Last week, Project Veritas released secretly recorded video of a Pfizer employee named Jordon Trishton Walker. As in other cases, Project Veritas appears to have approached Walker with a potential romantic partner (likely a sex worker paid by Project Veritas), who gradually gained his trust over a period of days. On his third date at a New York City restaurant, Walker made the following four statements about virus research at Pfizer, at different moments in the conversation:
Great take as always, E, but I am pushing back on this statement "I’ll be honest: I don’t think what Walker describes is necessarily dangerous. The virus is already training itself against vaccine-elicited antibodies in billions of people." I am speaking as an evolutionary microbiologist, and I believe this couldn't be farther from the truth, and what they did is inherently gain-of-function in terms of enhancing virulence.
Here's my reasoning -- in nature, viruses experience three primary types of selection. The first is what you describe, which is selection to overcome immune defenses in a population that has experience with the virus. The second is selection just to make more viruses during an infection -- "scramble competition" it is called, basically favoring whichever genotype can plow through the host the fastest before killing the host or getting stopped by the immune response. And the third is selection for transmission between hosts. That is partially related to the scramble competition, but favors other things like presence in bodily fluids, survival time outside the body and so forth.
My point is that in nature, there's expected to be a tension between scramble competition -- which favors lethality -- and transmission competition, which at least in respiratory viruses favors moderate illness because it inevitably prioritizes infection of the upper respiratory tract which is uncomfortable but not dangerous. But in a laboratory serial passage experiment, my understanding is that one animal is typically directly infected by a previous animal by intentional mobilization of infectious material by the experimenters, or by placing them together one-on-one in close contact. That is going to significantly reduce the power of selection for transmissivity and favor the scramble competition evolution of virulence. It's going to make a more dangerous virus, every time.
Like you say, there's no need for serial passage experiments in a world where massive PCR+sequencing monitoring is going on for vaxx resistant mutations, and where you can chemically synthesize any mRNA you want at a moments notice to make a new vaccine. The only reason for them to be doing serial passage imho is to look for more lethal variants, possibly to develop non-vaccine therapeutics like paxlovid or something.
I don’t have a science background, so I would have never thought of the risks here you describe, so thank you for your very reader friendly version of it- I do appreciate that. I also read an article on substack by Kevin McKernan where he takes it even one step further and describes that these medicines of molnupiravir and paxlovid (which have the special EUA status and are liability free) are also already mutating the virus into other vaccine evading strains. So the irony here being that they want even more basic treatments doing even more mutations sounds incredibly dangerous too.
In truth, RNA viruses are NEVER mutation supply limited. You can do the math (I won't to keep from boring people) but every possible amino acid change of every protein in the COVID genome occurs by chance in every single infected patient many times over. So what Pfizer is doing isn't going to make anything that doesn't exist in nature somewhere. The difference is that without natural selection for a mutation, it will never be common, so in nature the nasty lethal variants will probably never be important because they are outcompeted rapidly by less dangerous versions. But if you make a crapload of lethal virus in the lab and it gets out, it will burn a nasty hole in the population before it can get knocked back by its more temperate descendants.
The human immune system has been evolving over millions of years. So has human ingenuity! Both were purposely thwarted by Fauci and the greedy CDC/NIH establishment as they salivated over future profits from a half baked gene therapy that could be tested on a gullible world! But FIRST they needed to prevent any other valid treatment from entering the market… this is where the even greedier “Media” entered the scene..heavily invested in Big Pharma! My educated guess is that Sars Covid 2 is mostly a bust with no more lethality than the annual flu if it werent for the homicidal psychopaths running our “Health Care Apparatus”..
I’m so frustrated because no one is stopping them, and they are getting bolder. We might end up with that nasty hole and even then- will someone finally stop them? Covid killed many of the weak, and still we see no actual push back- in any of the countries.
If you want a vision of the future, imagine a basement lab churning out deadly pathogens, forever.
People don't understand how trivially simple some of this technology is. Any two-bit rogue country on Earth could replicate the experiment described in that Veritas video and create a new plague. You don't need any of the expensive infrastructure required for things like nukes or chemical weapons -- just the apparatus available in nearly any hospital microbiology lab in the world.
No I think we do-- just look at the braintrust doing it in the US. Very clear it is simple and you dont need anything except narcissistic useful idiots with a god complex. Research science has ALWAYS been like this. The only thing more prevelant in these times is the narcissism and the greed.
Sure you could, if you had access to monkeys. Lots of monkeys in some countries -- in some cities in India you gotta put locks on your refrigerator to keep them out of your groceries.
But it could just as easily be done in mice. "Humanized mice" cost a lot to create initially, but they are just like any other mouse now in terms of raising them. And with CRISPR-CAS tech, making them from scratch these days would even be fairly trivial.
Does a virus really mutate that much to be “lethal” to one person and harmless and even asymptomatic to another? Can we ascribe the different of outcome solely to the virus— or is it largely dependent on host conditions?
I think this is a great question because I also think there are so many many variables. One of the variables will be the temperature that they could keep the vials and whether they hit an area on the arm with a large capillary bed. Plus some people’s immune systems just might be better tuned at the beginning and they got lucky with the spike proteins only ending up in one or two areas of the body. It’s hard to tell. It’s also why its important to track men’s sperm counts and that Israeli study is so definitive- they tested sperm donors before and after the jabs. Tracking women and their fertility is so much more difficult because of all of the variable factors too.
I have a question for you, since you said you were an evolutionary biologist. What do you think the purpose or function of viruses are, in terms of their relationship to human adaptation?
They are just making a living for themselves, there's no bigger story than that. Like all other biological entities they just reproduce, and mutations that make them better at doing that get selected.
I don’t think it’s random. Everything in nature shows some kind of symbiotic relationship. Everything has evolved in context and in conjunction with other things that have a functionality, and maybe that is simply toward a goal of homeostasis or diversity or growth control. Because viruses use your genetic material to reproduce (and what they are reproducing is simply genetic material), and it quickly spreads through a geographic region, could it be a way to quickly adjust a species to its environment? I really don't think any thing here is random. Just yesterday I was talking with my son who asked me what my favorite animal was, and I said bird. And as I unpacked the reason, I realized that one cool thing about birds is how they disseminate seeds, and diversify a landscape. And they also eat bugs, and various insects that could be, in larger out of control numbers, could be a problem for the plants and trees that it helped plant. In a way, birds take care of the plant kingdom and also the soil. Rachel Carson's Silent Spring documents how horrific a landscape becomes when birds or their food is dessimated. I think viruses play an important role in human adaptation but I have never had a real conversation about it with someone who spends time in this field.
That is so interesting. It reminds me of the Rockefeller experiments on polio virus in the 1910s, serial passaging it through monkeys, and by direct injection into their brain, which selected for neural strains, or developed some kind of affinity with neural cells. This is thought to be the cause of the 1916 polio outbreak which started in Brooklyn, just a few subway stops from the Rockefeller Institute. Basically every big outbreak we have had the last century is probably the result of laboratory experimentation of viruses, doing exactly this, serial passaging them through animals. Even RSV came from laboratory animals.
Delighted to find you here circleofmamas! Found your website sometime in the last year and LOVE what you’re doing. I recommend it to anyone and everyone. AND I’m doing my part in the quiet guerilla communication needed in this age of censorship -- leaving your vax info sticky notes in public places. If the tech giants, telecom, govt, and academia shut down the large, broadcast message, then we “go small.”
Vaccine risks were not on my radar when I had my first baby almost 20 years ago. One kind acquaintance -- a mother of 5 whose firstborn was vax injured -- handed me a book that changed my mind forever and empowered me to keep my kids all completely unvaccinated in confidence. One person cared about me and my unborn baby. One act of kindness changed my trajectory for life, for me and for my children. This is how we win. By having the courage of our convictions to gently but earnestly speak what is true to anyone who will listen. To spark a flash of curiosity in someone who is even nominally receptive to the information. To make angry the entrenched opponent who will see the information on a sticky note and angrily comb through the linked research to “prove” their stance, and come away reluctantly converted.
We win in the end, because we have God on our side.
it's weird we have all of these fun reassortant viruses after successfully resurrecting ones like the 1918 Spanish flu et al, seems to be common game now as the guy who was entrapped on the video laid out, everyone spinning up novel revenue streams for their companies to rake in mandated government-sponsored profits to further spam our lives with more solutions to mysteriously happening problems (how many Pfizer/BioNTech ads lately?)
See the Dr. Thomas Cowan interview with the electrical engineer Shimon (forget his last name) who researched the 1918 Spanish Flu and its relation to the vaccine scam that was rolled out way back then. Hint: “0utbreaks” followed the “vaccine” everywhere it was distributed. Fauci studied this carefully and applied the lessons to this scamdemic.)
You have ignored a real fact. A LETHAL virus deselects itself as it reduces its own ability to reproduce and pass to further hosts. As we saw with Omicron and the other variants, viri generally mutate to be MORE INFECTIOUS and LESS LETHAL. This is the ideal evolutionary path.
Both less infectious and more lethal are less optimum and tend to be deselected. We would have been mostly wiped out many times if this were not reality.
Are you talking to me? I never mentioned lethality. Because largely lethality varies on the conditions of the host. How can the same virus be asymptomatic for one person but deadly for another? I don’t think any virus wants to kill its host.
I believe that was The Antisocial Darwinist above who brought that up. The idea he raised was that there were three different selective vectors acting on viral evolution: 1) ability to evade host immune system; 2) ability to out-reproduce other viruses in the host body -- "scramble competition"; and 3) the ability to spread to other hosts.
What he said was that "scramble competition" means exploiting the host as much as possible as quickly as possible, which tends to be lethal to the host. The ability to spread to other hosts is a different selective vector, and that one favors keeping the host alive. Since both are acting, one may be more important than the other. As you point out, that third selective factor may be more powerful than the second, as presumably was the case with Omicron.
The idea of scramble competition is interesting then. If a host is co infected with different pathogens, the sum is greater the parts, meaning, that each virus for example may scramble for dominance in the host resulting in a worse infection? That would require the host response to elicit a stronger response?
That's an angle I hadn't considered. I had been thinking of the natural selection operating on different mutational variants of a single pathogen. In either case, though, mutations that favor aggressive slash-and-grab would be favored immediately over gentler variants, up to the point that the host dies and doesn't pass them along.
In a later reply, The Antisocial Darwinist brought out the very interesting point that in the methods they are using with monkeys, their experimental design is to force the "pass-it-along" step, so selective factor 3 disappears. That means that factor 2 takes over, and they guarantee that the virus will be selected to be more lethal, not less.
I think the solution to the virus wars must wait ,for a new Einstein to solve the unsolvable puzzle .We are not advanced enough ,since the virus is more advanced and intelligent than humans . Before trying to fight and get read of the king Covid we should try and fix the many runny noses in winter .
Oh I didn’t say that. Maybe the other guy did. I’ve never heard of scramble competition before. How would a virus know it’s lethal?? I think it’s interesting he is applying the fight for survival to viruses which are not living conscious things. Should not they be in their own kingdom?
It isn't lost on me that the vesicle delivery systems behind mRNA vaccines could be used to deliver any sort of biological machinery into a cell, including CRISPR-Cas9 constructs. Making stable transhuman whatevers seems like a major engineering challenge, but the prospects for making horrible weapons, or half-cocked screwing around with the germ line, are easy to imagine.
Probably the most damaging element of this piece of high comedy is to the image people have of The Scientists as sober lab coat nerds. Sure, sure, this guy is management, not a laboratory researcher. Doesn't really matter. The Internet just watched an emotionally unstable homosexual have a complete breakdown into incoherent flailing rage, and that lisping morally compromised midwit just happens to be in charge of riding herd over the actual scientists. That's a PR disaster right there, that is.
I also got a hearty kek out of the exchange with the reporter where the executive says, wait you're not secretly filming me are you, this feels like one of those right wing sting operations.
"No, no, not at all!" *sultry gaze*
"Oh okay then."
We prayed to make our enemies ridiculous, and the Lord granted that and made them stupid in the bargain.
Yes, the PR disaster and the value of the video is “Watch a Pharma Bro brag about unethical research and capitalizing on the suffering of his customers in order to get laid.” That is how the video should have been marketed. The “Watch Pfizer exec admit to gain of function research” is both incorrect and boring for the MSM. Pfizer is scrubbing the video because the damage to its brand occurs in just watching the video, not in any of the actual information it contains.
Exactly, it's the ammoral Machiavellian casualness of his attitude, that confirms every suspicion we've long held regarding the sociopathic nature of those running Pharma. In addition to the GOF stuff, he also casually described (while chuckling about it) the revolving door between Pharma and Washington, and how the regulators are bought and paid for. None of this is news to us, but hearing a Pfizer Director chortling about it as if it's just the way things are done is eye opening. They are as corrupt and heartless as we thought.
Noting also that a Director position only three levels removed from the CEO is not some mid-level functionary but a high-level position. Clearly the guy is a dolt so they may have created some phony-baloney slot for this affirmative action hire, but in typical corporate governance it's a powerful position. At a minimum he would have been present at executive meetings discussing corporate strategy.
Project Veritas got themselves a big fish on this one, and they should be proud of their work. What's most amazing to me is that Pfizer would put such an obviously immature person in such a sensitive role, it's akin to corporate suicide. That's what happens when you hire to fil an AA slot (a two-fer to boot) rather than based on competence. Their foolishness is to our benefit.
“Director Position.” I’m seeing one of those “cars” they let children “drive” at the fair that have a loose steering wheel that slightly lets the child feel they are”driving” while the car is actually held on a track that it can’t jump out of. Capable of third grade-level cunning at most. Empty suit place-holder minion. Magnetic sign on the side of his car with “DIRECTOR” written on it while he eagerly waits for his master’s voice. “Assume the position, ‘Trish.’ You know why we keep YOU around to ‘direct research?’ BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME THINGS WE JUST CAN’T GET A WHITE RAT TO DO.”
This reminds me of hte Pfizer executive chuckling when testifying before congress that the vaccine was never tested on its ability to stop infection/transmission and uses "the speed of science" as an excuse.
Affirmative action is all about race. The abilities and competence of the individual cannot be examined, and a lack thereof does not eliminate the person from being handed the job. It will be interesting to see if Walker keeps his job, though. I suppose Pfizer won't dare fire him because he checks not one, but TWO equity boxes: he's both black AND gay. To take away his job would be a double whammy of racism and mark Pfizer as a white supremacist company.
Nah... harder than you think. Plus the logistics and scale of it. Word more than likely will slip out. At least as a first step get the majority to just walk right up and ask for it . You can even get them to do a vaccine passport to track them. Deal with the recalcitrants later
On a related note, do we think Pfizer would have immediately fired the guy if he’d been a straight white guy? They can’t say anything negative about him because of his double victim status.
To be sure anyone can be blackmailed and plenty of purported straight guys have unpleasant kinks a nice normal gay guy would not.
Those services were led by the cowboy types with a bit of excess machismo mindset, even if it was expressed not physically but in what they believed to be their own boundless cunning, and they were pretty susceptible to honeypots themeselves.
But anyone can be blackmailed though we might call the technique by other names. You'd be desperate if someone threatened real, plausible, horrible harm to your kids or your aged parents or your spouse.
That's what's so awful about coercion. You might have the stones to endure almost anything against yourself. But your five-year-old? Who they made scream in front of you, or over video link? You'd nobly go to law enforcement and tell 'em your baby is gonna be raped but you're doing your patriotic duty?
That's why the bad guys are bad guys. They have infinite ways of doing bad things.
We all have pressure points. I doubt any of us don't have some skeleton in our closet, or something we don't want broadcasted. And for those of us that don't have children or a spouse, there are other means...infinite means of persuasion. There is the carrot as well as the stick.
I have zero problems with any purported skeletons. I give them regular airings.
But if an evil person told me to shoot someone else's child or they would shoot mine? Better to shoot myself--but who, then, would protect my kid? There are some very dreadful things good people have been forced to do, all throughout history, and to be helpless in such circumstances is unbearable to contemplate.
Well there is a huge difference in scale. From selling out for a blow job or someone holding a gun to my head. If they have my kids, for sure Iwill do what they say. That kind of coercion isnt smart. Because retribution comes back. But the honey pot scene plays on guilt and weakness.
The reason why the honeypot works is because it is usually in the context of those already compromised. Jordan is already living a "rationalization rich" existence in his work life. I would have to rationalize a lot to be able to work there, knowing that I am indulging in behavior that doesn't benefit others and seeks to capitalize on their fear and pathology to be paid.
Sadly, this is true. One the other hand, victims need to be believed and therein lies the problem. I wish there was a nuanced way to approach this so that the wrongfully accused would not be stigmatized, and that those who are victims get justice when they have a lack of evidence to support their allegations.
Perhaps it was but the main reason was that they were subject to blackmail if they were in the closet. Security assessment made a distinction between the married guy with kids who secretly went to gay bars versus the openly homosexual.
All that being said, there is an obvious level of immaturity among many homosexuals that is hard to miss. Immaturity leads to poor judgment which is a security risk. This Pfizer clown's self-destruction when confronted is a pretty glaring example of zero self-control.
They were never subject to blackmail. MI6 has been a rat's next of homosexuality and pederasty since it was established. Blackmail was not really a factor since they had a high degree of control over the press and the courts. Ther's a masonic lodge near Cheltenham (think GCHQ) - nicknamed "Spies Lodge" - that has a history of homosexual pedophilia going back decades.
Decriminalised in 1967 and rarely prosecuted even before then. Most lived quietly and indulged privately.
It's because it was socially unacceptable and would cause a scandal, as well as their appetite leading them into trouble. This would all make them vulnerable to blackmail.
Well said. I think the public has a subconscious belief that researchers, scientists and doctors employed by mega pharmaceutical companies are seasoned, gray haired intellectuals -- sober, erudite, with impeccable credentials and resumes.
This bizarre display surely will trigger cognitive dissonance -- “there’s no way someone that ridiculous could be legitimate-- it’s clearly fake!”
That guy is most likely a reflection of the whole criminal gang called Pfizer .Would you take an injection from him ? Or for that matter from Pfizer .?
This only reinforces the idea that even though the LGBTQABCDEFG crew have brought their existence into the mainstream, they STILL remain open to exploitation..
A case study of someone who should NEVER be granted a security clearance. Can’t keep his mouth shut because he so badly wants to impress someone. Classic honeypot sting.
The scariest part: This gibbering idiot Walker actually has an MD. He was accepted by and graduated from Yale, then from a medical school. This kind of barely competent, amoral half-wit could be assigned to provide medical care to any of us.
That a pathological liar like Fauci could rise in inverse proportion to his skill as an MD should have provided slam dunk evidence of the level and penetration of medical fraud in institutional medicine.
Jordon Walker is merely a symptom of the disease called allopathic medicine. Now, what’s the cure??
Yes, I was thinking about the Fauci parallel, too. Like Fauci, Walker went directly from med school to a bureaucratic job, not a residency. For some reason they didn't match.
What's the cure, though? Beats me, but I'm worried about the increasing degree to which our life-and-death medical decisions are dominated by arrogant, unpricipled management weenies.
Medical tourism. Private clinics are more affordable than people think. I wouldn't set foot in a US healthcare facility today. I do worry about getting in a car accident though. If I wore some kind of health bracelet that directed me to a local vet I'm not sure they would honor it. I would prefer that option.
We have a lot of those Medi-clinics that have sprouted up all over the place. But have you ever sought treatment at one since the Plandemic was foisted on us? Do they ask for vaxx status and refuse to treat purebloods?
Auto accidents worry me, too. Ambulances probably have instructions to take the injured to the nearest local hospital.
...no doubt by design. Big Pharma routed the people to their clotshots and toxins by blocking access to inexpensive and wildly successful off-label antivirals whose names are familiar to all: Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.
They have also made it next to impossible to find physicians and healthcare givers who will treat Covid with these successful interventions.
Big Medicine is beholden to the deadly protocols used in hospitals to this day. They enrich these villains with untold wealth on the backs of the maimed and dead.
I once had a conversation with a women who had gone through Oxbridge then a law conversion with top marks in *everything*, a First, *everything*. Her CV was immaculate.
We started talking about cultural relativism. The PhD to her right got the definition wrong, then once we got back on the right track I asked "is there a single, objective reality: if we don't agree then we can't discuss anything of worth because your version is different from mine". This woman screwed up her face and squealed "this is just like tutorials back at Oxford!"
A very ordinary question that any educated person should be able to think about and discuss sensibly and she just packed it in. Amazing.
“The whole educational and professional training system is a very elaborate filter, which just weeds out people who are too independent, and who think for themselves, and who don't know how to be submissive, and so on -- because they're dysfunctional to the institutions.”
I’ve had similar experiences. Very unsettling. Cultural relativism is poisoning the minds of our young people, making them complicit in their own demise.
Obviously someone who hasn’t a clue about Objectivism…a model student of Marxist grooming. When you can disabuse the mind of objective truth, you can program it to accept anything. And we have seen the bitter fruit from that rotten tree most clearly over the past three years. The number of persons who passively accept the fear porn of the demagogue from his evil rostrum far outnumber those with the capacity for critical thought and discernment.
So many years, our schools have taught us not how to think but WHAT to think. Now we see what the cognitive rot this plunge into mysticism and relativism has done to the minds of so many.
Schools can't teach critical thinking .You either have it or not .I think the unthinkable has become reality ,that a good part of the population is permanently retarded . It's on display anywhere we look .
The scariest part2, Phizer employees do not have to be jabbed. So for him this is all about 'other sheeple'....but, if you have sex with a [freshly?] jabbed person you can get transfected, so...he may have to bear his own jab damages...if he lives that long.
He has an MD?! I didn’t trust doctors *before* seeing this, but I will view them even more negatively now. Any unstable, self absorbed, moral degenerate can get into AND graduate from medical school. Unreal.
He has rightly earned the absolute scorn of decent people.
Interesting how David Hogg, the Parkland FL student, got rejected by 19 colleges, then after becoming a celebrated anti gun activist was admitted to Harvard.
I'm confident that 20 years ago, there were a few "diversity" students, but it's changed dramatically in the last 10 years. That's the reason for the pending lawsuit at SCOTUS, b/c many qualified applicants--many Asian-American--have been denied admission in favor of less-qualified applicants who were accepted for "diversity, equity, & inclusion."
An Ivy League degree is worth almost nothing now. SAT scores & high school GPAs are often not factors in college admissions.
The type of gain of function research as Walker describes has been going on for many decades. This wasn't news to me. It's actually a standard research line in virology. Walker's admissions are simply a little more evidence on top of a huge mountain of evidence already existing that covid and its "vaccines" are an operation for financial, political and globalist power. The fundamental nature and purpose of this operation haven't changed because of Walker's admissions: covid's hospitalization and fatality rates have been falsely inflated by 300-400% for the purpose of instilling enough fear so that people will comply with any political restrictions and mandates, and inject themselves with multiple toxins that don't work and cause more illnesses, medical conditions and deaths to people under 60 than covid does. Covid and its toxins are political and financial weapons.
Agree. It was obvious to all that cared to see that the fatality rate was exaggerated. It was amazing, among all the shouting about “cases,” that information about the actual risk profile was absent. No one in media asked the obvious question, “so how risky is this virus, anyway?” By the summer of 2020 the answer was clear: if you were under 60, it was not very dangerous at all. Fear or no fear, It still angers me that so many were willing to throw the young under the bus to protect themselves.
No one in the media asked the even more obvious question , "is there really a harmful virus out there in the first place?" Obvious if only because of The Disinformation Dozen doing their best to inform us that there isn't, never was, never will be, & getting censored to the max. IF "the media" had a shred of credibility, they'd want to know about that.
I really didn't hear anything from Walker that surprised me. Of course, Pfizer is in business to make money. Of course, they are trying to get ahead of the next variant. Certainly, they are using animal models to do it, duh.
What surprised me the most, was O'Keefe's misrepresentation of what Walker said. Walker made it clear, despite being drunk, that they were developing variants to get ahead of the actual mutations that might be expected of the virus. His date even asked if it was gain-of-function research and Walker said, "not really." He was aware that it might look bad, and would obviously be a problem if their lab produced variants got out, but he did not in any way suggest that Pfizer was wanting that to happen.
Despite this, O'Keefe basically said that Pfizer was developing gain-of-function variants that they could release into the wild so that they could sell more jabs. Complete, fabrication of what Walker actually said.
I am no fan of Pfizer. But, if Veritas is literally in the name of your endeavor, I expect some veritas.
Good points. However, if mistakes could be made in wuhan, they could certainly happen at a lab in the US. I’m sure most employees are trying to save lives and not end them, regardless of how dangerous the jab might be. Carelessness can do a lot of damage. I’m not sure how you mitigate against that in the absence of ethical concerns at the top of the organization. If desired, Fail safe systems can be put in place. Because of what has happened in the recent past, distrust of this organization is warranted. That’s really the takeaway from this. If the public generally trusted that these organizations had any ethical principles, then your analysis would matter more. Yes, you can expect these orgs to do this sort of thing. No, you can’t trust them to do it well and safely.
A job is a job. Regardless of what the recruiter says in order to gain your interest and willingness to be underpaid, the actual job is different. A lab technician is not a top-of-her-class with her eyes on the dewy future of womankind. She is a lab rate, probably with a child or two at home to care for and a challenging relationship with her parents. No emotional support. Any philosophy she gained in college is wearing thin.
I never saw a corporate ethicist job in all the companies I worked for. I'm puzzled just thinking about it - what would they actually do? Without jeopardizing their job?
Exactly! Very insightfully stated! directed evolution or gain of function, it's all part of the same scam of lies and deception by these fake scientists trying to outdo Dr. Frankenstein; humanity is just one big experiment started in a petri dish ; these psychopathic clowns are the self-appointed and self-anointed "new gods" of the globalist tyranny and it is only for us to worship and obey; Walker is just another one of their stooges who is expendable and will be discarded very soon; Nature will not be fooled or outdone by these egomaniacs and masters of hubris and that includes the bacteria and viruses that have been with us since the beginning of time. "Satanism is not a 'belief in Satan' but the false pursuit to self-deify oneself."(Taylor Marshall in "Antichrist and Apocalypse")
Ah so. The PCR test is just another weapon in the conspiricists’ aresenal. Its results are used to justify the . . . [drum-rolling here] horrifying and rising statistics of the infected and dead. As long as the PCR test remains the world’s litmus test, we know we are being lied to.
Thank you for one of the best (& most succinct) commentaries on this Project Veritas release!
Most of us realise that messing with viral evolution is not exactly new, & was most likely the cause of this whole shebang. Most of us also wouldn't be surprised at whatever shady practice that Pfizer is contemplating.
The most interesting part of this, to my thinking, is the way this has grabbed so much public attention (even if not yet the mainstream media).
Throughout the pandemic one of the elite’s primary advantages has been incredulity. The fact that they do so remarkably stupid things, and employ astoundingly ridiculous people. The sheer idiocy is hard to believe for many people, and so they get away with it.
This seems to be such a case. Many simply cant believe pfizer would give a director-title to such a frivolous unserious person like this Jordan character, who would sit on a date with a stranger and reveal corporate secrets for the chance to get laid. And so the story gets little traction.
He was Pfizer's Sam Brinton. Does anyone doubt that if he remained on the job he'd end up on a Veritas video explaining how easy it was to obtain spent fuel rods?
Spot-on. People just cannot accept the extent to which American civilization has degenerated into a clown world that is beyond parody -- despite the excess of evidence.
Now that meritocracy has been denounced by the marxists, I’m curious to know if DIE departments are responsible for the hire of marginally competent, totally unprofessional, unserious buggers like this.
Cream of the crop is hard enough to find, let alone limiting the talent pool to a series of checked boxes. Marginally competent is the rule just about everywhere now.
This is what happens in a world made of lies: one questions everything (a good thing imo) or accepts anything (typical). The Hamlin story, this event, the covid debacle (intentionally created, some would say) and all the ones too numerous to mention have the effect of causing people to automatically defer to "I don't believe anything I can't verify with my own eyes and ears", or the other, "Of course it's true, or false, as the case may be. MSM or an expert just told me it is ".
We've gotten to a point where it doesn't matter what is said, the general normie public is too dumb and/or lazy to care. And that's assuming the general normie public will even be exposed to this story and these true statements about Pfizer's gain of function research to make billions more on a pile of dead and injured bodies.
Ecohealth Alliance did this exact thing Jordon Walker proudly proclaimed Pfizer does/will do......and at the behest of the US government in a Chinese biolab. This is well known and documented. And still no one cares.
They scariest part about this is not that evil entities are engineering viruses to be more deadly/communicable to maximize profit and suffering of the masses. But it's that they are doing it in the open, admitting they are doing it, laughing in our faces about it, while the normietards call us "conspiracy theorists"...
They are simply unable to imagine how they would act in a moral situation: these people are stealing from the shop I'm currently in -> stand helplessly and watch before turning back to the aisles with a vague sense of discontent.
It's not that the 'vaccine' is a 'flop'. It's that it was never about addressing a virus. It's all an astounding lie and manipulation to get people injected with a harmful and sometime deadly jab. And our DoD is behind it - per Katherine Watts and Sasha Latypova's work -. FFS.
that could well be. However. I find it counter productive to paint as an equal opportunity gay black hire. Who cares? Too often we here in our echo chamber drag the kitchen sink into an issue. You want to redpill folk to a 'minumum standard' where they can accept the government lies and it appears the vaxxes are dangerous (eg), and others in our movement are mad because you dont press the issue of genocide. Baby steps people. Never gonna get anywhere but backwards you start talking genocide with your typical normie.
Same with talking homosexuality and equal opportunity in connection with this young Walker. What point is being made? The guy, if valid, is a sociopath. Who said some interesting things. It detracts to start moaning and whining about equal opportunity hires.....
I have to agree with your assessment of this research.
What has more potential for catastrophe, as GVB has been trying to pound into people's heads from the start, is the usage of these non-sterilizing mRNA injections during the height of an outbreak, which drives the viral evolution far beyond what natural immunity would allow.
We, as in "Humanity" in fact have been chosen by big pharma to be the monkeys.
GVB is completely wrong so far. Where is the disaster that he has been warning us about? I know almost only vaccinated people and all of them cleared Covid just fine. He is an alarmist and should most likely be ignored.
right. ignore him until proven correct. of course, by that time we may all be dead. when it comes to "vaccination", safety must be proved before authorization, not after.
He is still wrong, there is no deadly Covid variant for the vaccinated. The vaccines are toxic, useless and likely even promote infections but there is no desaster.
If the virus is sterilized (killed) in the host, there's no more virus in that host.
Therefore, no virus to pass on to others.
By targeting only the spike protein, vaccinated people continue to host the viable viruses and they do what viruses do.
They multiply and mutate.
When they mutate into something deadly that we have no more antibodies against, we all die, not just the vaccinated, and not just the pristine unvaxxed.
A very accurate, perceptive take on this Project Veritas expose, citing the panic in the MSM to sanitize every link between Pfizer and Walker. When a company is guilty of an embarrassing lapse of professionalism, that’s what you do!
But I must take issue with one statement:“Vaccinator hysteria, however, has created an enormous global market for on-target Covid boosters.” There’s no natural market for this fraud injection protocol. It has been exposed and debunked totally. Only through coercion - an operative method of compliance from the outset reinforced by the medical establishment, social and mainstream media, and the Deep State globalist cabal (but I repeat myself!) - could this market be created and maintained.
[In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research.]
Here's how big companies do it: they outsource the dirty work to a smaller company, or they spin off a division to create the appearance of separation.
They still develop the game plan and call the shots.
Then when the op gets exposed, they can make statements like above that are technically true.
And by the time that happens, they've co-opted regulators, compromised lawmakers, and de-fanged all opposition through monetary gifts and cancel campaigns.
Paint a hapless chap as [the only] bad actor, toss that mid-level sacrificial lamb on the fire, pay the "hefty fine" and keep on moving...
Although in this case, there probably won't be any fines.
What's comical is that they're called "health care" companies when what they're really doing is developing new ways to kill people for the war machine, under the fuzzy warm blanket statement of "prevention."
They use defense against "the forces of evil" who could be developing weapons of mass destruction as cover to do it themselves.
Pair that with the extraordinary hubris to think that humans could hope to predict, in a highly controlled laboratory setting, what living organisms will do in the wild and how they will evolve in the REAL world and you can see that we have a group of people playing with fire who may have high IQ, but are hopelessly and dangerously naive.
How can we implant Icarian wings on these big corporations?
It’s tempting to believe hubris is the sickness of our age. Among the ruling classes there seems to be no recognition of the limitations of our current knowledge. I’m not so worried about transhumanism, except as a toxic pipe dream, because the current state of our abilities along those lines is incredibly crude.
This is how intelligence does it too, not just companies. Walker, in that position, would likely know about the "dirty work" (I have been in that camp) subcontracted out. Nowhere does Walker claim the work was NOT subcontracted. Most definitely was.
They can honest to say we didn't do it BUT we paid someone else to do it for us. Which is the same as doing it. Just slows down the realization to the public that, yes, in fact they did do it all along.
The media (non) reaction is far more interesting than the content of Walkers leaks.
The idea that this was all an elaborate setup by Pfizer gives them so much credit it’s mind numbing: they install a fake executive years in advance, to have him fake leak embarrassing intel to a fake gay date, only to then use their media leverage to block the entire story, and scrub his fake existence from the internet. Did they set up project veritas too?
Honestly I can’t deal with the hyper conspiracy loyalists amongst our movement, I’m starting to counter conspiracy theory them and label them as pharma double agents.
Veritas used a contact from Pfizer to set up the date. The said they were alerted about Walker by an former employee. You really think Pfizer couldn't have set the whole thing up? It would have been easy, and the reason is because people like you love to fetch balls. why would they? Well, most normies just saw ZomgRightwingerVeritasAntiSciencers!!!! harassing a gay, black man on the verge of tears they catfish and physically assaulted. The lack of being able to see the big picture is gonna sink us. This isn't even a conspiracy theory, it is good pre-suit ground salting. Maybe if our side quit getting legal advice from paralegals...
Of course the FizerNazis organized this little gay date nite interlude of comic relief for your edification. Indeed you ARE sucking it up hook, line and sinker. You think the RAND CORP always writes their scripts at the last minute?
MSM can’t acknowledge this video without giving project veritas credibility or at least making people start thinking in the direction the video would take them, therefore they will not show it like many things they don’t show. No matter what anyone thinks of the video - there is a targeted manipulation of information by the government, MSM, big tech, and big pharma that none of us can seemingly do anything about now or in the future. I can’t see the solution to end all of this other than the end times are approaching.
Au contraire, one could spot a lab leak by looking at the virus and identifying its lineage. One might recall that Omicron had a lineage that had already ended prior to it suddenly appearing.
The lineage it was from had already gone extinct some time before it appeared. To revive that lineage a SARS-CoV-2 variant would have to devolve back to that lineage before evolving into Omicron, that is is so statistically unlikely as to be deemed impossible.
There is no evidence of this, not only that, but it is the only case of SARS-CoV-2 I am aware of that has ever reappeared. If there were unknown reservoirs there should be other instances of other variants lineages that were thought extinct reappearing too.
Do we know historically that it "existed" earlier? I thought it was just comparative genetics that indicated that it came from a line that branched off from before original Wuhan covid.
There was a phylogenetic network analysis that showed the evolution of the different variants. Unfortunately I don't have an eidetic memory, Omicron IIRC had evolved from the original, however there was a break where that particular genetic line ended, Omicron then appeared some months IIRC after that genetic line was no longer detectable globally.
Great take as always, E, but I am pushing back on this statement "I’ll be honest: I don’t think what Walker describes is necessarily dangerous. The virus is already training itself against vaccine-elicited antibodies in billions of people." I am speaking as an evolutionary microbiologist, and I believe this couldn't be farther from the truth, and what they did is inherently gain-of-function in terms of enhancing virulence.
Here's my reasoning -- in nature, viruses experience three primary types of selection. The first is what you describe, which is selection to overcome immune defenses in a population that has experience with the virus. The second is selection just to make more viruses during an infection -- "scramble competition" it is called, basically favoring whichever genotype can plow through the host the fastest before killing the host or getting stopped by the immune response. And the third is selection for transmission between hosts. That is partially related to the scramble competition, but favors other things like presence in bodily fluids, survival time outside the body and so forth.
My point is that in nature, there's expected to be a tension between scramble competition -- which favors lethality -- and transmission competition, which at least in respiratory viruses favors moderate illness because it inevitably prioritizes infection of the upper respiratory tract which is uncomfortable but not dangerous. But in a laboratory serial passage experiment, my understanding is that one animal is typically directly infected by a previous animal by intentional mobilization of infectious material by the experimenters, or by placing them together one-on-one in close contact. That is going to significantly reduce the power of selection for transmissivity and favor the scramble competition evolution of virulence. It's going to make a more dangerous virus, every time.
Like you say, there's no need for serial passage experiments in a world where massive PCR+sequencing monitoring is going on for vaxx resistant mutations, and where you can chemically synthesize any mRNA you want at a moments notice to make a new vaccine. The only reason for them to be doing serial passage imho is to look for more lethal variants, possibly to develop non-vaccine therapeutics like paxlovid or something.
I don’t have a science background, so I would have never thought of the risks here you describe, so thank you for your very reader friendly version of it- I do appreciate that. I also read an article on substack by Kevin McKernan where he takes it even one step further and describes that these medicines of molnupiravir and paxlovid (which have the special EUA status and are liability free) are also already mutating the virus into other vaccine evading strains. So the irony here being that they want even more basic treatments doing even more mutations sounds incredibly dangerous too.
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/directed-evolution-iii
In truth, RNA viruses are NEVER mutation supply limited. You can do the math (I won't to keep from boring people) but every possible amino acid change of every protein in the COVID genome occurs by chance in every single infected patient many times over. So what Pfizer is doing isn't going to make anything that doesn't exist in nature somewhere. The difference is that without natural selection for a mutation, it will never be common, so in nature the nasty lethal variants will probably never be important because they are outcompeted rapidly by less dangerous versions. But if you make a crapload of lethal virus in the lab and it gets out, it will burn a nasty hole in the population before it can get knocked back by its more temperate descendants.
The human immune system has been evolving over millions of years. So has human ingenuity! Both were purposely thwarted by Fauci and the greedy CDC/NIH establishment as they salivated over future profits from a half baked gene therapy that could be tested on a gullible world! But FIRST they needed to prevent any other valid treatment from entering the market… this is where the even greedier “Media” entered the scene..heavily invested in Big Pharma! My educated guess is that Sars Covid 2 is mostly a bust with no more lethality than the annual flu if it werent for the homicidal psychopaths running our “Health Care Apparatus”..
I’m so frustrated because no one is stopping them, and they are getting bolder. We might end up with that nasty hole and even then- will someone finally stop them? Covid killed many of the weak, and still we see no actual push back- in any of the countries.
If you want a vision of the future, imagine a basement lab churning out deadly pathogens, forever.
People don't understand how trivially simple some of this technology is. Any two-bit rogue country on Earth could replicate the experiment described in that Veritas video and create a new plague. You don't need any of the expensive infrastructure required for things like nukes or chemical weapons -- just the apparatus available in nearly any hospital microbiology lab in the world.
Meanwhile, our FBI devoted 80(!) agents to censor “misinformation” on Twitter. All of our agencies are so wholly incompetent right now.
Originally it was 95, but they had to reassign 15 to investigate the pull rope on Bubba Wallace's garage door.
No I think we do-- just look at the braintrust doing it in the US. Very clear it is simple and you dont need anything except narcissistic useful idiots with a god complex. Research science has ALWAYS been like this. The only thing more prevelant in these times is the narcissism and the greed.
WEll, the serial passage in monkeys is a concern though. You don't do that in your basement.
Sure you could, if you had access to monkeys. Lots of monkeys in some countries -- in some cities in India you gotta put locks on your refrigerator to keep them out of your groceries.
But it could just as easily be done in mice. "Humanized mice" cost a lot to create initially, but they are just like any other mouse now in terms of raising them. And with CRISPR-CAS tech, making them from scratch these days would even be fairly trivial.
Does a virus really mutate that much to be “lethal” to one person and harmless and even asymptomatic to another? Can we ascribe the different of outcome solely to the virus— or is it largely dependent on host conditions?
I think this is a great question because I also think there are so many many variables. One of the variables will be the temperature that they could keep the vials and whether they hit an area on the arm with a large capillary bed. Plus some people’s immune systems just might be better tuned at the beginning and they got lucky with the spike proteins only ending up in one or two areas of the body. It’s hard to tell. It’s also why its important to track men’s sperm counts and that Israeli study is so definitive- they tested sperm donors before and after the jabs. Tracking women and their fertility is so much more difficult because of all of the variable factors too.
Exactly. Infectious clones like talked about JJ Couey. He suggests the danger is only the lab created purity.
I have a question for you, since you said you were an evolutionary biologist. What do you think the purpose or function of viruses are, in terms of their relationship to human adaptation?
They are just making a living for themselves, there's no bigger story than that. Like all other biological entities they just reproduce, and mutations that make them better at doing that get selected.
I don’t think it’s random. Everything in nature shows some kind of symbiotic relationship. Everything has evolved in context and in conjunction with other things that have a functionality, and maybe that is simply toward a goal of homeostasis or diversity or growth control. Because viruses use your genetic material to reproduce (and what they are reproducing is simply genetic material), and it quickly spreads through a geographic region, could it be a way to quickly adjust a species to its environment? I really don't think any thing here is random. Just yesterday I was talking with my son who asked me what my favorite animal was, and I said bird. And as I unpacked the reason, I realized that one cool thing about birds is how they disseminate seeds, and diversify a landscape. And they also eat bugs, and various insects that could be, in larger out of control numbers, could be a problem for the plants and trees that it helped plant. In a way, birds take care of the plant kingdom and also the soil. Rachel Carson's Silent Spring documents how horrific a landscape becomes when birds or their food is dessimated. I think viruses play an important role in human adaptation but I have never had a real conversation about it with someone who spends time in this field.
That is so interesting. It reminds me of the Rockefeller experiments on polio virus in the 1910s, serial passaging it through monkeys, and by direct injection into their brain, which selected for neural strains, or developed some kind of affinity with neural cells. This is thought to be the cause of the 1916 polio outbreak which started in Brooklyn, just a few subway stops from the Rockefeller Institute. Basically every big outbreak we have had the last century is probably the result of laboratory experimentation of viruses, doing exactly this, serial passaging them through animals. Even RSV came from laboratory animals.
Delighted to find you here circleofmamas! Found your website sometime in the last year and LOVE what you’re doing. I recommend it to anyone and everyone. AND I’m doing my part in the quiet guerilla communication needed in this age of censorship -- leaving your vax info sticky notes in public places. If the tech giants, telecom, govt, and academia shut down the large, broadcast message, then we “go small.”
Vaccine risks were not on my radar when I had my first baby almost 20 years ago. One kind acquaintance -- a mother of 5 whose firstborn was vax injured -- handed me a book that changed my mind forever and empowered me to keep my kids all completely unvaccinated in confidence. One person cared about me and my unborn baby. One act of kindness changed my trajectory for life, for me and for my children. This is how we win. By having the courage of our convictions to gently but earnestly speak what is true to anyone who will listen. To spark a flash of curiosity in someone who is even nominally receptive to the information. To make angry the entrenched opponent who will see the information on a sticky note and angrily comb through the linked research to “prove” their stance, and come away reluctantly converted.
We win in the end, because we have God on our side.
Keep up the good work.
it's weird we have all of these fun reassortant viruses after successfully resurrecting ones like the 1918 Spanish flu et al, seems to be common game now as the guy who was entrapped on the video laid out, everyone spinning up novel revenue streams for their companies to rake in mandated government-sponsored profits to further spam our lives with more solutions to mysteriously happening problems (how many Pfizer/BioNTech ads lately?)
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/reconstruction-1918-virus.html
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1002842
See the Dr. Thomas Cowan interview with the electrical engineer Shimon (forget his last name) who researched the 1918 Spanish Flu and its relation to the vaccine scam that was rolled out way back then. Hint: “0utbreaks” followed the “vaccine” everywhere it was distributed. Fauci studied this carefully and applied the lessons to this scamdemic.)
I think you are going to like this Arkmedic article if you haven’t read it yet...
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/the-killing-fields-of-samoa
Thank you for the lead, very interesting as I happen to know some people in Fiji.
Monkey pox?
Entrapped?
You have ignored a real fact. A LETHAL virus deselects itself as it reduces its own ability to reproduce and pass to further hosts. As we saw with Omicron and the other variants, viri generally mutate to be MORE INFECTIOUS and LESS LETHAL. This is the ideal evolutionary path.
Both less infectious and more lethal are less optimum and tend to be deselected. We would have been mostly wiped out many times if this were not reality.
Are you talking to me? I never mentioned lethality. Because largely lethality varies on the conditions of the host. How can the same virus be asymptomatic for one person but deadly for another? I don’t think any virus wants to kill its host.
"My point is that in nature, there's expected to be a tension between scramble competition -- which favors lethality -"
That was you.
I believe that was The Antisocial Darwinist above who brought that up. The idea he raised was that there were three different selective vectors acting on viral evolution: 1) ability to evade host immune system; 2) ability to out-reproduce other viruses in the host body -- "scramble competition"; and 3) the ability to spread to other hosts.
What he said was that "scramble competition" means exploiting the host as much as possible as quickly as possible, which tends to be lethal to the host. The ability to spread to other hosts is a different selective vector, and that one favors keeping the host alive. Since both are acting, one may be more important than the other. As you point out, that third selective factor may be more powerful than the second, as presumably was the case with Omicron.
The idea of scramble competition is interesting then. If a host is co infected with different pathogens, the sum is greater the parts, meaning, that each virus for example may scramble for dominance in the host resulting in a worse infection? That would require the host response to elicit a stronger response?
That's an angle I hadn't considered. I had been thinking of the natural selection operating on different mutational variants of a single pathogen. In either case, though, mutations that favor aggressive slash-and-grab would be favored immediately over gentler variants, up to the point that the host dies and doesn't pass them along.
In a later reply, The Antisocial Darwinist brought out the very interesting point that in the methods they are using with monkeys, their experimental design is to force the "pass-it-along" step, so selective factor 3 disappears. That means that factor 2 takes over, and they guarantee that the virus will be selected to be more lethal, not less.
I think the solution to the virus wars must wait ,for a new Einstein to solve the unsolvable puzzle .We are not advanced enough ,since the virus is more advanced and intelligent than humans . Before trying to fight and get read of the king Covid we should try and fix the many runny noses in winter .
Oh I didn’t say that. Maybe the other guy did. I’ve never heard of scramble competition before. How would a virus know it’s lethal?? I think it’s interesting he is applying the fight for survival to viruses which are not living conscious things. Should not they be in their own kingdom?
It isn't lost on me that the vesicle delivery systems behind mRNA vaccines could be used to deliver any sort of biological machinery into a cell, including CRISPR-Cas9 constructs. Making stable transhuman whatevers seems like a major engineering challenge, but the prospects for making horrible weapons, or half-cocked screwing around with the germ line, are easy to imagine.
Probably the most damaging element of this piece of high comedy is to the image people have of The Scientists as sober lab coat nerds. Sure, sure, this guy is management, not a laboratory researcher. Doesn't really matter. The Internet just watched an emotionally unstable homosexual have a complete breakdown into incoherent flailing rage, and that lisping morally compromised midwit just happens to be in charge of riding herd over the actual scientists. That's a PR disaster right there, that is.
I also got a hearty kek out of the exchange with the reporter where the executive says, wait you're not secretly filming me are you, this feels like one of those right wing sting operations.
"No, no, not at all!" *sultry gaze*
"Oh okay then."
We prayed to make our enemies ridiculous, and the Lord granted that and made them stupid in the bargain.
Yes, the PR disaster and the value of the video is “Watch a Pharma Bro brag about unethical research and capitalizing on the suffering of his customers in order to get laid.” That is how the video should have been marketed. The “Watch Pfizer exec admit to gain of function research” is both incorrect and boring for the MSM. Pfizer is scrubbing the video because the damage to its brand occurs in just watching the video, not in any of the actual information it contains.
Exactly, it's the ammoral Machiavellian casualness of his attitude, that confirms every suspicion we've long held regarding the sociopathic nature of those running Pharma. In addition to the GOF stuff, he also casually described (while chuckling about it) the revolving door between Pharma and Washington, and how the regulators are bought and paid for. None of this is news to us, but hearing a Pfizer Director chortling about it as if it's just the way things are done is eye opening. They are as corrupt and heartless as we thought.
Noting also that a Director position only three levels removed from the CEO is not some mid-level functionary but a high-level position. Clearly the guy is a dolt so they may have created some phony-baloney slot for this affirmative action hire, but in typical corporate governance it's a powerful position. At a minimum he would have been present at executive meetings discussing corporate strategy.
Project Veritas got themselves a big fish on this one, and they should be proud of their work. What's most amazing to me is that Pfizer would put such an obviously immature person in such a sensitive role, it's akin to corporate suicide. That's what happens when you hire to fil an AA slot (a two-fer to boot) rather than based on competence. Their foolishness is to our benefit.
agree w the AA idea. this guy checks two boxes for pfizer. maybe three if you include "handicapped" (mentally).
“Director Position.” I’m seeing one of those “cars” they let children “drive” at the fair that have a loose steering wheel that slightly lets the child feel they are”driving” while the car is actually held on a track that it can’t jump out of. Capable of third grade-level cunning at most. Empty suit place-holder minion. Magnetic sign on the side of his car with “DIRECTOR” written on it while he eagerly waits for his master’s voice. “Assume the position, ‘Trish.’ You know why we keep YOU around to ‘direct research?’ BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME THINGS WE JUST CAN’T GET A WHITE RAT TO DO.”
This reminds me of hte Pfizer executive chuckling when testifying before congress that the vaccine was never tested on its ability to stop infection/transmission and uses "the speed of science" as an excuse.
Affirmative action is all about race. The abilities and competence of the individual cannot be examined, and a lack thereof does not eliminate the person from being handed the job. It will be interesting to see if Walker keeps his job, though. I suppose Pfizer won't dare fire him because he checks not one, but TWO equity boxes: he's both black AND gay. To take away his job would be a double whammy of racism and mark Pfizer as a white supremacist company.
Homophobic too.
Reminds me of that other mentally unstable flaming Pfizer fag they got on camera earlier who wanted to force-vaccinate people using blow-darts.
If they put the vaxx in food than we are all 100% vaxxed .
Aren’t they already engineering mosquitoes to do this?
Nah... harder than you think. Plus the logistics and scale of it. Word more than likely will slip out. At least as a first step get the majority to just walk right up and ask for it . You can even get them to do a vaccine passport to track them. Deal with the recalcitrants later
This is why MI5 and 6 used to ban homosexuals from joining.
Now they just ban straight, white, able bodied, mentally robust, cis gendered people with XY chromosomes.
/S
Banning competence in favor of incompetence is the core of the bioleninist doctrine. It's a bold strategy but it has a tendency to backfire.
As for example, in this case.
On a related note, do we think Pfizer would have immediately fired the guy if he’d been a straight white guy? They can’t say anything negative about him because of his double victim status.
For a second there I thought I was the only one who saw this.
At least they would have to take out a fingernail or two on me to get me to admit that kind of criminality.
To be sure anyone can be blackmailed and plenty of purported straight guys have unpleasant kinks a nice normal gay guy would not.
Those services were led by the cowboy types with a bit of excess machismo mindset, even if it was expressed not physically but in what they believed to be their own boundless cunning, and they were pretty susceptible to honeypots themeselves.
To be sure. Most moral men cant be honeypotted. There are many moral men and women who wont be bought.
But anyone can be blackmailed though we might call the technique by other names. You'd be desperate if someone threatened real, plausible, horrible harm to your kids or your aged parents or your spouse.
That's what's so awful about coercion. You might have the stones to endure almost anything against yourself. But your five-year-old? Who they made scream in front of you, or over video link? You'd nobly go to law enforcement and tell 'em your baby is gonna be raped but you're doing your patriotic duty?
That's why the bad guys are bad guys. They have infinite ways of doing bad things.
We all have pressure points. I doubt any of us don't have some skeleton in our closet, or something we don't want broadcasted. And for those of us that don't have children or a spouse, there are other means...infinite means of persuasion. There is the carrot as well as the stick.
I have zero problems with any purported skeletons. I give them regular airings.
But if an evil person told me to shoot someone else's child or they would shoot mine? Better to shoot myself--but who, then, would protect my kid? There are some very dreadful things good people have been forced to do, all throughout history, and to be helpless in such circumstances is unbearable to contemplate.
Mr Pelosi is your guy there.
Well there is a huge difference in scale. From selling out for a blow job or someone holding a gun to my head. If they have my kids, for sure Iwill do what they say. That kind of coercion isnt smart. Because retribution comes back. But the honey pot scene plays on guilt and weakness.
The reason why the honeypot works is because it is usually in the context of those already compromised. Jordan is already living a "rationalization rich" existence in his work life. I would have to rationalize a lot to be able to work there, knowing that I am indulging in behavior that doesn't benefit others and seeks to capitalize on their fear and pathology to be paid.
That coercion is very smart because life isn't a movie and retribution comes rarely to those who most deserve it.
Honeypots start with basic instincts and then they often get much stickier. And the morally smug often get trapped the worst. They're so easy to read.
the funny part about kompromat is that it doesn't actually have to have any basis in reality
Some things, like rape or pedophilia, can get you lynched by the mere accusation, with no evidence being required at any point
The funny thing. There are few lynchings or retribution crimes.
Sadly, this is true. One the other hand, victims need to be believed and therein lies the problem. I wish there was a nuanced way to approach this so that the wrongfully accused would not be stigmatized, and that those who are victims get justice when they have a lack of evidence to support their allegations.
Nuance isn't required
No evidence, no crime
its innocent until proven beyond reasonable doubt guilty, not "you get the rope if someone cries for it enough"
previously we had the former, but now our society is governed by the latter, with no attempt to verify even being attempted after they lynch you
But then. they probably wouldn't be Pfizer employees either.
Exactly.
When was that? MI6 has been riddled with pederasts since it began.
Weren't Burgess and Maclean batting from the other end? Yes I bet there are some deeply odd people in there. We'll never know.
Yes - we do know. Burgess and Maclean were indeed batting from the other end. Here's another example: https://www.winterwatch.net/2022/01/freemasons-pedophilia-and-the-case-of-keith-harding/
There are many more.
This crossed my mind as well.
IS it? Or was it because homosexuality was a crime in the UK?
Perhaps it was but the main reason was that they were subject to blackmail if they were in the closet. Security assessment made a distinction between the married guy with kids who secretly went to gay bars versus the openly homosexual.
All that being said, there is an obvious level of immaturity among many homosexuals that is hard to miss. Immaturity leads to poor judgment which is a security risk. This Pfizer clown's self-destruction when confronted is a pretty glaring example of zero self-control.
They were never subject to blackmail. MI6 has been a rat's next of homosexuality and pederasty since it was established. Blackmail was not really a factor since they had a high degree of control over the press and the courts. Ther's a masonic lodge near Cheltenham (think GCHQ) - nicknamed "Spies Lodge" - that has a history of homosexual pedophilia going back decades.
According to JFK TO 9/11, EVERYTHING IS A RICH MAN'S TRICK, blackmailable ppl are exactly what the ruling elites WANT.
TY. will watch it.
Decriminalised in 1967 and rarely prosecuted even before then. Most lived quietly and indulged privately.
It's because it was socially unacceptable and would cause a scandal, as well as their appetite leading them into trouble. This would all make them vulnerable to blackmail.
Nowadays it’s almost like being straight has been criminalized.
Homosexuality is one of the most disgusting activities I can imagine ,it's like eating your own shit .Sex with the opposite sex can be messy enough .
Yup--but "vulnerable to blackmail" is GOOD.
Well said. I think the public has a subconscious belief that researchers, scientists and doctors employed by mega pharmaceutical companies are seasoned, gray haired intellectuals -- sober, erudite, with impeccable credentials and resumes.
This bizarre display surely will trigger cognitive dissonance -- “there’s no way someone that ridiculous could be legitimate-- it’s clearly fake!”
Project Veritas has done the world a huge favor by just letting this person show us who he is on video.
That guy is most likely a reflection of the whole criminal gang called Pfizer .Would you take an injection from him ? Or for that matter from Pfizer .?
"Wait ... I let a product designed by THAT guy into my DNA?"
Hands up if you DIDN'T clench at that statement.
This only reinforces the idea that even though the LGBTQABCDEFG crew have brought their existence into the mainstream, they STILL remain open to exploitation..
*the accurate idea.
A case study of someone who should NEVER be granted a security clearance. Can’t keep his mouth shut because he so badly wants to impress someone. Classic honeypot sting.
STD's must be a bitch though.
The scariest part: This gibbering idiot Walker actually has an MD. He was accepted by and graduated from Yale, then from a medical school. This kind of barely competent, amoral half-wit could be assigned to provide medical care to any of us.
That a pathological liar like Fauci could rise in inverse proportion to his skill as an MD should have provided slam dunk evidence of the level and penetration of medical fraud in institutional medicine.
Jordon Walker is merely a symptom of the disease called allopathic medicine. Now, what’s the cure??
Yes, I was thinking about the Fauci parallel, too. Like Fauci, Walker went directly from med school to a bureaucratic job, not a residency. For some reason they didn't match.
What's the cure, though? Beats me, but I'm worried about the increasing degree to which our life-and-death medical decisions are dominated by arrogant, unpricipled management weenies.
And politics.
It’s the new, “one size fits all” medicine.
Getting the MONEY out of medicine, obviously.
Medical tourism. Private clinics are more affordable than people think. I wouldn't set foot in a US healthcare facility today. I do worry about getting in a car accident though. If I wore some kind of health bracelet that directed me to a local vet I'm not sure they would honor it. I would prefer that option.
We have a lot of those Medi-clinics that have sprouted up all over the place. But have you ever sought treatment at one since the Plandemic was foisted on us? Do they ask for vaxx status and refuse to treat purebloods?
Auto accidents worry me, too. Ambulances probably have instructions to take the injured to the nearest local hospital.
It's impossible to trust Big Medicine anymore. But it's also difficult to find reliable alternatives.
...no doubt by design. Big Pharma routed the people to their clotshots and toxins by blocking access to inexpensive and wildly successful off-label antivirals whose names are familiar to all: Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.
They have also made it next to impossible to find physicians and healthcare givers who will treat Covid with these successful interventions.
Big Medicine is beholden to the deadly protocols used in hospitals to this day. They enrich these villains with untold wealth on the backs of the maimed and dead.
This is NO ACCIDENT.
I once had a conversation with a women who had gone through Oxbridge then a law conversion with top marks in *everything*, a First, *everything*. Her CV was immaculate.
We started talking about cultural relativism. The PhD to her right got the definition wrong, then once we got back on the right track I asked "is there a single, objective reality: if we don't agree then we can't discuss anything of worth because your version is different from mine". This woman screwed up her face and squealed "this is just like tutorials back at Oxford!"
A very ordinary question that any educated person should be able to think about and discuss sensibly and she just packed it in. Amazing.
“The whole educational and professional training system is a very elaborate filter, which just weeds out people who are too independent, and who think for themselves, and who don't know how to be submissive, and so on -- because they're dysfunctional to the institutions.”
― Noam Chomsky
We used to call those folks Educated Fools. Now they are The Elites.
"Educated into stupidity"
I’ve had similar experiences. Very unsettling. Cultural relativism is poisoning the minds of our young people, making them complicit in their own demise.
Obviously someone who hasn’t a clue about Objectivism…a model student of Marxist grooming. When you can disabuse the mind of objective truth, you can program it to accept anything. And we have seen the bitter fruit from that rotten tree most clearly over the past three years. The number of persons who passively accept the fear porn of the demagogue from his evil rostrum far outnumber those with the capacity for critical thought and discernment.
So many years, our schools have taught us not how to think but WHAT to think. Now we see what the cognitive rot this plunge into mysticism and relativism has done to the minds of so many.
Schools can't teach critical thinking .You either have it or not .I think the unthinkable has become reality ,that a good part of the population is permanently retarded . It's on display anywhere we look .
That he has a degree from Yale ought to put the final nail into the coffin that any "prestigious Ivy League" is worth a damn.
THIS is what diversity, equity, & inclusion get you.
I used to envy the Oxbridge lot deeply. Now it warns me that a clever half-wit is on the way.
so true. those schools have lost much of their reputation. that is the upside of this mess.
He fits a particular profile that should raise warning flags for anyone.
Exactly
The scariest part2, Phizer employees do not have to be jabbed. So for him this is all about 'other sheeple'....but, if you have sex with a [freshly?] jabbed person you can get transfected, so...he may have to bear his own jab damages...if he lives that long.
He has an MD?! I didn’t trust doctors *before* seeing this, but I will view them even more negatively now. Any unstable, self absorbed, moral degenerate can get into AND graduate from medical school. Unreal.
He has rightly earned the absolute scorn of decent people.
Remember that old joke:
Question: What do you call the person who graduates LAST from medical school?
Answer: Doctor.
Probably very few people are admitted to Yale due to merit, not for a long time, if ever. Same with the other East coast elite universities as well.
Interesting how David Hogg, the Parkland FL student, got rejected by 19 colleges, then after becoming a celebrated anti gun activist was admitted to Harvard.
Attendance at an expensive college since Y2K is a strong indicator of a specific arrogant worldview and probable lack of personal integrity.
I'm confident that 20 years ago, there were a few "diversity" students, but it's changed dramatically in the last 10 years. That's the reason for the pending lawsuit at SCOTUS, b/c many qualified applicants--many Asian-American--have been denied admission in favor of less-qualified applicants who were accepted for "diversity, equity, & inclusion."
An Ivy League degree is worth almost nothing now. SAT scores & high school GPAs are often not factors in college admissions.
The type of gain of function research as Walker describes has been going on for many decades. This wasn't news to me. It's actually a standard research line in virology. Walker's admissions are simply a little more evidence on top of a huge mountain of evidence already existing that covid and its "vaccines" are an operation for financial, political and globalist power. The fundamental nature and purpose of this operation haven't changed because of Walker's admissions: covid's hospitalization and fatality rates have been falsely inflated by 300-400% for the purpose of instilling enough fear so that people will comply with any political restrictions and mandates, and inject themselves with multiple toxins that don't work and cause more illnesses, medical conditions and deaths to people under 60 than covid does. Covid and its toxins are political and financial weapons.
entirely agree, Mr Kerner.
Agree. It was obvious to all that cared to see that the fatality rate was exaggerated. It was amazing, among all the shouting about “cases,” that information about the actual risk profile was absent. No one in media asked the obvious question, “so how risky is this virus, anyway?” By the summer of 2020 the answer was clear: if you were under 60, it was not very dangerous at all. Fear or no fear, It still angers me that so many were willing to throw the young under the bus to protect themselves.
No one in the media asked the even more obvious question , "is there really a harmful virus out there in the first place?" Obvious if only because of The Disinformation Dozen doing their best to inform us that there isn't, never was, never will be, & getting censored to the max. IF "the media" had a shred of credibility, they'd want to know about that.
I really didn't hear anything from Walker that surprised me. Of course, Pfizer is in business to make money. Of course, they are trying to get ahead of the next variant. Certainly, they are using animal models to do it, duh.
What surprised me the most, was O'Keefe's misrepresentation of what Walker said. Walker made it clear, despite being drunk, that they were developing variants to get ahead of the actual mutations that might be expected of the virus. His date even asked if it was gain-of-function research and Walker said, "not really." He was aware that it might look bad, and would obviously be a problem if their lab produced variants got out, but he did not in any way suggest that Pfizer was wanting that to happen.
Despite this, O'Keefe basically said that Pfizer was developing gain-of-function variants that they could release into the wild so that they could sell more jabs. Complete, fabrication of what Walker actually said.
I am no fan of Pfizer. But, if Veritas is literally in the name of your endeavor, I expect some veritas.
Good points. However, if mistakes could be made in wuhan, they could certainly happen at a lab in the US. I’m sure most employees are trying to save lives and not end them, regardless of how dangerous the jab might be. Carelessness can do a lot of damage. I’m not sure how you mitigate against that in the absence of ethical concerns at the top of the organization. If desired, Fail safe systems can be put in place. Because of what has happened in the recent past, distrust of this organization is warranted. That’s really the takeaway from this. If the public generally trusted that these organizations had any ethical principles, then your analysis would matter more. Yes, you can expect these orgs to do this sort of thing. No, you can’t trust them to do it well and safely.
A job is a job. Regardless of what the recruiter says in order to gain your interest and willingness to be underpaid, the actual job is different. A lab technician is not a top-of-her-class with her eyes on the dewy future of womankind. She is a lab rate, probably with a child or two at home to care for and a challenging relationship with her parents. No emotional support. Any philosophy she gained in college is wearing thin.
That’s why you need ethical people at the top to set standards and see they are carried out. What a world where this isn’t obvious.
I never saw a corporate ethicist job in all the companies I worked for. I'm puzzled just thinking about it - what would they actually do? Without jeopardizing their job?
like fauci's wife
Christine Grady, MSN, PhD
Chief, Bioethics
Head, Section on Human Subjects Research
I forgot about her. What has she ever accomplished? Other than tend to her husband.
Please....a pre 2019 definition for "Gain of function".
It worked like a charm for mail in ballot voting.
What an absolute despicable mess!
Exactly! Very insightfully stated! directed evolution or gain of function, it's all part of the same scam of lies and deception by these fake scientists trying to outdo Dr. Frankenstein; humanity is just one big experiment started in a petri dish ; these psychopathic clowns are the self-appointed and self-anointed "new gods" of the globalist tyranny and it is only for us to worship and obey; Walker is just another one of their stooges who is expendable and will be discarded very soon; Nature will not be fooled or outdone by these egomaniacs and masters of hubris and that includes the bacteria and viruses that have been with us since the beginning of time. "Satanism is not a 'belief in Satan' but the false pursuit to self-deify oneself."(Taylor Marshall in "Antichrist and Apocalypse")
Ah so. The PCR test is just another weapon in the conspiricists’ aresenal. Its results are used to justify the . . . [drum-rolling here] horrifying and rising statistics of the infected and dead. As long as the PCR test remains the world’s litmus test, we know we are being lied to.
Thank you for one of the best (& most succinct) commentaries on this Project Veritas release!
Most of us realise that messing with viral evolution is not exactly new, & was most likely the cause of this whole shebang. Most of us also wouldn't be surprised at whatever shady practice that Pfizer is contemplating.
The most interesting part of this, to my thinking, is the way this has grabbed so much public attention (even if not yet the mainstream media).
I'll be following with interest as it develops!
My thoughts exactly. Little I can add to your comment, other than that the whole sorry story exemplifies the inglorious mess we are in as a whole.
Throughout the pandemic one of the elite’s primary advantages has been incredulity. The fact that they do so remarkably stupid things, and employ astoundingly ridiculous people. The sheer idiocy is hard to believe for many people, and so they get away with it.
This seems to be such a case. Many simply cant believe pfizer would give a director-title to such a frivolous unserious person like this Jordan character, who would sit on a date with a stranger and reveal corporate secrets for the chance to get laid. And so the story gets little traction.
He is a diversity hire, similar to our Raggedy-Anne lesbian black gurl that speaks for the Whitehouse every day
He was Pfizer's Sam Brinton. Does anyone doubt that if he remained on the job he'd end up on a Veritas video explaining how easy it was to obtain spent fuel rods?
Spot-on. People just cannot accept the extent to which American civilization has degenerated into a clown world that is beyond parody -- despite the excess of evidence.
https://twitter.com/sbrinton/status/1542288527920185344/photo/1
Now that meritocracy has been denounced by the marxists, I’m curious to know if DIE departments are responsible for the hire of marginally competent, totally unprofessional, unserious buggers like this.
Cream of the crop is hard enough to find, let alone limiting the talent pool to a series of checked boxes. Marginally competent is the rule just about everywhere now.
Sadly, observable in almost every field of endeavor. Blatantly obvious in bureaucracies.
Bureaucracy is where it started.
"for the chance to" ... commit sodomy.
FIFY
Walker must be the only young, rich, gay guy in New York who has trouble hooking up.
This is what happens in a world made of lies: one questions everything (a good thing imo) or accepts anything (typical). The Hamlin story, this event, the covid debacle (intentionally created, some would say) and all the ones too numerous to mention have the effect of causing people to automatically defer to "I don't believe anything I can't verify with my own eyes and ears", or the other, "Of course it's true, or false, as the case may be. MSM or an expert just told me it is ".
...and getting tickets to 'Hamilton'.
💯🎯
During the Veritas twitter space, they said that the ‘date’ was an ex-Pfizer person. So they might have known (of) each other.
I keep going back to my original assessment of the WEF:
RETARD RODEO
We've gotten to a point where it doesn't matter what is said, the general normie public is too dumb and/or lazy to care. And that's assuming the general normie public will even be exposed to this story and these true statements about Pfizer's gain of function research to make billions more on a pile of dead and injured bodies.
Ecohealth Alliance did this exact thing Jordon Walker proudly proclaimed Pfizer does/will do......and at the behest of the US government in a Chinese biolab. This is well known and documented. And still no one cares.
They scariest part about this is not that evil entities are engineering viruses to be more deadly/communicable to maximize profit and suffering of the masses. But it's that they are doing it in the open, admitting they are doing it, laughing in our faces about it, while the normietards call us "conspiracy theorists"...
They are simply unable to imagine how they would act in a moral situation: these people are stealing from the shop I'm currently in -> stand helplessly and watch before turning back to the aisles with a vague sense of discontent.
It's not that the 'vaccine' is a 'flop'. It's that it was never about addressing a virus. It's all an astounding lie and manipulation to get people injected with a harmful and sometime deadly jab. And our DoD is behind it - per Katherine Watts and Sasha Latypova's work -. FFS.
Yes, that was my first thought too. But I think eugppius was actually referring to the uptake of the new bivalent vaccine by the now-wary public.
No matter how low your opinion about human nature, it can always go lower.
Jordan Walker, affirmative action hire paying off.
Boxes checked:
minority,
homosexual,
moron☠️
He's also a boss girl.
He’ll be on Jimmy Kimmel Live before the week’s out. Probably getting media training right now.
I think he’s probably been ‘taken care of’ by Pfizer. Jeffrey Epstein, anyone?
that could well be. However. I find it counter productive to paint as an equal opportunity gay black hire. Who cares? Too often we here in our echo chamber drag the kitchen sink into an issue. You want to redpill folk to a 'minumum standard' where they can accept the government lies and it appears the vaxxes are dangerous (eg), and others in our movement are mad because you dont press the issue of genocide. Baby steps people. Never gonna get anywhere but backwards you start talking genocide with your typical normie.
Same with talking homosexuality and equal opportunity in connection with this young Walker. What point is being made? The guy, if valid, is a sociopath. Who said some interesting things. It detracts to start moaning and whining about equal opportunity hires.....
enotionally immature
"is this real life?"
I have to agree with your assessment of this research.
What has more potential for catastrophe, as GVB has been trying to pound into people's heads from the start, is the usage of these non-sterilizing mRNA injections during the height of an outbreak, which drives the viral evolution far beyond what natural immunity would allow.
We, as in "Humanity" in fact have been chosen by big pharma to be the monkeys.
GVB is completely wrong so far. Where is the disaster that he has been warning us about? I know almost only vaccinated people and all of them cleared Covid just fine. He is an alarmist and should most likely be ignored.
right. ignore him until proven correct. of course, by that time we may all be dead. when it comes to "vaccination", safety must be proved before authorization, not after.
He is still wrong, there is no deadly Covid variant for the vaccinated. The vaccines are toxic, useless and likely even promote infections but there is no desaster.
GVB wasn't talking about the vaccinated alone.
It's really simple mathematics.
If the virus is sterilized (killed) in the host, there's no more virus in that host.
Therefore, no virus to pass on to others.
By targeting only the spike protein, vaccinated people continue to host the viable viruses and they do what viruses do.
They multiply and mutate.
When they mutate into something deadly that we have no more antibodies against, we all die, not just the vaccinated, and not just the pristine unvaxxed.
It ain't over till it's over, hon.
A very accurate, perceptive take on this Project Veritas expose, citing the panic in the MSM to sanitize every link between Pfizer and Walker. When a company is guilty of an embarrassing lapse of professionalism, that’s what you do!
But I must take issue with one statement:“Vaccinator hysteria, however, has created an enormous global market for on-target Covid boosters.” There’s no natural market for this fraud injection protocol. It has been exposed and debunked totally. Only through coercion - an operative method of compliance from the outset reinforced by the medical establishment, social and mainstream media, and the Deep State globalist cabal (but I repeat myself!) - could this market be created and maintained.
[In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research.]
Here's how big companies do it: they outsource the dirty work to a smaller company, or they spin off a division to create the appearance of separation.
They still develop the game plan and call the shots.
Then when the op gets exposed, they can make statements like above that are technically true.
And by the time that happens, they've co-opted regulators, compromised lawmakers, and de-fanged all opposition through monetary gifts and cancel campaigns.
Paint a hapless chap as [the only] bad actor, toss that mid-level sacrificial lamb on the fire, pay the "hefty fine" and keep on moving...
Although in this case, there probably won't be any fines.
What's comical is that they're called "health care" companies when what they're really doing is developing new ways to kill people for the war machine, under the fuzzy warm blanket statement of "prevention."
They use defense against "the forces of evil" who could be developing weapons of mass destruction as cover to do it themselves.
Pair that with the extraordinary hubris to think that humans could hope to predict, in a highly controlled laboratory setting, what living organisms will do in the wild and how they will evolve in the REAL world and you can see that we have a group of people playing with fire who may have high IQ, but are hopelessly and dangerously naive.
How can we implant Icarian wings on these big corporations?
And would that even help?
It’s tempting to believe hubris is the sickness of our age. Among the ruling classes there seems to be no recognition of the limitations of our current knowledge. I’m not so worried about transhumanism, except as a toxic pipe dream, because the current state of our abilities along those lines is incredibly crude.
Oh, yeah-and all their ideas of what the future holds are just ripoffs from science fiction authors and Marvel movies.
These types have a single focus:
More, More, MORE.
The human embodiment of cancer.
"Paint a hapless chap as [the only] bad actor, toss that mid-level sacrificial lamb on the fire"
This is so far the most convincing explanation for Trishton's directorship I've seen yet.
This is how intelligence does it too, not just companies. Walker, in that position, would likely know about the "dirty work" (I have been in that camp) subcontracted out. Nowhere does Walker claim the work was NOT subcontracted. Most definitely was.
And thus, they can honestly say "We didn't do it."
And by the looks of the internet whitewashing that took place within mere hours of the revelation, we can clearly see who's writing the history books.
They can honest to say we didn't do it BUT we paid someone else to do it for us. Which is the same as doing it. Just slows down the realization to the public that, yes, in fact they did do it all along.
The media (non) reaction is far more interesting than the content of Walkers leaks.
The idea that this was all an elaborate setup by Pfizer gives them so much credit it’s mind numbing: they install a fake executive years in advance, to have him fake leak embarrassing intel to a fake gay date, only to then use their media leverage to block the entire story, and scrub his fake existence from the internet. Did they set up project veritas too?
Honestly I can’t deal with the hyper conspiracy loyalists amongst our movement, I’m starting to counter conspiracy theory them and label them as pharma double agents.
Veritas used a contact from Pfizer to set up the date. The said they were alerted about Walker by an former employee. You really think Pfizer couldn't have set the whole thing up? It would have been easy, and the reason is because people like you love to fetch balls. why would they? Well, most normies just saw ZomgRightwingerVeritasAntiSciencers!!!! harassing a gay, black man on the verge of tears they catfish and physically assaulted. The lack of being able to see the big picture is gonna sink us. This isn't even a conspiracy theory, it is good pre-suit ground salting. Maybe if our side quit getting legal advice from paralegals...
Of course the FizerNazis organized this little gay date nite interlude of comic relief for your edification. Indeed you ARE sucking it up hook, line and sinker. You think the RAND CORP always writes their scripts at the last minute?
MSM can’t acknowledge this video without giving project veritas credibility or at least making people start thinking in the direction the video would take them, therefore they will not show it like many things they don’t show. No matter what anyone thinks of the video - there is a targeted manipulation of information by the government, MSM, big tech, and big pharma that none of us can seemingly do anything about now or in the future. I can’t see the solution to end all of this other than the end times are approaching.
Au contraire, one could spot a lab leak by looking at the virus and identifying its lineage. One might recall that Omicron had a lineage that had already ended prior to it suddenly appearing.
Omikron made a comeback because it is vaccine and natural immunity evasive and thus outcompeted other lineages.
Omicron was first re-discovered in Botswana in 4 traveling diplomats. They never identified the country the diplomats were from.
The lineage it was from had already gone extinct some time before it appeared. To revive that lineage a SARS-CoV-2 variant would have to devolve back to that lineage before evolving into Omicron, that is is so statistically unlikely as to be deemed impossible.
How can you know it was extinct? It could easily survive somewhere hidden, in other mammals or in people not subject to monitoring.
There is no evidence of this, not only that, but it is the only case of SARS-CoV-2 I am aware of that has ever reappeared. If there were unknown reservoirs there should be other instances of other variants lineages that were thought extinct reappearing too.
Do we know historically that it "existed" earlier? I thought it was just comparative genetics that indicated that it came from a line that branched off from before original Wuhan covid.
There was a phylogenetic network analysis that showed the evolution of the different variants. Unfortunately I don't have an eidetic memory, Omicron IIRC had evolved from the original, however there was a break where that particular genetic line ended, Omicron then appeared some months IIRC after that genetic line was no longer detectable globally.