I’m happy to welcome many Alex Berenson readers to my Substack. Until now, I’ve posted essays only very occasionally. Now that many of you have signed up, though, I’ll try to produce more regular material.
I refuse to give any of my time, data, and indirectly money, to a company such as Twitter, that does not respect free speech, so I'll just have to follow here.
For as long as I can remember, the definition of a “vaccine” has been “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting that person from that disease.” The quotation is how that definition read for years over at the CDC. And that is what vaccines for such diseases as polio, tetanus, measles, diphtheria, etc. do. But a few days ago on September 1st, the CDC changed that definition. A “vaccine” is now “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune system response against diseases.” [!] So vaccines no longer produce immunity to a specific disease. My guess is that the Biden administration changed the definition because the current so-called vaccines no longer meet the time honored definition of what a vaccine does. Those who have been hesitant to take a chance on the current so-called vaccines may now be even less inclined given that under the revised definition, one isn’t really being offered all that much. As Humpty Dumpty said to Alice in “Through The Looking Glass” : "Words mean what I say they mean, no more no less. The issue is who shall be master, me or the words.”
OK, here's what I am wondering: what is really going on with "vax protects against serious illness" vs unvaxxed. Seems like I see data cutting both ways. Can you sort it out with your science-and-numbers brain?
Seems to me that is the way things get written today. Many tweets -> Substack post and presumably, if you do it long enough, many Substack posts -> book.
From The Arizona Attorney General: COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for City Employees Is Unconstitutional. This could be a big step towards pushing back against the madness.
After it was alleged that an unvaccinated individual had become infected with the virus, recovered, became reinfected and subsequently infected other persons, an enterprising NY attorney made a FOIA request of the CDC to examine the claim. It turns out that the allegation was completely bogus. The CDC admitted that it has no documentation of this sort and further claims that it does not collect such data.
I refuse to give any of my time, data, and indirectly money, to a company such as Twitter, that does not respect free speech, so I'll just have to follow here.
I am happy that Alex introduced us to you! You seem to be a cool head and I look forward to following your logic.
For as long as I can remember, the definition of a “vaccine” has been “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting that person from that disease.” The quotation is how that definition read for years over at the CDC. And that is what vaccines for such diseases as polio, tetanus, measles, diphtheria, etc. do. But a few days ago on September 1st, the CDC changed that definition. A “vaccine” is now “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune system response against diseases.” [!] So vaccines no longer produce immunity to a specific disease. My guess is that the Biden administration changed the definition because the current so-called vaccines no longer meet the time honored definition of what a vaccine does. Those who have been hesitant to take a chance on the current so-called vaccines may now be even less inclined given that under the revised definition, one isn’t really being offered all that much. As Humpty Dumpty said to Alice in “Through The Looking Glass” : "Words mean what I say they mean, no more no less. The issue is who shall be master, me or the words.”
Thank you for publishing your work here.
OK, here's what I am wondering: what is really going on with "vax protects against serious illness" vs unvaxxed. Seems like I see data cutting both ways. Can you sort it out with your science-and-numbers brain?
I imagine Alex Berenson seriously boosted your substack :) !
have followed you there as well
I’ve been suspended on twitter never ever going on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram
It is wonderful to read your insights!
Seems to me that is the way things get written today. Many tweets -> Substack post and presumably, if you do it long enough, many Substack posts -> book.
More good news!!
From The Arizona Attorney General: COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for City Employees Is Unconstitutional. This could be a big step towards pushing back against the madness.
It seems that as a people we have forgotten a very important piece of History, The Nuremburg Trials and and Code. https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2011/04/BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code.pdf
Counter invite~Come to Gab. I won’t join Twitter again on principle.
Thoughts on the efficacy and safety of any Vaxx currently being developed or less well known? Novavax in particular?
Might I suggest Telegram?
After it was alleged that an unvaccinated individual had become infected with the virus, recovered, became reinfected and subsequently infected other persons, an enterprising NY attorney made a FOIA request of the CDC to examine the claim. It turns out that the allegation was completely bogus. The CDC admitted that it has no documentation of this sort and further claims that it does not collect such data.