Of the few studies that even attempt to assess the population-wide risk of myocarditis following vaccination, nearly three-fourths neglect to include the proper stratifiers
That's a great idea! If it were me I'd lose the Fbomb (just because it's pithy enough as it is and you need to draw people in when they read it..don't want to put them off until they finish reading it) and then split it between front and back of the t-shirt and you've absolutely got a winner! It's good stuff.
now at the end of the above massage wars ,I'm groggy and need a massage .I hope that some of the massage experts can recommend a cozy massage parlor down town .
A lack of integrity by those we formerly trusted is the real deadly pandemic. It will prove lethal to our societies. Far deadlier than covid or the "vaccines."
Sort of. If you mean institutions we formerly trusted, true. However, on an individual level, I never trusted Justin Trudeau or Joe Biden, I trusted Trump with a big grain of salt etc.
I think our institutions have been overtaken ty untrustworthy people. Given the influence of the WEF, I wonder how much they are to blame.
Our systems became self-selecting for the wrong kind of people during the 1980s.
For any group to thrive, it needs and external challenge, be it the environment or an enemy. Too much of a challenge is also bad: too hostile an environment and there's no technological evolution, too dangerous enemies and the group gets killed or subjugated.
A business is challenged by competitors and threatened by bankrupcy. A political party is much the same. A state by another state.
But when all this flows together? Then challenges and enemies must be found within.
The ones in power will always be the opponents of the common people ,sometime mild ,other times very harsh .The latest example is the virus war .There is not one act that is to our benefit ,its all harm no healing .The irony is that the people even vote for our own enslavement .I never voted for any of them .I always vote for myself ,many times a day .I don't need a leader .If I can't lead myself anymore than I will get a service dog to lead me ,he will give me better service than any politician .
There is also an appalling amount of coercion among the medical community. Just look at what's happening to Dr. Jordan Peterson right now: because of some tweets - perfectly honest tweets - the Ontario Psychology Assoc. wants to discipline him and revoke his medical license unless he agrees to undergo 're-education' on how to communicate!
I watched Gad Saad's podcast last night, when he explained what's happening to Dr; Peterson.
I cannot figure out what in the world is happening to Canada! Last year's trucker convoy described as "terrorism" by that lunatic prime minister Trudeau.
Trudeau seems to be completely under the WEF spell which means we are turning into a woke, censored, techno-fascist state way. And it seems to be happening quickly. I was born in a communist country and it's all the same: either you're with the party always and everywhere or you're poor, cancelled, demonized etc. We were poor.
Not just external forces. In NZ , GPs are heavily regulated which includes the 'advice' that they give to patients. An example is that everyone over 70 years old is offered statins. It is not possible for a patient to have a frank and honest conversation about treatment options. This is the new 'evidence based medicine' which is now being applied to everything these days.
John Campbell just put out a video on Swindon data showing heart damage going from a baseline of about three thousand in 2019 to 12 thousand in 2020 and then 18 and 25 thousand in 2021 and 2022. That big increase in 2020 is surprising since it took place before the shots; however, age stratification is conspicuously missing from their data. If public health authorities were honest or trustworthy, that increase in 2020 is cause for serious concern. But hiding the age data once again shows these people cannot be trusted. They are so awful I can't even imagine them releasing this type of data while including vax status.
Well, I have become quite cynical as a result of thus ‘pandemic’ but my first thought is to wonder if we can trust those ‘20 numbers. Were they padded to make the subsequent years high numbers less suspicious? Nothing would surprise me at this point.
Ethical Skeptic is constantly calling out new games public health authorities play while trying to hide warning signals.
Regardless of how they try to rewrite the history for 2020, SADS was not around until after the clotshot. Imagine if they had those types of deaths to work with during their 2020 bio-terror campaign.
It seems covid probably did much of the damage to hearts in 2020 before the jabs were introduced and caused even more damage.I have a close friend who got covid in the March and has had heart trouble since . The idiot got jabbed , falling for the story it would protect others . First Pfizer and second Moderna. The Moderna made his heart problem really flare up. I did warn him!
John Campbell is an example of what seems to be a mainstream guy who totally encouraged people to mask and get vaxxed for years. The difference is that he was always open to investigate other treatment options such as Vit D and was willing to host some vax injured on his channel. These were very credible and articulate people with no 'skin in the game' so had no reason to be dishonest. So the fact that he is now being censored makes it clear that this is about control. Being retired probably made it easier for him to report as he can't lose his job. This is a big part of people keeping quiet.
I respect John Campbell for being open minded and changing his views entirely. He's been honest enough to say he was wrong to believe the government propaganda. His world has obviously been shaken to the core.
That's what censorship does. Thing is, I don't know why they bother, I mean why silence it? If you ignore it, it is another nutter on the internet. Censor it and people will search it out to hear it.
Not as far as I know, but his previous one was. I saw it was new and was going to watch it later, was about the jabbed being sicker than unjabbed. Was very confused when I couldn't find it!
The tobacco industry did this for many years and got away with it for a while. Hope when this becomes obvious ppl will awaken to the corruption that affects most medical algorithms of treatment and abandon most if not all vaccination assaults.
Oh Jees, you've just sent me down some parallel universe trousers of time where we were all forced to smoke and instead of getting rid of smoking sections in restaurants, it became all smoking all the time...
People who have spent time in prison or have lived in openly totalitarian societies are familiar with being ruled by brute force. Most Westerners are not, so it has come as a shock. The majority of them still can’t process it. They cannot see what is staring them in the face. They cannot see it because they can’t afford to see it. If they did, it would completely short-circuit their brains. They would suffer massive psychotic breakdowns and become entirely unable to function, so their psyches will not allow them to see it. -- Hopkins
Yes!!! This was apparent early on to anyone who was paying close attention. The CDC kept using total numbers instead of age as well as number of people who actually got the shot at various ages .
CDC would do that early and often throughout the pandemic. At first it was the death toll, then when deaths were going down it was case rates and fears of overwhelming hospitals. If cases went down it was fear of "Long Covid" or the more unusual symptoms that actually are attached to many other diseases,
TES has been digging through the filth mount that is CDC data and has uncovered tons of interesting stuff in there, including the latest "...sudden cardiac death problem...That it is not being caused by Covid, nor Long Covid... 30-sigma as of wk 50 2022."
There are hundreds of case reports of myo/pericarditis + other heart injuries associated with the vaccines
I have over 300 heart condition case reports and counting (out of >2,600 case reports of vaccine SAE's). Including a few where e.g. one medical center somehow gets 10 cases of myo in teens, within 14 days of injection, over a span of 8 weeks. That is insane.
I take issue with one part of what you wrote here. The memo doesn't have to come down from Science Central because it is already communicated to the employees what answers are and are not approved. It is communicated in exactly the way you describe. Everyone doing these studies already understands what the "right" answer is on mRNA vaccine induced myocarditis. So, they cover up any evidence that these vaccines induce myocarditis. It is just as if the memo went out from Science Central, except it didn't have to. There is no practical or moral difference between sending out a specific direction to suppress data and building a system that does so without having to be told.
i mean only to say it's a diffuse, decentralised process that isn't distinct from the broader world of culture and politics. this is far from the only field where scientists avoid looking into matters that are politically or culturally uncomfortable.
There's also the issue that most or all universities and research centers in the West have or report to a "board of ethics in research"; while initially good-intentioned and certainly needed to avoid repeating things like the Vipeholm-experiments* f.e. today such councils serve more as political kommissars than anything else, having taken upon themselves to not only scrutinise the methods involved but also whether or not a completed study may be published at all.
In Sweden, the volunteer organisation AcademicsRightsWatch is fighting a David vs Goliath struggle against the thoroughly politicised climate at our universities -think DDR in its heyday, and you're pretty close. I do not say that lightly, but because the board of ethics colludes with the public prosecutor's office to try and get rid of non-conformists via lawfare, and with paty-affiliated and party-protected private agents trawling the web for anything they can try to build a case on against those deemed troublesome.
Most terrifying is that the majority opinion among academics - of all branches and fields - is firmly supportive of this: "It's good that they are getting rid of the troublesome ones" is the view of at least 3/4, and it is most common in the technical and natural sciences.
*Edit: Forgot to link to Wiki-article on the Vipeholm experiments. Sorry for using Wikipedia but the information, what there is left of it, is otherwise in swedish:
In short, during 1947-1949 over 650 institutionalised children with mental retardation in some form were subjected to dental experiments. Used as lab animals, basically. The project was jointly funded and run by the confectionary industry and the medical community.
I wonder since the shots don’t prevent infection if the shot plus infection isn’t even worse for myocarditis? I wish some experts would look into that, lol.
Igor Chudov went into that theme with me when I discussed my 43 year old neighbor - he had a modern a booster in Nov 2021 and then got covid in March 2022 and promptly got myocarditis. It’s severe and keeps flaring up. Igor surmised it was spike overload- his body couldn’t purge the spike from the booster and then the infection pushed him over the cliff. Scary stuff.
It has long been my opinion that if, as so many doctors said early on, the vaccines would lead to suppression of the immune system, then it makes sense that if your neighbor got a booster in November and then covid 5 months later in March, his immune system was not up to snuff as it would have been had he not gotten the vaccine.
Having spent around a quarter century in the pharma business, I can tell you that if you saw the raw data that came out of your average clinical study, you would think it came out of a random number generator. It is only after the statisticians get a hold of it that it begins to look like anything meaningful. That being the case, the results reported in any clinical study can be made to reflect many different things.
GIGO: Just like our author has stated- the most essential information is almost rendered inaccessible just through the way the trials and tests are structured.
What causes these things to be so poorly designed, so often?
Motivated reasoning, fear of the truth, jeopardized profits, lack of oversight, sheer incompetence?
Frightens me to death. (Well, it would were I jabbed) - but I have empathy for the innocents in this, especially the kids, and an insationable desire for revenge
The dangers have been known for a long long time.
Does anyone think the apparent investigations by Japan may yield results which even the MSM can no longer ignore?
I Fucking Love Science Except When It Contradicts My Preferred Narrative!
Doesn't roll off the tongue quite as smoothly...
I may need to get some tshirts printed...
That's a great idea! If it were me I'd lose the Fbomb (just because it's pithy enough as it is and you need to draw people in when they read it..don't want to put them off until they finish reading it) and then split it between front and back of the t-shirt and you've absolutely got a winner! It's good stuff.
I LOVE science...
..except when it contradicts my narrative.
You could keep the F Bomb, just sell it in the UK. We could sell here in the states "I bloody love science."
Those shirts will have to be sized XXXL to fit all of those words on the shirt. Ironic given the size and of the typical American.
Size can be any side...just resize the font to fit the shirt.
except those chunkies won't be the ones wearing these shirts, in fear of being
scolded or shunned.
now at the end of the above massage wars ,I'm groggy and need a massage .I hope that some of the massage experts can recommend a cozy massage parlor down town .
A lack of integrity by those we formerly trusted is the real deadly pandemic. It will prove lethal to our societies. Far deadlier than covid or the "vaccines."
Sort of. If you mean institutions we formerly trusted, true. However, on an individual level, I never trusted Justin Trudeau or Joe Biden, I trusted Trump with a big grain of salt etc.
I think our institutions have been overtaken ty untrustworthy people. Given the influence of the WEF, I wonder how much they are to blame.
Politicians have rightly earned the public's disdain.
I meant organizations like the FDA, CDC, NIH, etc, and doctors/researchers, in general.
Our systems became self-selecting for the wrong kind of people during the 1980s.
For any group to thrive, it needs and external challenge, be it the environment or an enemy. Too much of a challenge is also bad: too hostile an environment and there's no technological evolution, too dangerous enemies and the group gets killed or subjugated.
A business is challenged by competitors and threatened by bankrupcy. A political party is much the same. A state by another state.
But when all this flows together? Then challenges and enemies must be found within.
Here we are.
1980's were a watershed for sure. It was the first time I really started to see the 'other side evil, crusade against them' narrative.
Now it's come to this.
The ones in power will always be the opponents of the common people ,sometime mild ,other times very harsh .The latest example is the virus war .There is not one act that is to our benefit ,its all harm no healing .The irony is that the people even vote for our own enslavement .I never voted for any of them .I always vote for myself ,many times a day .I don't need a leader .If I can't lead myself anymore than I will get a service dog to lead me ,he will give me better service than any politician .
There is an appalling lack of curiosity among the medical community.
The external forces--corporations, grant applications for research--are crushing knowledge and endangering everyone.
There is also an appalling amount of coercion among the medical community. Just look at what's happening to Dr. Jordan Peterson right now: because of some tweets - perfectly honest tweets - the Ontario Psychology Assoc. wants to discipline him and revoke his medical license unless he agrees to undergo 're-education' on how to communicate!
I watched Gad Saad's podcast last night, when he explained what's happening to Dr; Peterson.
I cannot figure out what in the world is happening to Canada! Last year's trucker convoy described as "terrorism" by that lunatic prime minister Trudeau.
Now THIS attack on Dr. Peterson!
Trudeau seems to be completely under the WEF spell which means we are turning into a woke, censored, techno-fascist state way. And it seems to be happening quickly. I was born in a communist country and it's all the same: either you're with the party always and everywhere or you're poor, cancelled, demonized etc. We were poor.
Did you mean Crime Minister Trudeau also known as Castro junior ??
Yes I did actually! Thanks, that's great!
I heard his name is "Castreau."
They elected Castro's demon spawn for starters.
What did I miss?
Not just external forces. In NZ , GPs are heavily regulated which includes the 'advice' that they give to patients. An example is that everyone over 70 years old is offered statins. It is not possible for a patient to have a frank and honest conversation about treatment options. This is the new 'evidence based medicine' which is now being applied to everything these days.
Mattias Desmet covered this in “The Physcholgy of Totalitarianism “. Excellent book.
John Campbell just put out a video on Swindon data showing heart damage going from a baseline of about three thousand in 2019 to 12 thousand in 2020 and then 18 and 25 thousand in 2021 and 2022. That big increase in 2020 is surprising since it took place before the shots; however, age stratification is conspicuously missing from their data. If public health authorities were honest or trustworthy, that increase in 2020 is cause for serious concern. But hiding the age data once again shows these people cannot be trusted. They are so awful I can't even imagine them releasing this type of data while including vax status.
Well, I have become quite cynical as a result of thus ‘pandemic’ but my first thought is to wonder if we can trust those ‘20 numbers. Were they padded to make the subsequent years high numbers less suspicious? Nothing would surprise me at this point.
Ethical Skeptic is constantly calling out new games public health authorities play while trying to hide warning signals.
Regardless of how they try to rewrite the history for 2020, SADS was not around until after the clotshot. Imagine if they had those types of deaths to work with during their 2020 bio-terror campaign.
It seems covid probably did much of the damage to hearts in 2020 before the jabs were introduced and caused even more damage.I have a close friend who got covid in the March and has had heart trouble since . The idiot got jabbed , falling for the story it would protect others . First Pfizer and second Moderna. The Moderna made his heart problem really flare up. I did warn him!
Now that John Campbell is openly saying mass vax should stop, he is being censored on YouTube but still up on Rumble.
John Campbell is an example of what seems to be a mainstream guy who totally encouraged people to mask and get vaxxed for years. The difference is that he was always open to investigate other treatment options such as Vit D and was willing to host some vax injured on his channel. These were very credible and articulate people with no 'skin in the game' so had no reason to be dishonest. So the fact that he is now being censored makes it clear that this is about control. Being retired probably made it easier for him to report as he can't lose his job. This is a big part of people keeping quiet.
I respect John Campbell for being open minded and changing his views entirely. He's been honest enough to say he was wrong to believe the government propaganda. His world has obviously been shaken to the core.
At this point, I figure that anyone being censored is revealing a truth that the criminals behind all this don't want anyone to hear.
That's what censorship does. Thing is, I don't know why they bother, I mean why silence it? If you ignore it, it is another nutter on the internet. Censor it and people will search it out to hear it.
Only some people will search out for themselves if its not right in front of them though
Yes, I just watched that. Great video.
Has it now been taken down however?
Not as far as I know, but his previous one was. I saw it was new and was going to watch it later, was about the jabbed being sicker than unjabbed. Was very confused when I couldn't find it!
It is available on Rumble. Campbell has a channel on that platform and any YouTube banned video can be found there.
Thanks. I should have thought of looking there.
The tobacco industry did this for many years and got away with it for a while. Hope when this becomes obvious ppl will awaken to the corruption that affects most medical algorithms of treatment and abandon most if not all vaccination assaults.
Some will. Most won't. Much easier to just do as they're told. Provide them a few comforts and they'll follow you anywhere, even over the cliff.
Doomberg has a great post about Dupont and teflon (scandal of criminal proportions).
Same thing.
"Sir you can't board this airplane unless you smoke!"
Oh Jees, you've just sent me down some parallel universe trousers of time where we were all forced to smoke and instead of getting rid of smoking sections in restaurants, it became all smoking all the time...
People who have spent time in prison or have lived in openly totalitarian societies are familiar with being ruled by brute force. Most Westerners are not, so it has come as a shock. The majority of them still can’t process it. They cannot see what is staring them in the face. They cannot see it because they can’t afford to see it. If they did, it would completely short-circuit their brains. They would suffer massive psychotic breakdowns and become entirely unable to function, so their psyches will not allow them to see it. -- Hopkins
Yes!!! This was apparent early on to anyone who was paying close attention. The CDC kept using total numbers instead of age as well as number of people who actually got the shot at various ages .
CDC would do that early and often throughout the pandemic. At first it was the death toll, then when deaths were going down it was case rates and fears of overwhelming hospitals. If cases went down it was fear of "Long Covid" or the more unusual symptoms that actually are attached to many other diseases,
This is basically a continuation of the various tricks I've seen researchers and debaters use in the vaccine harms debate in order to obfuscate risk:
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/ive-spent-at-least-a-decade-in-the
If a tree falls in the forest, and no one is around to hear it, does it collapse from sudden cardiac death?
TES has been digging through the filth mount that is CDC data and has uncovered tons of interesting stuff in there, including the latest "...sudden cardiac death problem...That it is not being caused by Covid, nor Long Covid... 30-sigma as of wk 50 2022."
https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1611254012703014915
There are hundreds of case reports of myo/pericarditis + other heart injuries associated with the vaccines
I have over 300 heart condition case reports and counting (out of >2,600 case reports of vaccine SAE's). Including a few where e.g. one medical center somehow gets 10 cases of myo in teens, within 14 days of injection, over a span of 8 weeks. That is insane.
https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/full-list-case-reports-cardiac
I take issue with one part of what you wrote here. The memo doesn't have to come down from Science Central because it is already communicated to the employees what answers are and are not approved. It is communicated in exactly the way you describe. Everyone doing these studies already understands what the "right" answer is on mRNA vaccine induced myocarditis. So, they cover up any evidence that these vaccines induce myocarditis. It is just as if the memo went out from Science Central, except it didn't have to. There is no practical or moral difference between sending out a specific direction to suppress data and building a system that does so without having to be told.
i mean only to say it's a diffuse, decentralised process that isn't distinct from the broader world of culture and politics. this is far from the only field where scientists avoid looking into matters that are politically or culturally uncomfortable.
There's also the issue that most or all universities and research centers in the West have or report to a "board of ethics in research"; while initially good-intentioned and certainly needed to avoid repeating things like the Vipeholm-experiments* f.e. today such councils serve more as political kommissars than anything else, having taken upon themselves to not only scrutinise the methods involved but also whether or not a completed study may be published at all.
In Sweden, the volunteer organisation AcademicsRightsWatch is fighting a David vs Goliath struggle against the thoroughly politicised climate at our universities -think DDR in its heyday, and you're pretty close. I do not say that lightly, but because the board of ethics colludes with the public prosecutor's office to try and get rid of non-conformists via lawfare, and with paty-affiliated and party-protected private agents trawling the web for anything they can try to build a case on against those deemed troublesome.
Most terrifying is that the majority opinion among academics - of all branches and fields - is firmly supportive of this: "It's good that they are getting rid of the troublesome ones" is the view of at least 3/4, and it is most common in the technical and natural sciences.
*Edit: Forgot to link to Wiki-article on the Vipeholm experiments. Sorry for using Wikipedia but the information, what there is left of it, is otherwise in swedish:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vipeholm_experiments]
In short, during 1947-1949 over 650 institutionalised children with mental retardation in some form were subjected to dental experiments. Used as lab animals, basically. The project was jointly funded and run by the confectionary industry and the medical community.
I wonder since the shots don’t prevent infection if the shot plus infection isn’t even worse for myocarditis? I wish some experts would look into that, lol.
Igor Chudov went into that theme with me when I discussed my 43 year old neighbor - he had a modern a booster in Nov 2021 and then got covid in March 2022 and promptly got myocarditis. It’s severe and keeps flaring up. Igor surmised it was spike overload- his body couldn’t purge the spike from the booster and then the infection pushed him over the cliff. Scary stuff.
It has long been my opinion that if, as so many doctors said early on, the vaccines would lead to suppression of the immune system, then it makes sense that if your neighbor got a booster in November and then covid 5 months later in March, his immune system was not up to snuff as it would have been had he not gotten the vaccine.
Here's what I've been wondering...
Is ALL scientific research this sloppy and incompetent, or just most of it?
Is it just this industry, or is it all of them?
the problems are pervasive, and especially bad surrounding any topic of particular interest or enthusiasm
Having spent around a quarter century in the pharma business, I can tell you that if you saw the raw data that came out of your average clinical study, you would think it came out of a random number generator. It is only after the statisticians get a hold of it that it begins to look like anything meaningful. That being the case, the results reported in any clinical study can be made to reflect many different things.
GIGO: Just like our author has stated- the most essential information is almost rendered inaccessible just through the way the trials and tests are structured.
What causes these things to be so poorly designed, so often?
Motivated reasoning, fear of the truth, jeopardized profits, lack of oversight, sheer incompetence?
Young men who get vaccinated then get mildly ill from the virus might be at double risk.
This
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
Frightens me to death. (Well, it would were I jabbed) - but I have empathy for the innocents in this, especially the kids, and an insationable desire for revenge
The dangers have been known for a long long time.
Does anyone think the apparent investigations by Japan may yield results which even the MSM can no longer ignore?
Again - last paragraph nailed it.