Who was responsible for the draft resolution, circulated among the state health ministers of Germany, demanding the vaccination of teenagers contrary to regulatory advice?
Who was responsible for the draft resolution, circulated among the state health ministers of Germany, demanding the vaccination of teenagers contrary to regulatory advice?
This is exactly it! Your research skills (honed from your earlier academic career) and meticulous attention to detail are finally getting to the truth and not just running in circles. “Can’t hide from the Eugy.” One Eugyppius deep dive on the actual actors and timeline is worth a million schizo threads on graphene. We now need these articles to reach the proper people who can call these lunatics to account!
The only ones who got immunity associated with the jabs were the manufacturers themselves (from prosecution for a failed product). The recipients were all Guinea pigs in a grand experiment without precedent in human history.
Ah yes, the good old 5G-activated graphene theory.
All turned out to be true. Whenever any of my vaccinated friends come round, I just turn on my phone and watch thousands of nano bots crawling out of their ears. It takes me hours whacking the critters before my living room is back to normal, but it's worth it just to prove the point.
Eugyppius never discusses this kind of thing, which proves he's, like, just a shill for the lizard bloodlines etc. etc.
This is in no way meant to take anything away from eugyppius but I believe many of us have the ability to see thru the lies & BS. Most of us simply weren't aware because until recently, effectively when Trump/Brexit both won and the media globally lost it's mind, we believed most of our news feeds to be genuine. Now that eye have been opened between a combination of events since 2016 we realize the breadth and depth of corruption not only in our government but in the unit-party which is a combination of corrupt Republicans + Corrupt Democrats (in the US) + Private Interest that consist of both private sector companies and NGO's. Sometimes I wonder if the NGO was created to provide those with money and power an easier way to work with the corrupt in government.
This also serves to show the importance when studying politics, to look more at proposals, suggestions, policy statements and other such "soft" documents than finalised laws and regulations, since it is the "soft" documents that will inform and shape what becomes law, both via praxis and via actual rules-as-written.
It is the elites' way of communicating and organizing policy to make sure everyone is on the same page. Some of these policy proposals never get off the ground, and they are just floating ideas - trial balloons. Eventually they find something the majority, or at least the movers and shakers, agree on. This then floats through the intellectual circles and suddenly, all the "experts" are on the same page, unified in their opinions. It is designed to appear "organic" to the masses, but careful observation reveals how the system works.
Excellent, and that in turn shows why conspiracy theorists habitually get it wrong - for every significant malfeasance, they think there must a well defined and compact group of conspirators who somehow manage to manipulate other public officials. They then suppose that there must be mysterious networks able to impose blackmail on some, and fill secret bank accounts for others. No doubt some of this happens, although the evidence will rarely be forthcoming, but the resort to such assumptions of conspiracy as the default explanation is the problem.
The great appeal of Eugyppius's writing is surely that he avoids this assumption and successfully demonstrates how diffuse and haphazard the sources of harmful policies are, and how spontaneous tendencies within large bureaucracies, and the interactions of politicians/press/electoral pressures, will all produce similar results in different countries, without any international "cabal" to mastermind it all.
It is very reminiscent of how a human body /will/ develop cancer at some point or another, simply due to how the cells that make up the body collective (if you pardon the phrase) function.
No conspiracy needed when it's a built-in feature, if not by design so simply by function.
Yes. There's an important difference, of course, since the members of a bureaucracy are humans who choose their actions according to their goals. They may uneccessarily restrict their choices by failing to think them through, and their goals may be badly framed or immoral, but they are still choosing, whereas cells are not.
But the larger the bureacracy, the more the aggregate of actions will conform to patterns that can easily be deduced from the situation. For example, in order to keep their careers, a great majority will accept a group consensus once it has emerged - even if it contradicts a previous consensus; the rewarding of mistakes with further state funding will reinforce the carelessness and ambitions of the bureaucrats; the corrupting environment will lead the majority to put their career before truth or justice without compunction - scandals will be covered up, whistleblowers will not be vilified rather than defended, and so on.
As a retired teacher with about 20-25 years cumulative experience from trying to actually teach my subjects despite the best efforts of swedish school bureaucracy, what you describe is pretty much my lived experience.
I'll use a very simple example:
At one point, a bully had taken a girl's shoes, put them in the toilet bowl and pissed on them while she was standing next to him, crying.
To me this is crystal clear: he is to be detained to be picked up by his parents/guardian as soon as possible. A report is to be made to Social Services re: possibly abusive home environment and possibility of personality disorder, necessitating a compulsory investigation into this.
The girl's parents are to be informed and informed that if they wish to press criminal charges, such personnel as intercepted the event are available as witnesses.
Furthermore, the bully is not to be let back into school for the remainder of the semester and if this wasn't a first offence, is to be immediately expelled. How and where the bully's education is to take place is on its parents a/o Social Services.
To the women who run the school where this happened and the entirety of the school system, all of the above (while being fully legal!) was inconceivable; to them, the bully was the real victim because that is what they had a pre-decided consensus upon. Bullies and criminal are blameless and their behaviour is the fault of society.
Thanks to their consensus, nothing at all was done and the bully would remain at the school, growing worse and worse in his depredations and amassing a following.
To the female teachers, this was simply an impossibility since they had decided beforehand that their measures - talking to him to reach his "better self" - would work. Their eternal excuse was: "He must be given a second chance", even after his tenth or twentieth transgression (including thefts, assaults, and when a teenager threating to rape a female teacher).
To me, this demonstrates the folly of equating consensus with correct, proper or right but also how consensus made a virtue is an incredibly destructive force.
I think of it like fashion trends. One never knows what the next trend will be. Somehow a theme will spontaneously arise and become adopted. No one ever really seems to know where these trends started. The major driver is "everone who matters is following it, so I must as well".
So much legislation is done behind the back of the public these days. Elected legislators have access to it, and the media is supposed to inform us, but politicians and the media have been co-opted by big business and intel agencies, so we only hear about these things after they're a done deal.
It's more comfortable to the decision-makers that way, and less risk for the people objecting to things, specifically; objecting at the ballot box.
Corporatism, not as an actual ideology as such but as a consequence of liberal capitalist democracy (using european terms, I think neo-con plus neo-liberal would be the US eq.).
That letter is a precious piece of history. Because it is in written form, it appears more well-thought and intentional than US President Joseph Biden stating that the shot blocks the virus from spreading to people who have been injected. It is also totally unsubstantiated by any science other than the speculation that the injection should theoretically lower transmission rates even though no one ever studied that.
its why elections have become mostly meaningless. The regulatory state is comprised of layers and layers of unknown actors that are the ones actually crafting policy. Excellent piece on this written by John Carter here on substack.
But it will never happen because if the truth comes through it will be exposed as a giant grab for power and KONTROL whose measures were basically ineffective
I had to sign in to Google, was told I had to ‘request access’ and that I would receive a ‘letter’ notifying me if access had been granted.
It’s ok. I know what Nuremberg was about. Hangings are definitely in order. Thousands of kids and working-age adults were killed or injured, perhaps permanently. Google executives need to be in the dock too, since they continue to run cover for this unspeakable project.
Start by retracting all pension entitlements and continue to restrict future employment to situations requiring manual labour and no access to computers.
This is the quintessence of gaslighting. It smells of Big Pharma coaxing and cajoling politicians and health administrators to ramp up the “war effort” against the virus. But even at that time, evidence was growing stronger that the “vaccines” protected nobody from transmission or infection. So they changed the definition of a vaccine (around the same time that they changed the definition of herd immunity, effectively denying the existence of natural immunity, e.g., from prior infection).
Meanwhile, nobody in power had the ethical compass to demand a stratified risk:benefit analysis by age cohort.
I recognize any claim of "caring" by government or big corporations to be an intentional lie. They care about money, they care about power, they care about their careers and their social status, but I've never encountered a large powerful organization that actually cares about the individuals it claims to serve.
Fauci justified himself with something like "I was lying to prevent people from hoarding masks". Which is the stupidest lie (in the sense that indeed he knew that masks don't work in preventing respiratory infections at population scale) possible.
How can you be trusted if you lie? In particular how can any institution be trusted (especially during an emergency) if you candidly admit that in some circumstances you're supposed to lie?
How can you be sure that the effects of your lies will result in your desired outcome? Are you an health policy expert or a sociologist-psychologist-economist? Have you scientific evidence to justify this behaviour? Have you consulted with experts on the topic?
How can anyone be trusted based on such a lame rationalization.
We should try it next time we need to lie.
"The reason I lied about going to the bar instead of straight home is because I didn't want to contribute to the overwhelming the highway infrastructure. I decided it best to go to a bar and wait till off peak hours to head home."
Nov 20, 2023·edited Nov 20, 2023Liked by eugyppius
In the world they inhabit social capital is gained via popularity. It doesn't matter how it is attained. Being famous is too simple. It is the acquisition of brownie points from the right sources. Flattering media coverage, perceived as decisive doers, visibly communicating their understanding of globalist goals.
The characters mentioned are all this and more. Our real takeaway should be how inept and non-special politicians have become and how unsuited they are to manage the societal control they claim they need to run society. We should all be thinking we are much better off solving our own problems not relying on the state since it is run by clowns.
"We want to enable a return to a a mostly normal life. This also includes schools operating with as few infections and restrictions as possible."
Who was demanding restrictions in schools? Who was demanding mass testing in schools that made "infections" a concern? Find out this and you'll get at least part of your answer. In the UK it was teacher's unions, as described in my comment on your previous post.
I wouldn't be surprised if this was also true in many other countries. In early 2020 teacher's union activist Karam Bales correctly identified that "schools would become a political battle... they are the key to reversing a lockdown the government never wanted to implement". He was correct; with schools closed and parents unable to work, the UK was plunged into a de-facto national strike. The unions leveraged this to great lengths to prevent a return to normal life.
A non conspiratorial explanation for this would be that the covidians had all had their sensibilities honed in the internet school of rhetoric where one inconsistency identifiable in your stance means you are pwned forever no backsies
So to prove they really believed everything they were doing and saying they HAD to promote child vaccination
If coronavirus was a huge danger and vaccines were a huge blessing THEN it follows a good nonhypocrite would of course want to vaccinate kids
This Princess Bride logic is all over trans stuff: if trans women are women THEN they belong in women’s prisons AND they have been girls since birth THUS LOGICALLY giving kids drugs that melt their bones is the unassailable thing to do.
Makes me sick to my stomach that so many babies/children/teens were injected with this poison. I hope every one of these people that pushed these on EVERYONE rots in hell. Yes, I'm a Christian, but this hurts my heart so badly, I'm allowed to have righteous anger; I can only imagine how angry God must be. He will bring about His wrath for those who have done this to humanity, whether knowingly doing so, or just going along to get along. There is no excuse anymore. God imparted His wisdom and discernment in me about this whole CVD thing when it first started happening in 2020. I just kept watching the news (back when I watched the news, not anymore though). I kept seeing the running tally of CVD deaths on the screen and thought, "why are they keeping track like that?" Seemed too "in your face," like they wanted us to be scared. Then they began talking about the poison jab and I was like, "um no, I have no idea what's in that." Then I heard, in that still-small-voice inside me say, "don't believe the lies, don't take the poison." I knew that was God's promptings, and I listened to Him, and was never steered down the wrong path. Since then so much has come to light, and it's just almost unbelievable to me how deep this rabbit hole goes. I have lost all faith in gov't, the medical establishment, and in most people who are still deceived and refused to see the truth (many in my own family). I am the black sheep in my family, my brother isn't so bad in his unbelief, but my sisters are totally deceived, as are their entire families (and they've all been jabbed). They are so fearful and live in constant fear of contracting a virus, whichever it is at the moment. It's gotten so bad that one of my niece's won't even leave the house, she's 25 and is just wasting her life away being cooped up at home all the time (has barely left the house a handful of times in 2.5 years). It's really sad, but it's what my sister has brought on her own daughter because of fear. I don't live in fear, I know God's got me and mine. Yeah we all got CVD back in May 2022, but nothing since then, and we've only had a few sniffles since then too, and we are living our life normal, no masks, no distancing, nothing of that sort. We take lots of supplements and try to eat healthy, that's about it. But whatever happens, happens in my book. Keep up the great work eugyppius.
Most of my life has been living in fear, I think that was one of the reasons why I recognized it being inflicted upon me. Plus I had a friend in China who tipped me off about a month before lockdowns. Note to authorities: You can't schedule when to begin a pandemic.
I think there is a spiritual element as to why many were deceived and some weren't. There are timeless truths that are written in the Bible like discernment, taking every thought captive, and not conforming to the world, but being transformed by the renewing of your mind. Anytime a large group of people immediately acts in a certain way, this should be an indicator. The consensus has spoken, you should wear the golden mask.
I started writing a bit of fiction called "Prime Adherent." in which the main character is someone who was in charge of making all the decisions regarding restricting and terrorizing people. And then....karma.
They are still keeping track of deaths like that. Other respiratory illnesses reset seasonally, but not Covid. We are still doing the cumulative math on it. And those fully ensconced in the narrative believe they are undercounted. And why shouldn't they think so? 24/7 propaganda for years. Surely the government can't possibly be lying or the health authorities. And anecdotal evidence means nothing.
The sad/interesting part is that now that a lot of restrictions have been lifted here in the states, and yet excess deaths keep accruing, they feel abandoned by the very government and measures they championed. Now they claim the government is lying.
It was surreal. The death count, the case count, the mantras and PSA's. Walking through the grocery store with numerous warnings being piped in. The weird slogan on the walls of fences of dumpsters "We're All In This Together" in the McDonalds parking lot. The stickers, the signs, the masked faces, the reset of reality by everyone staying home/staying safe.
I've known for years the government was incompetent. But I didn't know it was run by children. I told the friend in China when he warned of the coming panic, that we would weather it as we had in 2002 and in 2008. I didn't know at the time, but I was relying on the precautionary principle and that "cooler heads would prevail." Meanwhile the worlds politicians and movers and shakers were playing Disease D&D and were basically psyching themselves up to psyche the rest of us out. At least that is one of my working theories along with the sunk cost logical fallacy, and also "you have these weapons at your disposal, why not use them?"
I am the one legged overweight black sheep of the family myself. Most of my family are not fearful, but they did move along to get along. My nieces and nephews I am sure are vaccinated. I know my sister is. Her reasoning for masking and vaccinating is, in the end, she works in a state school. The reason she gave me sounds like a "I don't want to get into it" rationalization. She stated that she wears a mask because she can, and she got vaccinated because she could. She more or less described that "it wasn't so bad or hard." As if those were the things that I was considering. It also wasn't so bad or difficult for most of us to get Covid when we got it.
Getting the vaccine and wearing a mask is easy. The price it pays on your soul is immeasurable. The things we regret in life, the opportunities missed, and the obligations deferred, we walk around with these things, but many of them thankfully, if we are fortunate, mainly affect us and not those around us.
I get this, and yes, I know we are to pray for our enemies. I'm still human, and still have human emotions. This is just too much to bear at times, it makes me so angry.
Quite an interesting piece of doublespeak. Please allow me to translate it into English:
"The Covid pandemic has brought many restrictions for all of us and especially for your lives. Unfortunately, the race against Corona has not yet been won!"
Our insane reaction to a mostly mild respiratory virus has brought many restrictions for all of us, and has not had any effect on public health. Unfortunately, we have painted ourselves into a corner and we don't know how to end it.
"The Covid vaccine provides triple protection:
-For you yourself,
-for the people you meet and
-for all of society, that is all of us!"
The Covid vaccine does not provide any protection:
- For you
- For the people you meet, and
- For any section of society. That is, it does not help in any way.
"We want to enable a return to a a mostly normal life. Please encourage all adult contacts of your child to get vaccinated. We need comprehensive immunisation to combat the pandemic!"
We have to find a way to return to a normal life before we all become bankrupt. Please encourage all adult contacts of your child to get vaccinated. We need to be able to say that we have combat the pandemic.
Thank you very much for meticulously reconstructing the details of this episode, which shall live in infamy, of the plandemic. For me there is no doubt that somebody _very_ important issued marching orders during that time and that this was definitely not the result of an "emergent" or "decentral" decision-making process.
Yes- now we see some of the activities in Germany.
The next step is to look around and notice the same things happening at nearly the same times in most G20 countries, with some state exceptions in the USA. The North American college mandates were part of the same big picture, dare I say "Conspiracy?"
This is exactly it! Your research skills (honed from your earlier academic career) and meticulous attention to detail are finally getting to the truth and not just running in circles. “Can’t hide from the Eugy.” One Eugyppius deep dive on the actual actors and timeline is worth a million schizo threads on graphene. We now need these articles to reach the proper people who can call these lunatics to account!
The only ones who got immunity associated with the jabs were the manufacturers themselves (from prosecution for a failed product). The recipients were all Guinea pigs in a grand experiment without precedent in human history.
Ah yes, the good old 5G-activated graphene theory.
All turned out to be true. Whenever any of my vaccinated friends come round, I just turn on my phone and watch thousands of nano bots crawling out of their ears. It takes me hours whacking the critters before my living room is back to normal, but it's worth it just to prove the point.
Eugyppius never discusses this kind of thing, which proves he's, like, just a shill for the lizard bloodlines etc. etc.
This is in no way meant to take anything away from eugyppius but I believe many of us have the ability to see thru the lies & BS. Most of us simply weren't aware because until recently, effectively when Trump/Brexit both won and the media globally lost it's mind, we believed most of our news feeds to be genuine. Now that eye have been opened between a combination of events since 2016 we realize the breadth and depth of corruption not only in our government but in the unit-party which is a combination of corrupt Republicans + Corrupt Democrats (in the US) + Private Interest that consist of both private sector companies and NGO's. Sometimes I wonder if the NGO was created to provide those with money and power an easier way to work with the corrupt in government.
'The Covid vaccine provides triple protection:
-For you yourself,
-for the people you meet and
-for all of society, that is all of us!'
Agitprop of the most devious kind.
Nudging and manipulation.
I think the need to stop all this is well overdue
Ah yes, that mis/disinformation ‘No one is safe until everyone is safe’ claptrap that was pedalled out, alongside the ‘safe and effective’ lies.
This also serves to show the importance when studying politics, to look more at proposals, suggestions, policy statements and other such "soft" documents than finalised laws and regulations, since it is the "soft" documents that will inform and shape what becomes law, both via praxis and via actual rules-as-written.
exactly, and they exert a stealth influence that you can only pinpoint indirectly.
It is the elites' way of communicating and organizing policy to make sure everyone is on the same page. Some of these policy proposals never get off the ground, and they are just floating ideas - trial balloons. Eventually they find something the majority, or at least the movers and shakers, agree on. This then floats through the intellectual circles and suddenly, all the "experts" are on the same page, unified in their opinions. It is designed to appear "organic" to the masses, but careful observation reveals how the system works.
Excellent, and that in turn shows why conspiracy theorists habitually get it wrong - for every significant malfeasance, they think there must a well defined and compact group of conspirators who somehow manage to manipulate other public officials. They then suppose that there must be mysterious networks able to impose blackmail on some, and fill secret bank accounts for others. No doubt some of this happens, although the evidence will rarely be forthcoming, but the resort to such assumptions of conspiracy as the default explanation is the problem.
The great appeal of Eugyppius's writing is surely that he avoids this assumption and successfully demonstrates how diffuse and haphazard the sources of harmful policies are, and how spontaneous tendencies within large bureaucracies, and the interactions of politicians/press/electoral pressures, will all produce similar results in different countries, without any international "cabal" to mastermind it all.
It is very reminiscent of how a human body /will/ develop cancer at some point or another, simply due to how the cells that make up the body collective (if you pardon the phrase) function.
No conspiracy needed when it's a built-in feature, if not by design so simply by function.
Yes. There's an important difference, of course, since the members of a bureaucracy are humans who choose their actions according to their goals. They may uneccessarily restrict their choices by failing to think them through, and their goals may be badly framed or immoral, but they are still choosing, whereas cells are not.
But the larger the bureacracy, the more the aggregate of actions will conform to patterns that can easily be deduced from the situation. For example, in order to keep their careers, a great majority will accept a group consensus once it has emerged - even if it contradicts a previous consensus; the rewarding of mistakes with further state funding will reinforce the carelessness and ambitions of the bureaucrats; the corrupting environment will lead the majority to put their career before truth or justice without compunction - scandals will be covered up, whistleblowers will not be vilified rather than defended, and so on.
Yup.
As a retired teacher with about 20-25 years cumulative experience from trying to actually teach my subjects despite the best efforts of swedish school bureaucracy, what you describe is pretty much my lived experience.
I'll use a very simple example:
At one point, a bully had taken a girl's shoes, put them in the toilet bowl and pissed on them while she was standing next to him, crying.
To me this is crystal clear: he is to be detained to be picked up by his parents/guardian as soon as possible. A report is to be made to Social Services re: possibly abusive home environment and possibility of personality disorder, necessitating a compulsory investigation into this.
The girl's parents are to be informed and informed that if they wish to press criminal charges, such personnel as intercepted the event are available as witnesses.
Furthermore, the bully is not to be let back into school for the remainder of the semester and if this wasn't a first offence, is to be immediately expelled. How and where the bully's education is to take place is on its parents a/o Social Services.
To the women who run the school where this happened and the entirety of the school system, all of the above (while being fully legal!) was inconceivable; to them, the bully was the real victim because that is what they had a pre-decided consensus upon. Bullies and criminal are blameless and their behaviour is the fault of society.
Thanks to their consensus, nothing at all was done and the bully would remain at the school, growing worse and worse in his depredations and amassing a following.
To the female teachers, this was simply an impossibility since they had decided beforehand that their measures - talking to him to reach his "better self" - would work. Their eternal excuse was: "He must be given a second chance", even after his tenth or twentieth transgression (including thefts, assaults, and when a teenager threating to rape a female teacher).
To me, this demonstrates the folly of equating consensus with correct, proper or right but also how consensus made a virtue is an incredibly destructive force.
I think of it like fashion trends. One never knows what the next trend will be. Somehow a theme will spontaneously arise and become adopted. No one ever really seems to know where these trends started. The major driver is "everone who matters is following it, so I must as well".
For us europeans old enough to remember what the term means, Kremlology never goes out of style.
So much legislation is done behind the back of the public these days. Elected legislators have access to it, and the media is supposed to inform us, but politicians and the media have been co-opted by big business and intel agencies, so we only hear about these things after they're a done deal.
It's more comfortable to the decision-makers that way, and less risk for the people objecting to things, specifically; objecting at the ballot box.
Corporatism, not as an actual ideology as such but as a consequence of liberal capitalist democracy (using european terms, I think neo-con plus neo-liberal would be the US eq.).
That letter is a precious piece of history. Because it is in written form, it appears more well-thought and intentional than US President Joseph Biden stating that the shot blocks the virus from spreading to people who have been injected. It is also totally unsubstantiated by any science other than the speculation that the injection should theoretically lower transmission rates even though no one ever studied that.
But Rikard that would compromise national security!
I want to puke every time they say that
Gosh darn chucks, didn't think of what a threat to Our Democracy(tm, pat pend) an informed and politically active citizenry would be!
Good thing you spotted my thought-crime in time!
https://open.substack.com/pub/barsoom/p/cryptocracy?r=qrctv&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
its why elections have become mostly meaningless. The regulatory state is comprised of layers and layers of unknown actors that are the ones actually crafting policy. Excellent piece on this written by John Carter here on substack.
Germany needs a covid Truth and Reconciliation Commission
The world needs it
But it will never happen because if the truth comes through it will be exposed as a giant grab for power and KONTROL whose measures were basically ineffective
Or Nuremberg Tribunals, with appropriate punishment:
(my google drive - whoever thought this one up is a genius):
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1dmXO1YmZ8MY2upybCD2HXD84ZduMYLTr
Karl, I hate google! Doesn't work .... won't see it.
Agreed, unfortunately I'm an Android developer, so they've got me by the ***.
If you wanna have a look:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.whack.whack
But I guess you don't, since Google Play is very much a part of google. Except, they published it!!!
I had to sign in to Google, was told I had to ‘request access’ and that I would receive a ‘letter’ notifying me if access had been granted.
It’s ok. I know what Nuremberg was about. Hangings are definitely in order. Thousands of kids and working-age adults were killed or injured, perhaps permanently. Google executives need to be in the dock too, since they continue to run cover for this unspeakable project.
That's strange. The link should work for anyone, without problem. Not sure why Google want you to 'request access'.
Why would you favour reconciliation?
Truth and Punishment would be my suggestion.
Start by retracting all pension entitlements and continue to restrict future employment to situations requiring manual labour and no access to computers.
Germany needs a working guillotine...How many teenagers died because of these machinations?
The conclusion would essentially just be:
"Mistakes were made for you plebs"
This is the quintessence of gaslighting. It smells of Big Pharma coaxing and cajoling politicians and health administrators to ramp up the “war effort” against the virus. But even at that time, evidence was growing stronger that the “vaccines” protected nobody from transmission or infection. So they changed the definition of a vaccine (around the same time that they changed the definition of herd immunity, effectively denying the existence of natural immunity, e.g., from prior infection).
Meanwhile, nobody in power had the ethical compass to demand a stratified risk:benefit analysis by age cohort.
Whenever I see the word "care and equity" I get very suspicious. Never liked "care bears" anyway....too happy to be realistic.
I recognize any claim of "caring" by government or big corporations to be an intentional lie. They care about money, they care about power, they care about their careers and their social status, but I've never encountered a large powerful organization that actually cares about the individuals it claims to serve.
Still, it's nice that there's so much caring going down.
Yes, like being in the ground floor of a 5 story outhouse. Lots of "caring" coming down from above.
Well, so long as you have a full-body protective suit, a power hose and a barrel of disinfectant, you can still bask in all that caring.
Which is exactly the way things are in the real world. (Okay, I don't quite know yet how to cash out the simile, but I'm working on it.)
I appreciate your deep dive into this subject.
Will we ever know? How come no journalist or news reader ever asked Fauci for the evidence supporting his flip-flop on masks during Covid?
The media are there to manage the narrative not inform. That's why they want to regulate the internet.
Precisely and exactly
Because they were already in support of masking?
Furthering the agenda rather than looking for the truth.
Shaking the magic eight ball...all signs point to yes!
Fauci justified himself with something like "I was lying to prevent people from hoarding masks". Which is the stupidest lie (in the sense that indeed he knew that masks don't work in preventing respiratory infections at population scale) possible.
How can you be trusted if you lie? In particular how can any institution be trusted (especially during an emergency) if you candidly admit that in some circumstances you're supposed to lie?
How can you be sure that the effects of your lies will result in your desired outcome? Are you an health policy expert or a sociologist-psychologist-economist? Have you scientific evidence to justify this behaviour? Have you consulted with experts on the topic?
How can anyone be trusted based on such a lame rationalization.
We should try it next time we need to lie.
"The reason I lied about going to the bar instead of straight home is because I didn't want to contribute to the overwhelming the highway infrastructure. I decided it best to go to a bar and wait till off peak hours to head home."
Thank you for reminding me of that one. It's easy to forget parts of this house of lies.
No "journalist" ever asked because if a "god" like Fauci changes his opinion, it's because reality has changed.
Nobody else cares to ask because there's no reason to believe he has opinions that aren't bought and paid for by Big Pharma.
In the world they inhabit social capital is gained via popularity. It doesn't matter how it is attained. Being famous is too simple. It is the acquisition of brownie points from the right sources. Flattering media coverage, perceived as decisive doers, visibly communicating their understanding of globalist goals.
The characters mentioned are all this and more. Our real takeaway should be how inept and non-special politicians have become and how unsuited they are to manage the societal control they claim they need to run society. We should all be thinking we are much better off solving our own problems not relying on the state since it is run by clowns.
Excellent detective work. Thank you.
"We want to enable a return to a a mostly normal life. This also includes schools operating with as few infections and restrictions as possible."
Who was demanding restrictions in schools? Who was demanding mass testing in schools that made "infections" a concern? Find out this and you'll get at least part of your answer. In the UK it was teacher's unions, as described in my comment on your previous post.
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/the-bizarre-campaign-to-vaccinate/comment/43948817
Also here in Ontario Canada is seemed like the teacher's unions were the ones who were scared and demanded everything.
I wouldn't be surprised if this was also true in many other countries. In early 2020 teacher's union activist Karam Bales correctly identified that "schools would become a political battle... they are the key to reversing a lockdown the government never wanted to implement". He was correct; with schools closed and parents unable to work, the UK was plunged into a de-facto national strike. The unions leveraged this to great lengths to prevent a return to normal life.
Thank you for holding people to account.
A non conspiratorial explanation for this would be that the covidians had all had their sensibilities honed in the internet school of rhetoric where one inconsistency identifiable in your stance means you are pwned forever no backsies
So to prove they really believed everything they were doing and saying they HAD to promote child vaccination
If coronavirus was a huge danger and vaccines were a huge blessing THEN it follows a good nonhypocrite would of course want to vaccinate kids
This Princess Bride logic is all over trans stuff: if trans women are women THEN they belong in women’s prisons AND they have been girls since birth THUS LOGICALLY giving kids drugs that melt their bones is the unassailable thing to do.
Makes me sick to my stomach that so many babies/children/teens were injected with this poison. I hope every one of these people that pushed these on EVERYONE rots in hell. Yes, I'm a Christian, but this hurts my heart so badly, I'm allowed to have righteous anger; I can only imagine how angry God must be. He will bring about His wrath for those who have done this to humanity, whether knowingly doing so, or just going along to get along. There is no excuse anymore. God imparted His wisdom and discernment in me about this whole CVD thing when it first started happening in 2020. I just kept watching the news (back when I watched the news, not anymore though). I kept seeing the running tally of CVD deaths on the screen and thought, "why are they keeping track like that?" Seemed too "in your face," like they wanted us to be scared. Then they began talking about the poison jab and I was like, "um no, I have no idea what's in that." Then I heard, in that still-small-voice inside me say, "don't believe the lies, don't take the poison." I knew that was God's promptings, and I listened to Him, and was never steered down the wrong path. Since then so much has come to light, and it's just almost unbelievable to me how deep this rabbit hole goes. I have lost all faith in gov't, the medical establishment, and in most people who are still deceived and refused to see the truth (many in my own family). I am the black sheep in my family, my brother isn't so bad in his unbelief, but my sisters are totally deceived, as are their entire families (and they've all been jabbed). They are so fearful and live in constant fear of contracting a virus, whichever it is at the moment. It's gotten so bad that one of my niece's won't even leave the house, she's 25 and is just wasting her life away being cooped up at home all the time (has barely left the house a handful of times in 2.5 years). It's really sad, but it's what my sister has brought on her own daughter because of fear. I don't live in fear, I know God's got me and mine. Yeah we all got CVD back in May 2022, but nothing since then, and we've only had a few sniffles since then too, and we are living our life normal, no masks, no distancing, nothing of that sort. We take lots of supplements and try to eat healthy, that's about it. But whatever happens, happens in my book. Keep up the great work eugyppius.
Most of my life has been living in fear, I think that was one of the reasons why I recognized it being inflicted upon me. Plus I had a friend in China who tipped me off about a month before lockdowns. Note to authorities: You can't schedule when to begin a pandemic.
I think there is a spiritual element as to why many were deceived and some weren't. There are timeless truths that are written in the Bible like discernment, taking every thought captive, and not conforming to the world, but being transformed by the renewing of your mind. Anytime a large group of people immediately acts in a certain way, this should be an indicator. The consensus has spoken, you should wear the golden mask.
I started writing a bit of fiction called "Prime Adherent." in which the main character is someone who was in charge of making all the decisions regarding restricting and terrorizing people. And then....karma.
They are still keeping track of deaths like that. Other respiratory illnesses reset seasonally, but not Covid. We are still doing the cumulative math on it. And those fully ensconced in the narrative believe they are undercounted. And why shouldn't they think so? 24/7 propaganda for years. Surely the government can't possibly be lying or the health authorities. And anecdotal evidence means nothing.
The sad/interesting part is that now that a lot of restrictions have been lifted here in the states, and yet excess deaths keep accruing, they feel abandoned by the very government and measures they championed. Now they claim the government is lying.
It was surreal. The death count, the case count, the mantras and PSA's. Walking through the grocery store with numerous warnings being piped in. The weird slogan on the walls of fences of dumpsters "We're All In This Together" in the McDonalds parking lot. The stickers, the signs, the masked faces, the reset of reality by everyone staying home/staying safe.
I've known for years the government was incompetent. But I didn't know it was run by children. I told the friend in China when he warned of the coming panic, that we would weather it as we had in 2002 and in 2008. I didn't know at the time, but I was relying on the precautionary principle and that "cooler heads would prevail." Meanwhile the worlds politicians and movers and shakers were playing Disease D&D and were basically psyching themselves up to psyche the rest of us out. At least that is one of my working theories along with the sunk cost logical fallacy, and also "you have these weapons at your disposal, why not use them?"
I am the one legged overweight black sheep of the family myself. Most of my family are not fearful, but they did move along to get along. My nieces and nephews I am sure are vaccinated. I know my sister is. Her reasoning for masking and vaccinating is, in the end, she works in a state school. The reason she gave me sounds like a "I don't want to get into it" rationalization. She stated that she wears a mask because she can, and she got vaccinated because she could. She more or less described that "it wasn't so bad or hard." As if those were the things that I was considering. It also wasn't so bad or difficult for most of us to get Covid when we got it.
Getting the vaccine and wearing a mask is easy. The price it pays on your soul is immeasurable. The things we regret in life, the opportunities missed, and the obligations deferred, we walk around with these things, but many of them thankfully, if we are fortunate, mainly affect us and not those around us.
I get this, and yes, I know we are to pray for our enemies. I'm still human, and still have human emotions. This is just too much to bear at times, it makes me so angry.
Quite an interesting piece of doublespeak. Please allow me to translate it into English:
"The Covid pandemic has brought many restrictions for all of us and especially for your lives. Unfortunately, the race against Corona has not yet been won!"
Our insane reaction to a mostly mild respiratory virus has brought many restrictions for all of us, and has not had any effect on public health. Unfortunately, we have painted ourselves into a corner and we don't know how to end it.
"The Covid vaccine provides triple protection:
-For you yourself,
-for the people you meet and
-for all of society, that is all of us!"
The Covid vaccine does not provide any protection:
- For you
- For the people you meet, and
- For any section of society. That is, it does not help in any way.
"We want to enable a return to a a mostly normal life. Please encourage all adult contacts of your child to get vaccinated. We need comprehensive immunisation to combat the pandemic!"
We have to find a way to return to a normal life before we all become bankrupt. Please encourage all adult contacts of your child to get vaccinated. We need to be able to say that we have combat the pandemic.
Thank you very much for meticulously reconstructing the details of this episode, which shall live in infamy, of the plandemic. For me there is no doubt that somebody _very_ important issued marching orders during that time and that this was definitely not the result of an "emergent" or "decentral" decision-making process.
Yes- now we see some of the activities in Germany.
The next step is to look around and notice the same things happening at nearly the same times in most G20 countries, with some state exceptions in the USA. The North American college mandates were part of the same big picture, dare I say "Conspiracy?"