The great unlearned lesson from this disaster has been that people with healthy immune systems suffer less from the various pathogens whose environment we share, and that the medical-industrial complex doesn't profit from our health and therefore suppresses the knowledge to maintain it. Their business model requires our sickness. Learn to protect your health and you're also immune to the mass hysteria.
You are so right. I’ve now learned to keep my vitamin D level up, and I use the Zelenko protocol ( C, zinc, Quercetin) against all viruses, not just SarsCoV2. Plus I gargle after being in crowds. I plan to keep this up for ever. No illness in almost 3 years now, even with hubby’s recent very bad cold plus many friends with Covid.
Pharma does not want us to know about natural prevention.
Supplements can be useful, but if we need them, we're doing something wrong. Our bodies are built to handle pathogens, and if we feed and treat it right, they're not a problem. The whole medical-industrial industry is designed to make us dependent on their drugs, and the supplement industry does too, but with proportionally less avarice. I take a handful of supplements, too, but my goal is to improve my condition to not need them. I need them much less than I used to.
I agree. My father was a pathologist and he was very focused on nutrition, time restricted eating, avoiding wheat (he called it white death), getting sunshine, avoiding vaccines, reducing inflammation, good fats (he would eat avocado with grass fed butter!) and reducing insulin response (he’d point to obese people snd say “hyperinsulinemia”) etc.
I once asked him if my hot car would have dangerous fumes from the plastic seats. His answer: “You eat cereal and milk for breakfast and you’re worried about plastic fumes?!”
Sounds like a wise man. Not only wheat, but all grains and most vegetables have varying amounts of toxic effects. I minimize all of them, but keep enough in my diet to maintain enough gut bacteria to process them if needed, like if Joe succeeds in running us out of diesel fuel, predicted for next month, which will close all the grocery stores, forcing us all to forage.
97 will be an easy target for us if we're careful. Researchers are on the verge of significant longevity extensions. Sergey Young is a major investor in longevity research and predicts 150 will be reasonable expectation within a few decades. Our parents were just a little too early to take advantage of it. Maybe we won't be.
Fauci himself admitted early on to taking 10,000 IUs of vitamin daily, 250% of what I take. By testing my blood I found that my daily 4,000 IUs in winter (and 3,000 in summer) was sufficient to raise my blood vitamin D to the upper end of what my doc considers a safe range. But of course, I can’t talk my narrative-following mother into taking any more than what’s in her daily multi vitamin.
Anyone who supplements D should also supplement magnesium. Metabolizing D consumes magnesium, and many people are deficient to begin with. It can also cause calcium imbalance, which causes other problems. Balance is important. If we need to overdose on anything, we're doing something wrong.
Excellent point. I take 4K IU vit D daily, and last year began having leg cramps. I started taking a magnesium & calcium supplement and the problem went away.
I have trouble digesting and absorbing vitamin D. As much as I would take, it did not increase my blood D levels significantly, even with K and magnesium. So now I take sublingual D+K which gets absorbed directly into the bloodstream.
The denizens of northern latitudes are known to be heavy drinkers; maybe trying to self-medicate their seasonal affective disorder. Maybe one of the reasons the Norwegians made their famous fermented cod livers.
We do meme drops almost daily. Free for everyone. All in house memes, and our own graphics to be made into stickers, art, shirts, whatever. Sign up, tell your friends, grab some memes, make some stickers.
eugyppius: Pardon the off-topic comment, but I want to let you know that as a paid subscriber for many months, I'm concerned that my email provider (yahoo) seems to be suppressing your content (and only yours--this issue is unique to your emails). I have never flagged any of your emails as "junk," but now a good percentage of your mails, including this one, get redirected into my junk folder and I have to find them among the dreck. Is anyone else having this issue?
Yes, same here, though I won't complain: I treat Substack e-mails as spam and delete them all (and I wish I could simply turn off all e-mail notifications). I log into Substack to check what's new.
But anyway, yes, Yahoo seems to be blocking Eugy's content.
That's always my first reaction too, considering Yahoo has been hacked so many times. I'm a computer consultant; I've helped several clients wean themselves to a better email provider.
That's a discussion to have with the client. A lot of people choose Gmail. I have a couple of Gmail accounts but I tend to avoid them because they stick their tentacles in every aspect of your life. It's fashionable to dislike Apple, but I like their mail because they do seem to be a little more serious about protecting privacy. As others have pointed out, there are many options.
Now hat Faussi is retiring who will be his replacement ? Sickness professor Bill Gates himself could be the chosen one .It is well known that Faussi and Gates are partners in crime and close friends . Gates is also an expert in regard to Y- russes , like Fauzi .He may give us a Christmas present called JITTERBUG .
Everyone should have at least two providers, just for insurance. Pick one. Or two, try them out, decide what works for you. Most mail readers handle multiple accounts well, assembling them into one mailbox.
I should have have gotten Zoho email a few years ago when a friend recommended it and it was still free. Even though I can afford to have a basic account I don't need even the basic account really, just for email. They don't scan your emails and put an emphasis on privacy, at least they did before. Ironically, I migrated from AOL and att.net email, the latter of which was connected to Yahoo, to Gmail because it seemed have become less invasive than AOL and Yahoo were once they were acquired by Verizon.
Yahoo is my spam account. If I need to give my e-mail address to someone (or rather: something, such as Substack), but I don't want it to spam the e-mail account that I use for real communication with real people, I give them that address.
Yikes! I tried that, and it looks like I just unsubscribed myself from all the stacks. :-( Or rather, all the unpaid ones (Eugy's still appears on my list). I just wanted them to stop e-mailing me, but not to delete it in my actual Substack account. :-(
Well, that's what happened. Maybe it's a glitch in the system(?). Anyway, now I'm trying to remember what I used to subscribe to, and I'm re-subscribing...
just as the effectiveness of the google search algorithm has deteriorated in the last years, also its ability to sort mail has declined precipitously. now if you don’t regularly click on “all mail” you miss all kinds of stuff.
Interesting. I subscribe to Berenson, Malone, Bray, and others on substack, but only the eugyppius emails seem to be affected, and with a startling amount of consistency...
this might have something to do with the fact that I use my own custom domain (eugyppius.com) rather than the default substack one (eugyppius.substack.com). i don‘t know if marking the emails as ‚not spam‘ is possible or could help.
It was definitely Eugyppius and Malone that were most frequently relegated to junk. After putting them back in the inbox many many times, I was thinking I managed somehow to override the setting.
I have an att email that was being routed through some kind of yahoo server. Business clients that I've had for years suddenly started going to junk, and I couldn't fix it despite how every single time I'd designate it as "not junk" and move it to the correct mail folder. This persisted for at least a year to two years, and it just affected about 3 client emails. Then all of a sudden last month, these emails stopped going to junk. I have zero idea how or why this happened.
I use Outlook, having done so for years, and it considers not only notification of these blog posts, but those of Robt Malone, Glenn Greenwald, Emerald Robinson, and other substacks to which I subscribe . And, if it doesn't like the subject matter of what I'm sending/forwarding to another, it tells me it can't (read: won't) deliver it Consequently, I need to go thru my junk folder daily and hand move it to my inbox.
I think it's more likely your mail provider rather than the Outlook app, although Outlook might have some junk settings you could adjust. Ditto your webmail to adjust your mail provider junk settings.
My ISP, Fairpoint, is fairly small, when considered in the broad scheme of the business. I've tried changing settings in both Outlook and with the ISP. Sometimes it works and when it does, the changes are only temporary and I once again find the emails in the junk folder. So I just religiously review that folder and, being cynic that I am, just chalk it up to 'it is what it is' and move on. lol
PS - I have gmail as a back up that I mostly use on my cell related correspondence.
Whau , I'm impressed ,there seems to be an almost infinite way to get a message like E.mail . Since I still live in the stone age, I use smoke signals .
For months, comcast either sends my substack subscriptions to spam or never sends them at all. I just put a bookmark for "substack inbox" on all my devices and check it every day.
The trouble with using ISP's email is that if you ever move, it can be a hassle to keep getting your mail (not all ISPs have that option), or switching to a new provider.
Please , while every one is busy with finding ways to get the mail ,the Monkey pox is out of control and making monkeys out of us . Could it be that the ones wearing masks ,start to look like monkeys behind the mask and try to hide it .?
All media is entertainment. Its business model is based on advertising revenues driven by clicks and eyeball viewers that respond to sensation and outrage. So, sensation and outrage is what you get when consuming the WaPo, NYT, cable TV, etc., and other regime media.
Let's face it, that's how media panic porn manipulated public behavior during the Coronadoom. Consume advisedly.
What was that old saying "If it bleeds, it leads"? Media has become sensationalist in nature, resembling the old National Enquirer and Star rags. Just a straight reporting of events and facts doesn't get enough eyeballs.
rololo ,what you talk about is not the climate ,it is the yearly seasons . The climate is something long term . Now lets get back to monkey pox and leave the weather to Al Gore .
Its like when my little sister was first learning to talk. We had a dog, she learned the word "dog", then every four legged animal became a dog.
Though I have to say, looking to gay men having piss orgies as a possible cause of a pandemic isn't a terrible call. Seems like a lot of germs gone wild in those... lifestyle conferences
Perhaps a strain of Monkeypox that permanently afflicts propagandists (not real journalists) could be whipped up in a clandestine lab in Ukraine. It would certainly make for a better world. Oops - I forgot - all of the US funded labs in Ukraine have been shut down or bombed by the Russians.
I have noticed that the press will hype and hype and virus they consider not serious. What's interesting is how differently it played out for Coronavirus.
Obviously there's a business model here - the press exists to warn you of dangers that are unknown to you, and by scouring the world for potential risks you'll be informed and well protected from any potential threats. Something like that. If you read about a fire you'll know that fires are happening, if you read about a car accident then you'll be more careful when driving or walking.
With Zika, Ebola, Legionnaire's and every other disease they could think of, the press chose to be as alarmist as possible. Yes, something might only affect 100 people, but it's a very real risk for those people! And so with this sleight of hand we can exaggerate things and push article clicks or papers as appropriate at the time.
With Covid, it was the opposite. All the corporate press said that it would be like the Flu, the WHO refused to declare it a pandemic, the works. I find it incredible that the same corporate media that 'knows' to exaggerate every fake viral threat, also understood that with Covid, it should do the opposite.
Does anyone else find it absolutely incredible that the scaremongering journalists that basically live to blow every single out of proportion, took such a measured response to Covid reassuring people that it would be no deadlier than the Flu, on the basis of absolutely nothing?
Unfortunately it seems that whatever take is presented in the popular media is quite at odds with reality, and the fact that it correctly switched when presented with an actual threat, well I find that somewhat concerning.
I have hopes that the media has finally achieved "the boy who cried wolf" status, and that most of the public will increasingly see it for the unreliable sham that it is and not take everything media says as gospel truth. Verify before trusting.
It all takes me back to the good old days of swine flu, avian flu, Zika, ebola, etc - these darn pandemics come around so regularly nowadays.
But what about all the millions of monkeypox vaccines the idiots in charge bought - with our money?
I heard India just destroyed 100 million covid vaccines that no one wanted or could be coerced into getting jabbed with. Mind you, better thrown away than jabbed into people's arms - and pHarma gets paid either way.
All pandemics going back to the 1976 swine flu debacle are invented to push fear and the rush to pretend life saving vaccines or injections. Which as we all know, do not save lives as they have never been realistically proven to do so. After all, without fake pandemics the CDC would have nothing to lie about and would have to thumb wrestle the FDA for top spot in big pharma's medical tyranny regime.
This is clearly a rearguard action (Oh, stop it, you there! Stop your sniggering.). They know monkeypox didn't 'take', but they still need to churn out an occasional story now and then, otherwise the sudden disappearance of the monkeypox scare will be too obvious.
The great unlearned lesson from this disaster has been that people with healthy immune systems suffer less from the various pathogens whose environment we share, and that the medical-industrial complex doesn't profit from our health and therefore suppresses the knowledge to maintain it. Their business model requires our sickness. Learn to protect your health and you're also immune to the mass hysteria.
dead right mr watson.
Elementary. Watson gets it. No need for Sherlock 😀
You are so right. I’ve now learned to keep my vitamin D level up, and I use the Zelenko protocol ( C, zinc, Quercetin) against all viruses, not just SarsCoV2. Plus I gargle after being in crowds. I plan to keep this up for ever. No illness in almost 3 years now, even with hubby’s recent very bad cold plus many friends with Covid.
Pharma does not want us to know about natural prevention.
Supplements can be useful, but if we need them, we're doing something wrong. Our bodies are built to handle pathogens, and if we feed and treat it right, they're not a problem. The whole medical-industrial industry is designed to make us dependent on their drugs, and the supplement industry does too, but with proportionally less avarice. I take a handful of supplements, too, but my goal is to improve my condition to not need them. I need them much less than I used to.
I agree. My father was a pathologist and he was very focused on nutrition, time restricted eating, avoiding wheat (he called it white death), getting sunshine, avoiding vaccines, reducing inflammation, good fats (he would eat avocado with grass fed butter!) and reducing insulin response (he’d point to obese people snd say “hyperinsulinemia”) etc.
I once asked him if my hot car would have dangerous fumes from the plastic seats. His answer: “You eat cereal and milk for breakfast and you’re worried about plastic fumes?!”
He “checked out” this year at age 97.
Sounds like a wise man. Not only wheat, but all grains and most vegetables have varying amounts of toxic effects. I minimize all of them, but keep enough in my diet to maintain enough gut bacteria to process them if needed, like if Joe succeeds in running us out of diesel fuel, predicted for next month, which will close all the grocery stores, forcing us all to forage.
97 will be an easy target for us if we're careful. Researchers are on the verge of significant longevity extensions. Sergey Young is a major investor in longevity research and predicts 150 will be reasonable expectation within a few decades. Our parents were just a little too early to take advantage of it. Maybe we won't be.
Here’s a Lancet obit re my Dad. BTW recommended AGAINST the untested MRNA “vax”
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00297-3/fulltext
Most of us do not spend as much time out of doors as our ancestors did. Hence the need to supplement Vitamin D.
And if prevention is mentioned in a public health setting, it is confused with madly vaccinating everyone in sight, problem solved.
Fauci himself admitted early on to taking 10,000 IUs of vitamin daily, 250% of what I take. By testing my blood I found that my daily 4,000 IUs in winter (and 3,000 in summer) was sufficient to raise my blood vitamin D to the upper end of what my doc considers a safe range. But of course, I can’t talk my narrative-following mother into taking any more than what’s in her daily multi vitamin.
Anyone who supplements D should also supplement magnesium. Metabolizing D consumes magnesium, and many people are deficient to begin with. It can also cause calcium imbalance, which causes other problems. Balance is important. If we need to overdose on anything, we're doing something wrong.
Excellent point. I take 4K IU vit D daily, and last year began having leg cramps. I started taking a magnesium & calcium supplement and the problem went away.
I have trouble digesting and absorbing vitamin D. As much as I would take, it did not increase my blood D levels significantly, even with K and magnesium. So now I take sublingual D+K which gets absorbed directly into the bloodstream.
The denizens of northern latitudes are known to be heavy drinkers; maybe trying to self-medicate their seasonal affective disorder. Maybe one of the reasons the Norwegians made their famous fermented cod livers.
My New England mother grew up taking cod liver oil. Seems like it was planned for historically. Lutefisk any one?
This needs a meme. We’re thinking the quote from the movie mean girls, But
“Quit trying to make monkeypox a thing, it’s never going to happen.”
Done, it’ll be at the next meme drop.
lol
That’s totally Rufus!
omg lol
"Meme drops" needs to be a candy!
We do meme drops almost daily. Free for everyone. All in house memes, and our own graphics to be made into stickers, art, shirts, whatever. Sign up, tell your friends, grab some memes, make some stickers.
https://westcoastjohn1978.substack.com/p/the-media
https://imgflip.com/i/6ypme7
Don't tempt them, they're trying to make it a thing via more GoF mad science:
https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1584708183636856840
eugyppius: Pardon the off-topic comment, but I want to let you know that as a paid subscriber for many months, I'm concerned that my email provider (yahoo) seems to be suppressing your content (and only yours--this issue is unique to your emails). I have never flagged any of your emails as "junk," but now a good percentage of your mails, including this one, get redirected into my junk folder and I have to find them among the dreck. Is anyone else having this issue?
Yes, same here, though I won't complain: I treat Substack e-mails as spam and delete them all (and I wish I could simply turn off all e-mail notifications). I log into Substack to check what's new.
But anyway, yes, Yahoo seems to be blocking Eugy's content.
Why the fuck do people still use yahoo?
That's always my first reaction too, considering Yahoo has been hacked so many times. I'm a computer consultant; I've helped several clients wean themselves to a better email provider.
...and in your opinion that would be . . . ?
That's a discussion to have with the client. A lot of people choose Gmail. I have a couple of Gmail accounts but I tend to avoid them because they stick their tentacles in every aspect of your life. It's fashionable to dislike Apple, but I like their mail because they do seem to be a little more serious about protecting privacy. As others have pointed out, there are many options.
I know. Either they charge or are weirder about seurity. Take your pick. I ignore stupid yahoo news.
Habit. Good suggestions for an alternate?
Protonmail is the best of the alternatives.
Now hat Faussi is retiring who will be his replacement ? Sickness professor Bill Gates himself could be the chosen one .It is well known that Faussi and Gates are partners in crime and close friends . Gates is also an expert in regard to Y- russes , like Fauzi .He may give us a Christmas present called JITTERBUG .
Everyone should have at least two providers, just for insurance. Pick one. Or two, try them out, decide what works for you. Most mail readers handle multiple accounts well, assembling them into one mailbox.
Exactly, different mails for different projects. Best kind.
I should have have gotten Zoho email a few years ago when a friend recommended it and it was still free. Even though I can afford to have a basic account I don't need even the basic account really, just for email. They don't scan your emails and put an emphasis on privacy, at least they did before. Ironically, I migrated from AOL and att.net email, the latter of which was connected to Yahoo, to Gmail because it seemed have become less invasive than AOL and Yahoo were once they were acquired by Verizon.
I been there since they opened and a certain slice of humanity has communicated with me there for decades. Don't hate on me bro!
For the same reason that so many retards are wearing snot pouches .
Yahoo is my spam account. If I need to give my e-mail address to someone (or rather: something, such as Substack), but I don't want it to spam the e-mail account that I use for real communication with real people, I give them that address.
I still use my AOL e-mail account! I have a proton account, too, but the AOL is still the primary one.
You can.
Click on your picture in the upper right --> settings --> notifications
Yikes! I tried that, and it looks like I just unsubscribed myself from all the stacks. :-( Or rather, all the unpaid ones (Eugy's still appears on my list). I just wanted them to stop e-mailing me, but not to delete it in my actual Substack account. :-(
That’s exactly what happened to me, too.
That's not supposed to happen!
Well, that's what happened. Maybe it's a glitch in the system(?). Anyway, now I'm trying to remember what I used to subscribe to, and I'm re-subscribing...
Ug! That's awful! I feel terrible!
I use yahoo and have had no problems.
If you have a smart phone, get the Substack app. Works pretty well.
I've heard t-mobile is interfering with apps for their customers. We might need to learn to use VPN to reduce midstream interference.
Agree. I have the app on my smart tablet and get a ping every time there is a new post. Forget email.
This happened to me while using gmail. I switched to protonmail and haven't had a problem since.
just as the effectiveness of the google search algorithm has deteriorated in the last years, also its ability to sort mail has declined precipitously. now if you don’t regularly click on “all mail” you miss all kinds of stuff.
Feature, not a bug.
I'll look into that option. Thx.
I've been using protonmail for all my substack subs and never had a problem (AFAIK).
It was happening with some of my substack articles but just got better in the last couple of weeks.
Interesting. I subscribe to Berenson, Malone, Bray, and others on substack, but only the eugyppius emails seem to be affected, and with a startling amount of consistency...
this might have something to do with the fact that I use my own custom domain (eugyppius.com) rather than the default substack one (eugyppius.substack.com). i don‘t know if marking the emails as ‚not spam‘ is possible or could help.
It was definitely Eugyppius and Malone that were most frequently relegated to junk. After putting them back in the inbox many many times, I was thinking I managed somehow to override the setting.
I have an att email that was being routed through some kind of yahoo server. Business clients that I've had for years suddenly started going to junk, and I couldn't fix it despite how every single time I'd designate it as "not junk" and move it to the correct mail folder. This persisted for at least a year to two years, and it just affected about 3 client emails. Then all of a sudden last month, these emails stopped going to junk. I have zero idea how or why this happened.
I use Outlook, having done so for years, and it considers not only notification of these blog posts, but those of Robt Malone, Glenn Greenwald, Emerald Robinson, and other substacks to which I subscribe . And, if it doesn't like the subject matter of what I'm sending/forwarding to another, it tells me it can't (read: won't) deliver it Consequently, I need to go thru my junk folder daily and hand move it to my inbox.
Thought police, anyone??
I think it's more likely your mail provider rather than the Outlook app, although Outlook might have some junk settings you could adjust. Ditto your webmail to adjust your mail provider junk settings.
My ISP, Fairpoint, is fairly small, when considered in the broad scheme of the business. I've tried changing settings in both Outlook and with the ISP. Sometimes it works and when it does, the changes are only temporary and I once again find the emails in the junk folder. So I just religiously review that folder and, being cynic that I am, just chalk it up to 'it is what it is' and move on. lol
PS - I have gmail as a back up that I mostly use on my cell related correspondence.
Whau , I'm impressed ,there seems to be an almost infinite way to get a message like E.mail . Since I still live in the stone age, I use smoke signals .
Many of us live in markets where there is only one ISP, so not much of a choice :|
I have email service from a couple of smaller providers, and they've all been very reliable. Avoid the crowds.
For months, comcast either sends my substack subscriptions to spam or never sends them at all. I just put a bookmark for "substack inbox" on all my devices and check it every day.
I use Yahoo as well and many of my trusted contacts have ended up in spam in recent months, FYI.
I have used a local ISP for my primary email (costs a little bit every month) and none of my substack emails go to junk or spam. So far, anyway.
The trouble with using ISP's email is that if you ever move, it can be a hassle to keep getting your mail (not all ISPs have that option), or switching to a new provider.
We've used this ISP through 4 moves to 3 different states - no problem at all.
You're lucky. Not all people or ISPs are in the same situation. Just something for people to investigate before they sign up.
Mine is a weak laugh. For every failed experiment, they have learned something new.
Please , while every one is busy with finding ways to get the mail ,the Monkey pox is out of control and making monkeys out of us . Could it be that the ones wearing masks ,start to look like monkeys behind the mask and try to hide it .?
28,000 cases is 0.008% of the US population. LOL.
All media is entertainment. Its business model is based on advertising revenues driven by clicks and eyeball viewers that respond to sensation and outrage. So, sensation and outrage is what you get when consuming the WaPo, NYT, cable TV, etc., and other regime media.
Let's face it, that's how media panic porn manipulated public behavior during the Coronadoom. Consume advisedly.
Yep...drug company revenues which explains their solid alliance with big pharma's lies and propaganda.
What was that old saying "If it bleeds, it leads"? Media has become sensationalist in nature, resembling the old National Enquirer and Star rags. Just a straight reporting of events and facts doesn't get enough eyeballs.
rololo ,what you talk about is not the climate ,it is the yearly seasons . The climate is something long term . Now lets get back to monkey pox and leave the weather to Al Gore .
Its like when my little sister was first learning to talk. We had a dog, she learned the word "dog", then every four legged animal became a dog.
Though I have to say, looking to gay men having piss orgies as a possible cause of a pandemic isn't a terrible call. Seems like a lot of germs gone wild in those... lifestyle conferences
Perhaps a strain of Monkeypox that permanently afflicts propagandists (not real journalists) could be whipped up in a clandestine lab in Ukraine. It would certainly make for a better world. Oops - I forgot - all of the US funded labs in Ukraine have been shut down or bombed by the Russians.
Don’t forget to reference this - https://www.nti.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/NTI_Paper_BIO-TTX_Final.pdf - NTI is run by Ted Turner who owns CNN, who is quoted as saying ‘the cia runs media’
Yes it does
Nico Soldo went into this in painful detail in an entire series of FBF/Fisted by Focault.
Yes, if your behavior destroys your immune system you will get sick.
Buy hey, their big pharma advertisers got to push more useless deadly jabs on an immune compromised population.
It keeps people in line and compliant.
I have noticed that the press will hype and hype and virus they consider not serious. What's interesting is how differently it played out for Coronavirus.
Obviously there's a business model here - the press exists to warn you of dangers that are unknown to you, and by scouring the world for potential risks you'll be informed and well protected from any potential threats. Something like that. If you read about a fire you'll know that fires are happening, if you read about a car accident then you'll be more careful when driving or walking.
With Zika, Ebola, Legionnaire's and every other disease they could think of, the press chose to be as alarmist as possible. Yes, something might only affect 100 people, but it's a very real risk for those people! And so with this sleight of hand we can exaggerate things and push article clicks or papers as appropriate at the time.
With Covid, it was the opposite. All the corporate press said that it would be like the Flu, the WHO refused to declare it a pandemic, the works. I find it incredible that the same corporate media that 'knows' to exaggerate every fake viral threat, also understood that with Covid, it should do the opposite.
Does anyone else find it absolutely incredible that the scaremongering journalists that basically live to blow every single out of proportion, took such a measured response to Covid reassuring people that it would be no deadlier than the Flu, on the basis of absolutely nothing?
Unfortunately it seems that whatever take is presented in the popular media is quite at odds with reality, and the fact that it correctly switched when presented with an actual threat, well I find that somewhat concerning.
I have hopes that the media has finally achieved "the boy who cried wolf" status, and that most of the public will increasingly see it for the unreliable sham that it is and not take everything media says as gospel truth. Verify before trusting.
It all takes me back to the good old days of swine flu, avian flu, Zika, ebola, etc - these darn pandemics come around so regularly nowadays.
But what about all the millions of monkeypox vaccines the idiots in charge bought - with our money?
I heard India just destroyed 100 million covid vaccines that no one wanted or could be coerced into getting jabbed with. Mind you, better thrown away than jabbed into people's arms - and pHarma gets paid either way.
All pandemics going back to the 1976 swine flu debacle are invented to push fear and the rush to pretend life saving vaccines or injections. Which as we all know, do not save lives as they have never been realistically proven to do so. After all, without fake pandemics the CDC would have nothing to lie about and would have to thumb wrestle the FDA for top spot in big pharma's medical tyranny regime.
This is clearly a rearguard action (Oh, stop it, you there! Stop your sniggering.). They know monkeypox didn't 'take', but they still need to churn out an occasional story now and then, otherwise the sudden disappearance of the monkeypox scare will be too obvious.
it's referred to as flogging a dead horse