully read the trial data that was made publically available and on that evidence advised my then 79 yo father to get the vaccine. I reasoned that although long term risks were unknown, his age meant these were less important.
On October 30 2021, he got his first Pfizer booster. I saw him on Nov 3, when he complained of feeling unwell. I travelled back to Europe that week and on 30 November got the news that he had suffered a massive stroke.
Tomorrow I’m getting on a plane to fly over and see him in the nursing home, where he will spend the rest of his life in a wheelchair.
Point being, if I had known this about the trials in Feb 2021, I would have persuaded him not to get the shot at all.
So it begins: the magnifying glasses & microscopes come out to analyze the efficacy of the so-called "vaccines" and the adverse effects of it.
In a normal world, this scrutiny would've taken place before millions of people were assured that the potion was "safe & effective."
In a normal world, Big Pharma would not have rushed to puncture millions of arms.
In a normal world, government medical bureaucrats would've protected the public.
Too bad we don't live in a normal world.
Pfizer is a criminal cartel and will eventually be brought to justice. A reordering of the political system in the US, with the elimination of the grifting sociopaths who have violated their oaths of office must occur first, but it will happen in our lifetimes. The powers-that-be are doing all they can to evade & avoid reality, but it's coming for them, one change mind at a time.
I think very few people are aware that the raw data is not available to regulators and approval boards
The whole concept of evidence based medicine is a sham. The companies fund the trials or studies, own the data, and publish findings whenever it suits them. From time to time public institutions come up with their own stuff, but its a fraction of what the private sector does
Why the FDA, EMA, dont require the entirety of the data I dont understand.
I remember you writing about the argentine trial long ago. It was fishy then - turns out there is a "there", there after all
Any patient showing a negative outcome is ruled out of the trial and vola the clinical trial show 100% effectiveness and safety. How convenient!
In such a huge trial some deaths will inevitably occur. You don't and won't see signals in vaccine trials in terms of the difference in number of deaths between groups. The difference observed here in number of deaths is entirely stochastic.
However, and this is a very big caveat to the above, what you _should_ do in a vaccine trial is look extremely carefully at each individual death in the vaccine arm. This was not done adequately. It probably can't be done, given the extent of data collected on such cases in general in clinical trials. We look for, and expect to see, gross signals in aggregate data.
Out of ~18,000 participants in the vaccine arm, there should not be even a single death with even a hint of association with the vaccine.
IF you have one single "this guy definitely died of vaccine" event, then among 18,000 participants, that probably makes the vaccine unlicensable under most circumstances. Conceivable exceptions would be a clearly effective vaccine against ebola, or HIV, or something of similar impact.
IF you have even one "maybe this guy died of the vaccine", then arguably you can proceed carefully, in risk groups, and watch very closely for other events. What you do not do is mandate it and eternal boosting for the entire population.
The problem was throwing overboard 80 years of medical ethics (patient has a veto) and 60 years of demanding an individual benefit/risk assessment to every treatment.
Didn't Brook Jackson alert the world to all this over 2 years ago?
Off topic, but in case anyone is interested in the evidence of "early spread," I've now summarized most of this evidence in one document. The first lie of officials was that this virus didn't begin to spread around the world until the year 2020. It's also interesting that no mainstream journalists are interested in the copious evidence of early spread.
Criminals every one of the Big Pharma executives and so called scientist that are witness and fail to speak out. Where is the outrage? Something deep and dark is afoot. Pray, plan, prepare and RESIST.
One old man sang and the leaders of the world danced. Fauci now says it was never possible to create a successful vaccine against respiratory disease. These three years will go down in history on how easy it was to fool the world. Does it say something about the type of leadership we have these days?
I find it noteworthy that Welt is running this story now. It doesn´t appear to be much more significant than any number of other issues related to the "vax" which us tin foil hat wearers have known about for a long time. It´s not like Welt, which has notoriously good ties across the Atlantic, was forced to run this story because it was trending in other media or some other reason. May there be a part of the establishment trying to make a move against the "vaxinators" or at least some of them?
I read about it yesterday and I was aghast. Surely, surely a company would do the responsible thing and not alliw a vaccine to be used on millions after adverse reactions like this in the trials...but no. Of course not.
Now I am at that stage of denial where I think that surely, surely politicians will take up this issue and will maje pizer cough up the documents and take them to court if necessary .
I hate suspecting that this wpn't happen either.
The poor people who died (were killed?) In the trials.
In response to Welt inquiries, Pfizer responded that “Regulatory authorities around the world have approved our Covid-19 vaccine. These approvals are based on a robust and independent assessment of the scientific data on quality, safety, and efficacy, including the phase 3 clinical trial.”
The UK MHRA (the first to approve Pfizer under EUA) didn't even analyse the trial data prior to approval. They just waived it through. When questioned under the FOIA, they stated that Public Health England analysed the data, but PHE subsequently denied any role in analysing the Pfizer Phase 3 trial results.
For over a year a number of us have been reporting to the University of Maryland “restoring trials” website. Peter Doshi oversees it. The Pfizer original trials published by NEJM were 6 months apart and covered the same population overtime. They were fraught with errors and accounting for the numbers of participants who were discontinued. They did not add up over the 6 month follow up period. The editors blew off the criticisms and accepted a lame explanation from the authors, including Pollack. Pfizer violated all rules of how to handle discontinued enrollees. Were withdrawals truly withdrawals? Then came the whistleblower...now the Pfizer Lyme disease vaccine story broke that Pfizer threw out a bunch of participants because the clinical site had problems. What can one believe when the very agency that is charged with oversight is captured, corrupt and ineffective.
Forced or otherwise not jabbed , use to take the over 65 for flu...not this year not ever....coincidence Nov. 26, 2022 I
Took the flu over 65 vacs. And, on Dec. 6 I got a stroke...twas mild lost memory, confused for 5 to 6 hours..spent 5 days in
Every time someone is juice-injured, they blame "anxiety."